| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (41)

Posted: Feb 12th 2008 10:26PM ledblimp260 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
pretty
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2008 10:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Nice... I like the presentation...

I like to see the evolution of Joystiq... now we need little profiles for everyone of us =)



Off topic: Is it possible to make money from a blog?
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2008 10:35PM chrisgrant said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I thinkkkkk so :-/
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2008 10:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The thing is... I have a lot of free time... lately, the work is a little slow... my economy is a little low this days =(

I want to start a blog to earn some extra cash... I spend most of my time in the computer and I want to take advantage of that.

Chris, can you give some tips and advices? Or anyone can help me?

rock_rules20 at hotmail
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2008 10:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
the greatest blog would be one run by a Sony fanboy, a Nintendo one, a 360 one, and a PC elitist...
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2008 10:49PM The Artist Formerly known as Jes said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ads on your blog will help generate revenue.

At least that's what I hear
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2008 11:01PM Vegnagun said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
You already have a blog. It's called "joystiq.com". You post here non-stop, they just rerouted your checks directly to Nintendo.
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2008 11:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Joystiq... please don't redirect my check to Nintendo anymore... send the checks to Laredo, Tx, please... =)

Full name: Fernando Paramo Mares

Address: Nintendoland Av. #64
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2008 11:25PM Vegnagun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No, see they're directing it to Nintendo so that the good men at Nintendo can put all of it into a fund to make a giant golden statue of Miyamoto dressed up as Santa Claus with Iwata sitting on his lap. You'll get it sometime in November at the rate your going.
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2008 11:25PM Some Guy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
if you can get the sony defense force and the nintendo defense force and all their other equivalents to make a blog, I WILL PAY YOU.
:P
Reply

Posted: Feb 13th 2008 12:44AM Anticrawl said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Fernando, go look into adsense. Then after that check in on Anticrawl to keep crawlers at bay.
Reply

Posted: Feb 13th 2008 1:10AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"the greatest blog would be one run by a Sony fanboy, a Nintendo one, a 360 one, and a PC elitist..."


If they all share an enthusiasm for furry, yaoi and pantsu you just described kotaku except for the 360, Pc fan boys.


Reply

Posted: Feb 13th 2008 1:18AM Anticrawl said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Also Fernando I think you would have a better chance partnering with samfish to create a peachchan.org website. Clearly there is a market for it when you consider all the questions he's had pertaining to his hot Peach pictures.

But seriously, I hope you have a great name and "image" in mind for your site. There are so many out there and a great many big sites so getting into the game now may be a little difficult.
Reply

Posted: Feb 13th 2008 1:20AM Anticrawl said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Also I was entirely serious about the Anticrawl software and wasn't making some lame joke.

Idea
Material
Adsense
Anticrawl
????????????
Profit
Reply

Posted: Feb 13th 2008 1:22AM Anticrawl said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Please stand-by for software promotion in.. 3.. 2.. 1..

http://www.anticrawl.com/
Reply

Posted: Feb 13th 2008 1:36AM Demon G Sides said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Noshino, that idea interests me greatly.

Perhaps... If you were a Sony or PC elitist... me, you, and fernando could start our own little shindig...
Reply

Posted: Feb 13th 2008 2:58AM Anticrawl said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@DemonGSides

Now that I think about it that sounds promising. Add a crazy cynical and a bit arrogant person in there to criticize each side regardless of their personally views because that's their style and they have a wealth of random ass knowledge to throw around and then you have an interesting thing going. Not only would one be getting great news by a colorful cultish clan of consumerists and cynicists, (hopefully just one) they would also be compelled to check in to see what will happen next.

And yes I realize the second sentence sounds like well me (At least I'm not in denial about being cynical douchebag. It isn't because I enjoy getting a rise out of people or that I'm a pessimist, because I'm not. I just find it fun and I usually don't bullshit my statements much either, most of it is based on something specific and true.)

In any case I'd be willing to put my good polish friend Fernando's back against the wall if need be. Actually use to be pretty hard on him until I figured "it" out.

If said site does exist regardless of anyone here being involved there must be a strict rule against the term, "bash" and its use on the internet. Eventually when the site has gained enough support they could begin a Revolution to remove the word (or its internet definition) from our vocabulary unless we are about to attend some live RPG event and plan on stating they are about to physically bash someone in the face with their plus one mace (damn I'm good.)


If that doesn’t work out there is always peachan….
Reply

Posted: Feb 13th 2008 12:35PM Demon G Sides said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm for it. Email me at demongsides@gmail.com
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2008 10:34PM Deck said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ooo this is nice! Way to go Joystiq!
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2008 10:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It links back to the article and everything! Much more functional and quite a bit prettier. God jorb, Joystiq.
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2008 10:47PM Vegnagun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yarp, Good Jorb.
Reply

Posted: Feb 13th 2008 1:35AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Coach Z in the horse!
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2008 10:54PM Vegnagun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Cheers guys! Now fix the comment system! It breaks into my house and steals all the good cereals.
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2008 10:54PM NukeAssault said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thats really cool. Glad its black too. Easy on the eyes. =)
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2008 11:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The layout removes too much from the rest of the site, its confusing and feels tacked on.
I still absolutely hate the new-er joystiq layout as a whole. big fail. i still prefer engadget's.
i even like a certain '***-updates' layout better. and that site sucks so hard. its like standing next to keanu reeves while he "acts"
But thats just my opinion.
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2008 11:08PM Vegnagun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Is that a bad yahtzee impression or are you trying to unconstructivly criticize?
Reply

Posted: Feb 13th 2008 12:47AM Anticrawl said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
How could it be a bad Yahtzee impression? It's called ZERO PUNCTUATION, not TOO MUCH PUNCTUATION. Doesn't qualify as an impression if it is the polar opposite.
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2008 11:06PM johnwest72 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's nice, but come on. Isn't it time for a little javascript so we don't have to reload the page each time a new picture is displayed? I only get through about 3-4 before I'm tired of it. Give us some ajax. I'll write it for you if you need me to, but there are lots of libraries out there.

John

ps. I'm guessing the reason for the reload is to load a new ad each time...
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2008 11:08PM severian00 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Love the control, much better than before. I may actually look at more than a pic or two in the galleries now.
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2008 11:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
on mouseover = IE @ work crashes
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2008 11:37PM chrisgrant said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
On mouseover on what element?
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2008 11:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i click on the gallery i want to see and it pops up just fine. then i click on the picture i want to see, and the new screen opens with the picture stretched too largely. sometimes it flickers back and forth between that picture and an enlarged translucent search box over the black background that shows "JOYSTIQ" text in caps and "Search". As soon as the cursor rolls over the picture IE freezes.
Reply

Posted: Feb 13th 2008 8:25AM fco said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Same here. All I get now is a black coloured mess, and then IE stops responding.
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2008 11:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Not for nothing - they look good - but you should have used Ajax for the gallery image changes. Having to refresh the page every time a new image loads takes away from the gallery.
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2008 11:59PM hvnlysoldr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Who shall be the first to exploit this newly refined ammo for the fanboy wars?
Reply

Posted: Feb 13th 2008 12:44AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hey nice use of Skitch! Great program isn't it?
Reply

Posted: Feb 13th 2008 1:13AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So the reply system is next in the list right?

J/k (An edit button would be really helpful)

To be honest I rarely click on the galleries but this is nice, adds style I guess.

Reply

Posted: Feb 13th 2008 8:39AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's a great update, I actually want to go into the galleries now, in contrast to before, where I tried to avoid it unless it was something very special. Good job!

But there is one issue that annoys me.I prefer to browse in hi res. It works fine if I change the pictures using the arrows, but when i click the picture itself to change, it switches to low res-mode.

Will there perhaps be a fix for this?
Reply

Posted: Feb 13th 2008 8:41AM kip said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Umm.. kind of a big issue here guys.. the "low-res" image is exactly the same as the high res image, except the img tag has smaller width/height values. This means the browser still has to download the same high-res image and then make it smaller. It'd be better if the low-res image was truly low-res.
Reply

Posted: Feb 13th 2008 3:23PM Lemmiwinks said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The navigation arrow buttons never work for me on any weblogs site. (i.e. - Autoblog has had the same galleries for weeks now and no-go on those buttons.)

'course, I can just click on the thumbnails, but just wanted to letcha know.
Reply

Posted: Feb 13th 2008 4:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Would be even better without all the JS errors...
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW