| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (55)

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 5:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Just FYI: Paper mills, like, manage tree farms to sell paper 'n' stuff. Nobody's burning down national parks to print People magazine every week.
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 5:56PM Burritoclock said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
LOGIC HAS NO PLACE IN ENVIRONMENTAL DISCUSSIONS!
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 6:35PM AirIntake said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Not true at all in Canada. Logging companies are allowed to cut down trees on Crown (public) land for virtually free (minimal stumpage fees). I work out in the bush often, and every year, there's less and less bush to work in, and more and more empty fields.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2008 3:21AM Namarrgon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Same is true here in Australia - there are "managed" forests, but the great majority of logging is done in public forests still (and much of it is shipped to Japan as woodchips).
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 5:52PM arttemis said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"...and stressed that there's still a model on the market that offers the features (for $100 extra, of course)."

Discontinued?
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 6:04PM glitched said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
discontinued after the interview?
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 6:21PM arttemis said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Retailers have been fazing out the SKU for almost a month and a half.
http://kotaku.com/348819/best-buy-says-playstation-3-80gb-is-on-its-way-out-%5Bupdate%5D
Obviously this doesn't happen without notice from Sony beforehand.
Seeing how this interview is in the "latest issue" (march 08) of EGM, I'd think it's NOT "discontinued after the interview" but before.
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 6:30PM glitched said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is a magazine, not a blog. The interview was not in march, it could have been a while ago... Thats why i had a question mark asking if anybody knew WHEN the interview actually was...

and your like was dated Jan 24.
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 6:35PM arttemis said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"and your like was dated Jan 24."
And the first words of the link state:

"We've received multiple tips from readers—ones who also happen to be Best Buy employees—who have informed us that the North American retailer hasn't received stock of the PlayStation 3 80GB model for ***many weeks*** and is expected to discontinue carrying the model soon."

You're right though - I don't know when the interview happened, though I doubt it's over a month old, but I quite possibly could be wrong.
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 6:01PM Nick the Hero of Canton said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So the ability to download PS2 games for the PS3 is being considered?

*waits for Sony fanboys to praise it yet still attack Microsoft's Xbox Originals*
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 6:05PM glitched said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I will praise it as an extension of what they have done for the downloadable PS1 originals...

What does it have to do with the downloadable xbox originals?
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 6:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Bahh...

Nintendo did that in the first place: N64 VC games... before Sony PS1 =)
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 6:28PM SheppyReturns said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Fernando, is there ever a point where that little voice inside your head goes "this is stupid, maybe I shouldn't post this?"

Just curious.
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 7:02PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
When were people attacking the Xbox Originals?
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 7:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Rather ironic that Fidli would make that point when it could easily apply to a lot of what he's posted.
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 7:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I knew this was going to happen. See, the purpose of no PS2 games in the 40GB was to promote software sales, which is where they make most of their money. If the PS3 games are sucking at the moment, the consumer goes and buys PS2 games. Where, you might ask? Right at gamestop, where they have a bunch of used games, in which gamestop makes a shitload of money and Sony doesn't see a dime. The loss of PS2 capability in the 40GB has little to do with cheaper production, but more with possible future sales of downloadable content.
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 11:18PM SheppyReturns said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Grimmus, thank you.... moving on.

dangermouse, you assume the worst when all evidence doesn't support it.

Xbox Originals runs off the emulator on 360. Games available were already compatible. No emulator was installed with the game. In fact, all the problems the 360 had running a hard copy still exists in the DLC copy.

PSX games on PSP and PS3 when bought from the Playstation Store, likewise, do not come with the emulator. That's built into the firmware or the software already. So all you're buying is a much better compressed version that would run the same way as a hard copy, glitches and all.

Now, considering Sony has yet to confirm the return of software emulation, neither can make assumptions on either side. But considering the way Virtual Console, Xbox Originals, and PSX emu all work on their respective consoles, why should we assume PS2 downloads from the Playstation Store will be the trend breaker? They HAVE to get the software emulation working before they can sell the games. Why would they keep that from us?
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 6:04PM Delgadoh said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I call shenanigans.
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 6:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Yup, there's absolutely no 'available' PS3 in Europe that has backwards compatibility right now. The very first European PS3 models had the 'half-hearted software backwards compatibility', but they've been discontinued.

The only version available here now, is the 'no PS2 support at all' one. Not to mention that it's still the equivalent of about $750 USD.

Quite honestly, the lack of backwards compatibility, price, and lack of dual shock controllers are the only things holding me back from buying a PS3. When they finally sort those three things out, I'll be getting one. Unfortunately, that doesn't seem like any time soon, if ever...

Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 8:44PM R V said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
$750 usd?
What is that now, 75 euros?
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 6:16PM RobAccomando said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I could see this coming from a mile away. An Extra $100 though?
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 10:26PM SoCoolCurt said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i think they were referring to the 80GB man.

"and stressed that there's still a model on the market that offers the features (for $100 extra, of course)"

u gotta read the whole sentence, not just the $100 part lol.
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 6:16PM FredFredrickson said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So they slashed backward compatibility in order to cut cost, and then they announce that they are releasing games that require backward compatibility to be played... welcome back, Sony. Back from your Xmas holiday a little bit late!
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 6:23PM SheppyReturns said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow, so I guess you missed that whole part about software solutions to BC issues, huh? It's okay. We'll just chalk it up to yet another half-hearted attempt at understanding your lastest bitch against Sony.
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 6:35PM FredFredrickson said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ah, of course, the inevitable apologist reply from Fidlious. I don't see a problem with bitching about this when it's obviously worth bitching about.

But no, they didn't make a dumb move; they just have to backtrack and fix their brilliant cost-cutting maneuver with software, which will give it sporadic incompatibility errors, and which will leave their market for BC play segmented and confused.

But hey, Fidlious is getting his buttons pushed when people mention these things, so maybe they are best left unsaid. No more tears, okay Mr. Wong?
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 6:44PM copa said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Consumers have already figured out the backward-compatibility solution.

That's why PS2 continues to outsell PS3 every month.

Sony changes their BC strategies faster than sheppy changes his user id. If Sony is continuing to fret over BC, they have their head up their ass.

They need to concentrate on getting out Home and XMB, and on helping their partners get out LBP and MGS4. And they have to knock at least three of those projects out of the park.
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 6:45PM SheppyReturns said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I hardly see where I am apologizing for Sony. Of course I also hardly see where your basis for bitching exists...

"So they slashed backward compatibility in order to cut cost,"

Bad move, yes... and you'd be hard pressed to find someone who defends it other than the people that argue BC isn't everything. I'm not one of those people...

"and then they announce that they are releasing games that require backward compatibility to be played..."

They announced dick. It was stated this is something they are LOOKING into. And in this statement, it was mentioned true software emulation would make a debut. Kinda like how it's done on PSP? Oh shit, that requires logic... it hurts.

Maybe one needs to reread this statement...

"What's more, according to PSN Operation Director Eric Lempel, downloadable PS2 title might be possible even on versions of the system that don't support disc-based backward compatibility at all. "There are possibilities through technology and software emulation to make that possible," Lempel said, intriguingly."
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 6:53PM SheppyReturns said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
"Sony changes their BC strategies faster than sheppy changes his user id."

Umm... really? You went there?!? Personal attacks that are unfounded?!?

A. Sheppy was banned long ago (early october) for slamming one of the bloggers. On occasion, I post as sheppy2.0 but most of the time, it's FidliousWong, named after the laugh inspiring chinese dub version of Darbie O'gille and the Little People. This means 2 usernames.

B. FidliousWong was publicly exposed as a sheppy account LONG LONG ago. Practically within a week of it's debut. Exposed by me once, but later exposed by Justin McElroy on the podcast as I got my B-B-B-Brush with Faaaaame. In fact, you'll never find me deny my existance as sheppy and the only reason why I made the change in my name is because I'm known as sheppy EVERYWHERE and decided to make a change.

C. All of this is essentially public knowledge and FidliousWong has been a constant user for the past 5 months... hardly constantly changing.
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 7:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
sheppy

You need some sense of humour... what happened to that little place in your heart? Now it looks like a lemon... bitter.

Happy Valentine sheppy...
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 7:08PM FredFredrickson said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I I had known it would hurt your feelings this badly, I might not have even posted, Fidlious. You can stop embarrassing yourself with all these lame-brain excuses though, you're not going to convince me I am wrong.

Any company that would cut part of it's hardware out only to re-introduce a software solution months later is obviously unsure of where it wants to go. You don't need to be a fan of any system to see that.
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 7:21PM finnith said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I thought lemons were sour?
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 11:25PM SheppyReturns said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
God, I feel like Jennifer Connely staring down an overly feathered David Bowie when I say this but... you have no power over me.

This is the internet, detached from reality. You may believe I invest real emotions to it, but I don't. I just saw misinformation and offered up a correction. Marty, I know this is hard for you but man, if you'd just quit taking the darkest assumptions on anything related to Sony and READ the article before commenting, I wouldn't have made mention. I mean, hell. I saw 5 Xbox 360s go up in flames (well, okay... 2 technically RRODs, one burned out the AC and two had bad drives... thank you Meijer extended Warranty) and yet I don't spend all my time bitching about 360.

hell, truth be told, I wish the Jaspers would hurry the hell up because I really want to finish my copy of Bioshock and PLAY these sealed copies of Halo 3, mass Effect, and Blue Dragon I have sitting here. Not to mention Lost Odyssey...

But despite that, I don't rant on and on about the system. Otherwise I wouldn't have kept all my games and controllers and I would have cancelled all my preorders of upcoming 360 games.
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 6:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Maybe they'll do something a la "XBOX Originals"
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 6:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Maybe they'll do something a la "XBOX Originals"
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 7:18PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
One more time.
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 6:18PM Amish said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They're salivating over the money nintendo has raked in with virtual console games. Why provide backcap when you can just sell them the game again in a format they'll never be able to transfer?

ca-ching.
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 6:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Is it just me, or doe sthat sound like they removed BWC so that they could resell ps2 games as downloadables?

And this is a good thing?
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 6:25PM arttemis said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Only on April 1st. But this is a different holiday. =(
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 7:07PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Anyone who truly cared about BC should have bought a BC version long ago. This whole scenario didn't exactly happen overnight. The simple truth is, most people really don't care that much... it's basically just internet fanboy fodder.
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 9:52PM arttemis said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I care immensely about backwards compatibility. I haven't purchased a PS3 yet, but I'd like to get one that does have that feature.
I don't see that as fanboy fodder.
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 11:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually, the 60 GB models aren't completely extinct in the wild yet...but just about though. We bought a 60 gig a little over two weeks ago at Kmart, just in time to still qualify for the 5 free Blu-ray movies offer.

So if you'd rather not pay bullshit eBay shipping fees, Arttemis, call up your local Kmart. They never sell any video game merchandise, lol. Some dude on CAG said he was still buying NES games there during the N64/PSX era!
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2008 2:02AM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Arttemis

Well, I didn't say "everyone". Seriously though, even if you do buy a BC model, I doubt you will end up using it much. You'll have the fanboys that claim they do, and a handful of people that actually do... but what really happens is some people think it's a "must have" feature, but as soon as they get a new system all they want to play is the new games. I've used the BC on all my consoles sparingly at best... and I'm a pretty hardcore gamer. The average joe is less likely to care.
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 6:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
.........
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 7:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"and stressed that there's still a model on the market that offers the features"

No, there isn't. The bloody fools.
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 7:17PM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Briiiing back, briiiing back
Oh bring back my BC to me, to me!
Briiiing back, briiiing back
Oh bring back my BC to me!
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2008 7:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report

Personally, I could care less about BC. That's just me though. I bought the 40GB (I will probably upgrade that to 500GB IF possible), I have not one regret so far. I still have my last gen consoles if I need to play the last gen games. I barely have time to play the current gen games let alone last gen.

If anything, just make an optional download to have BC. That should cover everything.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2008 12:00AM GoonieGooGoo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I could really care less about a larger HD....Backwards Compatibility is more important....not to mention a way to make old PS2 controllers compatibile.

True early adopters got rewarded for a change...

But the fact that SONY is throwing BC out the window for no other reason than to cut costs so they can defend the Blu-Ray adoption......well.....

Give BC back to all PS3 owners!!!
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2008 1:16AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i owned a ps1, bought a collection of games i loved. ps2 came out and i thought nothing of trading up as it had bc. bc just encouraged me to trade up. no bc on ps3 just makes me stop with sony at the ps2.

the wii vc makes sense to me because i own a nes, snes, tg16 and genesis. its a huge mess of wires to have all those and a wii hooked up, along with my ps2. plus no cart swapping. its a huge space saver between wires, systems and controllers.

now if sony were to have a vc with ps1, 2 and other old consoles, then maybe, but nintendo already grabbed up all the good consoles. another dealbreaker would be if they got the guncon 1/2 games to work on plasma screens. (and yes i understand its a hardware limitation with the guns). i love time crisis games, but have to lug my ps2 across the house to play.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2008 2:12AM WiredKnight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Right, so I can buy games that I already own?
Perhaps they'll have some way of unlocking games you've already bought?
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2008 6:23AM benedictm said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i hate to sound like a fanboy but....

Although it is slightly irritating to be paying Nintendo for games you have bought before te last gen, the Cube, does work just by sticking the discs in.

Yes, I know that the Wii is 2 cubes duct taped together and therefore easier to implement but it is useful I find. I do play old Cube games and when there's nothing worth buying on the Wii shelves then I'll often go an EBay a cube game I missed - jut picked up F-Zero GX and love it.

I'll get a PS3 at some point but I would love to have BC on t properly as I own quite a few PS2 games and there's a laod more I'd like to buy on EBay - saw Tekken 4 for £2.10 the other day. But i see that doesn't make Sony any money.

Look come on, all of you, Sony, Nintendo, Microsoft - just sit down ad make ONE machine. Sony, you deal with the building the thing so it's reliable, Microsoft you look after all the online bits n pieces and the marketing. Nintendo, you oversee the games (obviously taking some notes on how to make hardcore games as well for the other 2)

All hail the WiiStation 360! No exclusives you miss out on, no downloadables you miss out on, no old titles you can't download due to licensing arguments, no developers baking the wrong horse. Everybody wins.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Shank 2 review: Refined brutality

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45AM

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW