We and our dear friends the internet have been doing a fair amount of speculation about what the recently-rated
Lost Planet: Colonies could be. The most popular theory? A sequel to Capcom's third person action hit. The least popular? Ritchie's theory that it's an action game featuring Julianna Margulies as a by-the-book cop and Queen Latifah as her sassy sidekick. Now, the real word has come from Capcom via Famitsu and Ritchie got it wrong ... but so did the rest of us.
Lost Planet: Colonies is a spruced up version of
Lost Planet. Lost Planet 1.5, if you will.
The revamp will have a new female playable character, a new online mode that pits bugs versus humans and includes Xbox 360 and PC cross-platform play. (
We don't know what that means for the PS3. Seems there won't be a PS3 version.) That info, it should be noted, checks out for the Japanese version, but we don't yet know the specifics of the North American version. We're assuming it won't be too far off though.
So, what do you think, are you ready to buy
Lost Planet again?
UPDATE: Xbox 360 Fanboy has
more features from
LP:C including:
- 4 New maps, 2 of which are possibly a city and a desert
- New Female Playable Character
- Ten New weapons
- New Monsters
- Trial Battle and Score Attack modes for the campaign bosses
(Page 1) Reader Comments
A resounding "fuck-no."
Reply
Reply
Reply
They'll get their version in a year or so...its what it deserves...
I think I see why PS3 fans say do not buy Capcom games.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
It felt like what would happen if Nintendo made a shooter-- gameplay-wise.
In fact, the only aspect of the gameplay I found lacking was the inability to sprint. All of the weapons were great, and I loved the V.S.
of course the story was ridiculous and the fighting a little slow, but the boss battles and VSes made up for it.
definetly a great rent.
on another note, it would be awesome if they shipped a disk with just the bonus content that worked with the original.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I played and finished the game. I thought the boss battles were very intense and challenging. The mechs and rocket launchers are awesome. The grapling hook provided some interesting gameplay.
So why do some say it sucks? Are you just jumping in on the SUX bandwagon before even playing the game?
Reply
Capcom is definitely putting out some high quality games lately.
Keep up the good job. I can't wait for Resident Evil 5. As for this game if its priced at the right amoung I'll definitely pick it up. I heard a lot of goods things about it (except for the storyline which kinda gets wierd/hard to follow at times) and that the multiplayer was awesome so I'm definitely interested in the game now. Especially since its going to be the enhanced version.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
The Akrid were damned fun to fight, and I can't wait to play them online.
I just hope they change the damned server system for PC:
a) we wan't dedicated servers
b) we want to be able to join games in progress
c) in short, we want real online functionality. Not borderline Wii-level garbage.
I could care less about cross-platform, as odds are it will either cost money, be Vista-exclusive, or both.
Reply
If you can fight the akrid online mode, whether thats a co-op against them or one team controls bugs, it will be a lot of fun. All they need to do is sort out a few kinks like the lagg and the knock down issues and id suugt this game to anyone.
Reply
Reply
Seriously people. Why do you value some asshat company's reputation over your own money?
Reply
Reply
If it doesn't have that then I'll be passing the game yet again...
Reply