| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (70)

Posted: May 21st 2008 1:01PM baby sea tuna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Countdown to first (real) RRoD comment in 5...4...3...2...
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 1:02PM south said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Damn you! Now I wont say it!
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 1:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
sadly my PS3 hit the shitter on sunday, for some reason the hdmi output doesnt work anymore :(
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 1:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Oh mah gawd, Microsawft onlah sell mawr 'cuz of teh Red Ringz!

But seriously, if Microsoft and Nintendo are making profit then don't they both win? I kind of agree on the "no clear-cut winner" idea.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 2:19PM RKN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You had a PS3 deaftly!?!? : 0

Wait, you just used it as a Blu-Ray player didn't ya?
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 2:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Ninjak yessirp :) , nah i love the games i have for my ps3 even though its not many and why the hell did i get voted up for my ps3 dying haha
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 2:32PM RKN said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Because people here in general hate the PS3, when one dies, its a good sign I guess. : /

Mine died as well this weekend, GTA4 killed it, lots of people having issues with that. Have a 360 now. : (
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 3:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ninjakamster

You have a 360 now but that gamertag you're sporting is invalid. I tried to add you yesterday and it wasn't in the database. So, what say you now?
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 6:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
deaftly, my PS3 did the same thing and if you hold down the power button for around 5 second as you turn it on it will auto detect your output. This might fix it.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 1:04PM copa said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Here's the amazing part. This is the first time in console history that you're going to have three credible competitors making it through an entire lifecycle.

This is very good.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 2:01PM Haggard said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Kim is actually making some sense here. He's not really bashing the competition, just stating what he hopes will happen.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 1:04PM MarkHawk said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I kind of feel all gamers are winning this generation.

Sure there is shovel ware, typical shooters, glitchy games... it's not perfect but there is something for everyone and huge library for gamers. Best part is I am seeing updates to my Library every month now instead of just Nov-Feb.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 1:06PM baby sea tuna said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Good point. I haven't not had something to play in like, 2 years.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 1:12PM Courtney said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Totally agreed. Gamers win and I would hope that all three companies continue to perform well. The competition between the three makers can only help gamers more.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 2:05PM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agree. People want to fight about their chosen system being best, but those who get each of them, and/or the handhelds would realize that the competition has been great for us all. There is always a back-log of games to play. Its quite impressive. There is no loser.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 1:05PM Nigeria said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
So it looks like the DS has this generation wrapped up.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 1:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Extremely good point.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 1:09PM FernandoRocker said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
The DS has everything:

Good price, bright screens, touchscreen, great battery life, nice design, amazing sales (70 million worlwide), a lot of first party support, the biggest third party support (more than 360), it's now the RPG games system, unique games... full support from Square, Atlus, and a lot more RPG guys.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 1:11PM FernandoRocker said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The DS covers from the most casual games and games for women, to the most hardcore games.

That's the kind of support the Nintendo Wii needs.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 1:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Goes into

(DS is the best! DS is the best! DS is the best!) chant.

I sold my PSP, there just wasn't enough there at the time to keep me interested. Some favs I have are

Mario KartDS
New Supa Mario Brothas
Mario 64 DS
Sonic Rush
Bust a MoveDS

and still get to play a the GB Advance games I already had. I bring it to work sometimes to play on lunch since I get an hour and the ladies go gaga over New Super Mario Bros. :P
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 1:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
On that note, Microsoft will probably try and correct Shane Kim and issue another statement saying the first 'High Definition' console to 100 million wins.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 1:37PM Korova Pamplona said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
DS is not a console. You dont need to attach it to anything. Its a portable.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 2:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 3:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Gold Deaftly, pure gold! LMAO! +1
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 2:59AM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Korova


The Nintendo DS is closed proprietary piece of hardware designed to play games: it is a console.

A portable console: it's just not a home console.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 1:08PM killploki said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i would say each company is a winner when they start to see a profit on the systems they sell.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 2:04PM ChrisAre said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@baby sea tuna:
CREEPY!
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 2:05PM ChrisAre said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
ha, I'm dumb. Wrong one. By bad buddy (didn't want to take the time to spell out your name ;-) )
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 1:10PM LaughingTarget said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I win. Three kick-ass consoles, two solid handhelds, the trusty PC and more awesome games than I can even afford. Where's my first place trophy?
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 1:22PM LaughingTarget said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
That is...disturbing.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 1:16PM Top Cat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
the winner for me is the one that ends up with the best hardware, coupled with the best software to go with it. Guess i'm just old fashioned like that!

Better scan over that comment...ah yes, i maintain my strong position on the fence!
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 1:17PM Offensive Bias said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I doubt there'd be a clear cut winner this generation. I think that this generation is also going to be dragged out a little longer than the last one because it seems like there are still a lot of great games on the horizon for at least the next year, if not into 2010 and neither company seems to be eager to push out another product.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 1:18PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I say first system to 100 great games wins!

In all seriousness, there seem to be a lot more multi-platform owners than in past generations. I don't think there is going to be any one winner. As long as great titles keep coming to the 360, and great titles START coming to the PS3, I'll be more than happy to support both.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 4:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I hope MS doesn't wait until they sell 100m before they make a new console because then gamers will all lose. Sony's 10 year console life span idea sucks. We need new machines every four to five years.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 4:45PM RKN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Idiot, Sony will SUPPORT the PS3 for 10 years, not have that as their only console for 10 years.

Look at how they supported the PS1 for a while after the PS2 launched and with the PS2 when the PS3 launched.

Look in contrast at how Microsoft killed the original Xbox after the 360 launched.

You anti-Sony folks always twist the words the wrong way. Sheesh.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 5:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You can call me an idiot all you want but Sony took 7 years between the ps2 and ps3. The thing still isn't making any money and won't reach the $250 price point for some time which is when consoles really start selling. I don't hate Sony but waiting 7 year between consoles sucks for the consumer because games begin to look like crap compared to their pc counterparts in ust a couple of years. Keep watching out for Sony though I hope the paychecks and stock options they are giving you are working for ya.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 6:35PM RKN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I like money!
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 1:27PM Shignami said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Who said we would know the winner a year after launch?

Methinks it was a Sony employee....
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 1:44PM arrrgh said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
hahahah a +1 for you sir!
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 1:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This has been one of the most fun generations of gaming for me and we're only in year 2 or 3 (depending on the console). Now if the wii could get 5 truly great new IPs that are meant for me and not my little sister in a year or so I might be enticed to actually keep one of the wii's I buy instead of selling it.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 2:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
lol my god u just couldn't hold back could ya, kevingarnettscottypippen86
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 2:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What I'm serious if they could pull it off I would consider keeping one. I know it's a massive if, since they don't like making new IPs, but I would seriously think about it.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 1:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
so if the wii hits 100 million, but then the 360 and the ps3 also hit 100, the wii wins cause it got there first? this logic doesn't make sense. Sounds to me like if 3 hit 100 million, all 3 are winners and laughing all the way to the bank
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 1:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
this is exactly what i came into this comments section to post. the whole idea of a race is pretty silly. yes, the ps2 was "the winner" last time... because it sold waaaaaaaay more than the others. all 3 consoles can be winners if they sell well, make consumers happy, and make money for their creators.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 1:53PM BPMOmega XBL PSN Steam said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The question is: Will more than one system hit 100M?

Only two systems had done it before: PlayStation (102.49M) and PlayStation 2 (127M). The competition for each of those generations didn't even come close (Saturn: 17M, N64: 32.9M, GameCube: 21.74M, Xbox: 24M).

Can the market support more than one system to go that high? History hasn't shown it to be so. But, eh, who knows. Maybe things will be a bit different this time.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 2:04PM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The market does appear to be expanding though. The kids who are coming into game-playing age are obviously picking up consoles, but the adults who were into games when the Atari and NES were around are mostly still playing.

Games are constantly becoming more mainstream - besides, a lot of gamers own a Wii as well as a 'hardcore' console.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 1:43PM Korova Pamplona said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The first thing I thought when I saw the 100 mln figure was "PRICE CUT".

It sounds like Kim is laying the groundwork for $50 drop. At this point, MS needs to max game sales to keep that attach ratio up and giving gamers a fity will very likely mean an extra game sold. So, Christmas 08?

Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 1:56PM zero2dash said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm going to elaborate on the "we're (gamers) all winners" sentiment and say I think it's even better because this generation of consoles has introduced gaming to a whole lot of other people who would never have played games until now (with the Wii) and despite the fact that I may not (and others may not) get the most enjoyment out of it, that it opens the door for future gamers to buy more systems, new systems, more games, etc. and keeps the hobby we all know and love alive.

Despite what anyone thinks about the consoles they don't own or each respective company - we can all agree that we don't want another "videogames crash of 1983" on our hands that pretty much wiped out all of the console manufacturers and a lot of the game developers at the time.

/This ends my feelgood comment of the day./
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2008 2:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Considering that the PS2 broke 100 million before the next gen even began, its moronic to say 10 million = console win...its a marathon and based on the rapid growth of the industry, we may not know who wins until someone breaks 150 million units....or if Sony goes through w/ the 10 year plan, maybe 200-250 million...who knows??? alot of this is just speculation and guessing gamees.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW