| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (108)

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 1:06AM Eugimon said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
If god didn't want us to kill animals for fur, he wouldn't have wrapped them up in such fuzzy soft goodness.
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 1:58AM ThornedVenom said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Your avatar and comment go together like cream and pie.
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 3:47AM BPMOmega XBL PSN Steam said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
And if God didn't want us to eat other animals, He wouldn't have made them taste so good.

OM NOM NOM NOM NOM
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 11:00AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
QFT
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2008 3:42PM Ghengis said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Heh, I use that argument against my hardcore Darwinist friends -- "Why would the pig evolve deliciousness as a trait?"
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 1:13AM fischju said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm sure their money could have been spent much better, on signs and bullhorns. But this is less bothersome for those of us that do buy fur, bceause it means less money for signs and bullhorns :)
Reply

Posted: Mar 31st 2008 3:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wait, this brings up an important matter. Where do they get this blood?
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 1:16AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Let’s look at things from an evolutionary stand point, you believe in evolution don’t you? What is the point of pain? To keep animals away from danger. To keep them alive long enough to reproduce because they are the dependence of animals that used pain to stay alive. Pain allows animals to stay alive and reproduce. What causes chickens to stay alive and reproduce today? Tasting good. As long as chickens taste good to humans and humans are the dominate species, chickens will forever live. Evolution approves of KFC. Maybe if the dodo bird tasted better it would still be alive. Same applies to fur coats. Don’t go around torturing animals for fun or anything, but raising them and killing them for industry isn’t that bad.
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 2:57AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Same thing with Greenpeace and rainforest timbers.

In some countries once the value on having the forests was removed, they knocked them down to make room for farm land since they didn't want to starve (and could no longer afford to import food because they couldn't sell their timber).
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 6:10AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Uh, actually, the dodo was hunted into extinction, meaning the same kind of desirability that you're placing on chicken and furry animals. I'm far from a PETA supporter, but that's some pretty flawed logic, man.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood_Freeway_chickens
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 8:50AM Crono141 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
It isn't that flawed. Only reason dodo was hunted to extinction was because animal husbandry hadn't been developed yet.

In other words, the thought of capturing and raising them for food hadn't crossed their minds.

Well, now it has crossed our minds. I have absolutely no problem with raising animals for the sole purpose of killing them for food/clothing, as long as they don't have shitty conditions while they're alive.
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 10:14AM Centaur said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
"you believe in evolution don’t you?"

No.
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 10:24AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Chill Phil. I just threw that out there because there are a lot of people that think “if you don’t believe in evolution you’re an idiot” but they themselves don’t look at the world from an evolutionary point of view, which is usually pretty negative and unforgiving, hence I like to remind them.
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 11:32AM Crono141 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why does he need to "chill". All he said was "no".
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 11:53AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Mainly because his name is Phil.
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 12:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Chrono

We barely use fur for clothing. The high priced furs only serve the Capitalist class and are worn for STATUS. Not warmth, not practicalness, but for STATUS. The point is that wearing fur because it makes you feel that you're above someone else is stupid.
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 1:10PM Crono141 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I don't really care what you use the clothes for. The fact is the particular individual animals killed for their skins (fur) would not exist except we cultivated it for that purpose. Same with cows and beef and chickens and their meat.

As long as their existence on this planet isn't plagued with suffering, I couldn't care less what we do with the animal after its killed. And frankly, neither could it.
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 4:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"you believe in evolution don’t you?"

No.

I second that.
Reply

Posted: Mar 29th 2008 4:56PM Ignatius said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, um. Okay, go ahead and refute hundreds of years of the scientific process and theoretical thought. Instead, enjoy a good reading of a five-thousand year-old book. I'm sure that's accurate.
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 1:16AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
When will PETA learn that animals like being skinned and worn? Wouldn't you be flattered if someone wanted to wear you around their shoulders? Of course you would. We should all be so lucky.
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 1:24AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
PETA's next game should be about how they kill 95% of the animals they take in.
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 1:31AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'm disappointed. I thought this was a furry-hating game for a second.
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 4:58AM BurntMeatloaf said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Even furries hate PETA.
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 10:35AM xGearSecondx said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
YIFF YIFF YIFF YIFF YIFF YIFF YIFF

C-C-C-C-Combo breaker?
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 1:46AM Paulmichael said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Ugh. PETA is so annoying. But it's so funny to watch numerous shows make fun of the organization, like South Park!
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 2:04AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Don't forget about that episode of Futurama where animal rights nuts taught a lion to eat tofu :D
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 3:48AM BPMOmega XBL PSN Steam said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"You're vegetarians! Who cares what you do?
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 12:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
(paraphrasing)

Leela: Animals EAT eachother all the time!

TheOneCalledSmellyHippie: Nah-uh! We taught a lion how to eat tofu!

Lion: *sickly cough*
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 2:03PM Vandell said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Major failure, Awesome.
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 1:52AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
PETA just has a image problem. Anyone remember when Ace Ventura punched that old man in the face and wore him around his neck? Point made.
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 5:01AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Jim Carry was making fun for animal nuts, I'm sure he's not for animal abuse but neither is he against eating them.
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 11:54PM Blaquebeird said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't think Jim Carey's opinion is any more relevant than anyone else's. And why are you talking about him anyway? He didn't make any statement whatsoever in taht movie, the writer and director controlled what was done, not the actor.
Reply

Posted: Mar 31st 2008 2:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
**rubs head**
Y'all missed the point. It isn't that Carry supports PETA but that his character in the film was likeable (while at the same time being a joke). Personally I do not care for PETA causes but neither do I have the unreasonable hatred that many on this blog do.
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 2:03AM ThornedVenom said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I don't care much about which political or belief standpoint games take on (freedom of speech, right?) no matter how ridiculous I might personally think, but that last statement about animal characters not being subject to human laws is silly.


If they're to be considered as animal characters, then don't make them do human actions. I'd wear an ingame animal character furcoat anyday, whilst chomping my Kentucky Firaga Chocobo.
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 2:09AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Chocobos are delicious... specially in this time of the year =p
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 8:37AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
What's a Chocobo ?
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 9:52AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
What's so bad of not knowing what a chocobo is ?!

I dont know dam it.
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 10:10AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Dear Cyro,

Lrn2Google. Don't know something? Look it up. Not your personal gaming encyclopedia.
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 10:36AM Sponge said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Is it bad if I drop the h and think they would taste like chocolate?
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 2:21PM ThornedVenom said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
A chocobo is a yellow bird mount in Final Fantasy.
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 7:14PM Batzarro The worlds WOrst Detect said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, I agree. I mean, I'm sure when that racoon isn't protesting Burberrie(or however it's called) he's eating cute fishies and frogs and insects. HYPOCRITE RACOON!
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 2:17AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Trained penguins didn't work too well in Batman Returns now did it?

Just ask Danny Devito.
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 3:13AM ThornedVenom said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I thought that Tim Burton's work was a masterpiece.
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 7:58AM Rususeruru said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
off topic but Batman and Batman: Returns were enjoyable...

anything between Batman: Returns and Batman Begins should be ignored...

except for Mr. Freeze dying and Alicia Silverstone's Batgirl outfit.
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 2:52AM mundox said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I pwned those fur coats!
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 9:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have never met anyone who would take anything PETA does seriously. They are a full time parody of themselves.
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 3:23AM Noxat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm not a fan of PETA and their often bizarre tactics but I am also not a fan of the fur industry. I'm all for ethical animal treatment but then I also love me a tasty burger or chicken wing.
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 3:28AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Call me a militant vegan if you want, that's pretty much what I am at this point (and I don't really care what you have to say on the subject), but as much fun as this game looks, I don't approve of PETA's methods. And by "methods" I mean "blatant sexism".
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 6:15AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Blatant sexism? Really? Pardon me if it's just too early in the morning for my brain to work properly; I'd really like to know where you're getting that.
Reply

Posted: Mar 28th 2008 8:55AM Crono141 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
(S)He being a militant vegan, I wouldn't expect a logical answer, generic.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW