| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (11)

Posted: May 20th 2008 12:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Does that mean I can go now?
Reply

Posted: May 20th 2008 1:02PM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
...You can hold E3 in my garage for say...$100.00! Not like that many folks will be there anyway. :P
Reply

Posted: May 20th 2008 3:25PM Gwr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Going to E3 used to be on my Todo before diying list...seriously,tho it wasnt one of the most important things in it,it was in it.
Old E3 was cool,awsome,big,impresive and the absolute biggest videogames event,after it was "Nerfed"...not so much.
Who knows if these un-nerfing will bring it back to its former glory,it seems its better than before but still worse than how it was originaly.
The bad E3 and its secondary effects can harm the industry,if media doesnt like it then theres no use in it for publishers and they leave,then the industry decays.
Reply

Posted: May 20th 2008 1:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It sounds like E3 is going to lose all relevance at some point.
Reply

Posted: May 20th 2008 2:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Will someone tell me what makes an invite only E3 a bad thing?
Reply

Posted: May 20th 2008 2:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
For example: A site gives a not so favorable review of a game and the publisher of said game is on the "invite committee".

I'm sure there are hundreds of other examples. It is bad for the little guys or anyone not in the "inner circle"
Reply

Posted: May 20th 2008 2:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@gb sure but I dont see why that matters. A publication should be getting their viewership from its reviews or whatever. If their readers find value in it and they are shut out by publishers readers can complain to publisher, or give more love to publisher that did not lock out the website.

I mean this is just games reporting and not games journalism. Publishers control how information gets out, hell seems like most of what i read is rephrased Press Releases these days anyway.

I dont think being invite only is worth getting bent out of shape. The only thing that really matters is the game and its quality. If the site of your liking does not get an early copy of the game wait until they buy it at retail and post a review. Simple as that.
Reply

Posted: May 20th 2008 3:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It is incredibly difficult to get a readership without access to the information. This is the internet. We demand information now, not 2 weeks after the game is released.

Reporting on games costs money and losing page hits and ad revenue to another site because you did not get invited kinda sucks.
Reply

Posted: May 20th 2008 7:36PM PoisonedAl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm I the only one who sees the cock and balls in that picture, or are there other perverts out there too?
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 4:04AM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's funny considering that E3 was downsized primarily to reduce costs.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW