| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (25)

Posted: Apr 17th 2008 4:13PM vidguy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm surprised that the drunk-driving, prostitute-banging, cop-killing extravaganza that is GTAIV hasn't faced stiffer opposition to the M rating. With 10 hours of DLC already lined up for the 360, there's plenty of material that the ESRB won't directly rate. The potential for a Hot Coffee remake in DLC is huge.
Reply

Posted: Apr 17th 2008 4:47PM copa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think you misread the article. The ESRB does indeed evaluate the DLC. There is no potential for a Hot Coffee remake in DLC.
Reply

Posted: Apr 17th 2008 5:03PM vidguy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I did not misread the article. From what I can tell, the ESRB does not directly rate each piece of DLC. The game developer is required to keep their DLC in-line with the original content of the game, and the DLC is then said to have the same rating. So in your example below, a DLC Rock Band song with mild lyrics will be rated T not because the ESRB rated it but because the rest of the game that was rated T had similar traits.

With GTAIV already pushing the limits of the M rating, additional DLC content could break the barrier. In this sense, I think there is a potential for Hot Coffee type content; I never suggested that such content wouldn't rerate the game Adults Only. I think it's possible that the developers would save something from the game and its ESRB rating for DLC. Upon the release, the ESRB will have the incentive to rate the DLC and apply sanctions to the full game's warning as needed.

If the ESRB does indeed rate each piece of DLC, I cannot find evidence of it anywhere on this series of tubes.
Reply

Posted: Apr 17th 2008 5:10PM 007craft said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Again you read wrong. The ESRB DOES rate each peice of dlc. If they find its changed, they will change the rating on the actual game.
Reply

Posted: Apr 17th 2008 5:14PM vidguy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Link please? Neither the linked article nor the one at 1UP definitively states that the ESRB rates each piece of DLC. The way the articles read, the developer is 'required'/expected to keep DLC within the bounds of the game's original rating.
Reply

Posted: Apr 17th 2008 7:48PM vidguy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So does anybody agree with me? I know that full arcade/classic games get rated no matter what system they are for, but as far as I can tell the ESRB does not rate additional content for games distributed via DLC. It's up to the content provider to keep in line with the tone of the original game and rating; if they don't, the whole package can be rerated.

That's what the articles say and I cannot find any evidence that each UNO deck or Rock Band song is reviewed by the ESRB as copa and mike are saying.
Reply

Posted: Apr 17th 2008 4:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
At the possibility that the game may be re-rated, I doubt that any publisher would risk the money, given that a re-rating would cause the game's packaging to change, and bring in costs that may not be covered by the specific DLC in question.
Reply

Posted: Apr 17th 2008 7:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Or they just pull the DLC... I would think that would be easier. The game doesn't need to change just that extra content.
Reply

Posted: Apr 17th 2008 4:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"ratings" are just another tool that the "the man" and Satan use to ruin your life.

recently while playing a game that was supposed to M rated, I saw the side of a boob.

i've had to quit my job and my marriage to try and overcome the shock.

thanks for nothing ESRB
Reply

Posted: Apr 17th 2008 4:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You made an account just to say that?
Reply

Posted: Apr 17th 2008 4:30PM Jerk Face said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
*shrug*

I thought it was a pretty hilarious comment.
Reply

Posted: Apr 17th 2008 4:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, caustic made a good funny. Why the hate?
Reply

Posted: Apr 17th 2008 7:07PM Ethan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You don't need to make an account to post here. If you did there'd be more fanboys and less normal people. Or funny.
Reply

Posted: Apr 17th 2008 4:36PM copa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is stupid.

People keep throwing out inane examples like, "What if GTA releases a Cleveland Steamer Fun pack?" That's not going to happen (XBox Live and PSN would not distribute it), and that's not the core issue here.

The problem is that Rock Band is unable to release uncensored songs, because the ESRB insists that every piece of DLC has to conform to the game's Teen rating.

So, out of the hundreds of songs that Rock Band makes available, if they want to distribute a couple with an M rating (like the clearly marked albums in your local record shop), they can't do it.

Never mind that systems like XBox Live have the ability to restrict content downloads on the basis of ESRB rating.

Patricia Vance wants to change ESRB's role from providing information about a game's content, to controlling what content a publisher can or can't distribute. This is completely out of line.
Reply

Posted: Apr 17th 2008 4:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What the hell is this Ratatouille thing? "Hobo Murder and Cleavage?" I wrote this off as another stupid licensed kid's game, what the hell did I miss?!
Reply

Posted: Apr 17th 2008 5:01PM brokenmonkey said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I think it was their attempt at an unfunny joke.
Reply

Posted: Apr 17th 2008 5:49PM Neowyrm said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, I was wondering the same thing. I can't find anything about it on the internets...
Reply

Posted: Apr 17th 2008 5:00PM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What about user-created mods?
Reply

Posted: Apr 17th 2008 7:52PM vidguy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"ESRB ratings only address content created by the publisher, and cannot consider content that is created or introduced by individual players when playing the game online. ESRB-rated games that can be played online with other players and which enable exposure to user-generated content are required to display an Online Rating Notice on the game's packaging (if it exists), as well as in the opening screen."

esrb.com
Reply

Posted: Apr 17th 2008 6:40PM 343 Guilty Fart said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
OMG RATATOUILLE: HOBO MURDER AND CLEAVAGE CONFIRMED!!!
Reply

Posted: Apr 17th 2008 7:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Uh, am I the only one who googled it just to make sure he wasn't joking?
Reply

Posted: Apr 17th 2008 9:40PM DonaldMick said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This thread is worthless without pics.
Reply

Posted: Apr 17th 2008 7:10PM Ethan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They have to keep within the general tone? Guess there's no bunny hugging mission coming to GTA then.
Reply

Posted: Apr 17th 2008 7:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Since it is up to the content providers to ensure that the content is the same as the rating (or get rebranded like Elder Scroll was) I can see Rockstar pushing the limits until the ESRB says something and then pulling that content and doing it OVER AND OVER AND OVER. And I want to know what about user created content? Can I draw boobs on something and give that away?
Reply

Posted: Apr 17th 2008 9:14PM loflyinjett said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is rediculous,This is another example of the double standard between games and movies.Why is it the bonus features in movies dont have to keep with the same rating as the film...but say Rock band songs do.Stupid...DLC should be unrated or atleast no have any restictions.

Grrr
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW