PETA's fur-hating, law-skirting, super-cute animal game
You might think a game that encourages spray-painting private property might be a little irresponsible for an activist group, but an in-game disclaimer notes that it's all right because the animal characters are "not subject to human laws." It's like the ultimate diplomatic immunity! This gives us an idea for a crime spree involving trained penguins that the courts can't touch ... but perhaps we've already said too much ....
Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.














(Page 1) Reader Comments
Reply
OM NOM NOM NOM NOM
Reply
Reply
In some countries once the value on having the forests was removed, they knocked them down to make room for farm land since they didn't want to starve (and could no longer afford to import food because they couldn't sell their timber).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood_Freeway_chickens
In other words, the thought of capturing and raising them for food hadn't crossed their minds.
Well, now it has crossed our minds. I have absolutely no problem with raising animals for the sole purpose of killing them for food/clothing, as long as they don't have shitty conditions while they're alive.
No.
We barely use fur for clothing. The high priced furs only serve the Capitalist class and are worn for STATUS. Not warmth, not practicalness, but for STATUS. The point is that wearing fur because it makes you feel that you're above someone else is stupid.
As long as their existence on this planet isn't plagued with suffering, I couldn't care less what we do with the animal after its killed. And frankly, neither could it.
No.
I second that.
Reply
Reply
Reply
C-C-C-C-Combo breaker?
Reply
Leela: Animals EAT eachother all the time!
TheOneCalledSmellyHippie: Nah-uh! We taught a lion how to eat tofu!
Lion: *sickly cough*
Reply
Y'all missed the point. It isn't that Carry supports PETA but that his character in the film was likeable (while at the same time being a joke). Personally I do not care for PETA causes but neither do I have the unreasonable hatred that many on this blog do.
If they're to be considered as animal characters, then don't make them do human actions. I'd wear an ingame animal character furcoat anyday, whilst chomping my Kentucky Firaga Chocobo.
Reply
I dont know dam it.
Lrn2Google. Don't know something? Look it up. Not your personal gaming encyclopedia.
Just ask Danny Devito.
Reply
anything between Batman: Returns and Batman Begins should be ignored...
except for Mr. Freeze dying and Alicia Silverstone's Batgirl outfit.
I love how they are so against animal testing, yet their VP uses animal based insulin. but really, it's ok cause she needs HER life to save animals, but your diabetic grandma? she can just fuck off.
Reply
Worse is that they push emotive lies to kids about poor wittle animals and food products to justify their nonsense. They're attention whores, hypocrites and extremist fuckwits.
Meanwhile the people in your local animal shelter, PDSA, SPCA, Humane Society etc. tirelessly work for the actual betterment of animals and prosecution of cruelty cases.
Let's start a bacterial rights organization!!!