| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (39)

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 8:31AM Beatz said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Add to the nega-review:
It sucks playing as someone paler than I am.
Reply

Posted: Mar 5th 2008 6:38AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I thought he was a pasty fella too, only to realise it's body paint.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 8:34AM Dr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"The game is also brutally linear: you're constantly running from point A to point B, stopping to administer the occasional beatdown." It could also be described as "a very linear experience, that "may be a touch linear."

I think they're trying to tell us something! :D
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 8:46AM TRTX said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Even if you isolated the negative aspects...taking a look at it, that's almost the entire game.

It's too short, too linear, too easy, and too repetitive. Not to mention the controls sound clunky.

So why does this game get a 9.9999999?
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 8:50AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Because people are that desperate for the PSP to have a really good game.

From what I've played of the demo - it's horrendous. I'll be sticking with Patapon and PS1 games thx.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 8:53AM bm111 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Because! Well... it's pretty! And it has a loud-mouthed developer! And it's on a platform that doesn't have many great killer apps. Perfectly valid reasons if you ask me.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 9:23AM SheppyReturns said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I wonder if people will still be calling the developer loudmouth when they drop Okami on Wii. Or if idiots are still associating Jaffe with GOW despite leaving the series 2 games ago....
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 11:16AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It is exactly that Wong. I am amazed at the ignorance. People are so deperate to attack it that the frustration and anger of their Sony hatred causes them to forget simple facts. I was able to get my copy early and this morning I am blearied eyed having stayed up all night running it. Comments that would have us believe it is garnering high scores based on looks and lack of good PSP titles are infantile jealousy at best.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 12:14PM SheppyReturns said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
that response had nothing to do with what I said
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 8:51AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This game looks nice but I rarely have a chance to play handhelds these days. I'll wait for God of War III. It should be sick!
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 9:44AM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Me either. My PSP just sits on a shelf most of the time.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 9:49AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Haha, I actually sold mine. I dont miss it either. I only have a DS now and dont play it much. Definatly rather be playing 360 or PS3.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 10:51AM Jude said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
So, you guys don't take craps anymore? What's your secret?
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 11:22AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Whaaaa?? I do take craps, but thats where I get all my knitting in.

;)
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 11:31AM hotpuck6 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
toilets always a good time to call the parents and find out what they are up to this week.
besides, i'd be too afraid to drop my PSP in.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 8:58AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So what's the point of doing this again?
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 9:24AM Anticrawl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hrm, what's the point of you coming here and asking?
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 9:27AM darkinchworm said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
To show that even titles that garner high scores have their weaker traits, and that no product is perfect.

Don't take this too seriously, though.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 9:22AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Seriously, the game has always been this way and reviewers are not realizing it now.For example they criticize for being linear for having to go from point A to B and basically just beat em up until you meet an occasional boss. Thats what it has always been!

Not that im defending it, I just find alot of hypocracy. I personally did not find the game fun, infact I stopped after about 2 hours because it was just button mashing. But it takes a PSP sequel for them realize that what people liked about it was the animation, story, and cool looking combos. Personally thats the only things good IMO, overall opinion of the game is pretty low though.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 9:23AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow. You guys a tad cranky in the morning? Seriously, there are some PSP games that deserve bashing, but THIS? I've heard nothing but positive buzz, no idea where this hate came from.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 9:31AM darkinchworm said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You are dumb.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 9:32AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Joystiq is not bashing this game. They just gathered the negative points made by reviewers.

If you notice, by each point they make, there is a number. That number corresponds to the publication listed at the bottom of the article.

And, if you made it that far, at the bottom of the article, Kyle included:

"Welcome, greek mythology fans, to the latest installment in Joystiq's Nega-review series. As always, this Nega-review takes the small, negative points from many overwhelmingly positive reviews and compiles them together into a horribly scathing whole. While positive context may have been removed from some excerpts, everything inside the quote marks was indeed intended as a negative in the original review."
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 9:41AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
He may be talking about all the people posting and not necessarily joystiq authors ya know...?
I use these posts as a litmus test as to which joystiq posters lose my respect as having any opinion on gaming.


Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 9:47AM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Except for the fact Phranctoast that there really hasn't been much bashing on the game by posters here. I think Robo simply didn't get the theme of the article.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 9:59AM Anticrawl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hrm, well I was hoping I'd be the one to gut him but it appears I'm to late. It's pretty clear he didn't understand this whole "nega-review" concept.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 10:01AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
guess my mind reading talent has faded over the years.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 12:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Was talking about posters.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 10:41AM chuckrich81 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Seems like the main complaint is it's too much like the previous games which were both huge hits so that's not much of a criticism. I haven't played CoO but judging by the first two I'm sure all the negative points are true. Which just proves that a game can be linear and repetitive but still a lot of fun if the core gameplay is good.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 10:53AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Kinda like Brawl.. same old game overhyped...

still makes it a great game though... can't wait to play it this week is a good week for psp and wii
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 1:28PM Geist said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think the problem here is that nothing new is added. Like, at all. Same moves, moderately different spells, same characters, etc. Yeah, the game's fun, but I mean nothing changed.

Brawl, on the other hand, looks like it has a retarded amount of new content and a lot of new gameplay mechanics.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 1:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Like I said.. Brawl new moves and new characters equates to God of War new magics new weapons new worlds and environments are like new stages.. but it's still the same old Sh*t...

then again same old Sh*t isn't bad when said Sh*t is GREAT.. ya know
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 11:35AM hotpuck6 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i played the demo and loved this game, but then again i only played the original, so i guess it will feel less repetitive to me.
despite the negative points the bring up and hype, at the end of the day this is a hand held game better than pretty much any out there.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 12:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Can't wait for the Brawl Nega-Review.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 1:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Hopefully it'll have its fair share of "Roster should have included Character X".

I personally wanted to see Boo make an appearance.
Imagine playing as a fighter who could not be hit??? But you can only attack your opponents when they have their backs turned to you.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 1:04PM SoCoolCurt said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i love these Nega-Reviews. no game is perfect and this just prepares everyone for the nuances that will probably annoy them when they play it, but they wont admit it because they were so hyped for it.

i havent picked it up yet since im a poor college student and it was either Brawl or GoW:CC this month. i am excited that the things they said are negative where always problems with the series anyway. of course you like to see new stuff but i can feel comfort in knowing that i will be getting a similar experience to the one im used to getting on the PS2. i didnt expect it to be as deep as its PS2 counterparts so im not really surprised there and the fact that the PSP is dammed powerful doesnt mean its as good as the PS2 so im not surprised that they cut out some of the animations and stuff. also, isnt this game supposed to take place before the events of the first two? so why would he have all of the equipment like the Icarus Wings and such if he gets them later on in the series? maybe im mistaken there but if not then that just knocks off more of their arguement.

either way, im pretty excited for GoW:CoO and cant wait til i have some surplus cash to go pick up that and Patapon.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 1:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
lol Good one ... I never thaught that youl make one for CoO to :D
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 2:18PM DonDon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It'll probably be an amazing game for someone who hasn't played anything God of War (namely me), so all the comparisons to previous games shouldn't matter as much. And I'll be playing the games in chronological order, apparently.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 10:47PM Supermanisdead said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I thought the game needed a 95+ to get a Nega-Review?
Reply

Posted: Mar 5th 2008 1:44AM germdove said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Augh, bee jesus, why must you sting me!?
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW