| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (25)

Posted: Mar 11th 2008 7:33PM Neebs said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They are all probably just prospective marks for sequels/expansions/ports.
Reply

Posted: Mar 11th 2008 7:39PM LaughingTarget said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Better be an expansion or sequel, cliffhanger endings are the most horrible, despicable, disgusting thing to ever consider doing. Finish the damned story.
Reply

Posted: Mar 11th 2008 8:19PM iHavePants said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Plus the last few levels of Crysis were terrible anyway.
But they found a way to make the end worse.
Reply

Posted: Mar 11th 2008 8:10PM einhanderkiller said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
'Crysis Wars' and 'World in Crysis'?
Sounds like two RTS games I know.

I recently played Crysis on Very High detail on my cousin's computer. Needless to say, the graphics were jawdroppingly gorgeous. And the performance wasn't as bad as everybody said. With his 8800GT, Crysis
ran at framerates comparable to most console games.
Reply

Posted: Mar 11th 2008 8:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Joystiq, you suck. Honestly.

The making fun of Crysis' system requirements got old when the game came out and realized that at medium, it ran and looked better than any other PC game on the market.

Reply

Posted: Mar 11th 2008 8:20PM iHavePants said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Plus the game runs just fine with an 8800.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 1:49AM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Ihavepants

heh... well, that depends on what resolution and what detail. I had it one very high with an 8800 GT and it played pretty good most of the way at 16x10, but it became a near slideshow in the final battle.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 3:55AM iHavePants said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeh my 8600 ran fine all the way through with most settings on high.

Bits that killed it though were the snow and the first alien machine on the ship.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 2:56AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I really love shooting trees and then shooting the some more and making teny tiny pieces just because I can..............Oh and I love throwing turtles(Not the ninja variety).
Reply

Posted: Mar 11th 2008 9:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
omg i love the candy
Reply

Posted: Mar 11th 2008 11:46PM BumblePrime said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hells yeah! Used to love em when I was a kid.
Reply

Posted: Mar 11th 2008 9:54PM thewalrusking said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why the hell do all these console fan boy websites still hang on the Crysis requirements, my 3 year old pc played it on low, but 3 years old! My new rig that cost a total of a huge and oh my god $600 NO NOT 6000, can play it on medium and some settings on high. i just laugh when consoles fans try to make fun of pc games. But it pisses me off cause the expense issue is the biggest reason people dont get into pc games. The very pc they write these comments on can play alot of new games, just by adding a $150 gfx card. You dont need those absolutely retarted $8000 computers. Do you drive a $200,000 car?
Reply

Posted: Mar 13th 2008 1:54AM twillia7 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
its actually a video card they are making...
the secret details are this...
it will be the only video card capable of running crysis on...... medium!
you heard it here first folks.
Reply

Posted: Mar 11th 2008 10:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hey Kyle, instead of linking to the dumb ass story about Crysis's sytem reqs, why don't you link to a post about how Crytek proved you could run Crysis on an $800 dollar machine? It's doesn't take much to run the goddman game, jc.

WTF is wrong with Joystiq??
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 10:13AM KyleOrl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Guys, you all need to chill out re: the system requirements joke. It was just a throwaway line about the _fact_ that Crysis is near the high end of processor and graphic-card intensive games. It was an issue in many many reviews of the game, and just because _you_ can run it just fine with your $150 graphics card doesn't mean everyone else can or wants to.

Chill out.
Reply

Posted: Mar 11th 2008 10:17PM Spiritbeast said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Watch man, I'm about to put 5 Lemon Warheads in my mouth at once!"

"NO WAY!!!111"

Nevermind growing up in the 90's. Seems like an odd name for a console port.
Reply

Posted: Mar 11th 2008 10:25PM mezzaninex said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I miss the 90s : (
Reply

Posted: Mar 11th 2008 10:40PM FredFredrickson said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well shucks... Now what am I going to call my doomsday device?
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 12:28AM LonerAssassin said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"So sour you'll have to update your video card. Try new CRYSIS brand Warhead candies today!"
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 12:56AM Centaur said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow. Warheads and Amiga in one post. Happiness in a can indeed.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 7:51AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I can't play Crysis on the highest quality because they disabled the very high setting in Windows XP. Crysis is such a poser front for M$.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 9:18AM iHavePants said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
DX 10 is the only reason to use Vista, and it aint a good reason.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 7:25PM thewalrusking said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
did u know u can hack Crysis to run dx10 like effects I do and on XP
Reply

Posted: Mar 13th 2008 8:00AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, but I think that it is rotten that they would nerf a game in an attempt to force an upgrade to Windows Mexican. uh..... I mean Vista.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 5:54PM refinedsugar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow, there's a blast from candy past.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW