Sony not amused by Uncharted replica gun

by Ludwig Kietzmann { May 20th 2008 at 8:00AM }

Sony Computer Entertainment has declared its intention to take "the most appropriate action" against an online retailer making its Beretta and butter from a replica air gun. The weapon, based on one wielded by the goofy, treasure-hunting protagonist of Uncharted: Drake's Fortune, is currently listed for $169.88 on the King of Swords website. Speaking to GamesIndustry.biz, a Sony representative noted that the "PS3 Uncharted Drake's Fortune Full Metal M92 Airsoft Gun" was in no way an officially endorsed or condoned product, despite its use of the game's artwork in advertisement.

This isn't the first time a publisher has rushed to arms over the sale of replica weapons. In February of this year, Square Enix took stern legal action against those hoping to sell real things based on fake things.

Tags: Lawyers, Sony, Uncharted, Weapons

Related From Joystiq

Amazon lists Uncharted/DualShock 3 combo pack
7 days ago
Amazon.com's Cyber Monday deals available now
9 days ago
ESRB: Uncharted, PAIN and more become Pinball Heroes on PSP
29 days ago

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

Sir Fidlious Wong (Justin T. McElroy Memorial Burn of the Day Award) @ May 20th 2008 8:19AM

Good, they should license the IP if they wish to profit from it.

konajinx @ May 20th 2008 8:24AM

Replica guns don't kill people...PS3 games kill people.

Thank you.

chez @ May 20th 2008 8:43AM

Guns don't kill people. Wappers do.

borland502 (SDF - Macross Ring) @ May 20th 2008 9:15AM

Hah! Good one.

Chase @ May 20th 2008 8:35AM

*waits for Glenn Beck to create a news statistic about video games causing gun violence*

FOXHOUND @ May 20th 2008 8:38AM

Don't bother buying the gun. The game's a lot better. And just as lethal if thrown properly. ;]

GRANTED @ May 20th 2008 8:40AM

uhhh the chick has blonde hair. brunettes just don't have as much fun.

JaKa (Because 666 gives a wrong impression!) @ May 20th 2008 11:24AM

Yeah but nobody will notice a brunette sucking you off in a dark alley.

Brodie-san @ May 23rd 2008 11:33AM

On the disc the producers talk about how she had brown hair at the start of the process which ultimately was switched to blonde (for some reason).

Which begs the question: how old is that image and where did these fake gun peddlers dig it up from?

:)

Brucie B @ May 20th 2008 8:49AM

Sony's mad cause it's not there idea. LAME

ssuk @ May 20th 2008 9:36AM

Or mad because it infringes copyright and intellectual properties, but yeah! They're totally jealous.

FOXHOUND @ May 20th 2008 9:40AM

*their

Be genetically different.

brokenscope @ May 20th 2008 10:42AM

Sony is mad because someone made an airshit product based on their IP.

ScottG13 @ May 20th 2008 8:50AM

I like that the product was added Jan 4th to the website, but it takes Sony a Joystiq post and 5 months to actually take notice.

Way to protect your IP, Sony.

Jon @ May 20th 2008 9:17AM

Actually that seems normal. Many I.P. infringing products often goes unnoticed by their owners. After all the people running Sony are humans, and the web is one big pile of mess.

Personally I am more amazed that Nintendo has yet to shut down the Mother 3 translation.

borland502 (SDF - Macross Ring) @ May 20th 2008 9:27AM

*shrug* Corporate America can move slowly, especially if the infringement is small scale. Immersion didn't sue Sony right away either.

ScottG13 @ May 20th 2008 9:35AM

If you want to keep your IPs from the public domain and from being genericized, you have to defend them "vigorously."

Vidikron (FU) @ May 20th 2008 10:19AM

Who says they don't?

SoCoolCurt (PSN: KillaKornbread) @ May 20th 2008 10:44AM

lol i found that quite hilarious too. i guess Sony can be glad to know that their employees arent just randomly surfing the net on the clock.....well unless they are reading this site or something.

embassy @ May 20th 2008 1:17PM

Legal stuff takes time, lots of time. they're waiting for it to sell before jumping, what's the point of suing someone if there was no commercial gain from the infringement? Suing someone isnt free. And even if they win a judgement, it doesnt mean the infringing company has the funds to pay. It takes years for stuff like this to get settled. So its really a hassle sony ( or anyone) doesnt want to go through.

now if this shit sold 89 million units since january we have a different story....

ScottG13 @ May 20th 2008 1:40PM

Incorrect. IP is special in that a holder must "vigorously defend" their interests to prevent their trademarks from being genericized. It has nothing to do with "waiting for sales." Making claims against infringers are much more difficult if you knowingly let them infringe. I doubt Sony knew about this, but I have a hard time believing they don't have people who surf the net looking for infringement on their various properties and have Legal shoot of C&D letters. That's generally all it takes. I actually do some of that for my own company. You have to protect your interests.

Rob @ May 20th 2008 9:31AM

it's okay sony, the gun makes people want to buy your games!

GatorSax2010 @ May 20th 2008 9:45AM

I saw "Beretta and butter" and knew it was Ludwig. Awesome.

On topic, I figured this would happen. Given all the controversy over violent games, I didn't think that any game company would actually license something like this.

chez @ May 20th 2008 12:36PM

I saw guns and thought it'd be about yanks and guns.

Correct.

John @ May 20th 2008 10:16AM

That's not even what the Beretta looks like in that game. The Beretta in Uncharted is nickel plated with a black rubber handle. The other 9MM that looks like it was a Walther is black with a wooden handle. If I was Sony I would be pissed for intellectual property infringement and pissed because they were too stupid to even infringe correctly.