| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (79)

Posted: Dec 20th 2007 3:33AM samuraix025 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
quit trying to add fuel to a fire that should not have been set in the first place, grow up and leave his personal life personal. just because he can get more scoops then yall can doesn't mean anything, except he is seen as credible by the people who gives him those exclusives. you guys try to find any reason to bash IGN, and i never figured out why. but now with articles like this, it just sounds like you're jelous.

Posted: Dec 20th 2007 4:08AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Matt is one of the best journalists that this industry has ever seen - I don't care who he's banging. And I won't be losing any sleep over it. Will you?

Posted: Dec 20th 2007 4:53AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
VGMWatch.com has been able to confirm that VGMWatch editor David Gornoski is “good buddies” with Kyle Orland, editor of the news blog, Joystiq.com, which purports to serve as an unbiased news blog. Sources connected with both VGMWatch and Joystiq were able to validate this information. While VGMWatch has no interest in personal affairs, undisclosed conflicts of interest plaguing the game industry’s integrity cannot be ignored. To that end, there are several journalistic red flags surrounding the facts of this case.

Unfortunately, we have yet to discover any public acknowledgment from either ourselves or Joystiq.com informing readers of this conflict of interest. Furthermore, VGMWatch has continued to allow this editor to manage video game “controversies.”. Likewise, the Joystiq editor in question is responsible for promoting VGMWatch stories. Clearly, dozens of VGMWatch’s readers’ trust has been violated by this irresponsible abandonment of principle.

Posted: Dec 20th 2007 7:13AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Aww, I thought this said IGN's Castlevania responds to conflict of interest claims.

I'm so disappointed now.

Posted: Dec 20th 2007 7:38AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
This is an obvious conflict of interest and should have been disclosed. Good work by the writer. Don't worry about all the Nintendo fanboys trying to slam you. This is basic journalistic integrity to disclose. thanks.

Posted: Dec 20th 2007 7:48AM Korova Pamplona said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I think this is relevant and should be disclosed. And yes, it echoes something important about Gerstmanngate - the fact that gaming journalism is in bed with game companies. Voila!

I am sure neither nintendo nor gorin nor ign think this is a problem - they benefit from the relationship. Its only readers who eat it all up like it was organic cucumbers, when in fact its just waxy plastic crap. At the end, the readers go and plop their $60 bucks on a hyped game and the lovebirds and their lords get paid. Indeed, what could be wrong with that! Nothing, but a disappointed consumer.

At the end, gamers end up developing their own review discounting mechanisms to see through all the BS in game journalism and then have fights about whose is better and that makes for interesting internet.

Posted: Dec 20th 2007 8:26AM galfridus73 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Okay... how is it relevant?

Sure, I agree with the idea of disclosure. But the post in question is not calling for disclosure, no matter what David wants to keep saying in his defense.

Let's start with the basic part of the post and examine it from a journalistic standard (since that seems to be what we're talking about here): The lead sentence.

David's lead sentence is: "VGMWatch.com has been able to confirm that IGN Nintendo editor Matt Casamassina is married to Golin Harris Vice President Edie Kissko."

Look, if David wanted to focus on issues in the gaming press, he could have easily pulled the Gerstmann story into this and made it an overview of the gaming press and its relationship to the manufacturers. Let's be dead honest: Casamassina and Kissko have not been accused of anything more than being married. Last I looked marriage was not something you base a story on, but David clearly wrote it in such a way to highlight the marriage, not the idea of disclosure. No matter how many times he weighs into the comments to say "No, I meant this..." he doesn't seem to understand the power of the words he wrote and the targets he unwisely chose.

In the end, his call for disclosure is correct. His way of calling for it? Poor. Extremely poor.

The last thing I'll say, which is a picky little thing, is David clearly never learned injournalism class the word "that" is not needed about 75-80% of the time it's used (however, I'm just being picky about verbiage).
Reply

Posted: Dec 20th 2007 3:25PM Korova Pamplona said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You probably have a point about quality of delivery, but the goods are there.
Reply

Posted: Dec 20th 2007 5:17PM hvnlysoldr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Matt covers Nintendo platform games which are $50 not $60.
Reply

Posted: Dec 20th 2007 8:09AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Where the fuck are the pics?!?

Posted: Dec 20th 2007 8:25AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Generally speaking, Matt has been very enthusiastic about Nintendo games and very critical of Nintendo's business decisions. I think that is exactly where Nintendo's fans are.

Matt has sort of been the tip of the spear in skewering Nintendo over bad marketing (remember IGN's "Where is the Metroid advertising" editorial?) and short-sited decision making. If there is any place where is conflict would have shown up, it's on Nintendo's PR. But his critiques have been more pointed and articulate than any other site I read (including of course Joystiq).

Matt, I know you're reading these comments, so I'll say to you; keep up the good work. If anything, err on the side of being more critical of the big N, but don't go negative on games just for appearances sake.

Posted: Dec 20th 2007 9:18AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
It's great that EVERYONE forgets he's worked for IGN.com long before he was married. He was there when the site was N64.com.

Posted: Dec 20th 2007 9:50AM ProfWho said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
BREAKING NEWS:
David Gornoski owns or works for (sources are not clear, but he is clearly professionally involved with) E-mpire sites which are video game sites. One of those site happen to be a Nintendo news site. Notice how going after IGN which is the competition and probably killing his amateurish site.

I find his lack of full disclosure about his own background in the story disgusting.

Answer that conflict of interest David Gornoski.

Posted: Dec 20th 2007 9:58AM ProfWho said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Oh and link to evidence for David Gornoski being part of the competition here:
http://www.gamesetwatch.com/2007/10/vgmwatch_who_watches_the_watch.php

http://e-mpire.com/

Notice on the e-mpire site they fail to mention that Gornoski is an editor at e-mpire. Full disclosure should be there.

Posted: Dec 20th 2007 10:01AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Many readers still trust Casamassina because nobody has cited definitive proof that his marriage has influenced his work. No journalist has established a clear pattern of unethical conduct.

His wife Edie is not directly employed by Nintendo. She works for a PR firm that is currently doing work for Nintendo. PR firms have multiple clients and there is no evidence that Edie works on the Nintendo account. We do not know how long Nintendo has been using this particular PR firm. The connection to Casamassina is tangential since there are several degrees of separation.

If you believe that there is a scandal despite evidence to the contrary, you have to accept the flawed theory that violent videogames caused school shootings.

Many game journalists have left the press to become part of the industry. The implications of this trend is more relevant and sobering than the marriage status of Casamassina.

Posted: Dec 20th 2007 10:46AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Exactly right.

The implication is that Matt and his wife are somehow colluding to defraud IGN's readers. There is no evidence, however, that his wife is even involved, directly or indirectly, with the Nintendo account. Further, there is no implication that even is she is involved with the Nintendo account, that she has some degree of involvement in the aspect that would lead to providing Matt special access or bonuses in return for his cooperation and abnormally positive information.

If Matt mentions tangentially that he played a game in the middle of the night because the baby was up and he warmed up some Enfamil, which he considers great because he doesn't have to wake his wife...does he then have to put in a disclaimer that Golin Harris represents Bristl-Meyers-Squibb? Or if he mentions eating a Big Mac or driving a Corolla?

The whole thing comes across as a cheap attempt to impugn Cassamassina's credibility without a lot of solid reasoning for why. The only conflict-of-interest occurs if you believe that Matt is being asked to alter his news/blog/reviews to improve his family or his wife's situation at her job. Because unless some tangible benefit can be displayed, it's just an attempt at casting aspersions. Matt is a popular Nintendo reporter and fan, but he's hardly some Walter Winchell-type figure...or even a Walter Mossberg, for that matter. His is one voice among many and he's far from the most ardent fanboy voice out there.
Reply

Posted: Dec 20th 2007 12:39PM JoeTheRed said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Here, here!

And should any irrefutable evidence of misappropriation be found, it should be presented in the proper format:

http://objection.mrdictionary.net/index.php
Reply

Posted: Dec 20th 2007 10:09AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There's no need for Matt to disclose anything about his personal life. He's been writing about Nintendo for 10 years and he's right that his writing speaks for itself.

Also, there's a big leap in logic to suggest that marriage to somebody else working in the business automatically equals a conflict of interest. I'm sure that Gollin Harris' bottom line has been unaffected by poor game reviews. Last time I checked, the Wii and DS have been selling like hotcakes, despite any criticisms.

Posted: Dec 20th 2007 10:26AM UTBrian said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Matt and Mark Bozon are giant Nintendo fanboys but I doubt that has anything to do with who they're married to.

Posted: Dec 20th 2007 2:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This isn't news. They've been married for years. Actually, I thought that his wife worked for nintendo proper, not a company that worked for them. I still happen to agree with most of what he says, from his editorials that criticize & review (not the actual scores of the reviews, but the words themselves).

Possible conflict of interest? Maybe? But Cassamassina has been a pretty staunch nintendo supporter even in the darker days of the N64, before they were married. He loves (most) of nintendo's games, like the Metroids, Marios & Zeldas. So do a lot of people

Also, what's she the VP of? Operations? Accounting? Human Resources? That matters!

Posted: Dec 20th 2007 1:08PM dv8withn8 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I remember in college my now fiance worked at Best Buy and she helped me get a job there to make some extra cash. We worked together, generally not even the same days but one day the store manager comes to us after figuring out we were dating and decides to tell us that dating a co-worker is a "conflict of interest".

To whom exactly? Both of us were lowly part-timers and when we did work the same times we acted like nothing more than co-workers. So that was basically them saying one of us had to leave for no good reason.

Anyway, the IGN editor and his wife shouldn't even be an issue especially since they have come out and stated they understand company confidentiality and professionalism. The fact that Joystiq is contacting their employers for comment and being public about it could make employers nervous. Which could end up affecting their jobs.

Personally, I think this article moves beyond informative and toward sensationalism and damn irresponsible.

Posted: Dec 20th 2007 1:39PM Levi Partridge said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You've never heard of Edie Brickell before? The chick who gave us this god-awful song?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPs7-5feq-M

Posted: Dec 20th 2007 3:26PM KyleOrl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
For those saying there is "no proof" that she works on the Nintendo account, please check out her page on LinkedIn: Vice President, GolinHarris/Nintendo (Public Relations and Communications industry) 1999 — Present (8 years)

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/3/B72/5BB

Posted: Dec 20th 2007 5:32PM hvnlysoldr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
We'd like proof of conflicted interest please.
Reply

Posted: Dec 20th 2007 4:47PM LaughingTarget said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sorry, no matter how much anyone may claim it, no one can be impartial when married to someone in a company they are expected to review the produt from. Don't bullshit us, pal. If it were true, Sarbanes-Oxley wouldn't need to exist. Sad fact of it all, you don't have any reliability when you have that level of interest in a company.

Posted: Dec 20th 2007 7:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What does Sarbanes-Oxley have to do with it? That was a set of laws passed to stop routinely used unethical accounting practices that defrauded investors of billions of dollars. All of the people in those scandals weren't married. You're trying to link two entirely different situations to strengthen your argument. That's a classic strawman. The primary issue in conflict of interests with regards to Sarbanes-Oxley concerned accounting oversight by the same company that was managing the books. There is simply no comparison between that situation (as evinced by Enron) and a guy who works at a public news and reviews website reviewing games that his wife helps to publicize. If Cassamassina's wife was on the executive board for Fox/IGN AND maintained her job with GH....THAT would be a conflict of interest. That isn't what's happening here.

I'm guessing that you're not married? You seem to think that married couples can't segregate their work from their relationship. You are wrong. Many married couples do this EVERY DAY. I work with some of them. I AM one of them.
Reply

Posted: Dec 22nd 2007 8:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
AWESOME, nothing like bringing someone's personal life into a spotlight you so desperately want. I don't know who you are Mr. Orland but the fact that you would question what a man does in his personal life makes you just as pathetic as the person who "broke" the story. A conflict of interest? Do you know what kind of relationship Matt and Edie have at home? As for you saying that not many ign readers knew, they don't need to know because it's Matt's private life and should stay that way. Do you need to know when he uses the toilet also? Let the guy live his life and keep his family out of it.

Rudy

Posted: Dec 21st 2007 3:15AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Didn't Luke Smith allude to this in a 1up Yours ages ago?

Posted: Dec 21st 2007 4:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
IGN Matt is a Nintendo fanboy?! It affects the way he writes reviews and editorials?! NO WAY!!!

Seriously though, while I think it should have been disclosed by Matt somewhere on the IGN site, this doesn't make me respect the man any less. Fanboy or not, few journalists can match his enthusiasm and dedication.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW