| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (28)

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 1:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh wow.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 1:15PM KeenCommander said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'd be careful if I were these flash game creators, the Chinese "government" will probably have them killed.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 1:20PM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They can't do shit if they're not Chinese citizens.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 1:25PM Crono141 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I'm pretty sure that, when it comes to secret killings, it doesn't matter what nationality the target is.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 1:20PM Courtney said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Well, since it's a Communist government, aren't they just applying their general principles here?
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 1:25PM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Please care to elaborate, all I know about normal Communist governments is that they nationalize companies and rely on heavy taxes to create heavy public services.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 1:27PM Crono141 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Therefore, the flash IP belongs to everybody!
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 2:19PM Courtney said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@ThornedVenom

Early in Soviet history, the government nationalized a number of creative works and retained the right to do so (not sure if it was used very often). There's also the general issue of media and content control in China, USSR and other communist states.

As for China specifically, legal protection for Intellectual Property is a relatively new development (as I understand it), beginning in the late 70s and evolving in the 90s because of international pressure (particularly in regard to foreign works).
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 11:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, they're certainly a corrupt and self-serving government. In that sense, this is a perfect application of their basic principles. I don't know about communist, though. That's more of a tag-line for the regime to try and gain some legitimacy with the masses. They're just about as Communist as Atari is still Atari from the 80's.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 1:22PM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
One day their current government shall crumble from the bottom, because they can't forever act like that. I just wonder if I'll ever be able to witness that within my lifetime.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 1:55PM Batzarro The worlds WOrst Detect said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Castro ask that you not hold your breath. Zing!

(Yes, I zing myself)
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 1:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I dunno, but I think it's the same word for opportunity.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 1:36PM thejared said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I had sent an e-mail to the legal department of the olympics when this story broke saying I was encouraging everybody I know to boycott the olympics this year. Never got a response though.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 1:46PM Royale said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Go get 'em Jared!
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 1:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Don't worry Jared, your response will come in the form of a shuriken to the eye in
SEVEN DAYS

Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 2:00PM heypaul said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"What's the Chinese word for hypocrisy, again?"

Wei4 shan4

And yes, it's pretty rampant. Then again, it's government we're talking about! Speaking of which, I'm late for a lunch date with Eliot Spitzer.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 2:19PM Crono141 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You're such a prostitute, upz.

:)
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 2:29PM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
... how do you pronounce that? 4chan?
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 2:40PM heypaul said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Shush. I believe "escort" is the proper term.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 6:05PM LaughingTarget said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I thought it is "hypoclisy", or is that N. Korean? I get confused sometimes.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 11:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wei Shan, both fourth tone? Xie4 Xie4.
Reply

Posted: Mar 13th 2008 12:35AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Or how about 偽善? 8D

不客氣.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 7:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wouldn't they be hypocrites only if they accused someone else of doing it?
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 7:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, that (and the OP) assumes that the guys in charge of hunting down pirates are the same guys in charge of uploading web content, which is something like believing that Bill Gates coded Windows XP. But you get 1 bonus pt for attempting to be rational, which is more than I can say for some of the almost blatantly racist attitudes I am seeing here.

They would have been hypocrites had they acknowledged the piracy and done nothing about it; but the fact is, they took it down to respect the original author's IP. There's no hypocrisy in that even if the lawmen were doubling as the web coders.

What would be hypocrisy is a guy posting on his blog chiding other people for piracy, as if he'd never, ever pirated anything himself. Care to comment, Mr. Orland?
Reply

Posted: Mar 13th 2008 9:32AM KyleOrl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
First off, I meant no disrespect to Chinese people in general, and I'm extremely sorry if any of my comments came off that way.

I understand that the people stealing content for these games and the people protecting the Chinese olympic IP are different, but they're part of the same organization, and the irony was too large not to point out. And while they did take down one game, they still haven't addressed the two other blatant rip-offs to be found on the site. I just feel that an organization as respected as the Olympics should hold themselves to a higher standard in this regard.

I can't speak for the original blog poster, but for all I know maybe he has never taken part in piracy. Seems like a non sequitir to me.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 8:22PM blustrkr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What about patent infringement?
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2008 10:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
自相矛盾, to answer your quesiton.
Reply

Posted: Mar 29th 2008 1:44AM hvnlysoldr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is an application of irony, double-speak, hypocrisy, and karma. It's also deliciously funny.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW