| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (76)

Posted: May 9th 2008 1:00AM Anticrawl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They already made a Bioshock movie, it was on a format only playable via 360 or PC. It wasn't a very good movie though, the watcher had to keep clicking the next button to watch it frame-by-frame. It was quite dull and tiring, and only monkeys watched it all the way through and enjoyed it.

If I buy this sequel will it play itself? I think I was punished enough the first time.

Posted: May 9th 2008 8:55AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The line-up so far might add up to the most potential a video game movie has had to date.

I wouldn't have picked Gore Verbinski, that's for sure... Looking at his films, I doubt he could deftly pull off something of Bioshock's depth.

However, they could have done a hell of a lot worse.

Posted: May 9th 2008 1:31AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Tom Hanks as Andrew Ryan. Hands Down.

Posted: May 9th 2008 11:05AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You bite your fucking tongue.
Reply

Posted: May 11th 2008 7:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
nooooo tom hanks...so commercial.
Reply

Posted: May 9th 2008 2:03AM Rax Dakkar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wasn't the most powerful part of the story in Bioshock...

WARNING SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER WARNING

That while the game purported to give you the "free will" to take on your missions anyway you wanted, you were really just a pawn of who ever called you up on the radio? That you had to "kindly" do what they said? That impact was so much greater in a video game beause it had a sort of meta significance: no matter how much freedom we get in games, we ultimately have to do what we are told. You can't make Nico in GTA4 say to a character, "no I won't murder that person". We as gamers have accepted that and when Bioshock turned that into a plot twist that made gamers reflect on that fact it was very powerful. How is a movie going to do that?




END OF SPOILER END OF SPOILER


Still, a game with such an original sense of time and place will at least make for some excellent eye candy. Hope it doesn't fail like every other video game movie!

Posted: May 9th 2008 2:13AM spin cycle said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh, is that the excuse for making me destroy the city?

Cause I had already figured it out a while back, and I tried everything but pushing the destruct button. But that turned out to be the only way to advance.

In GTA4 you often have the choice of not murdering people. Ever do the missions to steal cars for Brucie? There are some that you can do by trying to steal the car out from under the gang. But then you lose a lot of money because they shoot up the car and make it difficult for you to get away with it. It's much easier to preemptively find a good spot to snipe from and take out the group, then go down and get the car.

So you do often have a choice, just not always. In BioShock, you have no choice.
Reply

Posted: May 9th 2008 12:54PM Rax Dakkar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
While GTA 4 does indeed have more choices than any previous GTA 4, it is still relatively confined to the tracks the developers want you to stay on; any game with so called "moral choices" is the same way. In GTA 4, how much of an impact does killing one criminal or the other really have on the overall story? In Mass Effect, all your moral don't really affect the story, until that last huge choice that affects everything. You could choose every "good guy" choice, then suddenly pick the "badguy" choice, and no one in the game would care.

My point though was that Bioshock's more powerful story element, I felt, worked only because it was a game and that it wouldn't work well as a movie.
Reply

Posted: May 9th 2008 2:20AM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
FUCK. YES.



Keep close to the source material and you've got my ticket.

Posted: May 9th 2008 2:34AM spin cycle said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I would mention that having Verbinski's involvement at this point means he is producing, not necessarily directing. Verbinski is not an experienced producer. Bruckheimer produced Pirates, and Bruckheimer has produced a lot of stuff, going back to Top Gun and including and entire evening of shows on CBS at one point. Not every director's first foray into producing turns out well, in fact, it usually doesn't.

Posted: May 9th 2008 2:56AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah you probably right with Watchmen. They do tend to screw up those kinds of movies like Watchmen (ala X-men 3, Spider Man 3 to name a few)
Reply

Posted: May 9th 2008 9:51AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thank god it's now Uwe Boll directing this movie.

Posted: May 9th 2008 10:24AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Just what we need, one of the most incompetent directors on earth making the Bioshock film. I see another crappy video game on the way.

Guess I'll just play Bioshock again instead of watching this sure to be disaster.

Posted: May 9th 2008 10:48AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Cool...

Though I think that I would rather take a playable sequel or prequel.

Just don't suck!

Posted: May 9th 2008 11:43AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
excellent, with him behind the wheel it should be a hit.

can't wait!

Posted: May 9th 2008 1:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Please do the right thing and either a) use music from the game or b) get the same composer to write original music for the film.

Posted: May 9th 2008 2:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I could totally see Dakota Fanning and Abigail Breslin as little sisters.

Oh, and John Goodman as big daddy. I'd run.

Posted: May 9th 2008 2:49PM Bentzero said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
nice boobies

Posted: May 9th 2008 2:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You mean Uwe Boll isn't doing this one? Finally, a video game movie I'm excited about!

Posted: May 9th 2008 3:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
please stop this movie from being made. hollywood is turning everything they can into a movie to make a quick buck. this movie is going to destroy the entire game and any possible franchise that could be made off of it.

Posted: May 9th 2008 5:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I laugh when people say Assassins Creed has better gameplay then Bioshock.

AC was the most repetitive game ever created.

Posted: May 13th 2008 2:29AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Honestly I think this is a game which easily lends itself to a movie. It was creepy and mysterious and you always wanted to know what was around the next corner. So long as they change NOTHING, it will be great. However, theres is no sense getting your hopes up, as movies such as the Resident Evil trilogy and Final Fantasy: the Spirits Within have already shown the movie industry's amazing ability to take something that could be a brilliant movie and turned into a smoldering hunk of crap. Here's hoping that wont happen here. Cheers.

Posted: May 24th 2008 8:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i wonder what the main character is gonna look like when you only see his arms during the game..

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 4:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have faith in Gore Verbinski I think he knows what makes a good movie and what doesn’t. Did you hear they are making a movie out of City Of Ember too! The preview reminded me of Bio-Shock, in fact I thought that was the trailer . But The movie looks like it’s going to be awesome. The set designer for Titanic and Nightmare Before Christmas is doing the sets for the movie, and from what I can from the trailer it looks so creepy/awesome!
My name is Blair Landon and I am an official ambassador for City of Ember. I have access to first-look pics of the movie not seen in the trailer (located on MySpace), and i'd love you to take a peak at them! I could also really use your help in spreading the word about COE and get lots of buzz going!
Don't forget to check out the widget we have too. It's pretty interactive and shows you where all the other City of Ember fans are around the world!
Again, I hope I'm not over-stepping and bounds by posting on your blog.
Best,Blair Landon
Official COE Ambassador
blair.ambassador@gmail.com

Links
Official Site: http://www.cityofember.com/
MySpace: http://www.myspace.com/cityofemberambassador
Widget: http://www.cityofember.com/widget.html

Posted: Jun 11th 2008 2:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
wellll.......

I think pre-1959 new years bombing could function as a movie... if they told the story of fontain's rise to power, ryans subsequent abandonment of his objectivist ideals, and such... you've got plenty of compelling characters and events all laid out the game would function as the sequel (thus choice of ending remains intact). however this would be a political character driven movie rather than an exiting action driven movie. this would drive away most of the gaming audience and the fact that its a game movie would drive away the rest of the movie audience...epic fail

in all likely hood this is going to end up as another disappointing game movie in which vin diesel argues with some ditzy actress over whether to kill a little sister... again epic fail

if anything bioshock shows how useful the video game can be as a medium... to put it in a movie is akin to expressing Mona Lisa through marble.

Posted: Jul 21st 2008 4:20AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Guys, I am just glad 2K was smart enough to NOT hand the movie license to that hack Uwe Boll.

Can't wait for the movie.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW