| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (48)

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 3:35PM SheppyReturns said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I never knew why they called this series "Civilization." My tactics can best be described as "What if Rome had Firearms?"
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 3:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
This is very bad news for Wii fans. If you're a developer you can make a game for the PC, 360 and PS3 with little difference. You have to change everything for the Wii. What will happen when there are no more PS2 games to port.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 3:51PM zsavior said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No it is only bad news to WII fans who want the same game everywhere. To me I want original games, I rather they cancel a product than produce a bad game. If they feel they can make more money on the PS3 360 and PC by all means go ahead. Just know that the market supporting the Wii isn't following them.

Game makers will make games for the WII NMH is a show of that it just matter of who is going to cash in on this lucrative base first.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 5:15PM Korova Pamplona said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This happened because they were surprised by Wii's success and didnt plan for it. From now on developers will plan for it. Problem solved. Good games ahead, dont throw away your wiimote.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 3:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"...studios' are quick to cash in on the console's success, provided the amount of work to do so is minimal..."

Precisely. It is nothing more than publisher greed and developer cowardice that prevents the Wii from receiving the innovative titles it could clearly be utilized for. No one wants to take a chance - everyone would rather dump all their shovelware on the system and accept the steady cashflow of customers too stupid to know otherwise.

Developers and publishers are exploiting the Wii's success to the detriment of any creative gems we could be given.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 3:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Makes ya wonder when dev's stop Ps2 development, do you think they will even give a shit about the Wii seeing its horrible 3rd party sales?
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 4:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Third parties games are selling better on the Wii than the PS3 third party games.

Noob.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 4:07PM zsavior said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Well that depends on the devs, and do they want to make money. As stated before they aren't making very good games for the WII NMH did bad in Japan it is doing well over here. Zack and Wiki is s niche game.

Now if a developer wants to actually make money, they will stop acting as if they don't know what to produce and bring over games like FF, or MGS or Tales of Symphonia. RE 4 did great when it was also put on the WII. They don't have to be the same franchises true new ones but still appealing.

They can say they don't give a shit about the WII but the truth is that only hurts the devs. Nintendo still seems to be racking in money, the question is will the devs continue to pass on money because of pure laziness and a unwillingness to adapt and change. Personally I don't believe so, a company like EA sees to much financial gain to say Screw them.

Galaxy, Brawl, TP, people are open to good games, if the devs choose not to responds they can try with 360 ans PS3 nintendo will continue to make money, with or without them at this point. And when the PS2 finally dies down, they will be looking towards the next huge market, they should try and break in now, rather than later.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 4:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Learn to read my entire comment and think a bit before responding and coming off like a jackass, it might help you out a bit in the future here and life in general. 1 day you might not end up being the joke of this site Fernando.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 4:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As much as I love telling Fernando off, there are quite a few examples of Wii ports from the 360/PS3 outselling (one that especially comes to mind is GH3), and I can guarantee you Civilization wouuld have been the same (it just strikes me as one of those games that would do better on the Wii). Also, while some (more than some admittedly) 3rd party games aren't selling, there are plenty that are, and anyone who takes a look at the Npd every once in a while would be aware of this.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 4:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Fernando - your statement is patently false. Assuming VGChartz data is correct, the top 5 games published by 3rd parties on the PS3 are COD4, Assassin's Creed, Pro Evolution Soccer, FIFA 08, and NFS Pro Street, together selling 7.6 million copies.

The top 5 3rd party Wii games are Guitar Hero 3, RE4, Rayman Rabbids, Red Steel, and Carnival Games for a combined total of 6.15 million copies. The PS3 third party games beat out the Wii on numbers alone... and that doesn't even take into consideration there are twice as many Wiis out there. The PS3's "attach rate" for 3rd party games is more than double the Wii's.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 6:16PM Catprog said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Nate

So if my console sold 10 units but every person who brought one brought every game available then 3rd party game sell the best on my console?

In other words attach rates are meaningless

Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 6:24PM Catprog said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Nate

(wishing there was an edit function)

Why did you leave the best selling 3rd party game out of the equation?

That takes the total of the wii to 8.19 million

In fact if you line them up the first 3rd party wii game not to Outsell the same in the Ps3 is

Dragonball Z: Budokai Tenkaichi 2 which only sold 0.19m

The Ps3 game Unreal Tournament III sold 0.20m

Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 4:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wait wait wait wait... they have a version for the DS and they're worried about dumbing down the graphics for the Wii? Whaa...?

I actually think that Civ isn't a good fit for the Wii. Civ is a long, meticulous, and in-depth strategy game that doesn't really fit with the Wii's target audience.

They said that if they'd started out developing for the Wii they'd have stuck with it. They just don't want to do a crappy port or spend 4 times the effort to re-engineer stuff so it'll work on the Wii. Be happy you're not getting another bad port. The only thing worse than no game, is a bad game you wasted money on.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 4:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Maybe a bad fit for the Wii audience (I disagree with that, this is one of those kinds of games that appeals both to the hardcore and the casuals but whatever) but anyone who would even take a second to think can see that the Wii, with its pointer controls and such, would have been a fine fit, and unlikely to be a 'crappy' port.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 4:34PM Crono141 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They've actually said that the core game is identical across all platforms: AI, mechanics, everything. The only difference is in the eye candy.

They've scrapped the wii release because they didn't feel like making low poly assets of the game.

Its a shame, because I likely won't get this game on any other platform.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 4:46PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Fatass of Kickassness

Since when have Civilation type games been for casuals?
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 4:48PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
*Civilization
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 9:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I know many people who never play games outside of a few games that definitely would be considered 'casual' and yet most of them enjoy the Civilization series.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 4:20PM SoulBlade said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dev studios just aren't used to having a console that requires them to make new games vs. having consoles that they can easily port games to and from.

Nintendo makes awesome Wii games because they focus solely on the Wii - they don't have to code their games thinking about the other platforms. It's easier for devs to justify effort on games for the 360/PC/PS3 vs. the Wii, especially given the third party sales trend.

It's true that third party games can succeed on the Wii, but many gems go unnoticed on Nintendo consoles - Zak and Wiki will forever be in that category, and I bet No More Heroes will as well. Capcom shows it love, but I hope they don't lose money on those titles.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 4:25PM Tez said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Except No More Heroes is not THAT great. But I agree with you in general.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 4:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dude, have you played the game? The dialogue is amazing, the combat is surprisingly fun, and I've never seen a game so in love with being a game.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 4:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
The wii can't handle what other modern consoles can and the controls might not be as great as they first appeared to be. No news here.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 4:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Typical jsn trolling. No surprise here.

Now, if you knew jack shit, you'd know that EVERYTHING except the visuals (including AI and such) are identical across ALL platforms, including the DS. The Wii is definately capable of handling this game, and I wouldn't pick enhanced visuals over pointer control.

Is there a PC version of this game? If so fuck the console versions.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 4:55PM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And this is what's pissing me off about third party developers. Even when Nintendo has proven themselves this time around with the Wii, third party developers still fuck them over and then complain that their games aren't selling.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 4:57PM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
didn't mean to reply to you.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 5:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
it's the truth, call it trolling if that's the best you're capable of coming up with. I mean it is the generic message board response these days when presented with a differing opinion and you have no other valid response to give.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 5:21PM Crono141 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No, its trolling. It might even be ban-able trolling since you added on the "No news here". Depends on how the mods take it.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 7:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thats funny, JSN, I could have sworn I posted this 'valid response', um, right after I called you out on being a troll.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 4:24PM Tez said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"We stopped working on the Wii version because it was actually taking time and effort, something we didn't feel should be put into the version of the game with the largest install base and best control potential. It was really, really hard!"

Great. PS2/PSP assets are to the Wii what the Unreal engine is to the 360. If devs don't have a third of the game already made for them in advance, they won't bother? Get fucked, developers.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 4:25PM LaughingTarget said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Shoehorn the controls?

**looks at Civ4**

Hmm, plays without having to use anything but the left mouse button. How much more complicated can Civilization get?
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 4:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is retarded. So what if the textures are super high res if your using a control stick for a cursor instead of a pointer.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 4:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
PS3s support mice in-game (if the devs choose to enable it). Sorry, had to say it.

I am actually not a fan of the Wii's pointer. It's pretty sloppy and annoying to use for long periods of time. The motion control is great, but I wish they'd refined the pointer a lot more.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 4:41PM SheppyReturns said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Umm, it's more than super high res textures....

Obviously assets on 360 and PS3 utilize things like Normal Maps and Emmission Maps. That's a hell of a lot of work to strip down.

Please at least learn SOMETHING about 3D before thinking the only difference is one system has a 51x512 texture and the other is 128x128. It isn't a matter of needing to lower texture resolution, it's a matter of needing to create all new assets.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 4:55PM LaughingTarget said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
MS Paint can compress a 512x512 texture into 128x128. I can do it on Paint.net (free program by the way) with minimal to no quality loss. Hardly an excuse. Besides, Civilization Revolution isn't turning out to be a mighty contender for amazing graphics of the year. Civ is known for a deep and immersing exercise in building a nation and leading it through history, not for bleeding edge technology.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 4:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I honestly hadn't even considered picking this one up for the Wii. The convoluted online system that Nintendo has (not) developed made this game a day one 360 purchase in my mind.

Plus, my 360 streams from my home server, so I can listen to my own music while I play strategy/puzzle games.

I'm not saying that strategy games don't have potential on the Wii, I just know that a number of my friends will pick up this particular title too, and the 360 makes online multiplayer much, much, much easier.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 4:45PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I hereby pronounce Firaxis to be idiots, having squandered the one version that would have felt most natural outside of the PC version, and thinking that that the controls would be a problem
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 5:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
mmm...the PS3 has K+M support...and actually I think a DS version would be the best (and hey, I do hate my DS)
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 4:56PM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And this is what's pissing me off about third party developers. Even when Nintendo proved themselves this time around, they still fuck them over with half-assed games then they go and complain saying it's nintendo's fault.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 5:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Vegeta, what Nintendo has been able to prove is that they can make a videogame console that would even sell to the casual gaming crowd...

Is that what you meant by Nintendo proving themselves this time?
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 5:20PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It takes time to rebuild bridges. Its natural for publishers to feel wary of putting epic games on a Nintendo consoles after 10 years of failure.

Installations like Fatal Frame IV and Monster Hunter 3 will (hopefully) start to alleviate this, and while Nintendo was able to make an overnight success, it hasn't been proven that 3rd parties can have a sizable piece of the pie by treating the Wii as a full-scale, competing platform instead of a 5th wheel of sorts
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 5:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I am truly dissappointed that this was shelved. I love Civilization and I've purchased every single Civ game for the PC.... but I don't own a 360 or a PS3, and I'm not about to buy one just to play one game.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 5:26PM ZippyDSMlee said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"...studios' are quick to cash in on the console's success, provided the amount of work to do so is minimal..."

Beautifully said, on a side note the WII mote and NC offers better mouse and KB like options than any other console, controls are not the issue here its the work required to port the graphics engine that combined with a lack of energy and imagination to port a title correctly its not wonder the stale and drained industry is not fooling with it.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 5:28PM Pipp said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
At this point, it would be shooting yourself in the foot to not push a Wii version of your game. I can understand that they might not have the manpower to do it, but you can almost guarantee you will sell more copies on the Wii than one of the other platforms they are developing on over the lifespan of the console.

This isn't bitter hate or anything, it just seems like a really bad move. I own a 360, but seeing developers missing opportunities like this is just staggering.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 9:29PM Elorian said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They've lost a lot of sales with this cancellation, including mine.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2008 11:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't get it.

1 - Surely the wiimote pointer would work WAY better and easier than trying to shoehorn civilization's controls onto a gamepad?

2 - Civilization has never been about the graphics. They have never been realistic.. merely representations. Frankly, they could probably use the DS art assest for the Wii and it's be ok. I rather like the idea of a 2d, cartoony civilization.

--

Either way, if I get anything I'm getting the DS version... (graphics and gamepads be damned ;-) )
Reply

Posted: Feb 6th 2008 12:38AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Lazy. Mother. Fuckers.
Reply

Posted: Feb 6th 2008 7:08AM BurntMeatloaf said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, you have to give them props in one respect: they won't rush it to market and make it crap.

You do also have to consider that the Wii seriously lacks in memory, and Civ has always been a very memory intensive title due to all the stuff going on in the background, as opposed to using it for nothing more than graphics. You can scale down graphics and animation, but scaling down game logic is not piece of cake.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW