| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (71)

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 2:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
That pic just became my new desktop background.
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 2:41PM Turles said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I didn't know you could run a computer on a gameboy.
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 2:43PM samfish said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You know, like, half those people aren't running anymore, DON'T YOU, McElroy?

Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:04PM Korova Pamplona said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Only the ones running have the speechbubble, you dumb blonde!
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:14PM Lemmiwinks said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, if you notice, the speech-bubble is being "spoken" only by those who haven't yet dropped out of the race.

Except for Romney...
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 2:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh, well I guess I have another reason to vote Obama even though I already voted for him (Florida primary already happened)
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 2:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
What, no Kucinich? No Ron Paul? Boooo...

Very weak. None of them recognize that the "scandal" is mostly over-hyped bs trying to pinpoint today's trouble on the newest "rap music" or "rock music" or "pornography".
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:04PM samfish said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Kucinich dropped out last week and Ron Paul is a moron, sooo...
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ron Paul isn't a moron...he just doesn't have a snow balls chance in hell.
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:12PM jake11 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
no, no, he is moron
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:17PM foxhound said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Porn is what's keeping this capitalist economy working.
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:17PM CommentSystem said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
a moron who doesnt have a snowballs chance in hell
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 5:10PM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
OK Paul - has some good ideas, but yeah, hes outta his mind. I went to his rally and when he started going on and on about the evils of child immunization I was shocked by the fact that people still use those conspiracy theories. Doesn't help he has all these weirdos running around giving pamphlets to people & telling them to watch you tube to learn more. That's just sad.

I'm a McCain supporter. The polls do show he could win this thing.
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 2:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You earn extra awesome points for saying "Pat's" instead of "Geno's". Seriously. Geno's is overrated trash.

And put real cheese on your steaks, morons. White American.
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 5:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Jim's and Tony Lukes are both way better
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 5:18PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't disagree (in fact, I'd prefer a few places in the suburbs), but I'm tired of tourists thinking that Geno's == cheesesteaks.
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 5:47PM macktar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
steve's prince of steaks all day
Reply

Posted: Feb 1st 2008 2:42PM beano311 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Agreed @ Macktar
Steve's > All
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'd say Dr Ron Paul is the way to go. He supports the First Amendment, which would give game developers more freedom.
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I've been all in for Obama for a while now. But I think we'll be looking at President McCain this time next year.
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:18PM Crono141 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I sure hope your right, because the alternative is President Clinton and First Lady Bill.

So basically exactly like '92-2000.
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 4:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I sure hope you're wrong, McCain sucks monkey balls...
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 4:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"So basically exactly like '92-2000".


Yeah those were some bad years unlike 2000-2008...
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 4:13PM Crono141 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
McCain won't get elected. I think even Hilary could beat him.
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 4:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Right now polls show McCain beating both Democrats. Obama is fairing better than Hillary. We are a long way out from elections, but if Hillary get the nomination then I think McCain will beat her.
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 5:12PM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Crono - the polls have show for a long time that McCain sits ahead of the dems - besides this, his popularity continues to rise while Hillary's doesn't.
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
As usual, another post in which Ron Paul is left out. I am a supporter, to the fullest, but even those of you who are not supporters have to admit that he is left out most anything that is done on all the candidates. Whether you support him or not, its absolutely not fair. I do realize that this was meaningless, but it is just more of the same old mainstream media garbage, leaving Ron Paul out.

Shame on you Yahoo.

Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:20PM Crono141 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I just hope ron paul has the good taste to bow out of the race once the conventions occur, and not try and run on an independent ticket. I'm all for the guy, but if you believe in his values and furthering those values, you'd understand that running 3rd party won't help anybody.

Except Hillary.
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 4:42PM LaughingTarget said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Paul isn't that far behind in the delegates if you have been paying attention. If you've seen his latest strategy, he has a good shot of putting up decent numbers. #2 in Nevada, which puts up more delegates than the over-hyped South Carolina and a possible #1 in Louisiana isn't exactly a bow-out situation.

Anyway, he is far more gamer friendly than McCain can ever be.
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 4:58PM Jerk Face said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ron Paul is left out of everything because he is a lunatic.
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 5:02PM Crono141 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/republican_delegate_count.html

I dunno, "4" is alot farther away from "93" than you might think, unless I'm reading this wrong.
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 6:05PM LaughingTarget said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They're counting unpledged as definite, so it's way off.
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 6:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I feel the same way about Kucinich. Poor lil guy.
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:13PM jake11 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
a*
god we need an edit button
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:20PM CommentSystem said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
obama plays halo, username : BObama408
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ron Paul left out again? That's a shame as he would clearly be the best choice. Way to link to a clearly biased "voting guide" Joystiq.
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Good thing I already support Obama.

However, based on his awesome free-trade views and all that, I doubt Ron Paul would do anything that could ever be perceived as anti-gaming.

And Ron Paul running as a third party-- or a candidate losing in the primaries-- DOES help. He gets a chance to share his views with others. It's a chance to show that there are voters who agree with him. He may not get a chance to execute the changes, but he will show everyone else that they are important, and that if they want some more votes, they will look at some of his ideas.
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:59PM Crono141 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And ultimately end up helping someone get elected that basically stands for the polar opposite of the guy you're voting for.

No, if you stand for his ideals, you'll vote for the viable candidate that most closely reflects them, not protest vote because your guy didn't get picked, ultimately helping the opposition.
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 4:36PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Paul running would be bad for the Republicans, much like Perot before him. Perot split the GOP base in 92, clearing the way for the little-known guy from Hope, Arkansas

Ralph Nader is one of the biggest reasons W is in the white house right now.

Paul could only do similar damage. Unless 3rd parties can get full-scale support (like the Bull-Moose party or the Constitutional Union party), they generally hurt more than they help
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Any reason you Bush-loving fascists link to page 2... the Republican page. =P
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:53PM Crono141 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You're a bush loving facist.

And by bush I mean hairy bush, and by facist I mean tool.
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 4:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I like bush from time to time. : /
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That is one scary pic
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 3:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I support Obama but I consider Ron Paul to be a very honest and inteligent man...who has no shot of winning. Also in response to Crono, what was so bad about 1992-2000?
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 4:08PM Crono141 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Janet Reno? Eilian Gonzales? Perjury? Impeachment? Al Qaeda's first attack on the cole, followed by no response? The opportunity to put Osama Bin Laden away for good, squandered? Tax Hikes? Nanny State? Any of this ringing a bell?
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 4:24PM Knight Marquise said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Chrono beat me to it...but if you want more......I have them. ;)
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 4:38PM Mr Khan said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
No response is a bit harsh, we did bombard installations of theirs in Afghanistan and the Sudan (although the latter was a mistake)

But i don't think anyone can compare how Clinton let bin-Laden slip through his fingers to how Bush did back at Tora Bora
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 4:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
People from Philly know Pat's and Geno's are both tourist traps and there are far, far better cheesesteaks in the city.
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 5:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Jim's FTW
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2008 4:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why does McCain have to be pro games I don't want to vote for him because he hates MMA and I love it WHY CRUEL WORLD WHY!!!
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW