Readers pick best webcomic: we are only trying to help

Red herring, red herring, blah blah blah,straw man, false dichotomy, blah blah blah.

Anything else?

Consoles are appealing over PC's because of their simplicity, plug and play. Waiting for a REQUIRED 20-min install is a big change in that.

Xbox1 had a built in HDD, yet how many of those games required an install? None to my knowledge.

If it was an option to speed up load times, great! If you have to wait 20+ minutes to play the game for the first time, not so great.

I have neither a 360 nor a PS3 and I don't really care about either. But your post was one of the worst bullshit arguments I have seen here in some time and you were due for being called out over it. You don't address the issue, you just make excuses, bluster, and make unrelated criticisms.

You defend the PS3 for the installation time, and then you rip Capcom for making the installation time.

That's the difference between being a Playstation fanboy and a Capcom fanboy.

And in Capcom's defense, I'm sure Naughty Dog was granted much more in-depth access to the PS3 hardware and better tech support from Sony than Capcom was. That said, Uncharted's use of the tech does still beat the shit out of DMC4's.

Well let me keep it simple - nobody needs to make "excuses" for this other than Capcom.
Its simply another salvo in the "PS3 sucks" campaign, linked to the "PS3 blu-ray is too slow" crap. Simply put, if Uncharted can have zero load times with no install, then its Capcom's fault, and Capcom's only - for having a mandatory load in the first place, and for the fact that even after that you have significant load times.

Fact is - the PS3 will always be superior to the 360 in terms of load times because of the hard disc in all machines. And all this is just typical MS BS to obscure this fact. Do you find anyone talking points of Mass Effect or Lost Odyssey for their long, tiresome load sequences?

And regarding your comment "If you have to wait 20+ minutes to play the game for the first time, not so great."
My point is - if you cant stand waiting 20 minutes (largely compensated by faster loading anyway) - why would you buy the 360, where you might face 2 weeks with no gaming when it goes RROD, where the online goes kaput for the entire xms holidays? Or where you have to wait 10-20 seconds everytime a new area loads?

You know colinbell, not all of us have had RROD issues, and since they have identified the issue that caused them the newer 360s on the shelves in stores probably don't have these problems. I don't think arguing about load times vs RROD are on the same level.

And before you label me a fan boy, I own all the systems and I agree that the PS3 is a superior piece of hardware, I just think it has some poor implementation in regards to a lot of its features.

Please do us all a favor and see if you can't learn something from here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyphen.

Once that's taken care of, maybe then we can try and work on those fanboy issues.

Both versions have achievement and from what I read on ign.com, the ps3 has better visual. Then again,your tv might be different.

thats where you misunderstood. "letting go of either one is fine with me even though i pretty much prefer the 360 version for its clearer visual currently on my tv's setting, and achievement of course."
see, when i said that, i meant that my tv's setting which is consist of contrast, brightness, tint and etc are currently setted to look good on 360 visual.

ding ding ding!

Kinda. I like both, and yet I like neither.

That was pretty funny, but PA made me laugh more.