| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (52)

Posted: May 22nd 2008 12:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Maybe this good news will help take their minds off of how bad Haze blows.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 12:45PM DjDATZ said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
LOL...WOW...we get the fact that Haze is a PS3 exclusive thrown in our faces as a "take that" but Metacritic has it pegged at a 56/100!! HA you can keep your shit!

Haze turns out exactly like Lair...LOL a COMPLETE failure.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 1:04PM efeez1986 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
PS3 owners stopped caring about Haze months ago so i don't know why xbox fanboys are so excited that the game is less than average. You guys talk about Haze more than PS3 fanboys do.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 2:21PM KaneRobot said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
No, XBox "fanboys" talk about it more NOW because all PS3 zombies did for months leading up to the release was tell everyone how it was a Halo killer. Now of course they shut up, since the game is a piece of shit.

Just like they did with Lair, they now go back to weep into their pillow and pray the NEXT big release doesn't disappoint them like almost all of their other big exclusives.
Reply

Posted: May 24th 2008 7:42AM sirpilf said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
this is actually a reply to kizzle... just because you are on a site called fanboy doesnt mean you have to show how much of a fanboy loser you are.

nobody ever called haze a halo killer, nobody ever even hyped it up all that much. the only hype it got was when it was announced to be an exclusive because that got all the fanboys raging. but nobody actually really cared about it deep down. we all knew it was gonna be just a mediocre game with a possibly interesting gimmick.

oh and about bioshock... not suprising at all, but at the same time who cares... most people that wanted to play it, have already played it. when a game comes out a year later on another system it might as well have stayed an exclusive. when oblivion came out for ps3 it didnt have any hype anymore.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 12:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
well this will be a great way to fund Bioshock 2.
anyhow good game. everyone needs to play this.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 2:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
good points!
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 12:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I really don't care one way or the other if games are exclusive.

BTW, I've been thinking of getting a PS3 for the Blu-ray player. Any good PS3 exclusive games around? Anyone care to chime in?
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 12:46PM thebetamax said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I bought a PS3 late last year for the Blu Ray player. I haven't purchase a single game for it but I did borrow and play Uncharted, Rachet & Clank, and Warhawk. I might be picking up MGS4 and new the Final Fantasy. But so far no exclusives have gotten my moola...
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 12:46PM msusig said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've been thinking about getting one as well for the Blu-Ray. I've got over 60 HDdvds. I have all the ones I want so my Hi-Def DVD library is lacking some new content. Metal Gear Solid 4 is coming out this month actually. Looks promising although i've read that the online multi-player isn't that great.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 12:48PM DjDATZ said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The highest rated PS3 exclusives are Rachet and Clank at 89/100 and Uncharted at 88/100.

The highest rated 360 exclusive used to be BioShock...but that's not an exclusive anymore...but other than that you have Halo 3 and Gears of War (console exclusive) at 94/100, Mass Effect at 91/100 and Forza Motorsport 2 at 90/100.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 12:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
i have no problems with PS3 getting sloppy seconds. I've had my fill with bioshock and it was mediocre gameplay wise with great graphics audio and a lame ending boss.

it could've benefited from more Metroid/Resident Evil puzzles. but it was an interesting single play through.

i really hope they spice some things up for Bioshock 2.

also, is it just me or is playing a FPS game on a PS3 like REALLY uncomfortable?
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 2:01PM reson8er said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Xbox fanboys make me chuckle, good job :)

Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 12:44PM msusig said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't mind sharing "exclusive" titles. This game was awesome. Haven't really played it since I beat it. So I could really care less is the PS3 gets a copy. Even with the enhanced visuals. Just don't make a Haze game for the 360 PLEASE!!!

Haze for the ps3..FTL!
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 12:52PM DjDATZ said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agree. As much as we might have wanted it before, PLEASE keep Haze on PS3!!
Reply

Posted: May 23rd 2008 12:09AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
lol... neither of you are forced to buy it if it comes out for the 360 ya know...
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 12:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why is this a story on a 360 site? Are you trying to incite a flame war? It's already started with that Haze comment.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 1:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Inciting flame wars is Dustin's forte. ;-) Oh well, what can yah do? Some people actually enjoy this. Go figure.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 12:48PM Trogd0r said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well that makes sense for 2K, they will make a ton of $.

What I don't understand is why they went to such great lengths to deny this, just to reverse their position a few months later?
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 12:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dustin Burg, you're a moron. I know you're being sarcastic but who cares if a year-old Xbox 360 game goes on the PS3. People who care so much about exclusives are losers because its like they can't find any other way to justify spending $400-$600 on a console
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 12:54PM Jonman said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There should be some kind of console-cultural-exchange program. PS3 gets Bioshock, 360 gets Final Fantasy.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 12:54PM DjDATZ said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
6 months after the 360 version was released? Dear GOD I HOPE they get improved visuals...
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 12:56PM DjDATZ said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually...make that over a year after...lol
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 1:03PM bluerei said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Thats fine, Bioshock was a lot more fun to play with max-out video settings and full anti-aliasing on the PC anyways. I'm sure the PS3 port is going to look just as bad as it did on the 360.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 3:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You're seriously going to argue that BioShock looked BAD on Xbox 360? That's one of the Xbox's best looking games. What are you even doing on this site?
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 6:11PM bluerei said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Yes, I am saying it did look bad, cause it's called a COMPARISON. COMPARED to the pc, yes, the 360 looked bad.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 1:12PM ccc said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Bah, whatever.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 1:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Are people honestly getting angry over this post? Heh, oh you wild and crazy guys.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 1:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What is exclusive these days? I mean really. Not everything stays exclusive. Companies like money. I was kinda hoping it would stay on X360, but its not like a huge major deal to me.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 2:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
exclusives are the most important thing one platform can have over the other.. as with 99% games being multiplatform this generation, exclusives are what attracts an investment in a console.

Sadly Microsoft dont hold as much value in them than sony and nintendo.. which is why the 360 has hardly any exclusive, certainly no system seller exclusives (bar halo 3..which can be considered "timed"), because Microsoft prefer the small change from the revenue of porting to the pc market. Instead of keeping 360 titles actually exclusive and having the only way people can play the games be by investing in the console. Just as mgs4, killzone 2, resistance 2, uncharted ect will attract people to the ps3 now, and in 3yrs time..as it'll be the only place you can play them.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 3:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It seems the only exclusives Microsoft can keep are those published by Microsoft Games Studios (Halo, Forza, Fable).
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 1:29PM Ujn Hunter said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i don't care that it's coming out for the ps3, it's just kinda silly to be called "exclusive" if it's not... what's the point of exclusive games if they are not exclusive?
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 1:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The term "exclusive" is a loose one these days, unless the game is actually made by first party developers.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 1:45PM Gemini Ace said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Improved visuals...brought to you by the mighty blu ray! lol!

Bioshock sucked by the way.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 2:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
GTFO! Bioshock was probably the best, most critically praised, game to be released last year.

It'll be interesting to see the countless posts on websites from ps3 owners gloating how they now have it..even though when they thought it was an actualy 360 console exclusive they claimed it to be rubbish.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 1:57PM Softserve said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I can't really understand why this would bother anyone. It's a good game, the PS3 version has been rumored since before the 360 version hit and this is coming several months later (that alone makes the graphics updates almost necessary). Including the DLC isn't a big deal either considering I believe all of that was free.

As far as I'm concerned this is just good news because more people will get to play it. Same as if it came out the same day.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 2:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Does anyone else have a wiked urge to go to every ps3 site on the net and spam spoilers now?

I kindof do. Payback for halo 3 spoilers.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 2:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Meh...I will trade getting GTA4 simultaneously released on 360 and PS3 and let Bioshock PS3 get released 17 months after the 360 release.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 2:19PM Wickerman22 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, this doesn't surprise me. It's published by a mainstream publisher and they usually sell out on the exclusives. Too bad MS couldn't have paid them for an exclusive.

Yeah, and I too laughed out loud when I read about Haze. I thought the same thing, another Lair.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 2:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Tell me Dustin, where does the CVG article say it will have improved visuals?

This is a Unreal Engine 3 game - and we all know how great that runs on the PS3. Epic are probably the only people to get it running steadily.

Great game, although I would of preferred they just concentrated on the sequel.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 3:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have a PS3 only and not being able to get Bioshock on it was a HUGE disappointment for me. Knowing that it's a meeter of time before it comes out on my system is very nice. I totally think the PS3 and 360 are both great systems in their own ways, and am sad that we, as gamers, feel the need to argue with each other over such paltry and insignificant things as which system is really better or who gets to play which games first. Can't we ALL just take a step back, pat each other on the backs and say, "Congratulations on getting to play Bioshock!" or, "I can't wait to hear how the GTAIV 360 exclusive DLC is turns out!!"
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 3:19PM bigd7387 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Well I know every time someone makes the statement that PS3 will have the higher visuals that hasn't been the case, Uh The Orange Box, Turok, Devil May Cry, and I'm sure it will require a nice 5gb Install so PS3 owners can get even fatter making sandwichs for the 1/2 hour the game takes to install to save 5 seconds. Then you will have to contend with BioShock looking really, really dark since the PS3 has a pallet of about 5 colors involving Brown and 4 shades of Black. I sold my PS3 since I was able to play Bioshock a year ago before the PS3 will get it and I would much rather put a game in and play right away vs' installing and sucking up the hard drive for a game system. I'm sorry but it's sad that a great game like BioShock has to lower itself to the level of the PS3 and its whopping 256mb of seperate video and processing ram. I can almost bet you know that it will have frame rate issues and it's funny that a system that is to be known for its HD has problems running anything with a steady frame rate at anything over 720p. I really give up, back to my Elite with the Falcon and BenQ drive and never ever back to a Sony Delaystation. Of course the Sony Fanboys have all said BioShock sucked but now they are loving it until it comes out and looks and runs worse than the 360 so they will again blame it on a conspiracy of lazy developers and not blame Sony for making a unfriendly system to develope for.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 3:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So it's coming to PS3? Big deal. Played it. Finished it. Moved on.
Reply

Posted: May 23rd 2008 1:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah that's the way I feel. That game is sitting at the bottom of my played game list. Let Playstation owners get in on the fun. And comparing the visuals to the PC version is just stupid. Of course the PC version will look better if you max out all the settings because you not really confined to a set of parameters like a console.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 3:36PM will18057 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's not just you...
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 4:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I love how certain people act like stuck up, arrogant, wang fight contesting, pale, scrawny, pimply nerds arguing over the superiority or inferiority of one system or game over the other. Whatever floats your boat is what floats it many varying opinions now just have some decency and respect and stfu with your feces flinging contests...

Morons
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 4:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Shame Microsoft couldn't keep it an exclusive to Xbox. You know what? I'm willing to bet we will see Mass Effect will one day be on PS3 too, it seems to be a trend with Xbox 360 games right now. I'm not bitter because i would love Bioshock to become more succesful. I would be bitter if they end up getting exclusive content, cause to me that would be a slap in the first to all the fans that supported the game when it first came out.

Anyway, its a shame for Microsoft. Titles like Final Fantasy, although are third party and could come to 360 never will, yet games on 360 seemingly have no problem going multi-platform.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 6:45PM Volkodlak said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Cool... it's a great game; so if you own a PS3 would you kindly buy BioShock.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 7:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"welcome to circus of 12month old values!!"
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 8:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Bioshock was never an X360 exclusive in the first place as it was released on the PC around the same time.

Exclusivity ain't what it used to be...
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW