| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (24)

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 9:57AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Once again a case of people making judgements on a game, without actually playing it. Apparently killing old women and stealing cars is acceptable to this woman, but schoolyard hijinks is not.

When is this stupid shit going to end?
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 10:35AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, but lest you forget, "stinkbombs", as they are so misleadingly named, can clear out a classroom for hours and cost children time for learning and waste taxpayers' money!!!
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 11:39AM Roto13 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I doubt GTA is acceptable to these people either, but yeah, they're completely ignorant.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 10:00AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What a moron... Are retailers actually marketing this game? Isn't that Rockstar's job to do the marketing? And she's the president of a teacher's federation?
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 10:10AM Nigeria said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You can't spell contro without versy.

Also, whenever I see the word "flail" I automatically think of the Wii.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 3:17PM BigD145 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think of D&D.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 10:33AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The thing that cracks me up is that anyone who is worried about this game is so out of touch. I mean, we're talking about slingshots and some boarding school. Really, boarding schools should be more pissed about their depiction.

If the game featured students threatening each other on Myspace and Facebook, stealing their parents' prescriptions, and underage drinking, then maybe that would be a little bit more modern and they might have more of a point.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 10:35AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Here we go again, as if people were running out of ways to make a complete ass out of themselves.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 10:38AM thain1982 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I think the term Hoechsmann was looking for is "Tilting at windmills." Way to ruin a Don Quixote reference, dude.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 10:41AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
...yeah, I think I'll ignore it this time around.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 10:55AM JasonWStanley said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
One sentance.

Play the game before you make judgement.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 1:31PM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It bugs me when epic short statements are misspelled: it's a complete love-hate situation (it's "sentence").
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 10:55AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Now if only Jacko will voice in on this again we can have a total flashback.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 11:04AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
JT is being disbarred (fingers crossed)
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 12:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Urge to kill rising...
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 12:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is why I advocate the extermination of all non-gamers.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 1:14PM SoCoolCurt said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i could bet anything that she has never even played or seen the game played. she just hears hearsay about it and wants the publicity. i mean its slingshots and stinkbombs for crying out loud, things that any normal kid has seen or been doing for years anyway. i mean if it was like a school shooting simulator or something ok pull it but this is harmless. save ur breathe for the real issues like your kids looking up napalm recipes on the internet to blow up his classmate that called him a toad face in gym class.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 2:28PM ChooChooCharlie said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
In other news: Emily Noble, president of the Canadian Teachers' Federation, proclaimed to the world that she was a stupid bitch that likes to get behind empty causes.

In a recent interview regarding her position on the matter, she stated "The game is called Bully, right? So it seems logical that it must be about torturing school children and causing general grief to adults. Have I played the game? No. But I always like to judge things before I look into them. It's just faster that way."
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 2:44PM Klitorisaurus said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
One of the paramount pieces of advice that teachers gave to me as a child was not to judge a book by it's cover. I guess the rules have changed.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 3:17PM BigD145 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Glorifying violence? Bully is all about what actually happens in schools. It shows what humans can and will do to each other, even at the youngest ages. Almost everything shown in Bully, I've seen in life.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 3:19PM Tez said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Return of Bully means more disappointed gamers"

Fixed.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 4:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
yeah here in canada they keep bringing Bully up everywhere (radio, tv). but the guy from McGill Universty is right, banning will not change school violence what's more i dont even think it triggers it.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2008 11:51PM Batzarro The worlds WOrst Detect said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"As tempting as it may seem, I'm not so certain that banning this will somehow result in a more peaceful and more loving school population."

Realists still exist?
Reply

Posted: Mar 9th 2008 9:21PM hvnlysoldr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Realism is ironic. Nothing is real except on different levels. How in the world is that real?
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW