We don't want to be thought of as single-issue voters. But we'd be lying if we didn't admit we look a little more favorably on politicians who we imagine might pick up a controller from time to time, in much the same way that people in Philadelphia are legally obligated to vote for a candidate they see eating a cheese steak sandwich at Pat's King of Steaks.
So this recent voting guide from Yahoo! Games has proved invaluable for us, and we're betting you can learn a little something too. (Spoiler alert: Obama and McCain are the most gaming-friendly on their respective sides of the aisle.) No, it may not be the only guide you need to the race, but if you're on the fence, it may just help to push you over.
[Via GamePolitics]
Reader Comments (71)
Posted: Jan 31st 2008 2:38PM (Unverified) said
That pic just became my new desktop background.
Reply
Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:04PM Korova Pamplona said
Only the ones running have the speechbubble, you dumb blonde!
Reply
Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:14PM Lemmiwinks said
Well, if you notice, the speech-bubble is being "spoken" only by those who haven't yet dropped out of the race.
Except for Romney...
Reply
Except for Romney...
Posted: Jan 31st 2008 2:48PM (Unverified) said
Oh, well I guess I have another reason to vote Obama even though I already voted for him (Florida primary already happened)
Reply
Posted: Jan 31st 2008 2:49PM (Unverified) said
What, no Kucinich? No Ron Paul? Boooo...
Very weak. None of them recognize that the "scandal" is mostly over-hyped bs trying to pinpoint today's trouble on the newest "rap music" or "rock music" or "pornography".
Reply
Very weak. None of them recognize that the "scandal" is mostly over-hyped bs trying to pinpoint today's trouble on the newest "rap music" or "rock music" or "pornography".
Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:28PM (Unverified) said
Ron Paul isn't a moron...he just doesn't have a snow balls chance in hell.
Reply
Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:17PM CommentSystem said
a moron who doesnt have a snowballs chance in hell
Reply
Posted: Jan 31st 2008 5:10PM Duke said
OK Paul - has some good ideas, but yeah, hes outta his mind. I went to his rally and when he started going on and on about the evils of child immunization I was shocked by the fact that people still use those conspiracy theories. Doesn't help he has all these weirdos running around giving pamphlets to people & telling them to watch you tube to learn more. That's just sad.
I'm a McCain supporter. The polls do show he could win this thing.
Reply
I'm a McCain supporter. The polls do show he could win this thing.
Posted: Jan 31st 2008 2:57PM (Unverified) said
You earn extra awesome points for saying "Pat's" instead of "Geno's". Seriously. Geno's is overrated trash.
And put real cheese on your steaks, morons. White American.
Reply
And put real cheese on your steaks, morons. White American.
Posted: Jan 31st 2008 5:18PM (Unverified) said
I don't disagree (in fact, I'd prefer a few places in the suburbs), but I'm tired of tourists thinking that Geno's == cheesesteaks.
Reply
Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:02PM (Unverified) said
I'd say Dr Ron Paul is the way to go. He supports the First Amendment, which would give game developers more freedom.
Reply
Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:07PM (Unverified) said
I've been all in for Obama for a while now. But I think we'll be looking at President McCain this time next year.
Reply
Posted: Jan 31st 2008 4:01PM (Unverified) said
I sure hope you're wrong, McCain sucks monkey balls...
Reply
Posted: Jan 31st 2008 4:08PM (Unverified) said
"So basically exactly like '92-2000".
Yeah those were some bad years unlike 2000-2008...
Reply
Yeah those were some bad years unlike 2000-2008...
Posted: Jan 31st 2008 4:21PM (Unverified) said
Right now polls show McCain beating both Democrats. Obama is fairing better than Hillary. We are a long way out from elections, but if Hillary get the nomination then I think McCain will beat her.
Reply
Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:13PM (Unverified) said
As usual, another post in which Ron Paul is left out. I am a supporter, to the fullest, but even those of you who are not supporters have to admit that he is left out most anything that is done on all the candidates. Whether you support him or not, its absolutely not fair. I do realize that this was meaningless, but it is just more of the same old mainstream media garbage, leaving Ron Paul out.
Shame on you Yahoo.
Reply
Shame on you Yahoo.
Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:20PM Crono141 said
I just hope ron paul has the good taste to bow out of the race once the conventions occur, and not try and run on an independent ticket. I'm all for the guy, but if you believe in his values and furthering those values, you'd understand that running 3rd party won't help anybody.
Except Hillary.
Reply
Except Hillary.
Posted: Jan 31st 2008 4:42PM LaughingTarget said
Paul isn't that far behind in the delegates if you have been paying attention. If you've seen his latest strategy, he has a good shot of putting up decent numbers. #2 in Nevada, which puts up more delegates than the over-hyped South Carolina and a possible #1 in Louisiana isn't exactly a bow-out situation.
Anyway, he is far more gamer friendly than McCain can ever be.
Reply
Anyway, he is far more gamer friendly than McCain can ever be.
Posted: Jan 31st 2008 5:02PM Crono141 said
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/republican_delegate_count.html
I dunno, "4" is alot farther away from "93" than you might think, unless I'm reading this wrong.
Reply
I dunno, "4" is alot farther away from "93" than you might think, unless I'm reading this wrong.
Posted: Jan 31st 2008 6:05PM LaughingTarget said
They're counting unpledged as definite, so it's way off.
Reply
Posted: Jan 31st 2008 6:08PM (Unverified) said
I feel the same way about Kucinich. Poor lil guy.
Reply
Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:28PM (Unverified) said
Ron Paul left out again? That's a shame as he would clearly be the best choice. Way to link to a clearly biased "voting guide" Joystiq.
Reply
Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:29PM (Unverified) said
Good thing I already support Obama.
However, based on his awesome free-trade views and all that, I doubt Ron Paul would do anything that could ever be perceived as anti-gaming.
And Ron Paul running as a third party-- or a candidate losing in the primaries-- DOES help. He gets a chance to share his views with others. It's a chance to show that there are voters who agree with him. He may not get a chance to execute the changes, but he will show everyone else that they are important, and that if they want some more votes, they will look at some of his ideas.
Reply
However, based on his awesome free-trade views and all that, I doubt Ron Paul would do anything that could ever be perceived as anti-gaming.
And Ron Paul running as a third party-- or a candidate losing in the primaries-- DOES help. He gets a chance to share his views with others. It's a chance to show that there are voters who agree with him. He may not get a chance to execute the changes, but he will show everyone else that they are important, and that if they want some more votes, they will look at some of his ideas.
Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:59PM Crono141 said
And ultimately end up helping someone get elected that basically stands for the polar opposite of the guy you're voting for.
No, if you stand for his ideals, you'll vote for the viable candidate that most closely reflects them, not protest vote because your guy didn't get picked, ultimately helping the opposition.
Reply
No, if you stand for his ideals, you'll vote for the viable candidate that most closely reflects them, not protest vote because your guy didn't get picked, ultimately helping the opposition.
Posted: Jan 31st 2008 4:36PM Mr Khan said
Paul running would be bad for the Republicans, much like Perot before him. Perot split the GOP base in 92, clearing the way for the little-known guy from Hope, Arkansas
Ralph Nader is one of the biggest reasons W is in the white house right now.
Paul could only do similar damage. Unless 3rd parties can get full-scale support (like the Bull-Moose party or the Constitutional Union party), they generally hurt more than they help
Reply
Ralph Nader is one of the biggest reasons W is in the white house right now.
Paul could only do similar damage. Unless 3rd parties can get full-scale support (like the Bull-Moose party or the Constitutional Union party), they generally hurt more than they help
Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:30PM (Unverified) said
Any reason you Bush-loving fascists link to page 2... the Republican page. =P
Reply
Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:54PM (Unverified) said
I support Obama but I consider Ron Paul to be a very honest and inteligent man...who has no shot of winning. Also in response to Crono, what was so bad about 1992-2000?
Reply
Posted: Jan 31st 2008 4:24PM Knight Marquise said
Chrono beat me to it...but if you want more......I have them. ;)
Reply
Posted: Jan 31st 2008 4:38PM Mr Khan said
No response is a bit harsh, we did bombard installations of theirs in Afghanistan and the Sudan (although the latter was a mistake)
But i don't think anyone can compare how Clinton let bin-Laden slip through his fingers to how Bush did back at Tora Bora
Reply
But i don't think anyone can compare how Clinton let bin-Laden slip through his fingers to how Bush did back at Tora Bora
Posted: Jan 31st 2008 4:20PM (Unverified) said
People from Philly know Pat's and Geno's are both tourist traps and there are far, far better cheesesteaks in the city.
Reply
Posted: Jan 31st 2008 4:34PM (Unverified) said
Why does McCain have to be pro games I don't want to vote for him because he hates MMA and I love it WHY CRUEL WORLD WHY!!!
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 221 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 161 comments
- Blizzard taking Valve to court over 'DOTA' trademark 116 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 107 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments










