Aside from being able to murder innocent people in cold blood, the soundtrack has to be one of the best parts of the Grand Theft Auto experience. Now, you'll be able to take those tracks with you back into the real world without shelling out the bones for boxed soundtrack collections, thanks to a cool new service that will let you mark tracks for download in game.
It works like this: You hear a song you like, you'll call an in-game service called "ZiT" on your mobile phone to mark it. You'll get a text message with the song and artist name, as well as an email if you're a member of the Rockstar Social Club. Said email will contain a direct link to download the song from Amazon's music site for $0.89 to $0.99. What's more, there's no DRM, so you can do whatever you like with them.
While we're usually not a big fan of extra ways to monetize games, this actually seems like a pretty ingenious way to integrate the service. This is pure conjecture, but wouldn't it be interesting if the songs in-game (and available for purchase) continued to be updated? ... That Rock Band money has to be pretty hard to ignore.
Reader Comments (69)
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 9:38AM (Unverified) said
"this actually seems like a pretty ingenious way to integrate the service."
No.
Reply
No.
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 9:38AM (Unverified) said
"While we're usually not a big fan of extra ways to monetize games..."
Yes.
Reply
Yes.
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 9:44AM copa said
Co, I'm not exactly sure what your objection is. They are not selling any content that is necessary to enjoy the game. They are not doing anything intrusive in terms of advertising. They are just providing an indexing service for people who are interested in buying the track.
Also, this referral revenue makes it much more enticing for big-time artists to license their stuff for use in GTA. The advance buzz is that the soundtrack for this game is absolutely amazing.
Reply
Also, this referral revenue makes it much more enticing for big-time artists to license their stuff for use in GTA. The advance buzz is that the soundtrack for this game is absolutely amazing.
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 9:59AM Peter Moore said
I don't see what the problem is with using the radio in game to discover music you hadn't listen to before, and then finding out what it is in a convenient and fast way.
Is it the paying part? You don't think artist should be paid for their music?
Reply
Is it the paying part? You don't think artist should be paid for their music?
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 10:01AM baby sea tuna said
Aw, he's just bitter that the Wii can't do something as cool as this (not that I'm planning on using the service, but it's an undeniably interesting integration concept.)
Reply
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 10:13AM (Unverified) said
So co, your issue is with a service that allows players to more easily buy and share the soundtracks to games they like?
They are not selling song download packs, they aren't tying this to unlockable content, they aren't forcing you to buy the whole damn soundtrack even.
Jeez, some people hate options, I mean do you hate having choices?
You know... freedom isn't free. it costs $0.89 to $0.99.
Reply
They are not selling song download packs, they aren't tying this to unlockable content, they aren't forcing you to buy the whole damn soundtrack even.
Jeez, some people hate options, I mean do you hate having choices?
You know... freedom isn't free. it costs $0.89 to $0.99.
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 10:16AM (Unverified) said
Haha so true. Don't like the sound of this feature. Oh, and Amazon music is only available to yanks.
I'll stick with the 360's music playback thingy ma jiggy if the ingame music isn't up to standards.
Reply
I'll stick with the 360's music playback thingy ma jiggy if the ingame music isn't up to standards.
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 10:22AM Vidikron said
"I'll stick with the 360's music playback thingy ma jiggy if the ingame music isn't up to standards."
That has nothing to do with this. This isn't about puttng your own music in or paying to have new music added, this is about purchasing music you hear in the game for use elsewhere.
Anyway, as usual, Co hates pretty much anything non-Wii. Baby sea tuna nailed his true problem.
Reply
That has nothing to do with this. This isn't about puttng your own music in or paying to have new music added, this is about purchasing music you hear in the game for use elsewhere.
Anyway, as usual, Co hates pretty much anything non-Wii. Baby sea tuna nailed his true problem.
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 10:24AM (Unverified) said
In that case I'll just record the music, sorta how it's been done with "pirated" game OST's for quite a while. Or just open them up on a PC and do a few conversions.
Reply
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 10:43AM (Unverified) said
Co is just trying to be the cool rebellious kid. more power to him!
Reply
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 11:12AM (Unverified) said
baby seamen in the mouth is the only one that can top Fernando in the annoyance catagory.
But yea this almost sucks as bad as Gameloft on WiiWare. Are they being paid by Microsoft??
Reply
But yea this almost sucks as bad as Gameloft on WiiWare. Are they being paid by Microsoft??
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 2:07PM (Unverified) said
"baby seamen in the mouth is the only one that can top Fernando in the annoyance catagory."
i dunno you're making a pretty strong argument for yourself on this page
Reply
i dunno you're making a pretty strong argument for yourself on this page
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 4:32PM (Unverified) said
Co's right, GTA: Virtual Shopping Mall is lame.
The $60 you pay for the game should entitle you to the data on it. It would be a lot better if you could simply rip a digital copy of the tracks from the game disc (like Sony's doing with Blu-ray). Buying the same data twice is idiotic.
Reply
The $60 you pay for the game should entitle you to the data on it. It would be a lot better if you could simply rip a digital copy of the tracks from the game disc (like Sony's doing with Blu-ray). Buying the same data twice is idiotic.
Posted: Mar 29th 2008 3:59AM (Unverified) said
@WiNG
Your right,but I'll just use my in game dash board to listen to music though. Also, about the choices your right again that's why I'm getting the Xbox 360 version so I have the choice to get the episodic content even if I realize I don't want it. I'll still have a choice.
Reply
Your right,but I'll just use my in game dash board to listen to music though. Also, about the choices your right again that's why I'm getting the Xbox 360 version so I have the choice to get the episodic content even if I realize I don't want it. I'll still have a choice.
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 10:07AM SheppyReturns said
I suggest you TRY the Amazon method. It's far too good to ignore.
Reply
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 10:22AM (Unverified) said
Can't be all that good! iTunes overtook Amazon music.
Guess it helps iTunes having much more music...
Reply
Guess it helps iTunes having much more music...
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 10:39AM SheppyReturns said
Let me put it this way...
You DL their downloading client. Supports Mac and even Linux. You put the music through Amazon's queue which comes in higher fidelity than average iTunes drops. It drops the music in the folder you choose and downloads MP3s. Not copy tagged MP3s. Not systems you have to authorize to play these MP3s. You can use them outside of iPods, you don't have a set number of times you can burn them, and you usually save $1.
Amazon's download service is fairly new and it's tied into their main store so I don't expect them to overtake iTunes anytime soon. However, there is something refreshing about buying music from a download service and not being told what you can do with it. At this point, fuck iTunes.
Reply
You DL their downloading client. Supports Mac and even Linux. You put the music through Amazon's queue which comes in higher fidelity than average iTunes drops. It drops the music in the folder you choose and downloads MP3s. Not copy tagged MP3s. Not systems you have to authorize to play these MP3s. You can use them outside of iPods, you don't have a set number of times you can burn them, and you usually save $1.
Amazon's download service is fairly new and it's tied into their main store so I don't expect them to overtake iTunes anytime soon. However, there is something refreshing about buying music from a download service and not being told what you can do with it. At this point, fuck iTunes.
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 5:53PM Cupajoe said
First, let me hit you with something blunt *smack*
Second, let me echo what these other gentlemen (or ladies) have politely told you, Amazon's DRM-free music store > iTunes. For all the annoyances I have with Apple iTunes is the biggest one because people think it's some amazing thing when it's not. It's just trendy and people buy into it. With iTunes you download a song loaded with ultra-restrictive DRM that you can do almost nothing with. With Amazon you have a DRM free higher quality song that you can do whatever the hell you want with! A short list comes to mind:
With Amazon's DRM free music you can:
-Put it on any MP3 player (Not just the iPod? NO WAI)
-Play it with any music program (lol winamp what?)
-Edit the song. Remix it. Shrink it. Turn it in to a ring tone (a *free* ring tone even! You don't have to buy the same song again just to put it on your trendy iPhone!)
-Use the song in a flash program, a home movie, or any other presentation
And so much more!
None of that you can do with iTunes unless you strip the DRM. And even then you have a lower quality song. I rest my case.
Reply
Second, let me echo what these other gentlemen (or ladies) have politely told you, Amazon's DRM-free music store > iTunes. For all the annoyances I have with Apple iTunes is the biggest one because people think it's some amazing thing when it's not. It's just trendy and people buy into it. With iTunes you download a song loaded with ultra-restrictive DRM that you can do almost nothing with. With Amazon you have a DRM free higher quality song that you can do whatever the hell you want with! A short list comes to mind:
With Amazon's DRM free music you can:
-Put it on any MP3 player (Not just the iPod? NO WAI)
-Play it with any music program (lol winamp what?)
-Edit the song. Remix it. Shrink it. Turn it in to a ring tone (a *free* ring tone even! You don't have to buy the same song again just to put it on your trendy iPhone!)
-Use the song in a flash program, a home movie, or any other presentation
And so much more!
None of that you can do with iTunes unless you strip the DRM. And even then you have a lower quality song. I rest my case.
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 9:54AM (Unverified) said
Does this mean that the included soundtrack in the game will suck on purpose? Well, it's not like the radio stations were not crap to begin with in past revisions.
But at least I will know have the option to finally play a GTA with no rap.
Reply
But at least I will know have the option to finally play a GTA with no rap.
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 10:02AM baby sea tuna said
Yeah, me too. It's called "custom soundtracks."
Reply
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 10:05AM SugarDaddy said
You always had the option to play GTA with no rap. Just pick the in-game stations that don't play rap. And what's wrong with rap? Are you afraid that you'll turn into a black person if you listen to it?
I always thought the in-game stations were pretty excellent actually. Lots of good music and stupidly hilarious DJs. Jeez, people complain about everything -- well maybe just you, you overly sarcastic, whiney little virgin you.
Reply
I always thought the in-game stations were pretty excellent actually. Lots of good music and stupidly hilarious DJs. Jeez, people complain about everything -- well maybe just you, you overly sarcastic, whiney little virgin you.
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 10:15AM (Unverified) said
So just because someone doesn't like rap, they are now a racist virgin? Good one.
So, if I happen to hate Indian music videos, that makes me a racist... wanker?
If I happen to hate classical music, I'm an uncultured hillbilly?
Calm down, Carl. Go swim in your pool.
Reply
So, if I happen to hate Indian music videos, that makes me a racist... wanker?
If I happen to hate classical music, I'm an uncultured hillbilly?
Calm down, Carl. Go swim in your pool.
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 10:16AM (Unverified) said
I thought the music in the past games was fine.
Reply
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 10:16AM (Unverified) said
were' fine. Damnit joystiq give us an edit post button.
Reply
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 10:31AM SoCoolCurt said
yea dude seriously, every GTA since III has had the option to turn off the stations you dont want to listen to. there is no problem here. i absolutely love the diverse soundtrack that GTA constantly brings. there is usually an even distribution of genres across the board and the talk shows are hilarious (i hope they can update them over time). if you dont like rap, turn it off. i personally like anything i can nod my head too be it rap, rock, country, classical, you name it.
Reply
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 12:10PM Vegeta has a ps3 said
@PSN
Same here. And the rap in San andreas was fucking awesome. Rockstar really knows how to pick a good soundtrack.
Reply
Same here. And the rap in San andreas was fucking awesome. Rockstar really knows how to pick a good soundtrack.
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 1:11PM SugarDaddy said
@WiNG: I'm the one who needs to calm down?! Never did I mention racist, and never did I say the dislike of rap makes someone a virgin. You're the one who flew into the tirade. You used the word 'wanker' for your insult, I used the word 'virgin.' Either way, you're completely missing the point. What kind of game where the main character is a gangster doesn't have any rap?
And yes, being a whiney bitch probably means you're a virgin.
Reply
And yes, being a whiney bitch probably means you're a virgin.
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 9:57AM SugarDaddy said
I'm sure there are a lot of licensed songs in the game already, but this is nice for peeps that want to expand the library. The best part is that you get to keep the song for yourself as well.
Reply
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 12:11PM Vegeta has a ps3 said
It's gotta be a series with Carl and Handbanana. that would be fucking awesome.
"He's not a boy anymore. Cause he just raped me!!!"
Reply
"He's not a boy anymore. Cause he just raped me!!!"
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 9:58AM (Unverified) said
Why do we need to pay for something we already own? Is it on the disk? Did we pay for that disk?
Oh, I must be confused big time or maybe I just don't understand. It sure looks like the people who pay for this will be buying it for a second time.
Reply
Oh, I must be confused big time or maybe I just don't understand. It sure looks like the people who pay for this will be buying it for a second time.
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 10:03AM Jerk Face said
What you are paying for is to be able to download the song to your computer and then put listen to it where ever you like.
So you're playing the game, and a song comes on. You like this song.
"Hey," you say, "I think I'm going to download this song, so I can listen to it on my iPod."
You mark it in game, get a message, download it. Pretty cool, I'd say.
It's not like they're forcing you to do anything.
Reply
So you're playing the game, and a song comes on. You like this song.
"Hey," you say, "I think I'm going to download this song, so I can listen to it on my iPod."
You mark it in game, get a message, download it. Pretty cool, I'd say.
It's not like they're forcing you to do anything.
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 10:35AM SoCoolCurt said
dude your not buying the song from the GTA game, they have just given you a way to figure out what the song you liked was instead of having to flip through the tracklist in the book. they just send an email with the song title and artist and a link to Amazon. you can download it from anywhere. youTube and the Firefox extension DownloadHelper will do good for you cheap asses, then all you need is a FLV Converter and bam, free music (often with bad quality.....)
Reply
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 10:03AM (Unverified) said
I cant wait for this game! This will be by far the best GTA EVARRR!! COD4 move over, GTAIV will be the new king of XboxLIVE.
Believe it!
Reply
Believe it!
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 10:14AM KeenCommander said
Why not just include the soundtrack on the disk. I know, I know - they always want more money, but we're paying for the game including the soundtrack, so we shouldn't have to pay for the soundtrack again outside the game. Though given ridiculously inflated song prices ($.99 each) that would make a GTA game "worth" over $100 in music alone, so they'd never do it.
Of course, IMO, San Andreas was worth $100 in gameplay, not bad seeing I got it for free with my PS2.
Reply
Of course, IMO, San Andreas was worth $100 in gameplay, not bad seeing I got it for free with my PS2.
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 10:21AM (Unverified) said
Wow, Wing doesn't know old games.
But yea they just want more money. They have to get money from somewhere, what with spiralling development costs so I don't entirely blame them. But as I said earlier Amazon music is only available to yanks so the market has kinda shrunk there. Forgive me but isn't GTA popular in Europe too? You don't hear about it because we don't do killing sprees related to them.
Reply
But yea they just want more money. They have to get money from somewhere, what with spiralling development costs so I don't entirely blame them. But as I said earlier Amazon music is only available to yanks so the market has kinda shrunk there. Forgive me but isn't GTA popular in Europe too? You don't hear about it because we don't do killing sprees related to them.
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 220 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 153 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 107 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
- Battleship movie adapted into FPS by Double Helix 93 comments










