Best Buy closing out 80GB PS3

God I love your avatar you can even see some nipple in it, where can i get the full pic?

zon, there's nothing i can say that will describe the depths of pathetic-ness you have reached. in fact, i'm going to have to give up on the word "pathetic" and just use "zon" instead.

samfish, i dont think sony will restrict the market to only one PS3 version sans at least software ps2 emulation.

zon, once again, shame.

I'm with ya, Kendall, only I got mine last summer following a price drop. The 60 gig has served me well so far, with no issues. I still got my PS2 library with some upscaled graphics and plenty of room for my gaming, though I'll likely upgrade the HDD when the time comes. I also managed to jump on a 2nd Sixaxis at half price during Christmas sales.

But if backward compatibility isn't important to someone, I guess 40GB is the way to go, especially if it gets another price drop.

Me too.

Yeah I think you are right, although I think the price cut is still a ways off...not quite the 28th...but I think March 1st..ish...personally.

It looks like this is happening, Sony desperatly needs to sell these things, the only way they can do that with good enough results is to drop the price (in the Xbox 360 Range, $399 would be a start). That means cutting corners, that means no PS2 support.

Sony is caught in an interesting situation, the current generation machine dosn't sell good enough, despite it being compatabile with the last generation and having great technological advances over the competition. The last generation machine is still selling like hotcakes, something that is very rare (imagine the original Xbox outselling the 360).

Sony needs to do the impossible, they need to put out a product with all the bells and whistles (Blu-Ray, PS2 Support) for a price that is equal to the competition.

The numbers don't lie, only about 25% of american households with Televisions have HDTVs, and most people who don't have an HDTV arn't ready to buy into an HD media player (eg: Blu-Ray). So Sony could probably succeed in making a non BD PS3, however, since all PS3 games are BD, this will never happen...

I really think the PS3 is suffering from ahead-of-the-times-itis. The 360 is going to shine for a while now, it's the perfect system for most people, it supports HD, but dosn't push it, it also has a decent price ($349 or $499, what would you pay?)

This dosn't come as a suprise to me though, it looks like Sony will push the 40gb version til the time is right and costs go down, then they will re-release an 80gb (or bigger) version... or not, you never know with Sony...

@paragraph

Sony isn't desperate. They don't care what winy xbox fanboys say. The system isn't going anywhere. It will last the entire generation, and it will sell just fine.

You never wanted a PS3. Don't lie.

Sorry my second reply about lieing was intended for Eggviper.

Good points Paragraph. The PS3 could be a little liek teh Dreamcast. Great system but just ahead of its time. Also, both with equally dumb management at the time of there release.

Except Dreamcast WASN'T ahead of the times which is why it failed, and Sega had 2 (arguably 3) failures prior to the Dreamcast...so actually its not alike. At all.

I just enjoy remembering that Sony was laughing at Microsoft for being fickle about SKUs and we've already seen four PS3 SKUs coming and going like the tide.

Ignatius, that's because you know what version you're getting with Sony SKUs. Hardware revisions have ALWAYS gotten new SKUs. Nintendo, meanwhile, has already changed the Wii three times and my reinvestment in 360 is largely dependant upon whether or not I can tell the box in my hand has a Jasper inside.

You can buy one used, just make sure it is in good condition.

"You never wanted a PS3. Don't lie."
----

You know what you're totally right. I don't want a PS3.

In fact its just like I said in my OP, I want the blu ray player. Quite frankly there aren't many games for it that interest me enough yet to justify the console by itself (just uncharted). And there won't be enough exclusives to justify it (for me) for a very long time. My 360 (and wii..) will fill in that role just fine.

I am however a movie fan. With what can be deemed as the conclusion to the HD format war (WB announcement) my reaction was to finally get a high def player.

So no, I don't care about the PS3 at all atm. It just happens to have what I need, and comes with a little bit of extra "potential" attached to it.

@ FidliousWong

Uh, dumb ass when the fuck did they change the Wii hardware?

That and that no matter which one you get, they all do the SAME FUCKING THING.

Thus you ask for a Wii, you get a Wii and it runs everything. No add ons. Nothing taken away. Just plug and play.

So WTF are you smoking man?

Sidepocket: Apparently you've never heard of a mod chip.

Nintendo has released Wiis with DMS, D2A, D2B, and D2C drive chipset revisions.
Four in total. DMS and D2A are nigh identical, so it's more like three.

What it boils down to is whether you want to solder 5/6 wires to the drive to mod it (DMS, D2A, and D2B), or 13-31 wires (D2C).

Don't call someone a dumb ass when you're actually one yourself.

Theres a solution to your problem. Don't buy the system. Well there ya go...

Good points Paragraph. The PS3 could be a little liek teh Dreamcast. Great system but just ahead of its time. Also, both with equally dumb management at the time of their release.

Shame on SONY for forcing people to buy their system those bastards...

Who's to say the replacement SKU isn't some other bundle or something? Likewise, who's to say the current 20GB models aren't about to become 40GB DS3 models like Japan has?

Many possible answers... not everything is "FUCK SONY! GRAWWWR!"

I work at Best Buy, I have sold several PS3's...more than 360 for the record, but anyways...I have never had a consumer think that the 40GB has backwards compatibility. NEVER. In fact, if anything I have had more people ask if the 80GB had it or not.

Its not that big of a deal.

Whatd you say about DS3M?

CGamble20 said...

"If you don't want it, don't buy it."

Interesting. I believe that's exactly what is happening right now, and I also believe that is exactly what Sony is trying to change.

Interesting. Sony wants to sell more systems so they removed BC. and it sells more. Wow.

Didn't they remark that it was merely to 'urge' PS3 consumers to buy more PS3 games? It wasn't a cost factor...

I've been reading your comments and personal attacks on anyone criticizing Sony and I couldn't figure out why you'd spend your time doing that. But then I read you work for BestBuy. That certainly explains the bad spelling, arrogant attitude and straight up douchebagness. Do you get a bigger commission on PS3s or something?

Nevertheless, it'd probably be a good idea to consider the fact that different people prefer different things. So what if you and the clueless horde that still shop at BestBuy don't consider backwards compatibility to be a selling point. Others do. There's no freakin' need to teabag them in a video game blog over that.

BC on the 80gb PS3 was software based. I don't believe it saves them any money to take it out. It would seem that removing the BC from the 40gig PS3 was more to make sure the 40gig model didn't make the 80gigger obsolete. It was more a justification of the lower price than a reason for the lower price.

BC on the 80GB is software and hardware based. It still has the graphics chip from the PS2, it just doesn't have the CPU from the PS2 like the 20/60GB did.

They did save money taking it out.

what?

I figure we'll be getting those two kinds of posts in this thread...

Maybe we need to use smaller words or something when explaining this to the Sony trolls or maybe we should just give up, but I'm gonna give it one last go. The difference between the 360 not having full bc and the PS3 not having full bc is that, unlike Sony, Microsoft was never touting the awesome full-backwards-compatibility-ness of the 360. When a company says one thing and then does another, that's not good public relations, especially when they don't fess up to the fuck up.
Remember the Exxon Valdez? The PS3 is the Exxon Valdez of consoles.

They did release a PS3 that was fully backwards compatible. The 20GB and 60GB had a freaking PS2 inside of them for all intents and purposes.

And nobody gave a shit cause of the price. So they cut some features and dropped the price. If BC is so fucking important to you go buy one that does have it.

How are you getting screwed as a consumer? If Sony is finding ways to bring down the cost of their console while sacrificing only BC and HDD space (which is easily upgradeable), what part of that is screwing you?

Because they haven't just done that. Their current collection of SKUs also have a different number of USB ports, for example. And for a game like Rock Band, which uses four USB ports (and doesn't come with a hub on PS3), that can be a big deal.

I am a 360/Wii owner, and would like to buy a PS3 sooner or later, but I'm not going to until they settle on a couple of consistent SKUs (seriously, four in the first year is insane), so I can choose intelligently without a superior one coming out at the same price point or cheaper a month later.

For now, it remains a good Blu-Ray player with the potential to be a great game system.

Of course, idiots like "CGamble20", who defend this console as though it were family, will disagree with me.

- Scott

If that were the case, wouldn't they technically be right?

Unfortunately no. The 40GB model doesn't play PS2 games at all and they've said they have no intention of adding it. If you feel like reading, further explanation can be found here: http://www.evilavatar.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-40059.html

"What we realised at launch is that there was a big requirement for it, but the next group of people that we are approaching at this sort of price point, from the feedback that we've had, is that PlayStation 2 backwards compatibility was not such an issue"