An evening with Uwe Boll's Postal

To be honest, I didn't know what to expect when I was invited to an early screening of Uwe Boll's latest film, Postal. Perhaps I'm in the minority, but I have never experienced an Uwe Boll film. Perhaps it's because Boll has never touched any of my most beloved game franchises. Looking at his past films, it appears he hasn't made as many films to justify the fervor that surrounds him. Is anyone really angry that the House of the Dead film wasn't A-grade cinematic material? Is the film somehow a disgrace to the game's "legacy?" Doubtful. Are people really up-in-arms over how he "ruined" BloodRayne, or Alone in the Dark?
Postal is also an interesting choice for the German director. Very few have actually played the game (neither have I) -- but those that have don't really like it. Even if the film amounted to a terrible disaster, it wouldn't disgrace the game, or the "genre" of the video game film (if such a thing should be considered). With all of this in mind, the curtains opened and Uwe Boll's Postal screening started.

The film opens with two terrorists in the cockpit of a plane. Already, the film attempts to provoke a response in a scene that's clearly evocative of the September 11th attacks. As a New Yorker, it felt distasteful, but at the same time, I understood that this was exactly the kind of feeling Boll wanted to get from the audience. The two terrorists argue the number of virgins they can sleep with in the afterlife, only to realize that perhaps their mission is just a sham. They call Osama bin Laden, and see that instead of the 100 (or 99) virgins they were expecting, they'd most likely only get a dozen. Split between the two of them for all of eternity, those wouldn't be virgins for long. Proclaiming the reward insufficient, the hijackers decide to turn the plane around, but only moments before an angry mob of civilians breaks through and crashes the plane into the World Trade Center.
The irreverent bickering of the two hijackers in arguably the most tragic moment of modern American history becomes the foundation for a potentially edgy dark comedy that dares to tackle the most sensitive issues of our culture. However, the film devolves to an amateurish slapstick comedy that rarely shocks the audience as it so successfully does in its opening scene.
Perhaps the story doesn't offer Postal a chance to really do much. It's hard to imagine anyone sane possibly coming up with a plot that ties American hillbilly life, suicidal scam cults, popular phallic children's dolls, the Holocaust, and Al-Qaeda into one coherent story. Regardless, Uwe Boll attempts to craft a story so all-encompassing that it ultimately says nothing at all.

"Dude," the film's unnamed protagonist is unemployed, stuck in a trailer park in the suburban town of Paradise. After a streak of bad luck, Dude loses his cool and decides to meet up with his brother, who runs a scam cult organization that quickly runs into trouble with the law. The cult, millions of dollars in debt due to unpaid taxes, decides to steal a very limited batch of Crotchdolls from a nearby Nazi-themed park, run by Uwe Boll. Unfortunately, Al Qaeda is also on the look for these lucrative Crotchdolls, which go for thousands of dollars online (the dolls also coincidentally contain vials of the avian bird flu).
"Did I ever want to see Dave Foley's penis while he relieves himself in the bathroom? Not really." |
Other than the opening plane hijacking sequence, only one other scene really challenges the taboos of filmmaking. In one of the film's big gunfights in the Little Germany theme park, the camera zooms exclusively on the innocent children being slaughtered in the crossfire. Bullets burst out of the kids, as they fall to the floor, dead or wincing in pain. It's a horrible sight, but Postal does it with such enthusiastic fanfare. We wish the rest of the film could be as daring.

Uwe Boll does make an appearance in the film, in one of the strangest meta moments in a film I have ever seen. The on-screen Boll introduces himself as a filmmaker, one that has enraged critics through his continued adaptations of video game movies. He explains how he's able to finance his films, and the Little Germany theme park: through Nazi gold, obviously.
How does Boll die? He gets shot in the crotch. |
Seeing Boll call himself a pedophile, only to get killed by having his genitalia riddled with bullets will undoubtedly sell a few tickets to the Boll-haters. Breaking the fourth wall to such an extreme, where the director himself talks to his most vocal critics -- that certainly must be celebrated. It's in moments like these where Postal best succeeds, and reminds us that Boll probably isn't as horrible as the internet paints him out to be.

Unfortunately, Boll's latest film, Postal, is not the worst movie in the world. However, this is a problem. For a film that's supposed to challenge our expectations with an in-your-face display of extreme debauchery, Postal is surprisingly tame. As the credits rolled and the critics and myself walked out of the theater, there wasn't a sense of anger, nor disappointment. Rather, we walked away yawning, bored. Perhaps if the movie were as bad as Boll critics had predicted, I'd write a fiery diatribe against the film's release. Instead, I'm left wondering why the filmmaker continues to get as much attention as he does. Certainly, Postal wasn't bad (nor good) enough to warrant such passion. Maybe I'm missing something.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Fernando Rocker @ May 13th 2008 10:05AM
Poor Uwe Boll... well, I guess he deserve that.
PojoMofo @ May 13th 2008 10:11AM
and worse...
Sir Fidlious Wong (Justin T. McElroy Memorial Burn of the Day Award) @ May 13th 2008 11:27AM
I've said it before, I'll say it again. Uwe isn't the worst director out there. Hell, his two main flaws are that he's overly confrontational and that he's an easy target for gamers to hate. As this article points out, has he really destroyed some of the best loved franchises in gaming? Nope. Are there worst directors? Yeah, actually. Let's see anyone talk about Uwe Boll being a horrible director after they've watched Dead or Alive or even this tripe... http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0284457/
Gamers, for some reason, just need hated figures and Uwe Boll fits that role for the sheep to flock against. Which is very tragic and sad...
Hashbrown Hunter @ May 13th 2008 11:30AM
...and a little more just to satisfy the hordes of people willing to jump him in the street,
FrankTheCrank @ May 13th 2008 12:36PM
Who in their right mind writes SAUSAGE on the wall?
WTF?
Nigeria @ May 13th 2008 10:10AM
It looks and sounds like Boll had great fun making this film. I'll probably watch it. Maybe at the cinema, or I might wait for it to hit DVD and score a copy of Ebay, or something. But I think I'll watch it.
green11420 @ May 13th 2008 1:56PM
I am actually excited to go see this too. Postal seems the type of game that Uwe Boll can't mess up because of the type of humor it has.
Lonecow @ May 13th 2008 10:13AM
My problem is not with the games he chooses to make into movies. I don't care about any of the ones he has ruined either. It is that he is completely ruining any chance for games to be taken seriously in film. Everytime someone generally makes a good script based on a good video game, producers immediately point to the failure of bloodrayne or House of the Dead and say that video game movies don't work. And when they do get through, like the upcoming Prince of Persia the directors have to go to great lengths to assure people that the film won't be a video game movie, so basically they just bought the title "Prince of Persia". Do other producers/directors have to give a disclaimer that their work will be nothing like the source material? No. In any other situation they make sure the fans know the movie will be true to the book, comic, anime or whatever it is based on (even if it ultimately isn't).
Games into movies have a bad wrap and Boll is one of the problems.
Also there is the fear that one day he MIGHT get his hands on a property people actually care about.
GRANTED @ May 13th 2008 10:20AM
i don't even really care about video games ever becoming good movies. it bothers me that he can be horrible at what he does, yet still gets to finance and direct more crappy movies. maybe he doesn't even bother trying with postal, but from what i gathered about inthe name of the king (though admittedyl i didn't watch it), he attempted to make an epic blockbuster (and simply failed).
it doesn't seem fair that he can still find work, nazi gold or no.
Matt @ May 13th 2008 10:35AM
Good point. Even if Postal isn't the worst movie in the world, it's certainly bad. And non-gamers don't know that the game Postal is pretty much ignored by most gamers.
People who are unexposed to the great stories in gaming won't be won over by this hack's movies. Where are the movies that accurately and artistically retell Grim Fandango, Halo, God of War or Half Life? If Boll keeps working they'll never get made, or if they are made they'll be done very cheaply by untalented directors.
nuero @ May 13th 2008 12:25PM
GRANTED: Actually, his goofy German Producers-esque tax loophole has been closed, so this could pretty easily be the last of his movies. So... that's good...
XLM @ May 13th 2008 4:08PM
Alas he's got 6 more coming down the poop chute including Farcry and Bloodrayne 3...
Travis @ May 13th 2008 10:15AM
Dave Foley FTW
Tyler @ May 13th 2008 10:16AM
Dave Foley could protect you from Chuck Norris, let alone a video game movie from complete suckage.
John Z @ May 13th 2008 10:18AM
"Rather, we walked away yawning, bored."
Which makes it a BAD MOVIE.
Chef Reinhold @ May 13th 2008 10:31AM
Which is what HE SAID.
Jawknee @ May 13th 2008 12:28PM
Actually he said it was neither bad nor good
Yourself @ May 13th 2008 12:42PM
Actually he said it was neither bad nor good enough to warrant the strong reaction Uwe Boll gets. So it could still be bad or good.
NATO_Duke @ May 13th 2008 12:49PM
Actually he said "wasn't bad (nor good) enough to warrant such passion"
he is saying its not bad or good enough enough to warrant the passion that people feel for his work.
Noshino @ May 13th 2008 10:26AM
"Seeing Boll call himself a pedophile, only to get killed by having his genitalia riddled with bullets will undoubtedly sell a few tickets to the Boll-haters"
Nah, they...WE'll just watch it online...
Tim The Enchanter @ May 13th 2008 1:28PM
Yeah, pretty much. I wouldnt spend a penny on this crap. It's one thing to review a movie when you didnt pay for it and the controversy around it makes it worth your time to see and then review it. It's another thing entirely to know it's crap and see it anyway.
LeadBoxx @ May 13th 2008 10:29AM
Dave Foley must be hard up for some cash. When is the next Kids in the Hall movie coming out?
Dan @ May 13th 2008 10:29AM
Heh. From Boll's perspective this is a worse review than if Andrew Yoon simply called it bad. At least with a bad movie Boll could continue in his infamy, but making simply boring films make him irrelevant.
Tim The Enchanter @ May 13th 2008 1:32PM
True. I guess that he feeds on our anger, so how much sustenance can he get from our boredom?
Mr. Scolex @ May 13th 2008 10:30AM
This actually sounds fairly reminiscent of the Postal series in a way that Uwe's other films never are of the games they are supposed to represent.
For the record, I loved Postal and Postal 2, if only for the fact that they focus so heavily on the hyperviolence and irreverence that causes so much controversy in games like GTA, and pump it up a million times, and receive almost no media attention, despite the fact that I can go and buy them at gamestop. That and the fact that you can piss on Gary Coleman.
I might consider actually seeing this. It sound like Mr Coleman is the only thing missing from making this a truly successful adaptation of the games, which are supposed to be cheesy and so "shocking" that it stops being shocking quickly. That's kind of the whole point, and I'm glad to hear he's pulled it off.
Not that I support Uwe at all, though.
DrXym @ May 13th 2008 10:30AM
"Instead, I'm left wondering why the filmmaker continues to get as much attention as he does."
Because gaming sites and blogs (like this one), give the guy the oxygen of publicity. If you stop publishing non-stories about the guy he will fade into the deserved obscurity where he belongs.
Its about time the responsible members of the gaming press took an editorial decision and stop publishing non-stories about the guy. And do the same to Jack Thompson while you're at it.
Josh @ May 14th 2008 1:13AM
The problem is, people read and reply to said topics. Thus, if you want the topics to stop, you have to stop reading them.
Girricane @ May 13th 2008 10:40AM
I'll need to watch the movie for myself before I decide whether or not I agree with your comments about the kid killing and 9/11 crash. To me, it sounds unnecessary and just thrown in to cause a stir. Unless the two pilots or the WTC going down has any lasting effect on the movie, then he's just pandering to piss people off. Which, based on his previous work, results in a poorly acted and shot scene that does nothing for the film.
As for kid killing, I'm sorry, but there's a damn line. Kid killing, while can be a great visual device in movies that you know, have a point to them, probably is again, just over the top and unnecessary for this type of film. If the movie is trying to be funny, then the kid killing probably should have been left on the cutting room floor (unless there are some goofy sound effects to go with kids getting shot.).
Even watching the man getting shot in the crotch won't encourage me to see this, I can only imagine how bad of an actor he is. And really, I'd have to BELIEVE his death in order to appreciate it :).
Ethan @ May 13th 2008 11:02AM
You know what, he should depict the prophet Mohammed if he wants to be really 'brave' and 'daring.'This'll rile a lot of people who, but people who know it's best to leave shit to become manure.
Yourself @ May 13th 2008 12:45PM
I agreed with you until your second sentence fell off the face of the earth.
Ethan @ May 13th 2008 2:16PM
Proof reading would be wonderful. Should read as this;
This film'll rile a lot of people, but those are people who know it's best to leave shit to become manure. i.e. we know that it's not significant.
StrangeBum @ May 13th 2008 11:15AM
Shit...I may end up watching this now if only for the whole scene with Boll in it. And not just for the groinal shooting, but for his whole rant on hating video games and such. It's such a satire of himself, I actually dig that he put that in there.
That said, I still hate Uwe Boll and am glad to be one that signed that stupid petition.
Tim The Enchanter @ May 13th 2008 1:36PM
as a download then?
Phinehas @ May 13th 2008 11:24AM
So, some sensationalist tries to stir up sensationalism with a sensational film. *yawn* Can we please just ignore him until he goes away?
Kujel @ May 13th 2008 11:26AM
*sigh* I'll just download it some point.
MarMar @ May 13th 2008 12:01PM
I actually want to watch this, the meta-movie moment you described sounded hilarious... I've never seen any of his movies, but maybe the guy is just post-structuralist he's just going over your heads?
P.S. -- don't wear "I'm a New Yorker" on your sleeve like that with 9/11, it makes you sound like an attention whore.
Organic_Shadow @ May 13th 2008 12:07PM
Wow this review was a waste of my time. He doesn't 'get' the Boll thing, he hasn't seen his movies, hasn't played the game... way to get it from the perspective of a lot of your readers.
Chintz @ May 13th 2008 12:34PM
"Are people really up-in-arms over how he "ruined" BloodRayne, or Alone in the Dark?"
Hey don't group Alone in the Dark with schlock like Bloodrayne. It was awesome for its time and was the direct template for Resident Evil, and thereby kinda started the survival horror genre. It's a classic.
(Though I'm not up in arms about the terrible movie he made of AitD. I slept through most of it so for all I know it was cinematic gold.)
Tom @ May 13th 2008 1:34PM
Uwe Boll or what ever bash him all you want. But I know that most of the people on this site never even played Postal 1 let alone Postal 2 (which the movie is based off of). So leave the Running With Scissors guys alone ok? Where else can I use an alley cat as a shot gun silencer? or stick dynamite up a rats ass and control it remotely?
AoE @ May 13th 2008 2:10PM
Wow Andrew, you really haven't seen a boll film before have you? I wasn't expecting a grade A film out of House of the Dead, I knew what the source material was, I was expecting a goofy grade-c horror film with bad acting and some decent gore effects... what I got was a grade-c horror film with bad acting decent gore effects, and clips from a 1997 light-gun game inter-cut with all of the action scenes. Yes, Uwe Boll managed to fuck up a grade-c horror film. No, I didn't realize that was actually possible either. After that the hate has mostly stems from the fact that he's an arrogant prick, albeit one with highly entertaining antics.
whiny bitch @ May 13th 2008 2:44PM
"It's in moments like these where Postal best succeeds, and reminds us that Boll probably isn't as horrible as the internet paints him out to be."
You should probably leave lines like this out until you've seen at least one of the movies people are talking about.
People don't call him a horrible director because he ruined franchises. They call him that because his movies were horrible. Other directors make horrible movies, but their horrible movies make money-- or the directors stop making movies. Boll is a striking exception, hence the rep.
Link408 @ May 13th 2008 3:07PM
you guys wanna see bad movies, then watch these
http://www.imdb.com/chart/bottom
Sean @ May 13th 2008 7:49PM
If I recall correctly, the plot of Postal was "I need to go to the store to get some milk".
That was it. That was the plot.
Mal F4cti0n @ May 13th 2008 8:53PM
Well....go watch Alone in the Dark and notice the horrible direction the movie has. Not too mention the HUGE gaps in the story or just the common sense, going from point A to B efforts that fail horribly. The whole boat scene for one, where they pull up a sunken treasure chest or something, and the crew locks the doctor in a room on the boat while out in the middle of the ocean. After the good doctor tries to open the door, which was locked from the outside, the crew opens the chest and they are all slaughtered. The doctor can hear screaming and he creeps back and hides. The screen goes black. The shot starts again with the doctor in the room. The doctor gets up and creeps to the door, opening it (it is now unlocked against all logic) he witnesses the blood and guts from the slaughtered crew. He then graps something from the bottom of the chest and scampers down the gangplank to a pier. What! How the f*ck did the door get unlocked and the boat steer itself to the pier and lower the gangplank. It just throws common sense off the deep end in order to hurry up and get to the next non-sensical, plotless scene.
pez @ May 14th 2008 2:11AM
I think you hit the nail on the head there. The thing that's so offensive about Boll is not that his movies are extremely bad, but that they are so mind-numbingly boring and confusing. He has the actors, the budget and untapped potential of the franchise. But the outcome is just horribly mediocre it falls flat at being bad. At least that's what I've thought of all of the stuff of his and has annoyed me the most. At least make a decently bad movie, god dammit!