| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (53)

Posted: Jan 15th 2008 11:37PM ArtificeDrake formerly known as said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
They can't tell ME how to enjoy MY worms! Perhaps I just won't enjoy it on the Wii at all. See how they like that. Good. Fine. Works out for everyone.
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2008 11:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
PWNED?
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2008 11:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Who needs online play when you have motion controls!!!
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2008 11:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Real life friends? Do those exist still?
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2008 11:43PM ummfada said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
instead of playing a Wii, just go outside
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2008 11:43PM ummfada said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
instead of playing a Wii, just go outside
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2008 11:43PM ummfada said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
instead of playing a Wii, just go outside
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2008 11:44PM ummfada said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
oops browser trouble
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2008 11:48PM BPMOmega XBL PSN Steam said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
It's forgiven, Slickback.

Erm, I mean... A Troll Named Slickback.

(+ just for name)
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2008 11:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Instead of posting comments in forums, go outside
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 12:24AM ummfada said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I said that because Wii games require silly movements and unreasonable motions and apparently people want to do it with friends (Via Online), my solution is as follows: GO OUTSIDE
...and it's 12:30 AM where I live so I'll write on these "forums"/this blog...

Thx, K, BAI.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 12:53AM bm111 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Wii games require silly movements and unreasonable motions"


They require things that seem silly and unreasonable to -you-. Although I don't want to know what else you find silly and unreasonable. To the rest of us (all 15 million) these things add something of value.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 1:35AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Instead of playing Worms, go outside and play with real worms. :P
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2008 11:55PM xeleion said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Man, I guess this means I'll have to invite my friends over to play with my Worms... I mean, with my Wii.

Um... nevermind. @.@
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 12:40PM Ghen said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I still call it the revolution in uncomfortable circumstances ;)
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2008 11:58PM ultimateq said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Playing almost any type of game online through a console is a waste. Just use your PC the game gods will smile upon you.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 12:05AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Um no. I think I'll stick with PSU on my X360.

*anticipates flaming responses*
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 12:06AM einhanderkiller said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Idea of the year:
Team17 should make a 2D, Flash-based, ad-supported but free-to-play Worms with online play with up to 4 people able to play on the same computer.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 12:11AM Shagittarius said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Diinied!
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 12:21AM Swizzler said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@THQ:
dum-du-dum-dum move!

one less game I want to buy.
*wallet cheers*
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 12:29AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow, this is right up there with the Hindenburg disaster, except Wii Worms is already in flames well before takeoff.

Oh, the humanity!
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 12:37AM hvnlysoldr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This setback and the Brawl delay to near my birthday has been repaid ten-fold because Famistu rated Brawl 40/40:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=9342879&posted=1#post9342879
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 1:08AM jtenma said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How did they rate the game if it's not completed yet? Why did they have to delay the game 1 week then(1 month U.S.), did they forget to put up a title screen or something? Surely the testing phase for Japan is over. This brings me to believe that they delayed the game just for shits and giggles.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 12:41PM Ghen said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
maybe the delays are translation based.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 12:38AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why am I not suprised. Worms is the perfect game to support multiplayer too, and AFAIK no console version has done so yet.

When will the freaking Wii get with the times enter the age of the Internet?!? This console can be so pathetic some times...
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 12:56AM bm111 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
lol yeah when Team17 screws up the -Wii- needs to get with the times, right you are!
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 1:31AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Who's to blame...Team17's incompetence or inability to meet a deadline with multiplayer intact, or the Wii's difficulty to establish an easy to implement platform for online play?

You can bet your ass that if this game was on the PC Team17 would have no problem implementing online play...
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 12:41AM fortunzfavor said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
How many consoles do we have to buy before developers decide to start shipping complete games?
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 1:53AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
that's just it - it's not how many consoles we buy that will get through to them, it's how many copies of their games we don't buy that will.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 12:51AM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
DUH, of course it's always best to multiplayer in the same room. But some players have no friends.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 4:40AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hey, lots of us have friends who live thousands of miles away who we love to game with on our Xbox 360s or PS3s. We'd love to be able to do the same on our Wiis, too. Back off. Just because someone wants to play online doesn't mean they "have no friends." Jerk.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 5:19AM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Who're you calling a jerk? It's not because the online component is appealing to a person with no friends that it directly implies that a person who likes, wants or plays online has no friends.

You fail at logic, jerk.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 7:09AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Go back and read what you wrote again. On second thought, here:

"DUH, of course it's always best to multiplayer in the same room. But some players have no friends."

The use of "but" suggests that if you can't play local multiplayer, it must be because you have no friends. You fail at grammar.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 7:31AM ThornedVenom said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
It means what it means: that some people don't have friends, and therefore have to rely on the online component for the multiplayer experience.


=> "The use of "but" suggests that if you can't play local multiplayer, it must be because you have no friends."


That's exactly what I meant: if you had friends to play with locally, then you wouldn't be friendless, right? The problem is that YOU don't even remember what you're arguing about in the first place, so let me remind you it for you.

You thought that my statement said that those who seeked an online experience meant that they had no friends, whereas I said that those who had no friends seeked an online experience. It doesn't work both ways.




You fail at arguing your point. But in any case, I don't honestly think that I'm going to convince you any further because you know what they say about arguing on the internet... but still, calling me a jerk in the first place wasn't necessary, Dirk.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 7:59AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You're right. Calling you a jerk was out of line. Sorry.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 9:11AM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No hard feelings: we're gamers and Joystiq readers after all. =)
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 12:58AM bm111 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Well I don't really care about online, but this is still retarded. Are they going to state a -real- reason sometime? LOL yeah, as if.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 2:00AM BigD145 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thanks THQ. Now how many more people are going to b!tch at Nintendo for not having enough online capable games even though Nintendo isn't responsible for this one?
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 2:10AM Cyantre said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Why would I buy a full priced Wii game when I can get Worms for $10 on the XBLA with online multiplayer? Epic fail Nintendo, epic fail
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 4:03AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
because it's the awesome 3d worm's featured in this video here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 2:13AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I can't throw a party everytime I want to play Wii Worms... and Worms Singleplayer has always been crap in general. So online play fills a gap between the parties. You can play against other people while having no pants on. That's why I love Open Warfare 2 on my DS.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 5:17AM MysticX said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
EEhhmmm....no Wi-Fi no purchase! It´s just that simple! And it means the game will be 7-everish at reviewers.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 7:44AM baby sea tuna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow, I didn't realize this many people liked Worms. Personally, I've never played any of them, but if I wanted to, I'd probably just pick up the one on XBLA.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 7:46AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Nintendo can't hear your complaints because their ears are stuffed with money.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 7:49AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report

Well, it could be worse. They could have announced an Atonement game with Carrot Top as Keira Knightley and a ground-breaking, expanse multiplayer mode.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 9:06AM knighty said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Worms has been awful since World Party. The one on XBLA is an absolute disgrace. The physics are just....horrific. WWP was the game in the series that did absolutely everything right, and I don't know what on Earth they were thinking with the more recent incarnations.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 9:28AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's funny how WWP for the Dreamcast had online multiplayer (It was flawed, but none the less; we're talking 1.5 generations before the Wii). I guess I'll clean my DC and give it a spin just for the sake of old times.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 9:47AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Nintendo seems to be afraid to put online multiplayer into games. What's the point of having internet capabilities if the vast majority of games aren't going to use it?
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 10:57AM loofmodnar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This game isn't made by nintendo.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2008 1:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
We know it's not Team 17's fault: they have had online multiplayer in their games for literally a decade now.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW