| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (75)

Posted: May 22nd 2008 5:37PM koehler83 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Whats wrong with an archive system and a competent search function?
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 5:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
In theory, I agree, but I think they're trying to cull the really bad crap so XBLA doesn't get a bad rap if someone buys and downloads one of those crappy games.

Plus, who knows, maybe a large number of old games slows down or otherwise negatively impacts the system. Scaling isn't always first in developers' minds.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 6:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
An archive system is exactly what's needed. This essentially screws anyone who wants to make a niche title or otherwise target a small audience. Isn't that the point of digital distribution... that you can take risks? But if you're designing a game from the ground up for XBLA, you spend money designing it, squashing the bugs, getting it certified... and then MS says "Sorry, you weren't making us enough money so we're not going to allow your product to be distributed. Unless you want to switch it over to XNA and not see any return." Absolute bullshit. What would a developer more likely do: port it to another platform (spending more money) or just not make titles for XBLA?
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 9:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They aren't discontinuing just any games just the ones that are shit, that takes a little time to be decided.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 5:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Looks like some website just got a whole bunch of info from Microsoft.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 5:39PM SheppyReturns said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, I'd say no need to remove em as reviews for DD games can be quite a bit more harsh than retail release outlets. Archive them, or simply label them "classics."

Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 9:28PM Demaar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, what the hell happened to half pricing old games anyway? There's a new game every week but they cut prices like twice a year or something.


Oh well, whatever they do is obviously up to them, I just hope they say "HAY, LAST CHANCE TO GET ****" when they're about to take them down.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 5:43PM ChooChooCharlie said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
" ... conversion rate below 6%. Microsoft will provide a three-month notice before delisting any game."

Maybe that will encourage some of the devs to reduce the prices on their games. That's good news.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 7:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Devs don't set the price for XBLA arcade offerings... they "suggest" them. MS has the final say.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 5:43PM Lekko said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
So when is Nintendo going to do this?
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 6:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
thing is, if they do so, they'll be left with nothing on WiiWare...
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 6:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Run Noshino RUN!!!
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 6:59PM MarkezJM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ Noshino and Fenix

Too funny, :)

I have downloaded Lost Winds but haven't played it much yet. Between that and the FF game, aren't those palatable games? I expect plenty of garbage on WiiWare, no doubt, but those both seem decent.

Which is odd when I noticed GameSpot gave each a 5? They really seem to be dumping and pooping on WiiWare games.
Reply

Posted: May 23rd 2008 4:33AM Cal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's GameSpot, does anyone really care about them anymore?
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 5:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And if I've bought the game, RROD'd and want it again I'm screwed I guess?

'Congratulations! You paid for a game and we're not gonna let you download it!'
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 5:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
No, you can use the new DRM management tool to migrate the content over to your new machine, thanks to the detatchable hard drive.

What's up with the four blog posts off of one interview, though?
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 5:47PM CB said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's why you kept your hard drive.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 5:52PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And if it was your HDD that died?
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 6:24PM CB said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dirk Dorkelson
May 22nd 2008
5:48PM

CB
May 22nd 2008
5:47PM

WTF? Why is my post posted later?
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 7:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
do you use a password or click the link in ur email?
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 9:34PM CB said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
password :/
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 5:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Elitist ahole policy. They can just add a filter for the hotter games, or put different games into differnt sections if they like. Removing them altogether is just mean.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 10:54PM Korova Pamplona said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, I think they can achieve differentiation through the interface. Let people check out the crap, if they want to, just have a bargain bin section or crap section. Whatever.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 5:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Or how about community ratings??
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 5:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
A community/user rating system would be a great addition to the service. Unfortunately, I don't think Microsoft would be willing to give the power to the people.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 6:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So every jackass can rate every game a 1/10?
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 7:08PM Tiptup300 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 7:08PM LaughingTarget said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Easy enough to add a control that only allows those who bought it rate the game.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 10:31PM kftgr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, in an indirect way, there is a form of community rating already: the ones the bought game gave it a +1.

This really has become an issue of voting with your wallet.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 5:49PM CB said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
For you guys complaining, I'm sure the current games that have already done well will not be going anywhere.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 5:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Doesn't this totally undermine one of the key features of direct download services? That is that titles have a near infinite shelf life w/out competing for retail space. I don't care how bad they suck, there's no reason to pull them. Make a games-that-suck category or something. This is a real slap in the face to XBLA developers.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 5:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
no its not

games under 60% shouldnt be there to begin with. this will make devs make better games
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 6:05PM ChooChooCharlie said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm wondering how Microsoft can actually do this. Wouldn't the developers have signed some kind of contract to initially put their games up on XBLA?
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 6:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
This won't make devs make better games, it will make them take less risks.
Reply

Posted: May 23rd 2008 4:37AM Cal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Doom, what about Haze though? =P
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 5:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
it's not mean... yaris should NEVER have existed... me=happy it will disappear so that new xbox owners won't face the same terrible game i have
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 6:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's probably worth pointing out that Yaris would not be picked up by this system. As a free game it has a conversion rate of 100% :)

I think it's a pretty dumb move - there have been retail titles that do horridly in ratings and early sale, yet become cult classics later in life.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 7:20PM Tiptup300 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Technically, Yaris has a conversion of undefined. It even sucks at math.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 5:52PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agree, it seems unnecessarily mean to remove under-performing titles. Might piss off even more devs, adding to the fuel of distaste among indie devs surrounding XBLA

That said, they've picked a fair enough system to do it. Combined low sales, a poor metacritic score, and age for a game

However, that would let at least one game i can think of (God Hand) would fall dangerously close to that criteria (metacritic average 73 and notoriously poor sales), so it would still be unfair to a dedicated corps of fans
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 5:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
God Hand is available in XBLA?
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 11:30PM Supermanisdead said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
GOD HAND CONFIRMED FOR XBLA!
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 5:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I dont know......unlike retail games, you wont find theses on ebay if for some reason a game becomes popular. How do producers/developers feel about this?
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 5:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
they r only removing BAD GAMES!
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 5:55PM Pipp said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I just hope I can redownload the games if my drive dies, or I need to make room and delete them off.

If not, Microsoft is in a lot of trouble.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 5:58PM Pojomofo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Typical M$ BS, If there isnt a way to redownload already purchased games that have been "delisted", This is huge mistake.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 6:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
why would u buy a low rated game anyway?
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 6:15PM tsinder said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
You keep making the same comment. You need to realize that "good" and "bad" aren't objective descriptors, and that ratings aren't a measurement of quality, nor are purchase rates. Ideally, a person would be able to determine for him or herself the value of a game rather than rely on loose external metrics.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 7:02PM LaughingTarget said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There is no recourse to buying a bad game, ratings are more important when downloading. Once you drop $5 on junk, it's gone forever. With retail, you usually can exchange the game for another one. It's unreasonable to ask every consumer to just buy every game out there just to judge for themselves.
Reply

Posted: May 23rd 2008 7:21AM Cal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Which is why they let you trial the games
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2008 6:00PM erwos said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Seriously, they need to make sure I can re-download my "de-listed" games. I think it's dumb to de-list in the first place, though.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Shank 2 review: Refined brutality

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45AM

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW