Color us not at all surprised. With this week's release of Bully: Scholarship Editon, we're seeing a return of the controversy that swirled around the game upon its original PS2 release in 2006. Emily Noble, president of the Canadian Teachers' Federation, called for the game to be removed from shelves this week, saying "We're asking retailers to be responsible. Yes, they can sell it and make a buck out of this, but is this the kind of marketing that they want to be [doing], selling games that glorify violence?"
McGill University's Michael Hoechsmann provided a more rational take, calling attempts to ban the game "flailing at windmills" and saying "As tempting as it may seem, I'm not so certain that banning this will somehow result in a more peaceful and more loving school population."
Though we're sad to see this silly controversy rear its head again, we do want to give big ups to Hoechsmann and reporter Jill Mahoney for providing a dissenting opinion.
[Via GamePolitics]
Reader Comments (24)
Posted: Mar 4th 2008 9:57AM (Unverified) said
Once again a case of people making judgements on a game, without actually playing it. Apparently killing old women and stealing cars is acceptable to this woman, but schoolyard hijinks is not.
When is this stupid shit going to end?
Reply
When is this stupid shit going to end?
Posted: Mar 4th 2008 10:35AM (Unverified) said
Yeah, but lest you forget, "stinkbombs", as they are so misleadingly named, can clear out a classroom for hours and cost children time for learning and waste taxpayers' money!!!
Reply
Posted: Mar 4th 2008 10:00AM (Unverified) said
What a moron... Are retailers actually marketing this game? Isn't that Rockstar's job to do the marketing? And she's the president of a teacher's federation?
Reply
Posted: Mar 4th 2008 10:33AM (Unverified) said
The thing that cracks me up is that anyone who is worried about this game is so out of touch. I mean, we're talking about slingshots and some boarding school. Really, boarding schools should be more pissed about their depiction.
If the game featured students threatening each other on Myspace and Facebook, stealing their parents' prescriptions, and underage drinking, then maybe that would be a little bit more modern and they might have more of a point.
Reply
If the game featured students threatening each other on Myspace and Facebook, stealing their parents' prescriptions, and underage drinking, then maybe that would be a little bit more modern and they might have more of a point.
Posted: Mar 4th 2008 10:35AM (Unverified) said
Here we go again, as if people were running out of ways to make a complete ass out of themselves.
Reply
Posted: Mar 4th 2008 10:41AM (Unverified) said
...yeah, I think I'll ignore it this time around.
Reply
Posted: Mar 4th 2008 10:55AM JasonWStanley said
One sentance.
Play the game before you make judgement.
Reply
Play the game before you make judgement.
Posted: Mar 4th 2008 1:31PM ThornedVenom said
It bugs me when epic short statements are misspelled: it's a complete love-hate situation (it's "sentence").
Reply
Posted: Mar 4th 2008 10:55AM (Unverified) said
Now if only Jacko will voice in on this again we can have a total flashback.
Reply
Posted: Mar 4th 2008 12:22PM (Unverified) said
This is why I advocate the extermination of all non-gamers.
Reply
Posted: Mar 4th 2008 1:14PM SoCoolCurt said
i could bet anything that she has never even played or seen the game played. she just hears hearsay about it and wants the publicity. i mean its slingshots and stinkbombs for crying out loud, things that any normal kid has seen or been doing for years anyway. i mean if it was like a school shooting simulator or something ok pull it but this is harmless. save ur breathe for the real issues like your kids looking up napalm recipes on the internet to blow up his classmate that called him a toad face in gym class.
Reply
Posted: Mar 4th 2008 2:28PM ChooChooCharlie said
In other news: Emily Noble, president of the Canadian Teachers' Federation, proclaimed to the world that she was a stupid bitch that likes to get behind empty causes.
In a recent interview regarding her position on the matter, she stated "The game is called Bully, right? So it seems logical that it must be about torturing school children and causing general grief to adults. Have I played the game? No. But I always like to judge things before I look into them. It's just faster that way."
Reply
In a recent interview regarding her position on the matter, she stated "The game is called Bully, right? So it seems logical that it must be about torturing school children and causing general grief to adults. Have I played the game? No. But I always like to judge things before I look into them. It's just faster that way."
Posted: Mar 4th 2008 2:44PM Klitorisaurus said
One of the paramount pieces of advice that teachers gave to me as a child was not to judge a book by it's cover. I guess the rules have changed.
Reply
Posted: Mar 4th 2008 4:05PM (Unverified) said
yeah here in canada they keep bringing Bully up everywhere (radio, tv). but the guy from McGill Universty is right, banning will not change school violence what's more i dont even think it triggers it.
Reply
Posted: Mar 4th 2008 11:51PM Batzarro The worlds WOrst Detect said
"As tempting as it may seem, I'm not so certain that banning this will somehow result in a more peaceful and more loving school population."
Realists still exist?
Reply
Realists still exist?
Posted: Mar 9th 2008 9:21PM hvnlysoldr said
Realism is ironic. Nothing is real except on different levels. How in the world is that real?
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 220 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 153 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 108 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
- Battleship movie adapted into FPS by Double Helix 93 comments









