| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (171)

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 1:48PM Rabidkeebler said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Time to ban gametrailers for giving the game a 98
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 1:51PM Vegnagun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They should have just sprung for the 10. I agree.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 3:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I generally defend GameTrailers, but I bet the 98 is just to act smug and not give a 10.

I mean, I don't want to repeat the 8.8 Zelda fiasco, but hell, GTA4 deserves it.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 4:20PM Rattle said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The game is hardly perfect.

For one, the walking controls are just as dodgy as ever and you'll find yourself walking in all kinds of directions unintentionally.

Also, I was disappointed but they've not implemented any skills (i.e. pistol skill, swimming skill) ala San Andreas.

I've also found it very hard to understand Niko's obsession with earning money no matter the risks; I've found nothign to spend it on other than weapons!

10/10 is just reviewers submitting themselves to the hype.
It's a great game, definitely mid 90's, but there is no such thing as perfection.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 5:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Your fucking shitting me right, I heard that the San Andreas changing main character system was removed, but are you serious that We can only buy weapons, I had very high hopes for this game.

I could never give a game a 10/10 That means it is absolutely perfect, and every game ever has at least one major problem with it.

Halo 3, Crap ally AI, Arbiter given gay sidekick role No inventive Weapons.
Mass Effect, you call this gameplay.
Gears of War, is it over already.

I put them 3 down cause they all got 10/10 by alot of reviewers and did not deserve them.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 5:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sorry about the double, post, but this game is now legally the best game of all time, it beats out Zelda ocarina of time by like 2 points
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 5:53PM JoshMilewski said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I HONESTLY don't understand the appeal of GTA. I'm completely dumbfounded by these scores.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 7:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Ratings systems are often relative, not absolute. A 10/10 does not mean that a game is perfect. What it means is that a 10/10 represents the best example of a game within a genre or a group of similar games. For example, if a reviewer were to give Mario Paint an 8 and Mega Man a 6, it doesn't mean he/she thinks Mario Paint is a better game than Mega Man; he/she means that Mario Paint does a better job of accomplishing its intended goals and is a better game in its oeuvre that Mega Man does and is in its. Reviewers giving GTA4 a 10 aren't saying it's perfect; they're saying it's setting a new standard.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 8:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
SO we ban websites that actually have the balls to not fall for the hype and actually tell the truth about a game.

This game doesn't deserve a 10...period.

IGN and these other websites are just riding R*'s dick and probably getting some money on the side for it.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 8:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Wow when I want to hear someone's thoughts on a game they haven't played I guess I know who to go to now
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 9:04PM MarkezJM said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I'd have rated it a 42. By the way, got Douglas Adams to autograph my copy of 'Mostly Harmless' when I was young lil dude.

Can't wait for this game to come out! For Wii60PS3ers, this is a pretty huge week what with Kart and GTAIV!
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 9:55PM Gizoku said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
10/10 DOES NOT mean perfection. Perfection is unattainable. And it would be senseless to have 10 point scale without using the whole thing.

A ten should only represent a game of undeniable quality.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 10:54PM embassy said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
: sigh :

i swear this happens to any game that gets universal praise. you get the same retards who associate 10/10 with being 100% god-like, flawlessly perfect, who make it their duty to proclaim to the gaming massess that "nothing is perfect" like they just fucking parted the sea.

get the fuck over yourselves and have a nice seat in reality.

does this happen in any other entertainment industry?

do people flip out when films or albums get 5/5 stars and what-not?

i would hope not.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 1:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
So 1 of 2 things will happen when gamespot reviews it.

1) They'll give it a 10 and everyone will scoff at them

2) They'll give it anything under a 10 and everyone will scoff at them

Best of luck to you gamespot I know you'll make the right choice!
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 1:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Maybe someone will get fired too!
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 2:10PM rivaldi22 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Maybe Gamespot will get fired.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 2:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Sweet God, I hope someone gets fired.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 4:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Who's left to fire?
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 7:42PM Giantenemycrab said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Who cares what Gamespot says at this point?
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 9:06PM Cal said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
The advertisers
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 1:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
9.8!!! GT is going down....HARD.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 1:52PM Vegnagun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Seeing this live up to the hype makes exponentially more hype for this game to live up to. I expect perfection from GTA IV, or gtfo.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 1:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"While the PS3 and 360 versions of the game are functionally identical, the PS3's visuals sport noticeably smoother edges, along with a warmer color palette that makes everything look slightly more realistic." + less pop-ins.....where'd that car come from?!?!
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 3:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hmmm.

What shall I choose?

A warmer color palette or exclusive DLC?

I totally can't play games with cool color palettes. It just ruins the experience.

Considering that most of the 10/10's have come from 360 versions of the game, I'd say a warm color palette is definitely NOT a reason to skip the 360 version.

Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 4:12PM reacher007 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
A warmer color palette ???
just tune your TV dude !!
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 4:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Didnt IGN say in their review that the 360 version had Better colour? :S

i quote from bottom of page 5 of IGN'S review

"The 360 has richer colors, but the PS3 has better anti-aliasing making it look a little cleaner"

Seems we have conflicting reviews on this :S
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 8:52PM MarkezJM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"I totally can't play games with cool color palettes. It just ruins the experience."

You continue to be a dunce.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 1:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Dear GameTrailers, WTF is a 'marquis game'?
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 1:55PM Rabidkeebler said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
please tell me you are being sarcastic
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 1:59PM Mr Khan said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Means its a game that's synonymous with gaming itself

You've got your Madden, Guitar Hero, Mario, Halo, and your GTA, that sort of thing
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 2:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
A 'marquis game' would be a game played by french noblemen; an interesting concept for sure.

You might be thinking about a 'marquee game'.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 2:05PM Mr Khan said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
lol
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 2:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Oui, ze marquis vill nevegggh plei zees filsee game. Veih is mai fromage y vin?
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 2:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Unfriendly_Cat is right. Let's be friends.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 2:16PM Delgadoh said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Hahah oh man that was funny. And people thought they were making fun of you.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 8:40PM Ethan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
A game played in a big tent.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 1:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
from http://uk.xbox360.ign.com/articles/869/869381p5.html:

PS3 version looks better, has the graphical edge.

PS3 version has far less pop-in.

PS3 version has better anti-aliasing making it look a little cleaner.

Because GTA IV can preload onto the PS3 hard drive, the in-game loads are faster than the 360 version.


GTA IV SIXAXIS motion sensing info from http://ps3.ign.com/articles/869/869541p7.html:

you can control boats, bikes, cars and helicopters. according to IGN, motion sensing only works well with boats.

the mini-games, particularly bowling, handle well with the motion sensing.

you can reload guns with a quick flick of the controller.

and ofcourse the motion sensing controls are optional.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 1:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
We'll be voted down :D
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 2:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
the truth must be told! =)

Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 2:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Did you also read that kotaku says that the motion controls in GTA are some of the worst in any ps3 game and are entirely useless?
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 2:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yes Curmeo but they have to deduct points for

No LIVE
No Achievements
Motion sense aside, supbar controller versus 360's

I might end up buying both versions as I did with COD4, if my sons keep bugging me enough. Just from the review video I watched I was hearing too many ooooohhhs and ahhhhsssss like you wouldn't believe, lmao!
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 2:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Just what we need: someone to turn this into a system war thread.

Thanks Curmeo for your heartily relevant contribution.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 2:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
to tmacairjordan87: reviewers will always have different opinions. i just summarized what IGN thought of the motion sensing controls.

to Fenix: "no LIVE"? you mean no paying $50 per year for the same basic online gameplay functionality! oh shit im getting ripped! achievements? dont care. i dont need motivations to play a game like GTA IV. and im sure as hell not gonna pay 50 bucks a year just for the sake of achievements! "subpar controller"? thats subjective, my friend. i prefer the DualShock 3 to the 360 controller any day of the week, twice on sunday.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 2:27PM Huey2k2 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think the real question here is, who cares?

You're getting essentially the same experience no matter what system you play it on... So if you have a 360 or a PS3 get the game and love it, I'm so fucking tired of these useless fanboy flame wars.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 2:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"I think the real question here is, who cares?"

people who own both systems or people who cant decide which system to buy for GTA IV. the IGN info in my post will help them make a more informed decision =)
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 2:47PM Slaziman said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
That really sucks. So I either get the worse looking version or I get the version without some exclusive episodic content and achievements.

suuuux
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 2:55PM Knight Marquise said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Curmeo...

Sorry I forgot to list you as one of the hardcore SDF fanbots. List updated now, thanks comrade.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 3:12PM HighFiveJesus said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
slow down there cowboy, some of that is trivial at best.
No LIVE
No Achievements
Motion sense aside, supbar controller versus 360's

By not having live, you aren't missing any actual gameplay that you can't have over PSN. Gameplay.

If you are REALLY into achievements, then i guess its a valid point, but its not like you can't do em in the PS3 version either, you just don't get a stupid little icon next to your name.

subpar controller is relative to the user, and veterans should actually be very comfortable with the idea. Third person games haven't universally been acclaimed to have the one true controller anyway. FPS, sure, but not stuff like this. You shoulda dropped the exclusive content as a point, although since it will cost extra, its not canon to prove which 60 dollars is better spent.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 3:25PM Huey2k2 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Guys look:

8==================>

MY E-PEEN IS BIGGER THAN YOURZ OMGZ.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 5:43PM R V said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
8====================================================================================>
dont think so
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW