| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (11)

Posted: May 14th 2008 1:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Almost like the side-plot from Grandma's Boy. That movie won a Grammy for Greatest Movie Ever Made btw.
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2008 2:08PM Obienator said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dyack can have some great ideas, but sometimes he sounds nuttier than Steve Jobs. I wish him well regardless.
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2008 2:10PM incredibilistic said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Not that it will make this well overdue and overhyped game any better. Of all the videos and screenshots I've seen of it looks like complete crap. The graphics look more Xbox 1 than 360 and the story moments have worse animation than Halo (jumpy and very puppet-like).
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2008 4:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Halo has a story? The game fooled me then.
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2008 3:02PM falcomadol said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think they should sell themselves to a publisher actually.

It takes a special kind of studio to be able to churn very good to great games out on schedule without some oversight, and when you're serving multiple masters, that job is made more difficult.

Maybe cut a deal with an independence clause, like Bungie.
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2008 3:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Silicon Knights has notoriously slow development cycles and having an "evil" business director cracking the whip might help."

"Blizzard has notoriously slow development cycles and having an "evil" business director cracking the whip might help."

"Valve has notoriously slow development cycles and having an "evil" business director cracking the whip might help."

Sure, they're no Blizzard or Valve, but to claim that someone "cracking the whip" would result in games that are just as good but come out sooner-- that's ridiculous.
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2008 4:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And nothing of value was lost.

Seriously does anyone still give a sh!t about Too Human?
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2008 4:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I care, and just because you don't doesn't change the value this game has for the fan base of thousands that are begging to get this game into their hands.

Why is it people these days think that if they don't like something personally that it has no value? There is a HUGE difference between an opinion of something's worth and something's general value.

You seem to not be able to distinguish between the two.
Reply

Posted: May 15th 2008 1:36AM BananaBoat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Not to troll, but anyone that had any sort of hopes for this game, realized that it's going to be ridiculously terrible, on the day that Epic got sued as a scapegoat. When a company is so desperate to find an excuse as to why their game sucks, you know it's going to be absolutely horrid. The last year of PR for this game has been "Wahh, Unreal Engine 3 is crap, so don't expect too much from this game" and yet there are STILL defenders out there on the internet, acting like this game could possibly not suck.

Reality is going to hit hard if you spend 60 dollars on this piece of garbage when it comes out. You've been warned, but I have a feeling you'll be buying it anyway. I've done my civic duty for the day.
Reply

Posted: May 15th 2008 8:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ MikeO
So you're still pumped for Duke Nukem Forever then?
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2008 9:53PM Tez said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Good. He sucks, makes the company look bad by whining on forums when his shitty alpha builds get called out for being shitty. Get someone in charge there that's worth a crap and let him develop his damned Epic Norse Opera Trilogy nonsense.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW