| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (45)

Posted: May 13th 2008 10:05AM FernandoRocker said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Poor Uwe Boll... well, I guess he deserve that.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 10:11AM Pojomofo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
and worse...
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 11:27AM SheppyReturns said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I've said it before, I'll say it again. Uwe isn't the worst director out there. Hell, his two main flaws are that he's overly confrontational and that he's an easy target for gamers to hate. As this article points out, has he really destroyed some of the best loved franchises in gaming? Nope. Are there worst directors? Yeah, actually. Let's see anyone talk about Uwe Boll being a horrible director after they've watched Dead or Alive or even this tripe... http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0284457/

Gamers, for some reason, just need hated figures and Uwe Boll fits that role for the sheep to flock against. Which is very tragic and sad...
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 11:30AM MrHashbrown said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
...and a little more just to satisfy the hordes of people willing to jump him in the street,
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 12:36PM FrankTheCrank said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Who in their right mind writes SAUSAGE on the wall?

WTF?
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 10:10AM Nigeria said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It looks and sounds like Boll had great fun making this film. I'll probably watch it. Maybe at the cinema, or I might wait for it to hit DVD and score a copy of Ebay, or something. But I think I'll watch it.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 1:56PM Emil K said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I am actually excited to go see this too. Postal seems the type of game that Uwe Boll can't mess up because of the type of humor it has.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 10:13AM lonecow said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
My problem is not with the games he chooses to make into movies. I don't care about any of the ones he has ruined either. It is that he is completely ruining any chance for games to be taken seriously in film. Everytime someone generally makes a good script based on a good video game, producers immediately point to the failure of bloodrayne or House of the Dead and say that video game movies don't work. And when they do get through, like the upcoming Prince of Persia the directors have to go to great lengths to assure people that the film won't be a video game movie, so basically they just bought the title "Prince of Persia". Do other producers/directors have to give a disclaimer that their work will be nothing like the source material? No. In any other situation they make sure the fans know the movie will be true to the book, comic, anime or whatever it is based on (even if it ultimately isn't).

Games into movies have a bad wrap and Boll is one of the problems.

Also there is the fear that one day he MIGHT get his hands on a property people actually care about.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 10:20AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
i don't even really care about video games ever becoming good movies. it bothers me that he can be horrible at what he does, yet still gets to finance and direct more crappy movies. maybe he doesn't even bother trying with postal, but from what i gathered about inthe name of the king (though admittedyl i didn't watch it), he attempted to make an epic blockbuster (and simply failed).

it doesn't seem fair that he can still find work, nazi gold or no.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 10:35AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Good point. Even if Postal isn't the worst movie in the world, it's certainly bad. And non-gamers don't know that the game Postal is pretty much ignored by most gamers.

People who are unexposed to the great stories in gaming won't be won over by this hack's movies. Where are the movies that accurately and artistically retell Grim Fandango, Halo, God of War or Half Life? If Boll keeps working they'll never get made, or if they are made they'll be done very cheaply by untalented directors.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 12:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
GRANTED: Actually, his goofy German Producers-esque tax loophole has been closed, so this could pretty easily be the last of his movies. So... that's good...
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 4:08PM XLM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Alas he's got 6 more coming down the poop chute including Farcry and Bloodrayne 3...
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 10:15AM FakeJamaican said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dave Foley FTW
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 10:16AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dave Foley could protect you from Chuck Norris, let alone a video game movie from complete suckage.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 10:18AM John Z said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"Rather, we walked away yawning, bored."

Which makes it a BAD MOVIE.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 10:31AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Which is what HE SAID.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 12:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually he said it was neither bad nor good
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 12:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually he said it was neither bad nor good enough to warrant the strong reaction Uwe Boll gets. So it could still be bad or good.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 12:49PM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually he said "wasn't bad (nor good) enough to warrant such passion"

he is saying its not bad or good enough enough to warrant the passion that people feel for his work.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 10:26AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Seeing Boll call himself a pedophile, only to get killed by having his genitalia riddled with bullets will undoubtedly sell a few tickets to the Boll-haters"

Nah, they...WE'll just watch it online...
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 1:28PM jumpshot said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, pretty much. I wouldnt spend a penny on this crap. It's one thing to review a movie when you didnt pay for it and the controversy around it makes it worth your time to see and then review it. It's another thing entirely to know it's crap and see it anyway.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 10:29AM Revving Injuns said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dave Foley must be hard up for some cash. When is the next Kids in the Hall movie coming out?
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 10:30AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This actually sounds fairly reminiscent of the Postal series in a way that Uwe's other films never are of the games they are supposed to represent.

For the record, I loved Postal and Postal 2, if only for the fact that they focus so heavily on the hyperviolence and irreverence that causes so much controversy in games like GTA, and pump it up a million times, and receive almost no media attention, despite the fact that I can go and buy them at gamestop. That and the fact that you can piss on Gary Coleman.

I might consider actually seeing this. It sound like Mr Coleman is the only thing missing from making this a truly successful adaptation of the games, which are supposed to be cheesy and so "shocking" that it stops being shocking quickly. That's kind of the whole point, and I'm glad to hear he's pulled it off.

Not that I support Uwe at all, though.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 10:29AM jocozo3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Heh. From Boll's perspective this is a worse review than if Andrew Yoon simply called it bad. At least with a bad movie Boll could continue in his infamy, but making simply boring films make him irrelevant.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 1:32PM jumpshot said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
True. I guess that he feeds on our anger, so how much sustenance can he get from our boredom?
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 10:30AM DrXym said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Instead, I'm left wondering why the filmmaker continues to get as much attention as he does."

Because gaming sites and blogs (like this one), give the guy the oxygen of publicity. If you stop publishing non-stories about the guy he will fade into the deserved obscurity where he belongs.

Its about time the responsible members of the gaming press took an editorial decision and stop publishing non-stories about the guy. And do the same to Jack Thompson while you're at it.
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2008 1:13AM JnZooger said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The problem is, people read and reply to said topics. Thus, if you want the topics to stop, you have to stop reading them.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 10:40AM Girricane said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'll need to watch the movie for myself before I decide whether or not I agree with your comments about the kid killing and 9/11 crash. To me, it sounds unnecessary and just thrown in to cause a stir. Unless the two pilots or the WTC going down has any lasting effect on the movie, then he's just pandering to piss people off. Which, based on his previous work, results in a poorly acted and shot scene that does nothing for the film.
As for kid killing, I'm sorry, but there's a damn line. Kid killing, while can be a great visual device in movies that you know, have a point to them, probably is again, just over the top and unnecessary for this type of film. If the movie is trying to be funny, then the kid killing probably should have been left on the cutting room floor (unless there are some goofy sound effects to go with kids getting shot.).
Even watching the man getting shot in the crotch won't encourage me to see this, I can only imagine how bad of an actor he is. And really, I'd have to BELIEVE his death in order to appreciate it :).
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 11:02AM Ethan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You know what, he should depict the prophet Mohammed if he wants to be really 'brave' and 'daring.'This'll rile a lot of people who, but people who know it's best to leave shit to become manure.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 12:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agreed with you until your second sentence fell off the face of the earth.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 2:16PM Ethan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Proof reading would be wonderful. Should read as this;

This film'll rile a lot of people, but those are people who know it's best to leave shit to become manure. i.e. we know that it's not significant.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 11:15AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Shit...I may end up watching this now if only for the whole scene with Boll in it. And not just for the groinal shooting, but for his whole rant on hating video games and such. It's such a satire of himself, I actually dig that he put that in there.

That said, I still hate Uwe Boll and am glad to be one that signed that stupid petition.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 1:36PM jumpshot said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
as a download then?
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 11:24AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So, some sensationalist tries to stir up sensationalism with a sensational film. *yawn* Can we please just ignore him until he goes away?
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 11:26AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
*sigh* I'll just download it some point.
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2008 2:11AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think you hit the nail on the head there. The thing that's so offensive about Boll is not that his movies are extremely bad, but that they are so mind-numbingly boring and confusing. He has the actors, the budget and untapped potential of the franchise. But the outcome is just horribly mediocre it falls flat at being bad. At least that's what I've thought of all of the stuff of his and has annoyed me the most. At least make a decently bad movie, god dammit!
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 12:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I actually want to watch this, the meta-movie moment you described sounded hilarious... I've never seen any of his movies, but maybe the guy is just post-structuralist he's just going over your heads?

P.S. -- don't wear "I'm a New Yorker" on your sleeve like that with 9/11, it makes you sound like an attention whore.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 12:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow this review was a waste of my time. He doesn't 'get' the Boll thing, he hasn't seen his movies, hasn't played the game... way to get it from the perspective of a lot of your readers.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 12:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Are people really up-in-arms over how he "ruined" BloodRayne, or Alone in the Dark?"

Hey don't group Alone in the Dark with schlock like Bloodrayne. It was awesome for its time and was the direct template for Resident Evil, and thereby kinda started the survival horror genre. It's a classic.

(Though I'm not up in arms about the terrible movie he made of AitD. I slept through most of it so for all I know it was cinematic gold.)
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 1:34PM Mistur said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Uwe Boll or what ever bash him all you want. But I know that most of the people on this site never even played Postal 1 let alone Postal 2 (which the movie is based off of). So leave the Running With Scissors guys alone ok? Where else can I use an alley cat as a shot gun silencer? or stick dynamite up a rats ass and control it remotely?

Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 2:10PM AoE said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow Andrew, you really haven't seen a boll film before have you? I wasn't expecting a grade A film out of House of the Dead, I knew what the source material was, I was expecting a goofy grade-c horror film with bad acting and some decent gore effects... what I got was a grade-c horror film with bad acting decent gore effects, and clips from a 1997 light-gun game inter-cut with all of the action scenes. Yes, Uwe Boll managed to fuck up a grade-c horror film. No, I didn't realize that was actually possible either. After that the hate has mostly stems from the fact that he's an arrogant prick, albeit one with highly entertaining antics.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 2:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"It's in moments like these where Postal best succeeds, and reminds us that Boll probably isn't as horrible as the internet paints him out to be."

You should probably leave lines like this out until you've seen at least one of the movies people are talking about.

People don't call him a horrible director because he ruined franchises. They call him that because his movies were horrible. Other directors make horrible movies, but their horrible movies make money-- or the directors stop making movies. Boll is a striking exception, hence the rep.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 3:07PM Link408 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
you guys wanna see bad movies, then watch these
http://www.imdb.com/chart/bottom
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 7:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If I recall correctly, the plot of Postal was "I need to go to the store to get some milk".

That was it. That was the plot.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2008 8:53PM Mal F4cti0n said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well....go watch Alone in the Dark and notice the horrible direction the movie has. Not too mention the HUGE gaps in the story or just the common sense, going from point A to B efforts that fail horribly. The whole boat scene for one, where they pull up a sunken treasure chest or something, and the crew locks the doctor in a room on the boat while out in the middle of the ocean. After the good doctor tries to open the door, which was locked from the outside, the crew opens the chest and they are all slaughtered. The doctor can hear screaming and he creeps back and hides. The screen goes black. The shot starts again with the doctor in the room. The doctor gets up and creeps to the door, opening it (it is now unlocked against all logic) he witnesses the blood and guts from the slaughtered crew. He then graps something from the bottom of the chest and scampers down the gangplank to a pier. What! How the f*ck did the door get unlocked and the boat steer itself to the pier and lower the gangplank. It just throws common sense off the deep end in order to hurry up and get to the next non-sensical, plotless scene.

Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW