| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (72)

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 8:56AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
starcraft 1.5
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 9:11AM ThornedVenom said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Would you have it any other way?
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 9:34AM SugarDaddy said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Starcraft 1.5 was Brood War. This is definitely worthy of Starcraft 2 -- true to the original and lots of new units and strategies to play around with.
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 10:35AM GenBanks said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well what did you expect from it for it to be classified as a 'real' Starcraft II?
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 11:05AM h0lic said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
looks sweet enough to be SCII, that's for sure.
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 8:56AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I can't wait for Starcraft 2! Did they release minimum specs yet?
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 9:05AM tcc3 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
If I know Blizzard they'll be generous. They've always been good about scaling their games to take advantage of, but not need a Goddammned Super Computer.
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 10:38AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They said the specs are fairly forgiving, and should run on many different machines. No specifics have been given yet, however.
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 11:28AM einhanderkiller said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
At least Pixel Shader 2.0 is required, which your graphics card should support if it was purchased within the last 5 years.
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 11:56AM Demon G Sides said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm buying an entirely new computer for this game only.

And I'll play it until I die.
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 9:05AM Spunky Monkey 190906 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Looks amazing as expected :)
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 9:10AM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
KEKEKEKEKE!!! (= FUCK YES)



I am DEFINITELY going to get Starcraft II because you're looking at a guy who had been DEPRIVED from real RTS action for YEARS (literally), and only casually played at friends' homes.

And I had never played Starcraft before.



PS: I'm not in the Brawl mania like everyone else because I don't have a Wii. Fernando, you owe me one!
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 9:16AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
FOR THE SWARM!
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 9:36AM SugarDaddy said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Now I'll be the first to admit that Blizzard is the king of the RTS, but c'mon... To suggest that there have been no good RTSs since the original Starcraft is just insulting. Warcraft 3, C&C (both generals and Tiberium Wars), and of course Company of Heroes. CoH is one of the best RTSs ever.
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 10:13AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I tried playing Starcraft 1 a few years ago and I would always lose my entire base to a big swarm of enemies 5 minutes into a skirmish against easy PC opponent.

I'm waiting for SC2 so I can start fresh again. :P
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 11:36AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Supreme Commander?
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 12:05PM AwesomeTown said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I used to be big into both real and turn based strategy games, I used to play Red Alert and CivII more than I play any game now. (Then again who didn't?) After Starcraft, I played a bit of RedAlert2 but then took a long break from the RTS. Recently tried to get into Supreme Commander, but I just couldn't do it. I just found it too boring.

Anyway, yea, I'll definately be getting Starcraft II though.
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 12:05PM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@SugarDaddy



Sorry if you misunderstood my stance: it's my fault for not detailing it properly.

I didn't get to have a gaming PC while growing up, and I didn't really have pocket money (I always had to ask my parents to buy me something when I needed it, as a safeguard) so that kind of meant that games/RTS was out of the question (grew up beta-testing MMOs). I only got to play some when I was at friends', and even then, most of them weren't into RTS.


So yeah, this is my chance to get my uber-micro started. Didn't mean to insult all of the other RTSes.
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 12:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
...And i'm not in the Brawl-mania because Nintendo repetitiously shafts Europe. Blizzard are better with release dates (something no man should ever be able to say).
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 2:37PM Pojomofo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Company of Heros opposing forces say hello!!

Really though, this and Spore are really the only 2 PC games I am looking forward to.
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 9:35AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Just looks like two Starcrafts duct-taped together if you ask me
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 9:41AM SugarDaddy said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
The fanboy in me is kicking in...

That's not a fair comment at all. Saying that means you have no idea who Blizzard is. When has Blizzard ever released a "duct taped" product as you say (though I can't comment on WoW cuz I think it's lame and I don't play)?

This game will be phenomenal as all Blizzard games are -- polished to the max with near perfect balancing. I've been waiting for this game for quite some time.

Now please release Starcraft Ghost.
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 11:40AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Saying *that* means you have no sense of humor, Mr. Sugar Daddy...
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 11:59AM Demon G Sides said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I Lol'd =)
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 1:14PM SugarDaddy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh yeah? That comment was supposed to be funny?
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 1:26PM Some Guy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
was a reference to the "two gamecubes taped together = wii" thing.
personally im meh about this game, but thats probably because i never played the first that much and am not that into RTS, but have probably never really given them a fair chance.
hopefully sc2 will be awesome enough for me to learn it.
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 2:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Haha, yes Sugar Daddy, it was definitely meant to be sarcastic (I own a Wii). I know full well that Blizzard wont do anything half-assed, but I am underwhelmed by the look of the game. I understand the reasons they've chosen this route, but I was hoping for more of a substantial evolution than a throwback/update.

It'll be good, but it wont have the magic I remember from when the first one came out, or when Diablo came out. Even Diablo 2 was a significant move beyond its predecessor. With this I just don't see it yet.
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 9:45AM SugarDaddy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ah, this is very welcome. I can't wait for the full hi-res vids from Blizzard with commentary. I thought they would wait to unveil the Zerg at E3, but I guess that means something better. Hell yes. The Zerg actually look good this time around. I was always pretty disappointed with the Zerg in the first game. They were fun, but you just couldn't stand up to the array of proton cannons that every Protoss player setup.
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 10:10AM Crono141 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I just hope they do something about all the rampant cheating on Battlenet. The multiplayer game is ruined because everybody has a glitch/crack they exploit.

WTF is the point of playing online if you cheat? Do you cheaters seriously suck so badly you can't win normally?

I had a buddy once who played against 2 cheaters in War2, and almost beat them both, and they still tried to trash talk him. If you're cheating, and you still get your ass kicked, you don't have ANYTHING to say.
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 10:18AM SugarDaddy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well Blizzard is aware of the cheating and they do their best to combat it. I'm not a big fan of playing against random people anyway. If I'm going to invest 30 mins to an hour on a single game, I'd like to chat with my friend about it after the fact.

But, ya, cheaters are super lame. How do you feel good about yourself after beating someone when you cheated to do it? It's like a virtual sociopath.
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 12:00PM Demon G Sides said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I only Hax UMS games where Multi command is needed

Otherwise, I fully agree.
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 10:28AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
can you say endless replay value?
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 3:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Seriously. I'm still playing the original Starcraft.
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 10:37AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The Zerg are looking terrifying, and their new abilities send shivers up my spine. Infesting any building, corrupting units, lurking underground to sprout out on unsuspecting victims. They're monsters!

As of lately the devs have gone on record saying the Zerg are quite powerful right now, and balancing them has proven to be a challenge. I can see what they're getting at.

While it's welcoming to finally see the last race in action, this sort of subdued any hopes I had of seeing this game in 2008. Despite Vivendi's CEO claiming it could be out as early as August, I now suspect this'll reach into 2009, possibly Spring.
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 10:40AM GenBanks said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is really nice, it's almost as though we're going through a PC Gaming revival of the classics... Starcraft II, Red Alert 3 and Sims 3. Bring back the glory days of PC domination.

Now if only they would release all these games on Steam, we'd get rid of the piracy and the PC would be back at centre stage...
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 11:07AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, you can pirate Steam games as well. But quite frankly it's the multiplayer only games you either can't pirate, or won't because it involves STEALING other people's account keys, which only sociopaths would be interested in.

I'm certain people will pirate Starcraft 2, but why do that when you can purchase it and get the full dose of community content?

Also is Blizzard going to change the Battlenet screens? I'd much prefer something that would support forums as well as chatrooms. Also all around better custom game lists and easier methods to join friends who join custom matches and the like.
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 12:25PM GenBanks said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But steam has massively reduced 'day 0' pirating of its games... meaning games that come out on torrent sites etc. before they even made it to shelves. Day 0 piracy can really kill game sales. Although I'm sure starcraft 2 will sell very well regardless of piracy :)
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 10:51AM XGM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I got hooked on the Command And Conquer series so i wasn't a big fan of Starcraft, but i still casually played it. I must say that it looks very good now, and i think Blizzard will polish it some more. Between this and Red Alert 3 I think ill move to Starcraft this time seeing as EA is making RA3...
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 11:03AM motang said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
About time, I have been waiting for it.
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 11:51AM Hydralisk456 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Finally, thanks Blizzard! Zerg look great!
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 12:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This trailer was pretty decent but I'm really eagerly waiting for Blizzard to announce StarCraft II for 360.
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 12:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dude, that's not gonna happen. It's been stated time and time again that SC2 will only be on the consoles. Sorry...but you're SOL.
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 12:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh there will be a 360 version and until then I wont buy a copy.
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 12:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Can't... stop... laughing.
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 7:18PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Can't... stop... laughing.
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 12:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
*Reads comment*
*Giggles*

If this happened the PC gamers would endlessly ridicule the ones who played the console version, safe in the knowledge that they'll be able to do things twice as fast. The fact that Blizzard are good with PC specs basically means, well, if you want to play it get a semi-decent computer. Wanting to play it on a console is self-subjugation of the highest degree.

This isn't even including the fact that two different communities for the same game would illustrate the disparities of the Live platform in that context; there wouldn't be the same flood of custom maps, the fragmentation of the community could lead both to suffer in numbers and Blizzard's battle.net is free. Sorry, but i can't comprehend why anyone, calling themselves a fan of the RTS genre, wouldn't play this game on a PC.
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 1:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
A Pissed-off English Gamer I've preferred the console version over PC version of every cross-platform game I've tried, the controls and controllers are vastly superior, literal plug and play (BS3 not included), just more fun all round. This is coming to 360, mark my words, MS and Blizzard are in this to make money and so they will go this path.
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 1:09PM GenBanks said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"This is coming to 360, mark my words, MS and Blizzard are in this to make money and so they will go this path."

Uhm, well I don't think the US is necessarily the core market here, I think it's probably South Korea (judging by where they keep doing their press events). I don't think they want to play it on xbox 360, and I don't think they want to dilute the PC playerbase by releasing on console. Anyway, to address that quote, if money is the reason why a console release is inevitable, why have Blizzard not released WoW on 360 yet? oO Surely the PC platform can't generate high sales...
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 1:11PM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've heard keyboard/mouse vs. controller comparisons for FPSes, but once you enter the RTS domain, the debate between console vs. PC becomes completely ridiculous.
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2008 1:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
for this specific game and genre, you're comment sounds like this,

"GTA IV? I'll wait for the cell phone version instead."
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW