| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (61)

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 6:44AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Pass. I'll just wait for their "exclusive" news to hit Joystiq.

Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 6:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No way in HELL. I'm certainly not gonna pay to watch a company brag about itself and it's products, that's just ridicules.

Not even a Final Fantasy XIII demo would sway me to subscribe. Waste of money, waste of time. Period. There are loads of FREE sites around the web that give far better Game Video content.
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 1:09AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"as well as special game demos, betas, add-ons and other interactive tidbits." for 24.99

Smells lihe Xbox Live Gold?
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 2:28AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Anonim:

Paying for demos and trailers? Xbox Live offers that for free!

I think Qore is Sony's way to pussyfoot around the subject of charging for their online service. Sony doesn't have the balls to come out and directly say, "Hey, PS3 fans, we may have to charge for our online service to pay the bills."

I have no problem with Sony asking a fee for their online service, but stop with the song and dance, and just ask it already.
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 6:52AM kspraydad said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sounds alot like all the stuff I thought was going to be inside HOME?
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 6:54AM velocitystrike said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Why do the letters X, Q and Z make something technology related sound so much better?

Anyhoo, if I had a PS3, I might have something constructive to say about this, but I don't, so all I can offer is "looks a bit like Inside Xbox mixed with the Nintendo Channel mixed with the Internet in general + a cost"
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 7:28AM John Z said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
QuZ they're Xtreme!

That was painful to type, I hope you know.

Anyway, yeah-- this seems like a poor attempt to change "get advertised at" to "pay to get advertised at". I give it six months before Veronica gets replaced by someone less expensive, then another three months before the service goes "free but advertiser-supported", then maybe six months before it gets pulled altogether.

By that point, Home should still only be a year or so out, so there won't be much of a gap. (*rimshot*)
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 6:57AM BiggRapp313 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I'd have to hear feedback from others before I subscribed. while 24.99 ain't really a LOT of money it's still enough to miss if the content ain't worth it.
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 7:04AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This will be a little better than having to get a magazine shipped out at the end of the month. I will have to get this. I can not pass on the exclusive content. And SOCOM Beta!
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 7:06AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow Sony, now I can pay for what I get online for free? That's brilliant, where do I sign up?
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 7:16AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"now I can pay for what I get online for free?"

yah! talk about Sony copying Microsoft...

Anyway, I don't like it, it seems that subscribers will have access to beta's, when it should be free...and if some people are tempted and actually give in to this, they might keep it going :(
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 7:25AM koehler83 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Okay, 1 blogger sign up and just post everything on youtube for the rest of us. K? K.

I don't know why Sony expects us to pay for their lies now.
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 7:37AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And if that's the Qore host: she's not hot enough.
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 7:38AM MrHashbrown said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
BLASPHEMY!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 10:40AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Agreed.

Apparently she's supposed to be a famous blogger or something about video games. I checked out her site for 10 minutes and I really don't understand how she is e-famous. Her writing style is crap.

I know by saying this I'm probably queuing up a group of people that will pick apart this post's writing style.
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 11:22PM SoCoolCurt said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
well i think Veronica Belmont is hot. more of a girl next door look to me, like someone who might actually play video games. anyone who reads Joystiq should know who she is, seeing as how she gets completely whored out at every games conference doing EVERY interview posted at this site lol. i think she does it from Mahola.com or something like that.
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 7:37AM MrHashbrown said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Fantastic idea, but it's a tad bit pricey per episode. Either way, Sony is definitely innovating in some way here and I'm glad to see it. Text magazines are boring :P
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 7:41AM shattercross said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
It's an electronic magazine people, if you don't like it don't subscribe to it. Do you honestly have to nitpick Sony to death just because you own something different?
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 10:01AM Pojomofo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Do you honestly have to nitpick Sony to death just because you own something different?"

You are obviously new to the 'stiq, Hi im Pojo!

j/k, but I certainly agree
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 7:42AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No I don't like it.
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 7:47AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"watch what you want, when you want, how you want"
I want to watch it on my iPhone for the mega convenience. Chances slim to none.

Also you have to pay for the service and they also throw adverts at you? No. Same for you Xbox.
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 11:30AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
iPhone: yesterday's technology all prettied up for today's yuppy. ;)

As for the online web magazine, I'll have to hear the reviews first before signing up - sounds interesting but I stopped reading paper magazines thanks to Joystiq, Kotaku and the other million other gaming sites out there.
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 12:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
How strange that yesterdays tech gave me a 16gb iPod with possibly the best touch interface in a handheld thing evaarrr with the fastest web browser I've used on a handheld and a 3D chip equal in power to a PSP.
Reply

Posted: Jun 5th 2008 12:29AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Little late for my reply but you think the Edge network is the fastest web browsing available? EV-DO is where things were at LAST year and that is much quicker than Edge. Yes, I know you can hook up to a wifi connection also but try using that while you are driving down an expressway.

Don't get me wrong, Apple puts together a pretty package and they refine the hell out of every interface to the point where you want to renounce your religion so that you can worship Mr. Jobs but the technology they use is not cutting edge. It's geared for the average consumer and the technology they use has been in other smartphones for over 4 years. Like I said, Apple just prettied it up and marketed it extremely well.
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 8:24AM MrAhh said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How much is a live subscription again? serious question not trying to start anything. Because as a ps3 owner i think this is kind of cool as long as the content each month is worth it i would get this.
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 8:28AM MrAhh said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ok after checking it's $50. So if sony finally get's there act together with the in game xmb + um qore. the psn seems like it's a good deal at $25.
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 12:09PM Misfit Toy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually...the seemingly "little known FACT" is that XBOX LIVE is actually FREE! FREE PEOPLE! IT IS FREE! The ONLY thing you pay for is to do online gaming. All the video featurettes that you desire on XBOX LIVE are all...wait for it...FREE!

Let me break it down. XBOX LIVE Gold account = $50. XBOX LIVE Silver account = FREE!!!

/rant
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 12:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
.......

why would you bother having xbox live if you can't play online? if it's that big a deal you might as well get a ps3 since the entire PSN is free.
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 1:18PM Ordeith said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why does anyone pay more then $40 for a 13 month live subscription?

Shop around people.
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 8:40AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
To be fair, I'm all for magazine-like services like this. It's not something I would peruse on a weekly basis but I might look through it occasionally. That's one advantage to the Nintendo Channel and Inside Xbox. It doesn't hurt to look through one or the other since its free anyway. But to make a conscience decision to pay for the same type of thing found on the other systems is a little harder sell in my book. I'm interested in seeing how this goes, but I can't imagine "Very Well, Thank You!" anywhere in that result.

Honestly, though? I still pine for the days of Coconut Monkey in PC Gamer. Bring me the games I cannot win!
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 8:40AM kspraydad said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is just an electronic magazine right? No different than picking one up at your local rag store but cheaper, faster, interactive and with demos (like on a demo disc people?)...

If you subscribe to PS specific magazines then I see this as a good alternative.

So...subscription to OPM $18 that I can drop and pick this up for $25.

Sounds fine to me.
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 9:20AM GenGrievous said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Exactly, tell that to the retards above you though.
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 8:42AM kspraydad said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
*cheaper

(applies to me where a sub to OPM is $30/year) Qore is more expensive for yanks.
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 10:05AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reminds me of PlayStation Underground CD Magazine. This could be good if it has the production value of UG.
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 9:37AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
So what exactly makes paying for Live so EVIL now? This is all stuff that comes with Live right now (if you're a gold member).
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 10:08AM Pojomofo said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
your kidding me, right?

Qore is completely optional, where as with M$, no $50/year, no online MP
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 10:42AM borland502 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"So what exactly makes paying for Live so EVIL now?"

Live was never evil, but in this case you're comparing apples to oranges. Though Pojo whipped out the tired M(Dollar Sign), he's right: The magazine is optional and not a core part of the service.

Now the "beta access" that the subscription provides is a little closer to the mark, but that's also access to beta products...not demos, which Microsoft thinks is somehow worth more to provide to Gold members first.

Despite the PSN's flawed beginnings, for my infrequent online use (I game with friends mostly on the PC), it's ideal over paying $50. As long as the core multiplayer services remain free, they can try and temp me with as many "bonus" things like this they want. I'd prefer that model over a flat fee for services that are core to the platform.
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 12:34PM unboring said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Do xbox360 owners actually think that the PSN doesnt have weekly trailers and review content added currently. Actually you get free rein on PSN, no need to be a "Gold" member. This is offering something completely different,
#1 its exclusive content
#2 its a new "interactive" user interface
#3 access to closed beta's
#4 its HD

again, this isnt going to replace the weekly content available in the PSN store. Its for people who subscribe to playstation magazines and want something more immediate. I think its a great idea, we will see if it works. I'll buy one episode if it is good I may or may not subscribe.

But really, just because its not on the console you own, doesn't make it stupid, its actually pretty innovative.
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 12:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have all three consoles, and I can say that the 360 has alot more in terms of trailers, demos and sneak peaks... Also, it's easier to download demos on the 360. No installation, just like a video game console.

It's not innovative; it's Playstation Underground again, without the demos and stuff they already offer, and not mailed to you on CD. I wouldn't have a problem being charged for it if this were 1997, if paper magazines were the go to source for video game news and previews.

I own all three, and this is still stupid because I have internet access.
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 1:25PM Kodros said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"Also, it's easier to download demos on the 360. No installation, just like a video game console. "

Grr, getting tired of hearing this. The "install" on the PS3 is most likely just unpacking the compressed game file. When you want to get rid of a demo, you delete it, there's no uninstall process.

The 360 does the same thing but it just unpacks it automatically at the end of the download. MS is not going to send an uncompressed file across the network.
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 3:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Kodros

What ever the 360 does, it does it way more efficiently then the ps3 because the instant anything is done downloading you can play it. No installing what so ever.
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 12:34AM KentuckyFrydCow28 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
L I V E

backwards spells...

E V I L

duh
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 10:19AM Pojomofo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
this sounds decent (especailly the SOCOM Beta stuff)

I will be the joystiq guinea pig on this one. I am enough of a sucker to plunk down $25 for this. I will report my findings on Friday
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 10:26AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
HardQore baby, that's fucking HardQore! I love it!! Take my dollahs, I don't need 'em!
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 10:26AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'll give the first episode a shot, to see if it's any good.
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 10:40AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So... Basically this is a Podcast, but you have to pay for it...
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 10:50AM borland502 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, I think that fairly sums it up. Now what would be cool, but I doubt the subscription would provide, is genuinely new information and automatic access to any early beta programs. That would give it a leg up on your average podcast, and it might well be worth the money.

But the cynical part of me suspects it will just be information I can get from other timely podcasts combined with access to a beta on a low visibility game.
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 11:22AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Think I'll just stick to the stiq, then.
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 11:56AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Try telling that to the sDF!

But yea I don't pay for Podcasts. The moment Ricky Gervais started charging for them I stopped listening. Why would I pay for something I can get for free by visiting Kotaku or Joystiq?
They're better still because they're not littered with 10/10 ratings for their 1st party titles (that counts for all "official" mags).
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2008 10:58AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Some of you talk as if your forced to subscribe to this. The issues area available on a per month basis also. Ill probably download the first issue and if I like it Ill subscribe.

It's like a standard magazine, you can either subscribe it and pay less or buy each mag every month and pay more.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW