| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (29)

Posted: Mar 18th 2008 6:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Well as far as I know Take Two distributes their games worldwide so it's true Rockstar don't need EA.
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2008 6:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Oh man...EA's white knight just got their ass kicked from a Rock Star's black pawn...
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2008 9:23PM Tiptup300 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
pwn'd
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2008 10:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
no, pawn'd
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2008 11:06PM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
pr0n'd
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2008 6:51PM Cal said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Hmmm, well since GTA:SA has sold over 20 million units I doubt they need much help bringing their games to a wide audience...
Reply

Posted: Mar 19th 2008 3:03PM WiredKnight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I know, right!? The only way EA could bring it to a wider audience is by dumbing it down and making it rated Teen.
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2008 6:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Its so ridiculous...like seriously how DO you get a wider audience than the GTA Franchise has? i mean for the life of me, i can't figure out how you broaden the demographic save for making GTA: Disney and pretty up with technocolor rainbows and frilly bearlike figures who you give candy rather than shoot, beat or run over.

All jokes aside though, EA = batnutscrazy.
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2008 7:14PM Cal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They could always EA-erise it by releasing the same game every year with a new feature or two and ever so slightly better graphics. Oh and you can't forget crappy dedicated servers, where you can get free lag =)
Reply

Posted: Mar 19th 2008 12:15AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They would probably release it on the Mac, iPhone, other cellphones, those little old school hand held AA battery games, board games, card games, Live version, PSN version, Wii Ware Version and then you would also see even more of a marketing blitz with GTA cereal, beef jerkey, baseball bats, beretta 9mm GTA edition etc.. They would just whore it out and ruin it more than likely...
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2008 6:57PM Nick the Hero of Canton said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Yesterday: WiiWare dev: XBLA is 'full of sh*t'

Today: Analyst: EA being Rockstar's 'white knight' is 'bullsh*t'

Tomorrow: The world.
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2008 7:00PM Jakey777 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
can't...resist...

It's only a flesh wound...
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2008 8:52PM Vordus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Look, you stupid bastard, you've got no arms left!
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2008 7:04PM LetsHaveWaffles said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Well put Mr. Hickey. Couldn't have summed it up better. It really is bullsh*t.
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2008 7:06PM kevinski said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You know, while it probably wouldn't happen, I'd love to see Rockstar sign over all of its major properties and projects to a company who simply couldn't be acquired so easily just prior to the Rockstar acquisition, just out of spite.
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2008 7:47PM JCarpio said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
To go on that.. Since Rockstar is independent. They could just leave after the inevitable buy out and go to activision blizzard. THAT would be spite.
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2008 7:58PM shibathedog said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's Rockstar, you know they have SOMETHING up their sleeve. I feel like some sort of comparison could be made like Rockstar is to the gaming world what The Pirate Bay is to the P2P world.

On a slightly related note, anyone else notice the lockbox you can get with GTA IV? Tell me that isn't spite, They only did that so no one can use the "What if kids take and play a parent's copy of the game without permission" argument anymore, Which is pure awesome.
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2008 9:52PM Sora said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'd love to see Rockstar buy the GTA IP from 2k (2k owns it, not Rockstar) right before the buyout, then go to ActiBlizzard. That'd splatter PWND all over EA's face.
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2008 9:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
i have an idea. if they get T2 and/or rockstar before GTAIV comes out, NO ONE BUY GTAIV
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2008 9:27PM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How bout no?
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2008 9:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i would succumb to the horror and buy a wii before i ever refused to buy GTA 4 for well....any reason imaginable
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2008 9:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Andrew: I already paid for the preorder.

Vegeta: I totally agree with you.

Tmacairwhatever: Grow up.
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2008 9:54PM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@play

Exactly. A boycott is fucking stupid. So I shouldn't play the game because EA's name is on it? That's ridiculous. This game is going to kick fucking ass regardless of whether EA buys Take-Two or not. That's not going to stop me from buying this game.

And besides I already put $10 down.
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2008 9:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
it is refreshing to hear an analyst call a spade a spade: ea's characterization of themselves could not be described any better than that.

they ought to be looking for their own white knight, vis a vis some original and creative IP's instead of the same old crap rehashed every year. played tiger woods 08? madden 08? these stinkers did not merit a new version, and the gaming community is beginning to see ea for what it really is: a lazy, greedy, faceless corporation that will not succeed at its current rate.

cant wait to see their stock slip, big time.
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2008 11:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Sora267

I would love nothing better then have Rockstar own the rights to GTA and be independent and do what they want. But they are not they are owned by Take2. I could be wrong about this and maybe they bought their themselves back like Bungie, but ... yeah... I mean without Rockstar and GTA licence there isnt much reason that EA would want to take over T2...

Reply

Posted: Mar 19th 2008 12:04AM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ding ding ding. Basically GTA is the only reason why EA would even consider trying to buy out T2. Without GTA, T2 would have been dead along time ago.
Reply

Posted: Mar 19th 2008 12:19AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So is this just EA trying to go around Rockstar's back(so to speak) and buy the GTA franchise by acquiring Take 2?
Reply

Posted: Mar 19th 2008 12:56AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Worth noting that Take-Two holds the all-time third-party record for both selling a game and for reaching the largest percentage of a console's install base. And EA thinks they can do better, even though history has shown repeatedly that they can't (and in fact, nobody really can)?

I actually think the analyst is kind. "Bullsh*t" applies if EA thinks that it can promote artistic freedom at Rockstar. But doing better sales and increasing their reach? That goes straight past bullsh*t to flying unicorn sh*t. I mean, at least bullsh*t really exists.
Reply

Posted: Apr 9th 2008 1:28AM hvnlysoldr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Bad choice of words I guess.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW