| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (69)

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 9:41PM Telprydain said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Not according to the latest EGM and their discussion with BioWare. BioWare specifically state that all 3 will remain exclusive to the 360 and that MS will publish them and both BioWare and EA will credited as developers.
EA doesn’t yet own Bioware (the transfer is ongoing) and EA have to honour the contractual agreements that Bioware have already agreed to.

Pachter admits himself that sometimes he just throws stuff against the wall and hope some of it sticks. He’s the one who said in 2006 of Xbox Live Arcade: “At the end of the day, we don’t play games for social interaction … We play games to escape… Microsoft’s strategy is “absolutely flawed”. He later predicted the PS3 would trounce the 360 in July this year.

I don’t have any issues with the idea of Mass Effect on the PS3 (putting aside for the moment that Microsoft is the publisher), but my concern about future titles going to the PS3 is that it will increase the development times exponentially. If they farmed out the PS3 port to a 3rd party (like Valve did for the Orange Box) I’d be happy as larry.
Mass Effect is a really great game, and the more people who get the play it the happier I’ll be.

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 9:47PM easo said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I predict that if this is true, than Crackdown, Halo3, Forza 2, PGR4, and Gears of War will also be ported to the PS3.

Stupid predictions are fun!

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 11:03PM BoilerMaker11 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
difference is that all those games aren't developed by companies that are owned by EA. EA multiplatforms everything, so this isn't unreasonable
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 11:31PM CountNoobula said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And I remembering hearing something about how Bioware and Pandemic will still be able to act freely despite being owned by EA. That may be a bit of a stretch, but I doubt Bioware is keen on PS3 development or porting this game.

Posted: Dec 19th 2007 1:25AM Lord Minogue said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Isn't Mass Effect 2 supposed to be impacted by the decisions you made in Mass Effect? Not to give anything away, but the repercussions of all of your decisions are not fully felt in the first game. To force one sequence of choices to be cannon would render a game about decision making moot.

Posted: Dec 19th 2007 1:54AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i think you can just take your character/party and their equipment into the next games. the main "choice" you make at the end isn't even saved to the file, so I'm guessing you'll have to re-pick that choice at the beginning of ME2
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2007 1:58AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'd not be surprised by a xbox-gta-3 style highly delayed release.

Besides, there is no hurry to release it on the PS3 now, no one has one. I'd imagine microsoft might consider selling the rights for a delayed release 2-3 years down the track.

Posted: Dec 19th 2007 2:44AM SoCoolCurt said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i have one...
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2007 3:29AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
hmm if no one has one... then i should tell ubisoft and infinity ward that their current million sellers on the PS3 are null and void.

Granted the PS3 has half the worldwide install base the 360 has...doesnt necessarily mean No one has one.

Still though 7 million units sold against 2 other competitors isnt bad...especially when you consider the 360 JUST recently hit 14 million in 2 years and 1 of those years was with no next gen competition.

But then both of those pale in comparison to nintendos mighty 16 million in one year.

Now thats just dang amazing
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2007 9:19AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@JJ:

Can you please show me where has COD4 and Assasin's Creed sold a million units on the PS3?????

Talking out of your ass aren't we ?
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2007 11:09AM arrrgh said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
JJ your credibility is currently ZERO

put up or shut up
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2007 7:22AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Since 2/3 of games in 360 I am quite interested in (Bioshock and Alan
Wake) will not come to ps3, Mass would be nice. Yet I don't think it will be ported.

Posted: Dec 19th 2007 7:31AM sand0789 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Money would have to change hands. MS would have to be given a healthy little pile. EA cannot legally do it without MS's expressed written consent.

Posted: Dec 19th 2007 8:51AM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sounds like talking out of his ass to me. The property is tied to MS right now, as would the 2nd and 3rd one. Since everyone has known this, how can he just opine that the game will go multiplatform and ignore the contractual elements to the IP.

Posted: Dec 19th 2007 12:59PM GoonieGooGoo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Does Michael Pachter provide oral sex regularly to one or all of the JOYSTIQ staffers???

Thats the only reason I can think of why he is consistently posted about on the site and made out to be some sort of expert on the videogame field when his predictions have been the equivalent of throwing a dart blindfolded at a wall of balloons.

JOYSTIQ STOP EVEN MENTIONING THIS DUDE FOR CHRISSAKES!!!

Posted: Dec 19th 2007 2:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Pachter is crazy. If "killer app" exclusive first party titles like Ratchet & Clank and Uncharted are bombing with under 100k in sales, what makes him think that EA will see it as fiscally viable to re-engineer the engine from the ground up to bring out a late port of an RPG, which traditionally does not do as well? ESPECIALLY if they didn't see it as viable to release Burnout Revenge on the PS3.

EA may be known as the King of Ports (Porterhouse, if you will), however there have been occasions where lust for profits have been tempered by common sense. They killed production on a PS2 version of Oddworld: Stranger's Wrath, and that left money from a platform with an over 100 million install base on the table.

Mass Effect will not be coming out on PS3. If anything, EA will force them to release it on PC, but a PS3 port would just be throwing money away. (and speaking of money, feel free to pass along that check here, Mr. Pachter, you obviously no longer have what it takes to be an analyst. ;) )

Posted: Dec 20th 2007 2:06AM Lekko said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I can't even begin to imagine how slow the elevators will be on the PS3 version...

Posted: Dec 19th 2007 8:46PM Digital Disco said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As long as Ea puts money behind Mass Effect and they make it the best game possible who cares if it comes to PS3.

Posted: Dec 20th 2007 2:08AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If EA has it, it's ruin. Hopefully MS is still in control. EA is definitely quantity over quality.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW