Man shoots son over Xbox 360 argument
As any crime beat reporter will tell you, police reports aren't always the most precise source of information about a crime. Take this opening paragraph from The Morning Call, which they say was taken directly from police reports, "The boy wanted his father to look at his Xbox 360 video game system. The father didn't want to. An argument ensued. The boy handed his father a rifle. Shoot me, he said. So the father did." ... Yep. That makes perfect sense. The dad wouldn't look at the 360, the 17-year-old (who's now recovering from a head wound) asked dad to shoot him, dad did. Of course. Now, if the first sentence ended with "which was displaying three flashing red lights," this might be a bit easier to swallow. A despondent kid, a parent knowing they're about to shell out another $350, it adds up. But as it stands, we're just not getting it. In the interest of full disclosure, we should mention that the dad's ex-wife said of the incident, ''he did the shooting but it was an accidental thing that took place.''
Though we're but a humble video game blog, we feel we can pretty confidently hand out some parenting advice here. Parents, we know it seems like a pretty good way to show your kids you mean business, but you probably shouldn't point a gun at their heads. You know, just on principle.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Andykapped @ Jan 8th 2008 4:03PM
Thats a really sad story. The dad must have been a PS3 fan
Trev @ Jan 8th 2008 4:47PM
So PS3 owners are mean enough to shoot their children and 360 owners are stupid enough to give someone a gun and ask for it.
And Wii owners? They just love the tape holding those gamecubes together.
sadt @ Jan 8th 2008 4:03PM
woow, three day old news, must be slow day
ViagraFiend @ Jan 8th 2008 4:13PM
stupid comment. -1
mastafool @ Jan 8th 2008 4:05PM
>HeadShot<
Jhongerkong @ Jan 8th 2008 4:28PM
Guess the dad decided to give his idea a shot. It probably just blew over him.
All jokes aside, STUPID PEOPLE ARE STUPID
Jhongerkong @ Jan 8th 2008 4:32PM
Didnt mean to reply here.
Damn reply system. Why couldnt you have been shot in the head?
Fernando Rocker @ Jan 8th 2008 4:05PM
This is old...
ViagraFiend @ Jan 8th 2008 4:13PM
stupid comment. -1
Fatass of Kickassness @ Jan 8th 2008 6:05PM
Repeated comment. -2
Both of you.
driven2sin @ Jan 8th 2008 8:30PM
your comment of being old is over 4 posts old from previous sayer of such things
parasadalos @ Jan 8th 2008 11:59PM
Your avatar looks like Ian Brown.
Kamizar @ Jan 8th 2008 4:07PM
Just one more case of video game violence >=( !
JACK THOMPSON WAS RIGHT!
Kamizar @ Jan 9th 2008 2:21AM
Oh lord, srsly people, sarcasm...
merf1350 @ Jan 9th 2008 8:36AM
We know, but any post, joking or not, claiming that the Zealot is right will not be tolerated, if he sees it or hears about it it will just encourage him.
gginther @ Jan 8th 2008 4:08PM
maybe it was pronoun trouble?
Phillip @ Jan 8th 2008 4:36PM
It's not "He doesn't have to shoot _you_ now", it's "He have to shoot _me_ now." Well, I say he _does_ have to shoot me now!
...so shoot me now!
Phillip @ Jan 8th 2008 4:36PM
*"He doesn't have to shoot _me_ now"
my bad.
xFenixKnightx @ Jan 8th 2008 4:08PM
Maybe he forgot that theres no respawn in life...close call though.
Trev @ Jan 8th 2008 4:48PM
I guess you could say his shields regenerated.
FOXHOUND @ Jan 9th 2008 7:46AM
Should've had a knife. Everyone knows you run faster with a knife.
SoulBlade @ Jan 8th 2008 4:10PM
Stupid people always make me sad.
Zorink @ Jan 8th 2008 5:45PM
Stupid people make my brain sad.
Knight Marquise @ Jan 8th 2008 4:11PM
Justin,
That's a tad disengenius. No 360 with the RRoD is going to cost anyone another $350.00, as it would be covered under warrenty.
As for the story, unfortunately, people get stuck on stupid.
LaughingTarget @ Jan 8th 2008 4:15PM
When my computer gets stuck, I hard reboot. Sometimes it needs a reformat. Think that'll work here?
borland502 (SDF - Macross Ring) @ Jan 8th 2008 5:51PM
"No 360 with the RRoD is going to cost anyone another $350.00"
Dunno, maybe it was the victim of a second-degree sledgehammer in a fit of rage. Does the warranty cover that?
Lekko @ Jan 10th 2008 4:34AM
maybe it got dusty inside?
I heard God does that.
Poisoned Al @ Jan 8th 2008 4:12PM
You see that's the problem with US gun laws. The idea that everyone can be armed, means that even stupid people can get guns.
LaughingTarget @ Jan 8th 2008 4:16PM
...
Ah, forget it, can't argue with a leftist apologist (it's OK to take away rights if I don't agree with them).
Poisoned Al @ Jan 8th 2008 4:17PM
So you're saying dumb people should get guns?
Knight Marquise @ Jan 8th 2008 4:18PM
Sorry PA,
It's not the gun laws that cause stupid people to be stupid, it's the stupid people. The right to keep and bear arms is in our Bill of Rights, and it's there for a reason. The second amendment is just as important as the 1st amendment.
Stupid people also kill others with knives, motor vehicles, ropes, etc.
Poisoned Al @ Jan 8th 2008 4:26PM
yeah, but you usually stand a better chance with those items. I'm not saying ban guns in the US, becuase it won't happen. Just some stronger checks other then ticking the "I'm not crazy" box would be a start. Being able to count to 11 without taking their socks off, would help too.
LaughingTarget @ Jan 8th 2008 4:27PM
Know thy history. If it wasn't for British soldiers trying to disarm the citizens of Concord and Lexington, the US Revolution would have never kicked off. Disarmament is an important pre-requisite of a tyrany, which is why the 2A was put in second. Also, since rights aren't a collective but an individual concept (read the Constitution again if you disagree, it never mentions rights of groups), the National Guard being the militia part doesn't fly. The National Guard isn't a militia, it is Government paid and General Militia is defined as every able bodied citizen with a weapon.
Ultimately, if we have Government dictating who is competent enough to own a firearm, all they can do is say only those under their employ are competent. You telling me the high school diploma required for a police officer is enough to make them competent for a lifetime concealed carry right in all 50 states but a highly educated individual with broader firearm training isn't?
Just look at your local politician to see where things are going. It is illegal in California to carry weapons or own automatics, yet Nancy Pelosi has personal bodyguards that violate both of those. No politician is more important than the people that elect them, but Government has cleary forgotten that.
Poisoned Al @ Jan 8th 2008 4:33PM
Funny, I thought the US revalotion kicked off becuase a load of rich land owners didn't want to pay tax and thought it was a much nicer idea to take over and have tax paid to them.
AirIntake @ Jan 8th 2008 4:45PM
Americans have their right to own guns, but that's not a problem. The real problem is that they feel so unsafe that they think they need guns.
Brokenscope @ Jan 8th 2008 4:50PM
The 4 boxes.
Soap, Ballot, Jury, and Ammo
Use them wisely.
Poisoned Al @ Jan 8th 2008 4:51PM
Good point. A number of contrys allow common gun ownership and don't have a problems. Canada and Sweden spring to mind. Ah, that's it then. It's just Americans that shouldn't have guns.
LaughingTarget @ Jan 8th 2008 4:52PM
Not even close. It wasn't the rich landowners, it was everyone impacted by the 3% tea tax. Tea has been a major part of British culture for centuries and the tax was impacting the whole of the colonies, not just those with cash to burn. This is, incidentally, why we're still more bent toward coffee.
There was minimal violence and most of the colonies were against joining any kind of revolutionary effort prior to the disarmament effort. In fact, most of the energies were poured into diplomatically asking the Brits to just let them govern themselves, something that would have happened anyway given the course of history and Britain's releasing of colonies over the 230 years since.
No, the actual start of the revolution was armed soldiers marching through Concord and Lexington, trying to tell the colonials they were too dangerous and incompetent to own guns. The colonials said, "Over our dead bodies," and started shooting. Thus the actual war started.
I always find it hilarious whenever we get political types trying to restrict weapon ownership and concurrently lay praise on the likes of Thomas Jefferson, who said this:
"Let your gun be your constant companion on your walks... this gives exercise to the body and independence to the mind... no free man shall ever be debarred the use of guns."
No free man shall ever be debarred the use of guns. If someone comits a crime and are placed in prison, they are no longer free, so that makes sense. But I'm free, I committed no crime, so I should, nor anyone who has committed no crime, be refused the use of guns, and given the wording and other parts of our hallowed Constitution, this includes automatic weapons and even ships of war (see the Letters of Marquis section under Article 2, it was hard to hire private Americans to fight pirates without them owning private warships).
Marty @ Jan 8th 2008 4:56PM
Sheesh, Laughing Target... just go back to your old country shack full of banjos and overalls, and leave us in peace.
LaughingTarget @ Jan 8th 2008 5:01PM
Heh, born in Seattle and raised in Los Angeles and have never lived anywhere with fewer than 2 million in close reach.
"A free people [claim] their rights as derived from the laws of nature, and not as the gift of their chief magistrate." --Thomas Jefferson: Rights of British America, 1774. ME 1:209, Papers 1:134
This is the same man that President John Kennedy (a hero to gun control folks) said was more intelligent than entire room of Nobel Lauriets and himself put together.
Knight Marquise @ Jan 8th 2008 5:13PM
Laughing Target,
Kudos Sir.
A rarity to find one with any knowledge of history on these blogs.
Raikage (Wii FC 5508 0487 4434 0992) @ Jan 8th 2008 5:24PM
Coffee = American
Tea = British
I don't like either
Mountain Dew = ??? = PROFIT!!!
Poisoned Al @ Jan 8th 2008 5:29PM
Behold the power of tl;dr
LaughingTarget @ Jan 8th 2008 5:30PM
Just one of my various passions, Knight.
Raikage,
Mountain Dew - Spartan
RogueStorm @ Jan 8th 2008 5:37PM
I'm pretty sure that more people in the US die every year from stab wounds (which are generally far more dangerous than a gunshot), vehicles and any other means you can think of. Guns in the hands of idiots get more attention than knives in the hands of idiots because the media likes it that way.
Raikage (Wii FC 5508 0487 4434 0992) @ Jan 8th 2008 5:38PM
THIS IS DEW!!!
GRANTED @ Jan 8th 2008 5:56PM
this has nothing to do with history, it has to do with safety and practicality. if americans are safer by having guns, why are there exorbitantly more gun homicides in the US than in gun-free societies? only country hicks want them because americans that live in urban areas (MOST of us) understand that they promote gang culture, crimes (esp. murders) of passion, and greatly increase the chance of (potentially deadly) violence against a person.
LaughingTarget @ Jan 8th 2008 6:15PM
Um, what? Russia's murder rate is 30 per 100,000, total gun ban. Brazil's murder rate is 14 per 100,000, total gun ban. Mexico's murder rate is 17 per 100,000, only .22s are legal but only with a lengthy registration porces.
Contrast:
Finland, 1.7 per 100,000, no restrictions. Israel, 1.4 per 100,000, no restrictions. Switzerland, 2.2 per 100,000, no restrictions.
Hmm, wrong on firearms control much?
Another contrast:
UK - 4,000 violent crimes per 100,000
US - 470 violent crimes per 100,000
The UK is so safe since those gun bans, yep...
Poisoned Al @ Jan 8th 2008 7:29PM
LaughingTarget: Fighting FOR AMERIAKA!!!!
KM @ Jan 8th 2008 8:57PM
"Disarmament is an important pre-requisite of a tyrany"
I couldn't have said it better myself LaughingTarget. For those who still don't get it, let me put it this way... One of the first things to go when the Nazis rose to power in Germany, was firearms, taken from owners registered on a pre-war gun list. Benito Mussolini, Joseph Stalin, and even China (both the Nationalist period, and Communist period).
I'm not a Republican (nor a Democrat), and I do not own any guns. I'm not some trailer trash redneck from down south. The right to bear arms is a necessity, unless of course you don't mind totalitarian governments, genocide, and oppression.