| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (65)

Posted: May 15th 2008 11:42AM samfish said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Final Fantasy 13, but after that, currently nothing.
Reply

Posted: May 15th 2008 11:43AM sabeerkibria said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Unfortunately for you, there are a lot of big games that are coming out that are bug. There's Resistance 2, Valkyria Chronicles, Killzone 2, Final Fantasy XIII and Versus, Gran Turismo 5, along with others. Just like how Xbox 360 sold a majority of their consoles last year with their heavy hitters, Halo 3 etc., its safe to assume that the majority of the PS3's heavy hitters have yet to come and are distributed throughout the next 2 years. Excluding Gears 2, there is almost nothing left that is particularly exciting on the X360 front that isn't coming to PS3.
Reply

Posted: May 15th 2008 11:48AM samfish said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh, and GT5, too, I suppose.

But otherwise, no major heavy hitters.
Reply

Posted: May 15th 2008 12:39PM Jacksons said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@samfish

I'm missing your point, here. Which console has more than a handful of upcoming "big" games? I can only think of a few that I want for all the current consoles.
Reply

Posted: May 15th 2008 11:51AM Tez said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The MGS4 bundle is essentially a sub-$400 80gb system. Doesn't that kind of count as a price cut?

Posted: May 15th 2008 12:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think the first post nailed it: "most gamers...just want a solid game system with a respectable library of games."
399 was the price for the 360 at launch, with shitty hardware, no free multiplayer, no real AAA exclusive until Gears (almost one year away, and that too an incomplete version of the PC title) and just 4-5 really good games overall for 18 months until mid-07
Compare that versus the PS3 now (even if you totally ignore the Blu-ray) and its an awesome deal.

Of course at launch it was another matter - 599, with a feeble library, and enormous negative publicity. Selling 8-9 million on that in the first year was impressive.

But I would still say that a cut to 299 just before christmas is a must - simply because the 360 is likely to cut another 50 by that time.

Posted: May 15th 2008 1:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But it's all relative. If the PS3 was this price at the 360's launch then it would have been a "good deal". But now you can get a 360 or Wii with many games for the same price and that's what the public is going to see.

A decade ago the PS3 would have been the best thing on the planet but it's up against todays products.
Reply

Posted: May 15th 2008 12:29PM AwesomeTown said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You can count me as one of the folk that'll pick up a ps3 this year. $399 is worth it IMHO. It's the only current system I don't have, and there are definitely games I want to play.

Posted: May 15th 2008 12:34PM Jacksons said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Blu-ray players are still $399. Expecting a further price cut on the PS3 is completely unreasonable.

Posted: May 15th 2008 2:50PM Drakkor said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
they should make the price cut to 300$ around the time Little Big Planet comes out, its a family friendly fun loving platformer, which should draw in a lot of "casual" players, people who don't care about wifi or hi def necessarily, and 300$ will be easy for them to swallow

Posted: May 15th 2008 3:06PM JMWTech said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thats too bad that the price isn't dropping, cause that's one way I'd buy one. The other way is if they finally come out with more than a few exclusive games that I would play. I have the money, it's just not worth it to me at this point.

Posted: May 15th 2008 3:07PM JMWTech said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thats too bad that the price isn't dropping, cause that's one way I'd buy one. The other way is if they finally come out with more than a few exclusive games that I would play. I have the money, it's just not worth it to me at this point.

Posted: May 15th 2008 4:29PM Lekko said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sony really should have gimped the system to make it cheap, then charged for every little tiny add-on like rechargeable battery packs, wi-fi, HD player, and made PSN a charge-based system.

They would have made soooo much more money that way instead of having all your costs up front.

Posted: May 15th 2008 6:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I call BS, I'm pretty sure they'll be a price cut by Christmas. It would be the prefect move...

Posted: May 16th 2008 6:06PM xGearSecondx said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Prefect" like that spelling?

I keed, I keed.
Reply

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW