Spurred on by the apparent success of anti-KFC game Super Chick Sisters, PETA is once again entering the Flash-based interactive activism arena with Bloody Burberry: The Fur Fighters. This time, the action focuses on controlling cute animal critters who are trying to raise awareness of the cruel, fur-coat-selling ways of the Burberry clothing stores. They complete this goal by freeing caged bunnies, protesting at fashion shows and spray-painting coats, all while avoiding some shadowy, black-clad security agents.
You might think a game that encourages spray-painting private property might be a little irresponsible for an activist group, but an in-game disclaimer notes that it's all right because the animal characters are "not subject to human laws." It's like the ultimate diplomatic immunity! This gives us an idea for a crime spree involving trained penguins that the courts can't touch ... but perhaps we've already said too much ....
Reader Comments (108)
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 1:58AM ThornedVenom said
Your avatar and comment go together like cream and pie.
Reply
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 3:47AM BPMOmega XBL PSN Steam said
And if God didn't want us to eat other animals, He wouldn't have made them taste so good.
OM NOM NOM NOM NOM
Reply
OM NOM NOM NOM NOM
Posted: Mar 31st 2008 3:20PM (Unverified) said
Wait, this brings up an important matter. Where do they get this blood?
Reply
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 1:16AM (Unverified) said
Let’s look at things from an evolutionary stand point, you believe in evolution don’t you? What is the point of pain? To keep animals away from danger. To keep them alive long enough to reproduce because they are the dependence of animals that used pain to stay alive. Pain allows animals to stay alive and reproduce. What causes chickens to stay alive and reproduce today? Tasting good. As long as chickens taste good to humans and humans are the dominate species, chickens will forever live. Evolution approves of KFC. Maybe if the dodo bird tasted better it would still be alive. Same applies to fur coats. Don’t go around torturing animals for fun or anything, but raising them and killing them for industry isn’t that bad.
Reply
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 2:57AM (Unverified) said
Same thing with Greenpeace and rainforest timbers.
In some countries once the value on having the forests was removed, they knocked them down to make room for farm land since they didn't want to starve (and could no longer afford to import food because they couldn't sell their timber).
Reply
In some countries once the value on having the forests was removed, they knocked them down to make room for farm land since they didn't want to starve (and could no longer afford to import food because they couldn't sell their timber).
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 6:10AM (Unverified) said
Uh, actually, the dodo was hunted into extinction, meaning the same kind of desirability that you're placing on chicken and furry animals. I'm far from a PETA supporter, but that's some pretty flawed logic, man.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood_Freeway_chickens
Reply
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood_Freeway_chickens
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 8:50AM Crono141 said
It isn't that flawed. Only reason dodo was hunted to extinction was because animal husbandry hadn't been developed yet.
In other words, the thought of capturing and raising them for food hadn't crossed their minds.
Well, now it has crossed our minds. I have absolutely no problem with raising animals for the sole purpose of killing them for food/clothing, as long as they don't have shitty conditions while they're alive.
Reply
In other words, the thought of capturing and raising them for food hadn't crossed their minds.
Well, now it has crossed our minds. I have absolutely no problem with raising animals for the sole purpose of killing them for food/clothing, as long as they don't have shitty conditions while they're alive.
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 10:24AM (Unverified) said
Chill Phil. I just threw that out there because there are a lot of people that think “if you don’t believe in evolution you’re an idiot” but they themselves don’t look at the world from an evolutionary point of view, which is usually pretty negative and unforgiving, hence I like to remind them.
Reply
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 12:53PM (Unverified) said
@Chrono
We barely use fur for clothing. The high priced furs only serve the Capitalist class and are worn for STATUS. Not warmth, not practicalness, but for STATUS. The point is that wearing fur because it makes you feel that you're above someone else is stupid.
Reply
We barely use fur for clothing. The high priced furs only serve the Capitalist class and are worn for STATUS. Not warmth, not practicalness, but for STATUS. The point is that wearing fur because it makes you feel that you're above someone else is stupid.
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 1:10PM Crono141 said
I don't really care what you use the clothes for. The fact is the particular individual animals killed for their skins (fur) would not exist except we cultivated it for that purpose. Same with cows and beef and chickens and their meat.
As long as their existence on this planet isn't plagued with suffering, I couldn't care less what we do with the animal after its killed. And frankly, neither could it.
Reply
As long as their existence on this planet isn't plagued with suffering, I couldn't care less what we do with the animal after its killed. And frankly, neither could it.
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 4:08PM (Unverified) said
"you believe in evolution don’t you?"
No.
I second that.
Reply
No.
I second that.
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 1:16AM (Unverified) said
When will PETA learn that animals like being skinned and worn? Wouldn't you be flattered if someone wanted to wear you around their shoulders? Of course you would. We should all be so lucky.
Reply
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 1:24AM (Unverified) said
PETA's next game should be about how they kill 95% of the animals they take in.
Reply
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 1:31AM (Unverified) said
I'm disappointed. I thought this was a furry-hating game for a second.
Reply
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 10:35AM xGearSecondx said
YIFF YIFF YIFF YIFF YIFF YIFF YIFF
C-C-C-C-Combo breaker?
Reply
C-C-C-C-Combo breaker?
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 1:46AM Paulmichael said
Ugh. PETA is so annoying. But it's so funny to watch numerous shows make fun of the organization, like South Park!
Reply
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 2:04AM (Unverified) said
Don't forget about that episode of Futurama where animal rights nuts taught a lion to eat tofu :D
Reply
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 3:48AM BPMOmega XBL PSN Steam said
"You're vegetarians! Who cares what you do?
Reply
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 12:53PM (Unverified) said
(paraphrasing)
Leela: Animals EAT eachother all the time!
TheOneCalledSmellyHippie: Nah-uh! We taught a lion how to eat tofu!
Lion: *sickly cough*
Reply
Leela: Animals EAT eachother all the time!
TheOneCalledSmellyHippie: Nah-uh! We taught a lion how to eat tofu!
Lion: *sickly cough*
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 1:52AM (Unverified) said
PETA just has a image problem. Anyone remember when Ace Ventura punched that old man in the face and wore him around his neck? Point made.
Reply
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 5:01AM (Unverified) said
Jim Carry was making fun for animal nuts, I'm sure he's not for animal abuse but neither is he against eating them.
Reply
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 11:54PM Blaquebeird said
I don't think Jim Carey's opinion is any more relevant than anyone else's. And why are you talking about him anyway? He didn't make any statement whatsoever in taht movie, the writer and director controlled what was done, not the actor.
Reply
Posted: Mar 31st 2008 2:25PM (Unverified) said
**rubs head**
Y'all missed the point. It isn't that Carry supports PETA but that his character in the film was likeable (while at the same time being a joke). Personally I do not care for PETA causes but neither do I have the unreasonable hatred that many on this blog do.
Reply
Y'all missed the point. It isn't that Carry supports PETA but that his character in the film was likeable (while at the same time being a joke). Personally I do not care for PETA causes but neither do I have the unreasonable hatred that many on this blog do.
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 2:03AM ThornedVenom said
I don't care much about which political or belief standpoint games take on (freedom of speech, right?) no matter how ridiculous I might personally think, but that last statement about animal characters not being subject to human laws is silly.
If they're to be considered as animal characters, then don't make them do human actions. I'd wear an ingame animal character furcoat anyday, whilst chomping my Kentucky Firaga Chocobo.
Reply
If they're to be considered as animal characters, then don't make them do human actions. I'd wear an ingame animal character furcoat anyday, whilst chomping my Kentucky Firaga Chocobo.
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 2:09AM (Unverified) said
Chocobos are delicious... specially in this time of the year =p
Reply
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 9:52AM (Unverified) said
What's so bad of not knowing what a chocobo is ?!
I dont know dam it.
Reply
I dont know dam it.
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 10:10AM (Unverified) said
Dear Cyro,
Lrn2Google. Don't know something? Look it up. Not your personal gaming encyclopedia.
Reply
Lrn2Google. Don't know something? Look it up. Not your personal gaming encyclopedia.
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 2:21PM ThornedVenom said
A chocobo is a yellow bird mount in Final Fantasy.
Reply
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 7:14PM Batzarro The worlds WOrst Detect said
Well, I agree. I mean, I'm sure when that racoon isn't protesting Burberrie(or however it's called) he's eating cute fishies and frogs and insects. HYPOCRITE RACOON!
Reply
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 2:17AM (Unverified) said
Trained penguins didn't work too well in Batman Returns now did it?
Just ask Danny Devito.
Reply
Just ask Danny Devito.
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 3:13AM ThornedVenom said
I thought that Tim Burton's work was a masterpiece.
Reply
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 7:58AM Rususeruru said
off topic but Batman and Batman: Returns were enjoyable...
anything between Batman: Returns and Batman Begins should be ignored...
except for Mr. Freeze dying and Alicia Silverstone's Batgirl outfit.
Reply
anything between Batman: Returns and Batman Begins should be ignored...
except for Mr. Freeze dying and Alicia Silverstone's Batgirl outfit.
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 9:56PM (Unverified) said
I have never met anyone who would take anything PETA does seriously. They are a full time parody of themselves.
Reply
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 3:28AM (Unverified) said
Call me a militant vegan if you want, that's pretty much what I am at this point (and I don't really care what you have to say on the subject), but as much fun as this game looks, I don't approve of PETA's methods. And by "methods" I mean "blatant sexism".
Reply
Posted: Mar 28th 2008 6:15AM (Unverified) said
Blatant sexism? Really? Pardon me if it's just too early in the morning for my brain to work properly; I'd really like to know where you're getting that.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 221 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 161 comments
- Blizzard taking Valve to court over 'DOTA' trademark 116 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 107 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments










