| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (80)

Posted: Feb 25th 2008 5:02PM wirikidor said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'll still called it SL. Instead of "Second Life" it's "Sony Life".

Oh and I can't wait to try it.

Posted: Feb 25th 2008 5:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Hey I have an idea, its not bad enough that people waste their lives in front of video games (dnt get me wrong im kinda one of those ppl), but lets make a virtual world so u can make ur own apartment, so that you never have to get one yourself, or even interact with the real world for that matter, make my life and the lives of other even more meaningless.. on a another note..Sexual predators?? Pick me Pick me!

Posted: Feb 25th 2008 5:37PM BIGGEN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i was kinda under the impression that Home was further along than this:

"At GDC, they spoke to interested developers about creating content for the online service"

Posted: Feb 25th 2008 5:39PM AlexFirth91 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"allows users to take virtual photos of their virtual friends doing virtual things. You can place these virtual pictures onto virtual picture frames in your virtual apartment, as well".

LOL thats so funny

Posted: Feb 25th 2008 6:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Is that an upskirt picture?

Posted: Feb 25th 2008 6:00PM GoonieGooGoo said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Yawn....HOME Bores me.
No one cares about it.

FOCUS ON GAMES SONY.....GAMES!!!

Posted: Feb 25th 2008 6:07PM finnith said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Home looks pretty cool but it seems that people have the impression that everything is going to be free.

Posted: Feb 25th 2008 6:10PM the awesome said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Can you still dance in it?

Posted: Feb 25th 2008 6:15PM Duke said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Yeah you can dance and do other gestures. Its really cool to log in and have 5 people in the middle of the space dancing while you wander around looking for something to do....oh wait, no, its not fun.
Reply

Posted: Feb 25th 2008 6:21PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reminds me of PSO for the GC users who had a keyboard

That's right, all nine of us...
Reply

Posted: Feb 25th 2008 6:21PM Samoon said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
stfu u stupid fanboys.. this service willl rock ur socks off.. and mine... ur just talkin trash because its not on the 360.. if it was.. u'd be the ones cheering it on..

so STFU!

Posted: Feb 25th 2008 6:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
And how old r u 10? Rock your socks off? LOL Wow kid, that is funny. Ive had a very long day and in the mood for some more good laughs. What else you got for us?
Reply

Posted: Feb 26th 2008 6:51AM Maverick Saturn 06 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Laughable :)
Reply

Posted: Feb 25th 2008 6:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Who is excited about this? Really. Besides those who already live out another life in games like Second Life. Sorry but its nice that Sony is trying to do something new and different but does this really have a place in the game world. On a console?
I take it the few that will get into it are younger kids. Or adults who into escaping the reality of their own lives into some fake, lame replacement.

Posted: Feb 25th 2008 6:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Says "Bucfann" with the mario avatar.
Reply

Posted: Feb 25th 2008 6:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yea and? This is the default. I never got around to choosing one because it really doesnt matter. Now if it were a unicorn or something gay as default then id go out of my way to switch it.
Reply

Posted: Feb 26th 2008 6:51AM Maverick Saturn 06 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And yet, thousands of gamers a year play gaming, how is playing on this and talking to people any different to spending countless hours blasting heads in Gears or Resistance or racing in Motostorm or killing evil connons in Mario?
Reply

Posted: Feb 25th 2008 6:39PM ummfada said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report

Posted: Feb 25th 2008 7:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't want to sound rude but that was boring.

Again its a shame they are using Home for something like a virtual chat when it could be used for something like the Sims.Hell they should be using this for a Sims kind of game or at least the urbz.

Reply

Posted: Feb 25th 2008 7:17PM ummfada said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
opinions are subjective (duh)
Reply

Posted: Feb 25th 2008 6:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Home looks great but with those graphics and stuff its a shame Sony studios aren't developing a game like the sims using this, it would've better IMO.

There should be something between Home and Garry's mod. Somewhere where you can virtually hang out and do stuff like doing bicycle/skate tricks and fracture every bone in your body using physics engines and stuff, that would be great.

Posted: Feb 26th 2008 6:59AM Maverick Saturn 06 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sims 3 :)

Sims Online 2 lost out to second life and WOW :P
Reply

Posted: Feb 25th 2008 9:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'll admit that I am a 360 fanboy but I am excited about home for the trophy system just because its more "achievements" for me to get so whatever i just wish they would hurry it up.

Posted: Feb 25th 2008 11:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Think of Home as a MySpace or Facebook with avatars and you're going in the right direction. It will appeal to those people. The rest of your assumptions I cannot comment on but most of you are wrong.

Posted: Feb 26th 2008 6:58AM Maverick Saturn 06 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Personally, I think it'll be a bit of fun for everyone, it won't just appeal to community people, but generally everyone, I seriously doubt any PS3 owner that has the free option to access home from thier xmb will avoid the temptation of visiting it every now and again, even if they hate it. And I doubt anyone will find the fun in spending thier entire gaming time on it either.

Its more of a novelty, I'm pretty sure, more or less, every PS3 owner will use it at least rarely, just some will use it more so then others.
Reply

Posted: Feb 26th 2008 12:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Also includes floating people as seen in the screenshot with the girl looking towards to bowl building. See there in the tree!

Posted: Feb 26th 2008 2:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thats pretty funny, i didn't bash home, I have a ps3 btw and i was spot on about the browser crashing.

I know you don't have to pay for something you don't want, I simply stated there will be things that you will want but will have to pay for in order to get them, there thats not bashing now is it little fan boys.

I also stated lets see if it can run without crashing. It's well known that the browser and virtual keyboard take up more memory than they need to and the rest thats left is for home, my guess is something is going to get scaled back here to accommodate home - if not, i have a feeling if a simple browser can crash with insufficient memory errors then I'm going to go out on a limb and say something as ambitious as HOME can also - again not bashing, just making a simple statement.

Home will be a fad for a couple of months (unlike the wii) and thats all it probably will be. Things such as wondering around socializing with your friends, meeting up to play games? Are you serious? why do you need a 3d world for that when you can just pop in a disc, create a game, send out invites or wait for you friends to click your name and join and be done with it?

why stand around for 20 minutes waiting for your 'virtual' friends to show up when you can just 'jump in'

Posted: Feb 26th 2008 5:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
First of all you have no clue what your talking about when it comes to memory. Memory used through the browser thanks to flash, scripts, ajax, and so on use memory in raw fashion. Games do not. Memory used in games/actual software (like home) use mainly gpu memory.

Lets also not forget when in the brower, its that 128mb or whatever thats responsible for storing, graphic data (as websites obviously have no way to the ps3's gpu), computational data and then system data. So theres much more of a chance of it crashing the browser when the site has complicated scripts and such on it.

Also the ps3 browser is probably not as standard compliant as most browsers (for example i doubt it would have the .NET framework 3.0).

Also when running games/home, complex calculations are done by the 6 spu's (unless EA made the game lol) in addition to the gpu so memory is not nearly the same issue it is when browsing. So lets stop tryna make a connection between the two for they are not the same thing and there for dont apply to eachother.

Think about it, if the system memory was all the ps3 had for all its calculations, how on earth would you expect Killzone 2 or GT5 to run in your theory. It would be impossible there for you should already know your theory is bullshit/severly flawed.
Reply

Posted: Feb 28th 2008 2:48AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I say SUCCES! People like to play with customization and virtual doodads, they just do, it's already been proven with MMOs and Sims.

Posted: Mar 6th 2008 2:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
home is awesome and free and you 360 owners are just gonna have to get over it! by the way 360 owners, im doing this right now on my ps3!

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW