| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (37)

Posted: Apr 28th 2008 1:33PM RKN said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
All I can say is..............LOL.
Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2008 2:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Incompetent at Dawn.
Reply

Posted: Apr 29th 2008 6:33PM enReturns said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
i dunno what you'll say when u see the one form the overrated game gta4,

*smells money*

*keeps waiting for real good games, MGS 4, anyone?*


pd, if you give me a minus, you know where you can stick the plus!
Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2008 1:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Viral advertising for IGN?

That's about the only thing that makes sense at this point.
Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2008 1:57PM BananaBoat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, that's my thought as well. It's not a stretch to see them shelling out a little cold hard cash for some subliminal advertising on the front of the box/strategy guide. Knowing that all major corporations have quality assurance employees, and that noone could have missed that obvious mistake, it just doesn't make sense that it could be a mistake, especially now that it's happened twice.


(Unrelated Note: 12 more hours! 20 for me!! GTA IV WEEHEEEE)
Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2008 1:36PM ozzzy said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Give it a rest. The world will continue with or without the IGN watermark controversy. Is it really a shock that the strategy guide authors used the same cover as the game?
Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2008 1:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
but the watermark is in a different spot, so it's not the same piece.
Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2008 1:39PM Roto13 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
It's not the same, though. The watermark has the letters IGN in it, and it's in a different spot.
Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2008 1:56PM MarkHawk said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The water mark is on a layer that was slightly moved up in the picture. Same layer just moved slightly. Still a huge error.
Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2008 3:05PM ozzzy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Brady games received the PSD file with the IGN logo from Capcom. It looks like they moved a layer or rescaled the wolf to fit the different format dimensions, but the graphic file is likely the same.

Either way, the point of the post was to say less Okami art nit picking, more GTA IV coverage. =)
Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2008 2:53PM samfish said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
MarkHawk is correct. It IS in the same spot if you look at the original picture on IGN's website. They just adjusted the layer with Ammy on it, it looks like.

Plus, it IS the same logo. Not sure why people keep saying it's different. If you look on the Wii box's cover, the insignia and the letters 'IGN' are clearly there.
Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2008 1:42PM Zertoss said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I facepalmed.
Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2008 1:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Graffick desinin

Ur doin it rong!
Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2008 1:48PM NukeAssault said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Motivational poster... GO!
Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2008 1:45PM FredFredrickson said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
As a production artist, I simply can't grasp why they would have needed to pull the artwork off the web - from IGN no less - for actual print materials. Don't they have the originals?
Reply

Posted: Apr 30th 2008 7:11PM Wagyu said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, the original PS2 game was developed by Clover Studio, and the Wii port was handled by Ready at Dawn ... but that still doesn't fully explain things, because Capcom should've still had the production artwork ...
Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2008 1:50PM Gwr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report


L A W L !

Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2008 1:47PM Saria the Cat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I can't see how it's intentional since it takes much squinting and someone else pointing it out in order to even see the logo. Why bother with advertising like that if most people won't even be able to notice it? And don't give me any of that subliminal messages shit, 'cause that's been proven to be ineffective.
Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2008 1:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Trust me, someone -had- to put that in, there's no way the letters I G N can just "accidentally" be drawn in a base art.
Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2008 2:57PM samfish said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Of course they put it in. It was IGN when they ran the images trough a batch process to get their watermark on all the Okami screens.

Then some hack working for Capcom came along and pulled it off IGN's site for whatever reason and didn't crop out the water mark.
My guess is that at a place the size of Capcom, things have to go back and forth so much and this cover was technically meant to be just a comp, but somewhere along the way another person took over the cover after the comp had been submitted and they just didn't notice it.
Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2008 4:29PM Saria the Cat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I know that it was put in intentionally by IGN when "stamping" their images for the game on the site, but I am referring to the speculation that IGN is somehow attempting to advertise on Capcom's game or that there is some intended collaboration between the two organizations.
Reply

Posted: Apr 29th 2008 11:56AM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I saw the real box in stores the other day, and it's a lot more visible in real life than scanned onto the internet.
Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2008 1:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
holy shit, this is hilarious. LOL
Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2008 1:56PM nXt said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
U R MR GAY
Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2008 1:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
When is IGN going to press charges?
Reply

Posted: Apr 29th 2008 11:57AM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why should they?

Well, how could they? The pictures aren't copyrighted by IGN at all, they're just watermarked because they're from their website. But technically, they still have no ownership of the pictures.
Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2008 2:00PM KeenCommander said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think Joystiq is just afraid of the competition from IGN.
Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2008 2:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Strategy guide covers with inadvertent watermarks are SERIOUS BUSINESS!

Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2008 2:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Rubbish!
Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2008 2:20PM GewurztraminerX said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, Capcom's reaction to the box art snafu was to re-issue the same or two alternate box arts, sans watermark, to those that purchased the game. For a game in which the artistic style is a key element, that seems like a nice way to approach the situation.

As for the strategy guide; i'm torn between saying "that's BradyGames' problem" or "deal with it".
=D
Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2008 2:21PM motang said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
So is IGN getting a cut since there logo is being used. ;-)
Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2008 2:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Not only does it have the logo and say IGN, if you look really hard, you can make out at least a CO next to it meaning it obviously said IGN.COM
Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2008 2:44PM ScottG13 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This still cracks me up.
Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2008 6:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It has to be intentional. Why and how else would two different watermarks show up in the same spot?
Reply

Posted: Apr 29th 2008 12:04AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Talk about lack of effort on the Wii. :/

You can't get AAA games/effort, now we get this?

(Yeah, I know it's a simple mistake but you have to wonder why anyone needs to download IGN art images at all when they've got the original official art in their repertoire).
Reply

Posted: Apr 29th 2008 4:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I work for game stop, and the cover art we used to tell people that the game is coming out had the "ign" water mark on it as well.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 7:01AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
well, at least when they make the new covers (minus the watermark, hopefully), the watermarked one might go limited edition, right?

still, why get the image off of ign? why don't you go through the game files itself? i think the image is a bonus art thing, or something.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW