| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (32)

Posted: May 16th 2008 2:14AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Seems like it to me! I'm overly excited now!
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 2:23AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
For once, I just want a blockbuster game to not come out! The GTAIV mass hysteria hasn't even died down yet!
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 2:23AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I swear... I have never seen a game produce better and better news one after another. First, it was gameplay footage, next, it was Individual execution, next it was a Halo 3-based party mode, now it's 4 player co-op?!

Jeez, Maybe they can just add a candy dispenser that attaches to the 360...
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 2:29AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I thought 4-player co-op was confirmed a couple weeks ago. Either way, it's going to be in.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 2:31AM Future Tech said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Maybe he meant "multiple difficulty settings FOR co-op players"
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 2:40AM Anticrawl said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Sadly this is what he meant because in an earlier video he was speaking about how difficulty will throttle for less advanced friends when playing through co-op mode.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 2:41AM Anticrawl said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Will probably work more like a handicap though, I think you actually pick the difficulty before the act like Guitar Hero does.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 2:44AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
4-player Co-Op would've made any difficulty to easy anyway...

But the fact that each player can have his/her own difficulty setting is still genius.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 2:49AM Anticrawl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Arnon

Yeah, GOW was laughable easy in campaign co-op (sept the damn car level), even on insane. Halo 3 with 4-player co-op and the mystic skull on legendary was still overly easy.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 8:50AM DjDATZ said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I was even said before that each player would have their own difficulty settings...that way one player could play on insane while the other could play on 'n00b'.

No, he did not confirm 4 player co-op.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 3:22PM Anticrawl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah Dj, that's pretty much what I said in my reply. I can't believe people didn't remember that interview about the difficulty levels for each player in co-op.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 2:47AM Anticrawl said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
While he didn't confirm 4-player co-op (SEE: Above post) I sure hope this game will be the game to finally break me of my Shadowrun lust. No matter how many new games I buy, I eventually get tired and bored of them then go back to Shadowrun, along with the majority of my friends list.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 10:45AM Vcize said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thumbs up for Shadowrun.

While Gears 1 is to me what Shadowrun is to you, I enjoy jumping back into Shadowrun about once a week with some friends and having a good time. Shame that the game sold so poorly. People claim they want innovation and not just the same tired thing, but they don't, and sales prove it.

As great of a game as CoD4 is (and I DO love it), it's a 10 year old game (Counterstrike) that's been redone dozens of times already.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 2:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Really? I used to play shadowrun all the time but now I have no one left to play! In fact, I might not even have the game anymore, but I would gladly pick it up if there is really still an active community (used 15 bucks now!)

This is an open invitation to anyone, I play Halo 3, GTA, COD4, Rock Band and Crackdown mostly, but I have just about every game (except Gears 1 because some turd stole it from me! I'll wait until 2 now...)

XBL: beckerist

BTW, my box is currently headed to TX (as we speak!) so it might be a bit before I accept you.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 3:21PM Anticrawl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Shadowrun for the 360 has a very active community and a cult-like following. You might as well call me the man-in-white.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 3:04AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Amen Anticrawl that damn train car level is fuckin annoying. Still beat that shit on insane before anyone else on my list did though haha.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 4:33AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'll assume he said 'for' :o(

Don't want to get my hopes up, only to be disappointed at a later date.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 7:57AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
it was in UT3, I would be surprised if it were absent in Gears 2. Even if it is 'too easy', the more the merrier.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 8:32AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
He said FOUR player co-op, not FOR! CONFIRMED!

"I'll take those, shhhhhhiiiiiiittttt yeahhhhh!!! Sup Bitches?!!!"
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 9:18AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That would be pretty cool if he shocked us with both of thses features.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 9:40AM Jayslacks said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hey, Cliffy. How about fixing the host advantage! How about that!
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 12:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Fix the host advantage? You would never think it was a problem the way X3F reports.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 12:04PM Jayslacks said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, no one complains about something that works for them. I refuse to host games because it is bullshit. That is why Halo 3 and COD4 is so good. Are there host issues in those games? Yes. Do they hide it? Hell yes! Gears doesn't even pretend. It just gets annoying to be sniped by a shotgun...
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 9:47AM cchance said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i really wish they would do it, 4 player coop even if only over XBL... or perhaps 2 local, 4 xbl ... or 2local+2xbl that would be sick!!!!!

but i doubt it... though ill pray
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 10:07AM Gronar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It would be game design suicide not to include 4 player co op after Halo 3.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 10:19AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
2008 year of the 360
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 10:31AM DjDATZ said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Just to keep your hopes up Dustin, I HIGHLY doubt GoW 2 will NOT have 4 player co-op. If Halo 3 could do it, GoW 2 NEEDS to do it.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 12:14PM NukeAssault said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It better!
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 12:13PM NukeAssault said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What? No four player? That was the only thing driving me to buy it. Now its a rent for sure. =(
Reply

Posted: May 17th 2008 1:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They didn't say there isn't going to be four player co-op, it just hasn't been confirmed yet........

I'm fairly sure they will have it, because it is almost required after halo did it.......it'll happen
Reply

Posted: May 19th 2008 12:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
All i can say is, it better have 4 player co-op.
Reply

Posted: May 16th 2008 5:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think 4-player co-op would be sick, but you have to remember what this would effect.

1. Gameplay difficulty

2. Splitting up

3. Achievements

and there's probably more but I'm too lazy to think of any more at the moment.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW