| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (72)

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 11:55AM quickshade said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Jesus loves us.

This is one time when Sue happy = good!
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 1:18PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As good a movie story like this seems to be, this will fail miserably.

Honestly, take this quote for example: "the suit notes that should the EA-Take-Two acquisition come to fruition, it would "remove one of the few companies with the ability and expertise to compete in the market for interactive football software.""

Get real. So Take-Two and EA are the only two companies capable of making football games?
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 3:47PM WiiFTW said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Well, who else has made a game before the exclusivity agreement that was actually competitive to EA's Madden? Nobody. The same way in other sports (Hockey, Basketball, Baseball, etc.) there is an EA version (i.e. NHL 08) and a Take-Two version (NHL 2K8). Both versions are relatively close in sales and are competitive because BOTH VERSIONS have the big-name pro players. That's what the difference is. Whoever gets that basically wins. End of Story.

I've been waiting for this lawsuit for ages.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 5:53PM SoCoolCurt said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
MLB: The Show says hi.....
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 11:56AM rogre78 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I really hope they win this one. I really miss the NFL 2K series. Madden has really been disappointing.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 2:35PM EJ A said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They should turn this case into class-action.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 11:57AM whookid said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Now if we could just buy out EA.....
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:16PM The Artist Formerly known as Jes said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Then we have become the very thing we have sought out to destroy...
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 1:08PM xGeneral DEATHxDEETH82 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah...WHATEVER, JESUS!

*Proceeds to buy out EA, ruin life, wish that he had listened to "The Artist"*
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 5:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
well, sometimes you just gotta fight fire with fire

give them a taste of their own medicine and they may stop... well, probably not since this won't work anyway
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 11:58AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I think this is a waste of time and money because ea will win this case no matter what on the count they have way better lawyers, and btw im a way big madden fan anyways
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:36PM thund3rstruck said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"I think this is a waste of time and money because ea will win this case no matter what "

Sorry guys but lawsuits aren't subject to the same trivial fanaticism that fanboys are, they're subject to the law and this sounds like a compelling case.

EA did in fact conspire with the NFL to fix their price for the Madden series in the wake of massive competitive sales by the 2K Series. This is a noble lawsuit and I hope EA can't buy their way out of it.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 11:57AM DonaldMick said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
And there's a flag on the play...

"Personal foul, lawsuit with no chance in hell of winning, he was givin' him the business down there, first down."

In all seriousness, I would LOVE for this to work but I suspect EA will give the original members of the class a bag of money and tell them to go away.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:34PM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I dunno, I would think these people lack standing on the issues and will lose the case outright. I guess I would have to read the suit to really get a good idea though.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 5:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
haha, great "referee going by the rulebook" reference. Now if only the NBA would admit they order their referees to make shady calls... then we could actually have the better teams win, instead of the teams the NBA wants to win so they'll make more money
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 11:59AM Vcize said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
These people are dumbasses, they're suing the wrong people.

As much as I love the NFL and hate EA, this exclusive license stuff is the NFL's fault, not EA's. It was the NFL who had the idea, and put their exclusive license up for bid (much like Sunday Ticket on Directv), all EA did was bid on it just like everyone else, their bid was just higher.

Rest assured, if EA didn't have the exclusive license, someone else would.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:05PM SheppyReturns said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'd say "Wow, that was a thorough and reasonable arguement" if not for the mentioning of the recent Take 2 actions from EA and how, once EA secured exclusive licenses to sports, quality has steadily gone downhill. Not even mentioning the sports they've skipped for an entire year or longer.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:17PM AwesomeTown said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I can see what you mean, but this is as much EA's doing as the NFL. It's basically abuse of the NFL's antitrust exemption in my opinion. It might not fall under that, but it sure seems like it. This is just bad for the consumer and the agreement should never have happened. Shame on you EA and the NFL. Shame.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:22PM copa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Vcize is 100% correct. If EA had approached the NFL and said, "We refuse to deal with you unless you sign an exclusivity agreement with us," AND if such a threat would have been financially crippling to the NFL (it wouldn't have) so they had no choice but to accept it, then you might have grounds for a lawsuit about anticompetitive behavior here.

That's not what happened here. The NFL offered an exclusivity agreement for competitive bidding, and EA won the bid.

Complaining about the state of pro sports franchises under EA may be emotionally satisfying, but there is not legal basis for this suit. It is completely retarded.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Here's the thing, though:

The NFL is protected by anti-trust laws. They cannot, legally, be sued for this.

So these two gamers have chosen to go after EA instead.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:45PM Vcize said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"once EA secured exclusive licenses to sports, quality has steadily gone downhill. Not even mentioning the sports they've skipped for an entire year or longer."

No doubt the quality has gone downhill. I bought every Madden game from '95 through '05 and wasn't able to keep '06 through '08 for more than a week before selling them, but that's not really the point here.

They were essentially forced into the agreement. Don't get me wrong, I'm sure they loved the idea, but their choices were either get the exclusive license or have no license at all and let someone else have the exclusive license. They did not go actively seeking it, they just submitted the highest bid that was requested by the NFL.

So what is these guy's case going to be? Even though the NFL were the ones that put the license up for bid we feel that these game's subjective quality has gone downhill in our opinion since securing the license that they were asked to bid on?

Yeah, that'll fly in court....
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:50PM Vcize said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Here's the thing, though:

The NFL is protected by anti-trust laws. They cannot, legally, be sued for this.

So these two gamers have chosen to go after EA instead."

Good point about NFL anti-trust laws.

All that should mean though is that they have no case at all, not that they have a case against someone else.

The real crime here though is that while EA deserves a lot of the hate they get, they get a TON of hate they don't deserve by people that just assume that EA went to the NFL and said "oh hey NFL 2k5 was a good game so we want to buy the exclusive NFL license and put them out of business" (this is even referenced in the article) when that's not actually how it went down at all.

People can hate them for getting complacent with the series, and people can hate them for trying to take over Take Two now, but they get a lot of hate for this exclusive license which was actually not their fault while people act like the NFL is another victim in this when they're the true aggressor.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 5:18PM RPGJock said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Don't forget to blame the NFL Player Association also. They jumped on the bandwagon too. You can't use any of the members of the NFLPA without their license agreement also.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 11:59AM sicsided said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
still waiting on Backbreaker....
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:01PM juju187 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I like to play monopoly too...
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:07PM CommentSystem said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
if ea gives back football to 2k sports can 2k let them have baseball? seriously the mlb2k series keeps getting worse and worse
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:20PM SheppyReturns said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I didn't know Take 2 had MLB... how does that work with Sony making games as well too?
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:22PM LiqwidZero said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
MLB 2k1 on the Dreamcast was the best.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:27PM SheppyReturns said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, I heard The Show was damn good, downloaded the demo, and remembered why I don't play basebal games...
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:29PM DonaldMick said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The MLB agreement is for third parties only, IIRC.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That would be great, MVP Baseball 2005 is the best baseball game ever.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:36PM CommentSystem said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ wong: i was talking about letting ea make the game instead, not any contractual agreements or anything.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 1:24PM The Commenter Formerly Known as said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@jimy
No, MLB The Show 08 is the best baseball game ever. Seriously, if you haven't played it you need to. It plays similar to MVP but without all the glitches and bad announcing. This game is easily better than that crap MLB2K. I don't why everyone wants to hate on Madden when 2K has done the worst job with license. And even in 05, Madden was still better than 2K, but not by much.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 5:09PM Bryan T said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You are all wrong.

Best Baseball game = Ken Griffey Jr. Baseball (the original, not winning run) for the SNES.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:12PM mrmobius said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The good thing about football (soccer) in Europe is that even though EA has the license to use the team names for Fifa, Pro Evo is still selling great and although I don't know the official figures I'm guessing they're about even.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:12PM Negativecool said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hell yea! Get pwned EA! Get PWNED!
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:21PM LiqwidZero said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If the NFL payed EA to publish games exclusively, wouldn't that mean EA is being commissioned? Being commissioned to do something isn't anti-competitive, or so I believe. If anything, the NFL is liable for this "anti-competitive" practice.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:25PM Joanna D said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That doesn't look like football, he has the broken ball in his hand!!!
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:42PM Shagittarius said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Is that some kind of lame soccer joke?
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:27PM verymetal said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
IF EA can be sued over this, then my question is can we sue other gamers for glitching during a game of Madden. LOL...
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:53PM Vcize said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You'd probably have just as good a chance of winning that case as these guys do with this case.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 1:00PM andyg8180 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
time for Mr Peter Moore to jump ship again lol
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:43PM FredFredrickson said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They have the right idea, but they shouldn't seek restitution - the courts should just declare the practice of exclusivity agreements unlawful in this case and we should move forward.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:51PM FakeJamaican said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i'd let EA buy me out if I were these guys..."here's some cash...STFU"

schwing
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antitrust

Competition = Good for Everyone
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 1:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
they need to take the issue up with the NFL. MLB, NBA, even the NHL didn't go exclusive, and EA has licenses to those as well. NFL, PGA, NASCAR, FIFA, and NCAA all chose to go to EA with the exclusive license to their property.

A large chunk of EA's business is licensed sports gaming, so I don't blame them for going out and getting what is made available by the companies owning the licenses.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 1:30PM The Commenter Formerly Known as said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@googoogachoo
You're wrong. They're fighting for a company who has done the same exact thing as EA but for baseball. 2K bought the exclusive rights to MLB, but any first party company (Sony) can make a baseball game. And lucky they did because MLB2K sucks big time. Madden has done a much better job with the exclusive license than the stuff 2K puts out every year with MLB sticker on it.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 1:55PM Vcize said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
APF2k8 failed because it wasn't a very good game, plain and simple. It had many of the same faults Madden did, people just like to cry for it because it's the little guy now and because 2k5 was so good. People decided 2k8 was going to be an underappreciated gem before it was ever released.

That said, no NFL icense definitely hurt bigtime. They took a shot at the made-up teams thing with retired players and it didn't work.

Ironically, a while back it was EA faced with this problem when Madden 64 released without the NFL license. They chose to go the route of "copy the NFL without actually using the license" by creating teams like the Foxboro Patriots and South Florida Dolphins and they did OK. Not great, but OK.

This is the route take two should go. With as stale as Madden has gotten I think a lot of people would overlook minor differences like "Miami" vs. "South Florida" if the game was far better, but they are less likely to overlook "Miami Dolphins" vs. "totally made-up team with no NFL equivalent".
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 1:57PM Vcize said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yikes, that was supposed to go under JP's post down the page further.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW