| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (111)

Posted: Jan 25th 2008 6:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
God, you're all such lemmings. Fox News is capitalizing on a raunchy topic at the expense of EA -- the company that capitalizes on *you* with raunchy topics.

Bioware can't have it's cake and eat it too -- on Sci. vs. Fi., Mass Effect's fat a$$ head writer was practically wheezing with excitement telling the camera about how gamers can have sex with hot aliens while playing Mass Effect. Considering Geoff was also interviewed on that television program, I'm sure he probably watched it, and so he should have been aware that sex/titillation was being used to hype up the game. And I mean, honestly, enough of this fingers-in-the-ears business claiming that the ESRB does a great job and that games aren't marketed for teenagers... Spend ten minutes playing COD4 or Halo 3 and good luck not having the "pleasure" of chatting with a dozen 13 year olds.

Sorry to be playing devil's advocate here -- just trying to keep you honest, joystiq.

Posted: Jan 25th 2008 7:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Just because "13 year-olds" are playing those games does not mean they are being marketed to that demographic. It is not the fault of the manufacturer if some game outlets and parents let their children play these games.

Just trying to keep you honest mar-mar.
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2008 8:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If you're dumb enough to think that this very website's advertisers (from the US military to axe body spray) target the 50-60 y/o female demographic or anything other than male youth with disposable income, then I can't help you tie your shoes much less keep you honest. Like Fox news, you're probably living in the la-la land of ideology where there's no such thing as, you know, "facts" and "reality" just "what I feelllllll!!!!" That's the only world where EA can be the evil spawn of satan that charges microtransactions one day, and the savior of man kind that defends virtual nudity the next day...
Reply

Posted: Jan 26th 2008 7:52AM Slaziman said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Are you stupid or something? Sure, kids buy it, the whole game appeals to them, probably on purpose. But it's not marketed to children in the sense that it's advertised in schools and other crap. Learn the difference. The kids buy it because it looks cool not because the game was pushed through their noses by the corporate fiends.
Reply

Posted: Jan 26th 2008 11:23AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
eighteen and nineteen year olds are still considered 'teenagers' and are legally able to purchase MA rated games. there's no reason the ESRB should be held responsible for parents nor retailers for supplying these games to those younger than the rated age.

im kind of over this whole 'it takes a village to raise a child' crap. i didn't share the fun they had producing said kid, so i feel no reason to share the responsibility ....
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2008 7:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This shit just got real.

Posted: Jan 25th 2008 8:22PM Tye El Czar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I find it would be extremely clever for a game to have the ability to beat the crap out of every Fux News freak and all of NewsCorp, oy. Hell, I'd love to see what players could do to Murd(er)doch!

Posted: Jan 25th 2008 11:21PM freelance said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Cooper Lawrence has brought down the wrath of the devoted. Now that fanboys are taking their skill of pettiness, which they have refined and honed in forums and blogs fueled by 7 generations of gaming, and is using it for good instead of evil she has found out exactly how spiteful gamers can be.

Posted: Jan 26th 2008 6:59AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
lol
Reply

Posted: Jan 26th 2008 1:08AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
dm: What makes this different from the rest of the biased mainstream media coverage the industry gets is the fact that Fox lied in a despicably blatant way in their report. While most news outlets rely on psychoanalyzing gamer stereotypes (OMG! violent games = violent children!), here Fox is picking on a game that didn't even HAVE the content that Fox is purporting it to have.

There's a line between overreacting to something in a game, and simply making stuff up.

Posted: Jan 26th 2008 6:51AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What was damaging, and often is on FOx, wasn't so much the interview section, it was the chat at the end.

I thought the gaming guy on the right did a pretty good job countering the uninformed "expert" on the left.. and made her look pretty silly. Even though he was essentially outnumbered as the host wasn't exctly neutral.

But then whatever "balance" there was in the report was completely undone by the inane, uninformed chatter of the panel at the end. Its all very well having fair and balanced news/debates.. but if at the end you get a bunch of people obviously picking one side "why isn't it AO?" "The rating system is broken" "What happened to lovely, pure pacman?" then the impression the viewer goes away with is that the industry guy was lying.

I don't actually even have a clue who those guys on the panel were, but if I did I'd be emailing THEM, or voting THEIR books down on amazon.

(agree with the column 100% btw)

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW