| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (18)

Posted: Feb 22nd 2008 4:41PM Nick the Hero of Canton said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sweet, for lack of a better word.
Reply

Posted: Feb 22nd 2008 4:41PM FredFredrickson said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Although I have my doubts, I just hope for two things for Fable 2. A longer game, and just a slightly more complex RPG system.

I beat the entire game in one weekend, and it was disappointing to me that the inventory / RPG aspects of the game were so shallow. That's not to say I didn't enjoy it, but man - it had so much unspent potential.
Reply

Posted: Feb 22nd 2008 4:43PM tcc3 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Maybe thats another way to earn money ingame: child support.


Maybe Henchmen could huntdown deadbeat digidads.
Reply

Posted: Feb 22nd 2008 4:45PM Crono141 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'd totally knock my wife up.

Too bad we only have 1 360, and it probably wouldn't do splitscreen.
Reply

Posted: Feb 22nd 2008 5:01PM Nimble Cat said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
You can do co-op on one Xbox, that's actually all they seemed to be showing at the conference.
Reply

Posted: Feb 22nd 2008 4:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I used to play UO and monsters rarely dropped a lot of gold. They would drop armor and stuff that was worth a good bit of money which you could then sell. So maybe in Fable 2 they'll just drop stuff you could take to a store and get cold hard cash.
Reply

Posted: Feb 22nd 2008 4:52PM Stupidiot said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sidequests and assassin missions are usually fun ways of making money, but can someone please explain the appeal of serious work to make cash in games? That's the kind of thing that keeps me from playing MMOs like WoW - It sometimes feels like you're just spending lots of time keeping a second job, and that just isn't much fun to me. This coming from someone who loved the original Fable to pieces...
Reply

Posted: Feb 22nd 2008 4:55PM Duke said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
This is bs - whenever I kill monsters they drop bags of gold, and sometimes snack cakes. How the hell can they now claim that it isn't realistic. My whole world's being turned upside down.
Reply

Posted: Feb 22nd 2008 6:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I honestly will miss the snack cakes and ice cream most of all...
Reply

Posted: Feb 22nd 2008 5:09PM glitched said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Well if MS really wants to push their Live Anywhere and Games for Windows initiatives, and wants to deliver on their promise from a year ago that there would be some measure of cross-platform multiplayer between the 360 and PC, you'd think they'd make cross platfor coop a priority.

Fable 2 would be a great "showcase" title for GfW so if they have any sense, they'd enable cross-platform play for it.


Reply

Posted: Feb 22nd 2008 6:25PM Stupidiot said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wouldn't it be kind of difficult to implement cross-platform gameplay for a game that's only being developed on one platform (to our knowledge)?
Reply

Posted: Feb 22nd 2008 6:45PM glitched said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
riiiight.... You think It wont be coming to PC? The precedence is set man.
Reply

Posted: Feb 22nd 2008 8:34PM Stupidiot said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't have any doubts that it will come to the PC eventually but, so far as I know, there haven't been any official announcements or anything, which makes cross-platform play seem unlikely at this stage. The only other game I know that supports cross-platform play is Shadowrun, and that was developed as a multi-platform game from the start.
Reply

Posted: Feb 22nd 2008 5:15PM Mike Knew said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This sounds like a stupid idea to me. I don't want to be doing jobs in a game for hours to continue with the game, I'd rather go make some money in real life.
Reply

Posted: Feb 22nd 2008 5:26PM DarkTetsuya said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I thought 'realism' went out the window the moment it became a *fantasy* game...

Just saying.
Reply

Posted: Feb 22nd 2008 6:28PM Stupidiot said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Precisely. When since does a game have to be realistic to be immersive? I personally find games to be a lot more engaging when they try to be fun, rather than fail to be real. (and face it, with current technology and input methods, games can't even come close to being 'real')
Reply

Posted: Feb 22nd 2008 6:07PM 343 Guilty Fart said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This game was originally titled 'Animal Crossing 2: The Fable'
Reply

Posted: Feb 22nd 2008 7:20PM Odog4ever said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ok, aside from having to do "side jobs" to earn money I didn't read anywhere that you won't be getting money from quest too, right?

Who is to say that doing one large quest won't net you as much money as working your "job" for a few virtual days. Also you may actually get a large some of money from your job meaning: Maybe the goods in fable are cheap enough where you won't be broke ass hell.

Honestly until the game gets closer to coming out, we shouldn't freak out and assume we are going to be spending all our time grinding away on mini games.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW