GamePolitics has an interview with Rep. Lee Terry (R-Neb), one of the congressmen, along with Rep. Jim Matheson (D-Utah), attempting to pass a federal law forcing retailers to check IDs before selling M- and AO-rated games. One of the better moments in the interview is when GP asks Rep. Terry what game he was talking about when he stated there are titles players could score point for virtual rape. Terry responded, "That's a good question. I don't know of any [specific games] offhand... I just used the rape, pillage and plunder line..."
The ESA has publicly come out against the bill, with CEO Mike Gallagher saying that the bill is unconstitutional. He states the ESA shares the representatives' goals of "ensuring children are playing parent-approved computer and video games," but points out that all consoles now have parental settings which can be used to make sure kids play only the games their parents allow.


















(Page 1) Reader Comments
Why dont they just slap the parents into paying attention instead of trying to pass all this BS.
Reply
WHAT KIND OF POLITICIANS ARE THESE?!
Reply
That's just how it goes.
Fuck Yeah!
This is coming from a 16 year old-let them pass it. It seems to me like the best path would be to have m rated games treated as r rated movies.
Reply
Honestly, they've basically admitted they're just making the damn legislation to score political points, haven't they? What with the "standard line" thing, or whatever they're calling it. Wouldn't surprise me at all if they've raped people themselves in the past and then covered it up at the taxpayers' expense; that's how this kind of thing works these days, isn't it?
Actually, they already are. The MPAA movie ratings are not enforced by any laws just like the ESRB ratings. Besides, all this would do is make criminals out of people for no good reason. Is that really what you want?
Reply
The best he could come up with for ID was his college student ID, and since that didn't have DOB, he just had to reason with the guy that if he was in college, he was old enough to buy the game.
Reply
Kid: Well why can't we just make a law against flag burning?
Amendment: Because that law would be unconstitutional.
But if we changed the Constitution...
kid: Then we could make all sorts of crazy laws!
Amendment: Now you're catching on!
Reply
Reply
Also, "I'm just a Bill" is educationally awesome!
Reply
Reply
That they dont even know what they talk about,and take it so un-serious,i dont think the goal is to pass the law(wich probably wont happen) but something else-unrelated to it.
Maybe to have their names get seen more? maybe its some congres fraternity test "go and try to make a game law to enter" is the new"dres as chick in a bar".
IDK,yet they keep trying for the sake of it ,so it must be another personal reason.
Jack doesnt count,hes just so crazy by now that it might be whatever.
Reply
Reply
I don't see what the big deal is. M ratings get your mommie to buy you the game. That way when you shoot up your school the only people to blame are you and your parents and not the video games.
Reply
Reply
If you listen to the news I am one of the few responsible parents out there. I would be upset if some store let my 15 year old buy GTA3. I DO own the game and I DO let my 15 year old play it. I will not however, even allow the game to be played when my 3 year old is awake.
I absolutely hate it when he parents get on TV saying that they can't believe that their kids are playing these violent/sexually explicit games. When they are asked how their kids got the games they invariably reply that they got it for them for their birthday, or some other such nonsense.
If you don't want your kids playing certain games it is your responsibility to say NO. THAT is part of being a parent.
Reply
Reply
Reply