| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (79)

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 10:36AM foxhound said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Perhaps it's for the best, considering that shot alone doesn't look very enticing to play.
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 10:39AM MarkHawk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It did in 2006. Looks better then Saints row does now but I agree. Looking forward to what they have in store for us.
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 10:40AM sicsided said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Look up the trailer from E3 06. It looks like it had potential, but still not that much enticing. Sad for the workers there. Especially after mentioning a week or so ago that they were getting into full production for it.
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 11:16AM MrXBob said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You guys do realise it was 100% cgi? They did a good job to make the visuals look closer to gameplay than most CGI videos do - but not a single bit of it was an actual game being played (the animations all link too perfectly into each other, the aiming was much too smooth and perfect even for a mouse, the camera and reactions in the driving section were terribly faked).

In fact I'm pretty sure they didnt get very far into developing it anyway, along with Driver - although at least the tech demo they showed of that was a real engine. Sayign that though, it's impossible that the game would have looked like that in the final game. Just look at GTA IV - even that doesnt have the absolute clarity and perfection of that engine.

They only showed a couple of main areas, which made it extremely easy to pack in billions of polygons and light it all perfectly. Make that into a game, and it would have to be scaled back immensely - especially a free-roaming one.
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 11:53AM sicsided said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@MrXBob

Eh, whatever about the graphics, it was the gameplay. Did they release something saying it was only CGI? I've seen some impressive scenes from CGI to in-game play on the fly, so that's why it looked interesting to me. I mean if they could keep that going through the whole game.
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 12:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
And here's the problem with gamers these days...
It's a new IP. So, what you do is look at a picture and go "Nope, not interested."

If it's an old IP, well then the decision was made if you like the game or not even before seeing anything. All you need to do is announce the game is being developed.

Is it just bad-taste? Lack of intelligence? "Fanboyism"? What causes people to not think or have a slightest bit of an open mind about things.

Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 2:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's just a bad case of CLS.

Cooper Lawrence Syndrome.
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 3:17PM Autopsy15 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
sicsided,

I'm pretty sure they didn't say whether it was CG or not but it's plain to see that no real time demo looked that good back in 2006, this trailer has crisp clean lines(no aliasing), smooth animations, and an amount of detail that couldn't be done back in 06', especially when developers were still working out the kinks in the PS3.
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 10:37AM MarkHawk said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Now I'll never no what happened days 2-8 ...
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 10:38AM Pojomofo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sony London Studios - "Look how great these games are looking"

Sony Europe - "That looks like $#!t your fired"

Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 2:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
my fired?
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 3:29PM Autopsy15 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No! Anything but my fired!
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 10:40AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ouch.
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 10:40AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sucks. I really wanted to see what they could do with The Getaway. The Tech Demo of London looked great.

Don't know enough about 8 days to feel one way or the other.
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 2:46PM KarlW said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
My sentiments entirely. Getaway looked promising. Never heard of 8 days until now.
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 10:42AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, that's two titles we won't see at E3. Curious as to what they have up their sleeve to replace these.
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 12:16PM Spunky Monkey 190906 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Afrika ¬_¬
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 3:30PM Autopsy15 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Lulz.
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 10:47AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Oh how the Sony fanboys jumped with glee when they saw the graphics for this game in a trailer for the first time. I remember thinking it looked amazing too.

Of course any time I think that the PS3 will do something that will make it a must buy for me, Sony slaps me in the face and takes it away.
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 10:48AM SheppyReturns said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Nnnnnooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 10:50AM FernandoRocker said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
See the good side: Less typing in the "just wait until..." lists.

=p
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 10:59AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I think you've been the only one typing that, freddy.
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 12:12PM DinnyHoon said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
This just in: Fernando Rocker doesn't like the PS3.

WE GET IT
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 12:18PM Spunky Monkey 190906 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't think I ever recall anyone using the words 'just wait until..' except fernando for any game.

Usually its more like 'Yeah, but look at this list of upcoming games...now how do you feel jackass?'
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 12:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Fernando, now I know how you felt when it was announced that Disaster: Day of Crisis was being delayed indefinitely :(
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 2:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
You must be joking or picking on Fernando or something on that one. There have been numerous just wait until... lists for PS3. Perhaps not in those exact words I guess, if you wanna nitpick. Comparisons between the 360 and PS3 lineups constantly use upcoming "games" (Quotations refer to Home), and always manage to include everything from blockbuster to niche and indy titles on one side of the fence, while the other side is missing several blockbusters and likely focuses on non-marquis games. 2008 being the year of the PS3, or why I have to buy a PS3, or how amazing it is that the PS3 can bring together so many amazing games in a single year this is amazing I'm so glad with my PS3 purchase are also standard culprits for a just wait until... list in different clothing.
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 2:18PM SheppyReturns said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
David, if you're going to try trolling, try not being a moron. The "just wait until" lists haven't been seen for at least a year. In fact, it's the other side starting the list wars nowadays. And there is a noticable difference between "Just wait until" and "I cannot wait for."

Fact of the matter is, this arguement hasn't be used in defense of PS3 for a LOOONG time. Not even by some of our more notable trolls like El Serpiente. Frankly? I was looking forward to both of these games so this information is a blow for me. But I haven't seen any fantards even so much as mentioning these titles in at least eight months. In fact, I was the last one who mentioned Eight Days as a "I can't wait until we're shown more of."
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 3:34PM Autopsy15 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Putting a smilie at the end of your insults doesn't make them any less hurt full, Fernando.


D=>
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 10:49AM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So two of the great triumvirate of titles that were announced about two years ago have been canned?

Ouch. Wonder what'll happen to Heavy Rain
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 12:20PM Spunky Monkey 190906 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What will happen? Nothing ever did happen in the first place, we don't even know if its a game yet, lmao, at least we knew these two were games.
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 11:00AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
/begin rant

So where is the list Sony, where?? Are these Devs going to help the Killzone 2 devs, Resistance 2 devs, GT5 devs?? What long list are you talking about? Was Haze the bench mark for the other games, and now you see the reviews and wonder why Halo is not dead?!?

This article kind of goes along with the other article about exclusives.

I think I am going to go trade in my PS3 for a PS2, at least the PS2 is getting Alone in the Dark. (since I do not have BC that is)

/end angry psycho rant
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 12:22PM Spunky Monkey 190906 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Would you rather wait till PS3's days are over to get Getaway 3? Lol

Maybe its a good move, now they can concentrate on games that WILL actually exist.
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 1:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Did you not read the article, London Studios are doing Little Big Planet, and focus is towards getting that out..
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 11:08AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't own a PS3 but I remember seeing 8 days and being blown away (I also remember wondering if the game itself would look anywhere near as good as the trailer). Sorry PS3 fans it looked like it had potential.
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 11:09AM gangcar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Teach 'em Japanese and send them packing to work on the next Team ICO release.
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 11:13AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
owned.

must of been canned because the game was failing on ps3 like getaway one and two did on ps2
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 12:23PM Spunky Monkey 190906 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Getaway 1 was a classic ¬_¬ Its 2 that flopped hard and PSP version.
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 12:24PM Spunky Monkey 190906 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Getaway 1 was classic, its 2 that flopped hard.
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 12:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I suppose

But the bugs and glitches stopped me from playing it >:(
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 1:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah the first getaway was amazing except for the controls. It was the first "sandbox" game (Kinda not really a sandbox game since all you could do were missions) that really had a decent cover/shooting system that I can remember
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 11:14AM darkinchworm said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Maybe they'll have these people help out with Killzone 2 so that instead of 3 shitty titles, PS3 owners get one surprisingly good sequel.

Anyone agree?

...anyone?
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 11:24AM Pojomofo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
troll attempt = failed miserabley
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 11:48AM darkinchworm said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Spelling attempt = failed miserably.
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 12:24PM Zoot Suit Jedi Grammar Hammer En said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Spelling pwnage FTW!
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 3:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
/Troll Attempt

360 is like the PS3 but one plays movies, one plays games. Ok both play movies..I think. Oh look a Pinata is in my garden!

/Phailed
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 11:22AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Who needs Gateway and Eight Days when you have Afrika?
(sarcasm intended)
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 11:28AM Pojomofo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
they were going to start making 360 games, but figured they didnt want to go up against "Buku Sudoku"
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 11:50AM darkinchworm said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Funny how PojoMofo dared call me a troll for speculating on the quality of follow-ups to titles that were historically lackluster, then sarcastically compared the significance of first-party PS3 titles to an XBLA title.

Who's the douchebag now?
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 12:33PM darkinchworm said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
el serpiente:

If I spot someone acting stupidly or spewing misinformation, I won't hesitate to knock 'em around a bit. Forgive me if that's not your cup o' tea.

If that isn't what concerned you, well...

Perhaps my assumptions regarding Killzone 2 and the now-cancelled Getaway sequel are too strong. Anyone making a final judgment on anything they've yet to play is being unfair, true. However, the prior releases have garnered less-than-stellar reviews, and I'm of the opinion that there hasn't been nearly enough media released for Killzone 2 to suggest that it's much stronger than its predecessor. Hence my knock against the title. If you can find a preview that honestly suggests that it's a substantial improvement over the prior Killzone, please direct me to it.

And have a nice day!
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2008 1:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"If I spot someone acting stupidly or spewing misinformation, I won't hesitate to knock 'em around a bit. Forgive me if that's not your cup o' tea."

Ok, let's do the same with you then

"However, the prior releases have garnered less-than-stellar reviews, and I'm of the opinion that there hasn't been nearly enough media released for Killzone 2 to suggest that it's much stronger than its predecessor. Hence my knock against the title."

huh? Both The Getaway games, and Killzone and Killzone: Liberation had gathered a lot of hype, not only that, in all of the cases, it was an either completely love the game or completely hate it situation, hence why the scores.

"Hence my knock against the title. If you can find a preview that honestly suggests that it's a substantial improvement over the prior Killzone, please direct me to it."

If you haven't seen anything that suggest improvement, then sir, where have you been for the last 6 months or so?
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW