| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (30)

Posted: Mar 30th 2008 12:35PM dargis49 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The super Star Wars ames are still better than any Star Wars game I've played.
Reply

Posted: Mar 30th 2008 3:17PM Some Guy said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
apparently you have never played rouge squadron.
Reply

Posted: Mar 30th 2008 3:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Or Rogue Leader.
Reply

Posted: Mar 30th 2008 12:33PM Naoki7 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hey, where's Rogue Squadron? :O
Reply

Posted: Mar 30th 2008 12:58PM AirIntake said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, where's Rogue Squadron, Shadows of the Empire, Episode I: Racer, etc etc?? Not to mention all the PC games like Dark Force/Jedi Knight I/II, XWing, Tie Fighter. This video series is sure missing a lot of great SW games especially considering how long it is.
Reply

Posted: Mar 30th 2008 1:04PM Dr Stabbingworth said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
It's the second episode in the series and they were focusing only on games based on the original trilogy.

Comprehension ftl
Reply

Posted: Mar 30th 2008 2:12PM AirIntake said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'd say that Rogue Squadron, Dark Forces, X-Wing and Tie Fighter WERE from the original trilogy, especially considering how loosely some of the games in this retrospective have followed the trilogy anyways. They're already at 2002 and they've missed these great games. Plus, why would they arbitrarily limit themselves to only games featuring the original trilogy, when that forces them to miss out on some of the best Star Wars games available.

Plus, with your exceptional comprehension skills, would you like to point me to where it says that they'd only be covering games based on the original trilogy? Considering Joystiq itself said "Based on the trailer above, we assume it will follow the same format as their first retrospective, chronologically detailing the history of all ninety-some video games that take place in the Star Wars universe" and then provided a link to the Wikipedia page 'List of Star Wars video games', I was lead to believe they'd be covering a bit of all games.

Reply

Posted: Mar 30th 2008 2:20PM SheppyReturns said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
But you're currently on Retrospective 2 of 9. I think they confirmed it as nine. First retrospective was covering the very early games and more notable, the games which only covered a portion of the story. This time was focused more towards games that attempted to tell the complete story of a chapter or the entire trilogy.

Meanwhile, all the games you mentioned either focused on the expanded universe, side stories between episodes, or having no focus on the story at all (Jedi Knight, X-Wing vs Tie Fighter). There are more chapters coming... this episode had a theme that they stuck to. Most games people have listed in their "why nots" don't fit the theme. Patience Padawan, we have a long bit to go before the debut of Force Unleashed, which is when this series is supposed to wrap up.
Reply

Posted: Mar 30th 2008 2:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm pretty sure the first video mentioned that they were starting with games based on the original trilogy, and then the prequels, and then games not based on either. I can tell you TIE Fighter is definitely not based on the original trilogy - I don't remember inspecting cargo freighters, helping one side in a civil war, or TIE Defenders, do you? ;)
Reply

Posted: Mar 30th 2008 1:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Where the fuck is Dark Forces??!??!??!?!?!

I hate Gametrailers now.
Reply

Posted: Mar 30th 2008 1:24PM SheppyReturns said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
ZOMG! They missed my favorite Star Wars game so far in episode two of a huge multipart system! I am outraged and pissed to the point of stupidity! I will now mention some Star Wars game I liked despite it being noticable absent on any of the systems covered so far because my nerd rage boils the very seas!

Seriously, this is part 2 of... wasn't this gonna be 9 parts? If you game isn't listed, it's coming. So shut the **** up.

On a side note, should I mention I have Star Wars Aracde for 32X?
Reply

Posted: Mar 30th 2008 1:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"On a side note, should I mention I have Star Wars Aracde for 32X?"

Sure, why not?
Reply

Posted: Mar 30th 2008 2:12PM SheppyReturns said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well then, I have Star Wars Arcade on the 32X....

sankyu, sankyu
Reply

Posted: Mar 30th 2008 1:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
At exactly 1:00 into the video, they show the swimming level from the 1st Namco Star Wars game (the one that shows the developers obviously hadn't watched the movie).

It totally reminded me of Episode I. See, Namco's game wasn't crappy, it was just way ahead of it's time.
Reply

Posted: Mar 30th 2008 1:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What happened to:
Battlefront?
Tie Fighter?
Rogue Squadron?
StarWars Demolition?
Jedi Power Battles?
Anything not on Nintendo or Atari?
Reply

Posted: Mar 30th 2008 1:51PM SheppyReturns said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Refer directly to my previous comment. Obviously they cannot cover every game in 23 minutes, which is why it is a multipart series. If it wasn't covered in the first two episodes, it will be.
Reply

Posted: Mar 30th 2008 2:14PM AirIntake said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, so far they've gone chronologically, so perhaps people were expecting them to actually go through all games chronologically.
Reply

Posted: Mar 30th 2008 6:01PM Sweetz said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Not people who watched the first episode. At the end of the first installment, they very clearly stated that the next chapter would cover only games directly based off the plot of the original trilogy.

I guess they should have made it clearer for people starting in the middle.

They're going to cover EVERY Star Wars game made people (well, at least official ones), so don't get your panties in a bunch.
Reply

Posted: Mar 30th 2008 1:45PM hvnlysoldr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I love Trilogy Arcade. Also shows how many Star Wars versus Mario games there are.
Reply

Posted: Mar 30th 2008 2:50PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That first game they showed actually looked like a pretty good game standing on its own, even if an eye-gougingly unfaithful and inaccurate adaptation
Reply

Posted: Mar 30th 2008 3:35PM Naoki7 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
NINE parts? Good grief.

But yeah, that means it'll be like the Final Fantasy retrospective and have the "main" games first then all the spin-offs and oddballs last.

Go go Episode I Racer!! Woooo!
Reply

Posted: Mar 30th 2008 5:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I still remember Super Star wars,yeah it was a hard game.

I need an emu now.
Reply

Posted: Mar 30th 2008 5:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The NES games were so freaking hard. I've never gotten past the deathstar after rescuing Leah. It's funny how kids today complain about games being too hard or something and we just took it so much for granted. I don't think I ever even thought about it. It was just how the game was.

And I still have vivid memories of my dad getting me an SNES, and how he showed me was having my eyes closed and switching it on, and all I hear is the Star Wars theme blasting at me in 16 bit glory. Amazing gaming/geek moment...
Reply

Posted: Mar 30th 2008 9:25PM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Come to think of it, those games look amazing.
Reply

Posted: Mar 30th 2008 10:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
These are pretty cool, cant wait for the next one.

Griffen (or whoever) be sure to link to the next one when it comes out or I'll definitely miss it.
Reply

Posted: Mar 31st 2008 12:54AM kevinski said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hahahaha...Darth Vader turning into a scorpion? Very nice. Anyway, the SNES installments were great for the time, although Super The Empire Strikes Back was just freakishly difficult. I mean, there's something seriously wrong when I can't even get off of Hoth in that game, yet I can beat Super Return of the Jedi without much effort.

The audio in the SNES installments was absolutely amazing. It actually made the games more enjoyable than they really were, in my opinion. While I love the games for what they are, I can't help by cringe at how bad the collision detection is. Really, running and slashing at stuff with your lightsaber really just doesn't cut it. You pretty much have to jump around like mad while spinning around with the lightsaber. Somehow, I don't remember any such thing in the movies...
Reply

Posted: Mar 31st 2008 12:57AM Lord Minogue said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Gotta love the Star Wars Trilogy Arcade - I played it a scant two years ago and it didn't show its age one bit!
Reply

Posted: Mar 31st 2008 1:20AM kevinski said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I remember watching Starcade a long time ago. Usually, the in-game graphics in the games played on the show were pretty basic. Then, out of the blue, there's this freaking jet game that looked absolutely amazing.
Reply

Posted: Mar 31st 2008 10:29AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I just wish they would have gone chronologically. This whole "Original Trilogy" and "Prequel" grouping is a very illogical way to look at the Star Wars video games. I would rather have them do it by developer rather than what they're doing now. It would have been nice to see an evolution of the games instead of this mess of groupings they did.

And what's up with it coming out every two weeks? Can't they just have stalled the retrospective a month (or two) later to coincide with Force Unleashed and release one every week? They give me a taste and I can't have more until a fortnight from now! I am mad.
Reply

Posted: Apr 1st 2008 3:24AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
IMPOTENT RAGE!!!!
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW