| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (33)

Posted: May 16th 2008 4:55PM Pojomofo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
who is having the bigger Mass Exodus, ESA or Gamespot??
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 5:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It depends if you want to count each company as 1 or each company as the total amount of people there.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 11:40PM TOYBOXX said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yes, something is going on behind the scenes of the ESA and E3 is a big part of it. In the past publishers abandoned E3 because they're product wasn't being displayed at the event like they wanted thus throwing their own party to show the gaming media what their product is about. Apparently other companies feel the same.

E3 is depleting even as we speak.
Reply

Posted: May 17th 2008 12:24AM BananaBoat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Someone already did a big story on how companies can leave the ESA and still benefit from the ESA's activities. Basically ESA is a lobby group, and their lobbying helps all game companies, whether they are members or not. On top of that, companies get to use the E3 excitement to host their own exclusive events that basically piggy-back on E3. In other words, these companies are free loading at our (the gamers) expense. The reality is that without a strong lobbyist group (even though I'm sure I know how everyone feels about lobbyist groups) to protect video games, there could very well be censorship in the years to come, and if companies leave the ESA left and right, who is going to be left to do that lobbying?

I wonder how small the annual fee is for these companies, that they can't suck it up and stay part of the team. Meh.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 5:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This may be the last E3 IMHO, unless the ESA gets a new VP.
They better hurry.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 5:00PM Zertoss said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I want to know what the hell happened with the ESA that companies are suddenly jumping ship.

If it was just Actiblizion, that would be one thing, but for LucasArts to suddenly bail too just a couple of weeks later, it's kinda weird.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 5:05PM Pojomofo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
something is definitely going on behind the scenes, or maybe the ESA is just no longer needed?
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 5:38PM Dolar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think the reason is that it is really hard to see exactly what the ESA has done for the game companies in the recent past.

With E3 not being that big of a deal, and with individual publishers doing there own events. It just seems like the ESA painted itself into a corner of futility. And I think it is hard for people in the gaming companies to see exactly what service the ESA provides aside from E3.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 5:43PM SheppyReturns said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Umm, the ESA fights all those game laws you people hate. The ESA makes contributions to gaming friendly candidates. The ESA is essentially all that's keeping the bible thumpers from pulling another Comic Code Authority on the industry and essentially destroying the freedom of speech for 20+ years.

And yes, I'm a member....
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 6:04PM potato said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Fidlious: The ESA is also responsible for lobbying for ISPs to spy on their customers, throttling/banning BitTorrent, and all kinds of other shenanigans, in the name of preventing piracy. They are as bad as the RIAA.

They are hardly a benign or benevolent entity. They've proven themselves to be yet another industry lobby group - one that has placed no moral limits on its actions, seeking only the improve the bottom line of the industry.

Just because they're fighting the anti-game laws doesn't mean they're on "our" side.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 6:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Thanks potato for bringing up those points. It's entirely true that the ESA represents the game industry in the same manner that the RIAA/MPAA represent theirs. It's an association of game publishers who want to make sure that the market remains as profitable for them as possible. Sometimes, that coincides with our interests as game consumers. But it should never be assumed.

A point about lobbying vis-a-vis free speech: it doesn't actually matter if the ESA fights or wins these cases in court. The triumph of political freedom is muted by the need for marketability. Manhunt 2 being the obvious reference. They could have released the game as-is, on PC, but because Sony, MS, and Nintendo refuse to release AO titles, it was financially untenable. And why do the console makers refuse AO games? Because they want to sell hardware units to parents of small children and they think this is going to make a difference. What's the point of paying the ESA to fight for free speech when some of the most important companies in the ESA conduct their own forms of censorship?

The real purpose, of course, is for the ESA to keep the market open for the products that the big publishers want to sell. It has nothing to do with freedom and everything to do with profitability.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 5:11PM kompakter said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What purpose does the ESA actually serve anyway?
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 5:25PM Zertoss said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Besides running E3 and supporting the ESRB, they fight legal battles against piracy, bad game legislation and game censorship.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 5:44PM SheppyReturns said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Which to me is much more important than a trade show...
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 5:12PM Kadamon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ever since Doug stepped down, there's been a lot of people having problems from what I hear. Maybe it's just small things that irk the companies.

Who knows really.

Oh and Pojo? I vote for Gamespot. They lost almost all of their staff to be replaced with new guys.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 5:32PM Deck said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Is this bad, or is this something that doesn't matter? That is what i would like to know. Some people take on it.

If they really are the ones that fight ridiculous game legislation, and other political fronts and so forth..this could be bad. But then whats causing companies to start leaving all of a sudden? Sure its only 2 so far, but within two weeks...something is fishy.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 5:55PM SheppyReturns said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's two things. The first is a general dissatisfaction with Gallagher as he's a lot more quiet than Lowenstein.

The other is this general "feeling" that the industry no longer requiring a champion against the moral majority's attempts against the industry, however given two different game censorship laws were attempted in the past two months, that hardly seems the case.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 5:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What does leaving the ESA mean exactly?

How does it affect us gamers?
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 7:51PM PoisonedAl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Think the RIAA for games, only not quite as annoying becuase they have less cash.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 7:52PM PoisonedAl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Think the RIAA for games, only not quite as annoying becuase they have less cash.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 5:36PM BPMOmega XBL PSN Steam said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Something funny's going on, gang! We'd better get to the bottom of this mystery!
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 7:53PM PoisonedAl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The post system has fucked up agian. These were meant for Jnas, and I'm SURE I hit the right link the second time.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 5:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
the ESA sent my isp an email because they caught me downloading a dreamcast game. DREAMCAST GAME.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 5:56PM SheppyReturns said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dreamcast isn't 75 years old.... that's when the copyright protection ends.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 6:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Here's to the ESA going out of business!
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 6:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
how does the ESA or the game publisher make money when someone buys a game that is not produced anymore? Where you cannot find it new anywhere? Used games do not generate any profit for them only for the people who sell it to you.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 6:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Agreed timmy. I'm all for stopping piracy in gaming, but going after people downloading Dreamcast games? How does that help anyone at all? What difference does it make to Sega if someone buys Chu Chu Rocket secondhang, or downloads it? Sega's not getting money either way.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 8:13PM PoisonedAl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"how does the ESA or the game publisher make money when someone buys a game that is not produced anymore?"

It has been proven that they can sell their old shit via Live Arcade or Virtual Console. I have to say, hats off to them for that.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 10:32PM BigD145 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Al: How many Dreamcast games are on Virtual Console? *cricket chirp* Any? I'm waiting.... How many Dreamcast games are on anything but the Dreamcast?
Reply

Posted: May 17th 2008 2:56AM BPMOmega XBL PSN Steam said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There actually are a couple on GameTap (Crazy Taxi, Typing of the Dead, etc.). And SoulCalibur is coming to XBLA, soo....
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 10:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thing is that we still have no clue about what is going on. I wonder if the ESA is running into financial problems or is becoming too big for its own good. Kinda like E3. Or maybee its that Actiblizzan and Lucasarts found a new master.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 10:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
E3 SUCKS!!! I hope they go down they over charge companys and are too greedy, i say all the game companies come to canada Gaming Expo brought 43,000 public attendee's more then any US expo ever did!!
Reply

Posted: May 17th 2008 6:13AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
the ESA is way more than E3. (some good, some bad).

the way the commenters on here talk you'd think its only purpose was as an event organiser.. which probably ammounts to 1% of what they actually do.

the ESA is good for the industry.. and what's good for the industry can be both good and bad for gamers. So I guess i'm pretty ambivilent about who joins or leaves.

(That would be like getting worked up over which megacorporation is beating which other megacorporation in consoel sales... which would be patently irrelevant for everyone here. ;-) )

Still, i'd like to hear the gossip behind it...
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Portabliss: Sticky Bees (iOS)

Posted on Feb 6th 2012 9:00PM

Now Playing: February 6-12, 2012

Posted on Feb 6th 2012 5:45PM

Sanctum 2 defends PC, consoles in 2013

Posted on Feb 6th 2012 9:00AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW