| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (102)

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I hate patent trolls...
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'm off to patent common sense, just try and use it, I'll sue your ass into the ground!

Oh, and I'll only pick hugely successful companies, of course. More money for me.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 2:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I have the feeling that, for the most part, you'll have that "common sense" all to your self.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 9:11PM SoCoolCurt said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
yea patent trolls are the absolute worst. just out to make a quick buck at someone elses expense. i think patents are too vague anyway.

"hand held computer input apparatus and method"

couldnt that be just about any remote control? no one person or group should have this much power over such a vague idea.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:17PM dabamf said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I hate patent trolls...
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:18PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
apparatus=portal. i like cake.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:18PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
apparatus=portal. i like cake.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:22PM Dr Stabbingworth said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Comment system FTL?
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Whatever it is they patented looks more like a dildo, honestly.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Guess who is next in the "Sue" list?
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:20PM Exo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
stop double posting
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:20PM Exo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
stop double posting
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Irony is a cruel lady.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
no
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
no
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
no
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Irony is a cruel lady."

it would be if i haden't done it on purpose
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:43PM Exo said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
"Irony is a cruel lady."

it would be if i haden't done it on purpose
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:45PM Exo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
lol

seriously though, i dont get how you can do that without trying to
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 2:47PM PoisonedAl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's a case of the false idea of "clicking it makes it go faster." When you press the submit button, the reply is sent over the internet tubes to the sever. Sometimes the server is a bit slow loading up the next page so the reply button is left on screen. Pressing it again sends the post again so it's posted twice. Also, data requests are rarely lost, but sometimes it might take time to process, so the data gets put in a queue until the server it ready for it. The user see that the page hasn't updated straight away so mashes the reply button.

It happens to all of us sooner or later so don't get cocky.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 3:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually, a couple days ago I definitely only pressed the button once, the next screen failed to load so I just restarted firefox. And there it was, two posts! Curse you intraweb!
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 4:10PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's how its been happening to me. If i'm on Internet Explorer, it will go to "Cannot Find Server" after i click once, i hit refresh and two comments are there. If i'm on Firefox, i get a blank white screen, hit refresh and get the same thing
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 7:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Profile 0 or as I call him MissingNo. is cruel and has stolen my comments.

I also laugh at the patent troll.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 7:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Profile 0 or as I call him MissingNo. is cruel and has stolen my comments.

I also laugh at the patent troll.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I always find it interesting that people wait for years before filing these lawsuits just so they can get the profit... I mean, really, the reason behind a patent is to protect a method, not to be a lottery entry for a lawsuit down the road.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Anyone can think of an idea, but it takes a lot of money and man-power to make it happen. This guy couldn't have done it if his life depended on it. For a start, he doesn't have a fan-base like Sony and Nintendo have had for many years. Ugh, just such a silly case. I hope the judge laughs at him.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
*sigh* ... another ridiculous lawsuit.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Hopefully the recent US supreme court rulings on patents will lead to the court quickly throwing this patent out the door as something obvious which shouldn't have been granted a patent in the first place.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That patent image looks more like a mouse than a wand.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:27PM FredFredrickson said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That patent image looks more like a mouse than a wand.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
More like those ol' barely functional wireless mousses (mice?). I had one and it barely worked, it was annoying and looked sort of like a wii-mote except it didn’t work when you point it to the screen oh no, you had to use a damn trackball which is no good when you are using Windows 95.

It needed lot’s of batteries to work which didn’t last enough, at the end I throw it away. It looked cool tho’.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Can you patent having a button on a remote???
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
definite troll. I doubt any wireless mouse manufacturer licensed this patent and he hasn't sued them. Also, he has given up his right to sue Nintendo because he didn't sue when Wavebird came out
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm surprised they didn't file in Texas!
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:43PM Zertoss said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
That's because we have a little-known clause here in TX that states that the losing party in a frivolous lawsuit gets the chair.

Those other boneheads making news lately are soooooo screwed.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 2:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
LoL I don't remember where I saw it on TV, but I remember someone saying they solved their planet's lawyer problem by having them face the same punishment/fees as the losing party.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 2:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
FOX -

That would be Justice League. The episode where Green Lantern was fooled into thinking he blew up a planet and The Flash (poorly) defended him.

(nerd moment over)
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 2:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
FOX -

That would be Justice League. The episode where Green Lantern was fooled into thinking he blew up a planet and The Flash (poorly) defended him.

(nerd moment over)
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 2:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
FOX -

That would be Justice League. The episode where Green Lantern was fooled into thinking he blew up a planet and The Flash (poorly) defended him.

(nerd moment over)
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 2:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
FOX -

That would be Justice League. The episode where Green Lantern was fooled into thinking he blew up a planet and The Flash (poorly) defended him.

(nerd moment over)
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 2:58PM LaughingTarget said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
FOX -

That would be Justice League. The episode where Green Lantern was fooled into thinking he blew up a planet and The Flash (poorly) defended him.

(nerd moment over)
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 3:18PM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Bash lawyers all you want, but when you need us - there we are to bail you out of trouble.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:34PM Dizzy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Jeff Bell asks Copper Innovations Group, "And your contribution to society is...what?"
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:41PM ummhello said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
the ps3 remote isn't motion sensing...and by their definition "hand held computer input apparatus and method", the PS3 is the only one that might qualify (depending on definition of "computer")--and if they're talking about the PS3 remote, then why not ALL tv remotes?? lame. stupid lawyers/politicians at work.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 2:05PM hey buddy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Didn't 'Read The Fucking Article' enough? It's not about motion sensing, it's about a numeric sorting system to organize multiple controllers.

If he held a patent, and it's being infringed upon by techniques used by these companies, I think he should win a fair settlement. Not one comment here even mentions the possibility that the companies MIGHT be ass-raping the little guy. Way to bludgeon the notion of the inventor and support the corporation, guys... Go Halliburton!
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 2:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Good god, ill. He's a patent troll. Do you know what he patented (or rather, the part of the patent he's suing over)? I goddamn number "1" "2" "3" or "4" denoting which controller is which player.

Thats common sense, and/or obvious. He has NO chance of winning, because you can't patent something thats obvious.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No mention of Microsoft ? I guess they are scared of the legions of lawyers they have.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No mention of Microsoft ? I guess they are scared of the legions of lawyers they have.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:45PM Zertoss said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I guess they forgot that Nintendo and Sony employ lawyers that are just as vicious.

I can remember a few instances akin to tossing a baby into a pen full of starving pit bulls.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 1:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
For once Nintendo and Sony can come together on something. Well, at least their team of lawyers can. I am also going to assume that they have extensive Ninja training.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW