To hear the devs of EA's upcoming Dead Space tell it, the pause option is the wimp's way out, just a way for you to grab a vine and pull yourself, breathless, out of the lightning sands of terror which they have crafted. In fact, they're so down on it, they're considering leaving the tride-and-true pause feature on the cutting room floor (or, perhaps, recycling it into uncomfortable silences or theatrical intermissions).
But are we the only ones who don't normally use the pause button to catch our breath but rather when life gets in the way of gaming? Is EA telling us we shouldn't interrupt our play to enjoy a refreshing soda or answer a creditor's phone call? Either way, the decision to remove pause is theirs, but if their pauseless game scares the crap out of us, we're sending them the cleaning bill.
Reader Comments (51)
Posted: Feb 11th 2008 6:01PM SirUrza said
Forget answering the phone. What about when you're so scared you need to use the toilet? :P
Stupid idea.
They should put a Pause ON/OFF feature in the title screen's menu options, off by default if that's how they decide the game is intended to be played. Then we can play either way.
Heck, make an achievement for playing with Pause off if they really want to promote that type of game play.
Reply
Stupid idea.
They should put a Pause ON/OFF feature in the title screen's menu options, off by default if that's how they decide the game is intended to be played. Then we can play either way.
Heck, make an achievement for playing with Pause off if they really want to promote that type of game play.
Posted: Feb 11th 2008 6:07PM (Unverified) said
I totally agree. If they're doing it for immersion, like rumble, there should be the option to turn it on and off, like rumble.
Reply
Posted: Feb 11th 2008 6:01PM (Unverified) said
Just pop into the 360 Dashboard instead. Microsoft requires the game to pause when the Dashboard blade is opened...
Reply
Posted: Feb 11th 2008 8:59PM CommentSystem said
really? cause i keep getting 8 second violations everytime i do that in NBA2k8
Reply
Posted: Feb 11th 2008 11:21PM ludwigk said
Or pull the controller of the currently logged in gamertag. It is a TCR (technical certification requirement) that the game pause in the even of a controller pull as well. I mean, a game without pauses would never get through CQC anyways. (Yes, I worked in EA's QA department)
But seriously, unless they're making the single player scenario around hour and a half tops, they've got to put in some suspend mode for sure. I just don't get that long to game at a time anymore.
Reply
But seriously, unless they're making the single player scenario around hour and a half tops, they've got to put in some suspend mode for sure. I just don't get that long to game at a time anymore.
Posted: Feb 11th 2008 6:28PM ComicShaman said
Well, it's not actually a "move" yet. The article says they're just considering it, not that they've decided to actually do it. So it's just a bad concept at this point.
Reply
Posted: Feb 11th 2008 6:15PM (Unverified) said
I've not been following this game, but hearing this has suddenly raised my interest level considerably.
Will this be out for the PC?
Reply
Will this be out for the PC?
Posted: Feb 11th 2008 6:15PM (Unverified) said
It's not just the wimp's way out, it's also the wife-has-picked-right-now-to-try-and-talk-to-me way out, the someone's-at-the-door button, the phone's-ringing button, and the I've-drank-too-many-Java-Monsters-and-have-to-take-a-leak button.
I would be hesitant to plunk down $60 for a game that was going to tell me I cannot pause it to go get a drink.
Reply
I would be hesitant to plunk down $60 for a game that was going to tell me I cannot pause it to go get a drink.
Posted: Feb 11th 2008 6:41PM (Unverified) said
What a retarded idea. I do accept I sometimes pause when I'm scared, but most of the time is because I have to take out the dog, answer the phone, ect. EA should know that besides playing their games a have a life o tend to!
Reply
Posted: Feb 11th 2008 6:42PM ComicShaman said
If you want to immerse people in your game, give it a good story, atmosphere, and controls. Don't rely on gimmicks.
To me, there comes a point where a developer has to stop trying to force the player to experience a game EXACTLY as they want it to and let the players have their way. This idea reminds me of games where you can't skip the cutscenes. Yes, the developers put a lot of work into them and they want you to see them, by God, and you're missing the full experience if you don't, etc. and so forth. But some players don't dig cutscenes, and to force them to watch all the way through will just piss them off.
For a really egregious example of pushy developer philosophy, see Factor 5 with "Lair." They could have included analog controls, but chose to inflict awful motion-sensing controls on players instead, because that was "their vision" for the game.
I hope EA dumps this idea.
Reply
To me, there comes a point where a developer has to stop trying to force the player to experience a game EXACTLY as they want it to and let the players have their way. This idea reminds me of games where you can't skip the cutscenes. Yes, the developers put a lot of work into them and they want you to see them, by God, and you're missing the full experience if you don't, etc. and so forth. But some players don't dig cutscenes, and to force them to watch all the way through will just piss them off.
For a really egregious example of pushy developer philosophy, see Factor 5 with "Lair." They could have included analog controls, but chose to inflict awful motion-sensing controls on players instead, because that was "their vision" for the game.
I hope EA dumps this idea.
Posted: Feb 11th 2008 6:46PM (Unverified) said
Just started playing Assassins creed, and was very pleased when I found out I could pause during a cinematic instead of skipping it. You know, cause the real world takes precedence over the virtual one.
I hope this winds up like the Turok "Grab Bag" thing and the pure hate changes their mind.
Reply
I hope this winds up like the Turok "Grab Bag" thing and the pure hate changes their mind.
Posted: Feb 11th 2008 8:13PM WedgeTalon said
+1
Too few games allow pausing during cinematics. I'm especially looking at you, JRPGS.
Nothing is worse, though, than trying to pause an awesome cinematic to go do whatever just to end up irrevocably skipping it. :(
Reply
Too few games allow pausing during cinematics. I'm especially looking at you, JRPGS.
Nothing is worse, though, than trying to pause an awesome cinematic to go do whatever just to end up irrevocably skipping it. :(
Posted: Feb 12th 2008 8:06AM (Unverified) said
WedgeTalon,
which JRPG's are you talking about? nowadays most of them do allow you to stop the cutscenes...
Reply
which JRPG's are you talking about? nowadays most of them do allow you to stop the cutscenes...
Posted: Feb 11th 2008 6:48PM (Unverified) said
This seems misguided to me. I mean, I can sorta understand having it in for trivially saved games. Being able to easily roll back to a previously saved game subverts temporal irreversibility and lessens the importance of game decisions. But it seems to me that taking out the pause function could make the game so improbably inconvenient to play that--even if someone actually buys the game--most people will be loathe to put the disk in because of the incredible commitment required in doing so.
Reply
Posted: Feb 11th 2008 6:50PM Withad said
Reading the article, it seems that they're more interested in stopping players pausing to use items like power-ups and health packs selected from an inventory. That all has to be done in real time.
Doesn't explain how they're going to handle other normal pause menu functions like save, load, options or quit though.
It's an interesting idea but I doubt it'll actually happen and if it does, there'll be a lot of people who don't like it. I wouldn't be surprised if it was only brought up during the interview to see how gamers would react.
Reply
Doesn't explain how they're going to handle other normal pause menu functions like save, load, options or quit though.
It's an interesting idea but I doubt it'll actually happen and if it does, there'll be a lot of people who don't like it. I wouldn't be surprised if it was only brought up during the interview to see how gamers would react.
Posted: Feb 11th 2008 7:12PM (Unverified) said
That's odd, I had this exact same idea when I sat down and played some Eternal Darkness the other night. Then my girlfriend called, and the beast known as "impracticality" reared its ugly head.
Reply
Posted: Feb 11th 2008 7:20PM (Unverified) said
I use the pause button to take a crap. You telling me EA doesn't want me to crap?
Reply
Posted: Feb 11th 2008 8:15PM ComicShaman said
I'm afraid it's true.
EA is trying to establish a monopoly on crap, you see. They don't want the competition.
Reply
EA is trying to establish a monopoly on crap, you see. They don't want the competition.
Posted: Feb 11th 2008 7:29PM (Unverified) said
The only game (series) I can think of that I've paused for a break from the game is WarioWare. If you're doing the same microgame 999 times in a row, you need a pause to rest your wrist.
The only other time I pause games is when life gets in the way, not because I'm scared or enthralled or whatever and just need to be reminded of how much real life actually sucks. The point of gaming is to break from reality.
But the fact is that life is often more important and you do need to be able to stop gaming to get back to things that matter.
Reply
The only other time I pause games is when life gets in the way, not because I'm scared or enthralled or whatever and just need to be reminded of how much real life actually sucks. The point of gaming is to break from reality.
But the fact is that life is often more important and you do need to be able to stop gaming to get back to things that matter.
Posted: Feb 11th 2008 8:03PM IceAndrews said
Just use the XBox Dashboard button. Problem Solved.
Reply
Posted: Feb 11th 2008 8:11PM BIGGEN said
i agree with the one guy, have it an option like rumble. tell you what tho, if EA or anyone for that matter can actually make a game that scares the shit out of me, i'll play it their way. condemned has come the closest to even giving me a shiver down my spine and i would plunk down $60 for some actual immersion like that. werd
Reply
Posted: Feb 11th 2008 10:28PM In A World said
Maybe time slows down (or stops altogether) if you're idle? Technically you didn't pause the game, it's just that you're not moving/switching weapons/etc.
Another way this would work would be if there was no loading after dying. Much like in Halo 3, the game could instantly start you back at the last checkpoint... also there would have to be a checkpoint every couple minutes.
Or maybe the game could go all Slaughterhouse 5 on you and just randomly place the player in different points in the timeline, instead following a linear plot, thus rendering useless any concept of progress or continuity.
But that's just me. I'm sure EA is too stupid to justify this dumbass design choice.
Reply
Another way this would work would be if there was no loading after dying. Much like in Halo 3, the game could instantly start you back at the last checkpoint... also there would have to be a checkpoint every couple minutes.
Or maybe the game could go all Slaughterhouse 5 on you and just randomly place the player in different points in the timeline, instead following a linear plot, thus rendering useless any concept of progress or continuity.
But that's just me. I'm sure EA is too stupid to justify this dumbass design choice.
Posted: Feb 11th 2008 11:33PM (Unverified) said
Congratulations everyone, you've proven you can all come up with some inane or repeated example of what you need to use the pause button for. Now, the next question on the "I've got the creativity level of a chimpanzee" test is...
Reply
Posted: Feb 12th 2008 6:10AM BIGGEN said
"Now, the next question on the "I've got the creativity level of a chimpanzee" test is..."
How to leave a douchebag comment about how everyone has proven we can all come up with some inane or repeated example of what you need to use the pause button for.
see, i can do it too. only i got an A.
Reply
How to leave a douchebag comment about how everyone has proven we can all come up with some inane or repeated example of what you need to use the pause button for.
see, i can do it too. only i got an A.
Posted: Feb 12th 2008 1:13AM (Unverified) said
i bet that waste of time made you feel slightly superior. although, you do have a point, if you were an english teacher and this was a class room and we were students. in fact, this was the stupidest waste of reading time when compared to the comment i just made about yours.
Reply
Posted: Feb 12th 2008 3:51AM Lekko said
I'm sorry, but if you take out pause, you end out missing more of the game than you gain.
People show up and instead of just pausing and getting rid of them or dealing with things so you can get back to the game, you have to just let it run and miss out on whatever, or leave it in gameplay and die so you have to re-re-replay the same thing again and again, which discourages you from playing.
I can see what they are getting at, but I think removing pause just doesn't really work. Pausing in general could use retooling, yes, but not removing it altogether.
Reply
People show up and instead of just pausing and getting rid of them or dealing with things so you can get back to the game, you have to just let it run and miss out on whatever, or leave it in gameplay and die so you have to re-re-replay the same thing again and again, which discourages you from playing.
I can see what they are getting at, but I think removing pause just doesn't really work. Pausing in general could use retooling, yes, but not removing it altogether.
Posted: Feb 12th 2008 7:22AM (Unverified) said
How about this? For all the people who are so "hardcore" that they think pausing a game is the wimp's way out. How about they just leave pausing in as normal and YOU just don't have to press that button instead of forcing something so silly on the rest of us. No one's forcing you to press pause.
Reply
Posted: Feb 12th 2008 9:19AM (Unverified) said
Looking at the comments, there was apparently only one person that read the entire story.
They are talking about using the Pause feature to stop time in order to use inventory items such as health packs or change weapons. I can see this as a good thing to keep you from pausing to fill up on health packs in order to defeat the enemy.
There was no mention that I could see of not being able to pause the game.
Reply
They are talking about using the Pause feature to stop time in order to use inventory items such as health packs or change weapons. I can see this as a good thing to keep you from pausing to fill up on health packs in order to defeat the enemy.
There was no mention that I could see of not being able to pause the game.
Posted: Feb 12th 2008 7:28PM (Unverified) said
Actually,
"this system keeps you in the game all the time and looks bloody cool.
The development version we played had a pause function assigned to the start button, like every other game. But EA says it's unsure whether that will make it to the final game."
What YOU describe would be great, what the article describes (which is complete removal of the pause button) would prevent midcore gamers from playing the game.
Reply
"this system keeps you in the game all the time and looks bloody cool.
The development version we played had a pause function assigned to the start button, like every other game. But EA says it's unsure whether that will make it to the final game."
What YOU describe would be great, what the article describes (which is complete removal of the pause button) would prevent midcore gamers from playing the game.
Posted: Feb 13th 2008 10:16AM (Unverified) said
Good point Doc.
I was basing my interpretation on the following info from the article...
"you could hit pause, calmly cycle through your inventory and ram a few health packs down your throat...developers talking about omitting that option completely so you won't be able to pause the game, revive, and take a breather."
Looking further towards the end, there was the mention of removing the pause altogether. They would get so much flak for doing something like that - I hope they have someone there with a bit of common sense.
Reply
I was basing my interpretation on the following info from the article...
"you could hit pause, calmly cycle through your inventory and ram a few health packs down your throat...developers talking about omitting that option completely so you won't be able to pause the game, revive, and take a breather."
Looking further towards the end, there was the mention of removing the pause altogether. They would get so much flak for doing something like that - I hope they have someone there with a bit of common sense.
Posted: Feb 13th 2008 11:15PM WiredKnight said
If there was no pause, how would you save/load/quit? There must be those basic options, so I think iCarrumba is right. There's no pause "menu," for inventory/equipment changes, but there must be some way to put the game on hold.
On the other hand, it might be kind of interesting. You have to find a safe corner somewhere before you can get up and leave the game for an extended amount of time XD
Reply
On the other hand, it might be kind of interesting. You have to find a safe corner somewhere before you can get up and leave the game for an extended amount of time XD
Posted: Feb 15th 2008 11:20AM (Unverified) said
Just have back/select handle your inventory and health kits, and have that in real time or half time or whatever, and have start handle saving/loading, options, quitting, and actually pausing the game.
Reply
| 1 | 2 |
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
Dark Side 'Cause It Looks Cool: The Failings of Moral Choice in Games
Posted on Feb 10th 2012 7:45PM
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 221 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 155 comments
- Blizzard taking Valve to court over 'DOTA' trademark 112 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 107 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments








