| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (11)

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:38PM copa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So in conclusion, they spent $714,000 getting active in legislation. And they spent $5 million to break their lease at the LA Convention Center in 2007, so they could say "Oh, my bad!" and return to LA in 2008.

Yup, I'd drop out of the ESA until they started spending my money better as well.

Posted: Jun 15th 2008 5:43AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
the thing I don't get is that the ESA board is essentially made up of managing directors from games publishers/companies... so they were the ones that decided to change E3, and they are the ones complaining about it.

I always thought the ESA was about more than E3... (both good and bad) but if your figures are right then they really AREN'T.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 1:03PM zingerhill said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's really nothing for an industry the size of the games industry. Actually pretty embaressing.

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I wonder what they spent more money on, free speech or IP/patent stuff.

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:53PM Peter Moore said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
$714,000?

That's it?

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 12:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Go ESA! Stop those pirates from downloading Dreamcast and Atari games!

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 2:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I can't help but suspect that the whole reason for all of the anti-videogame political talk/legislation was from the politicians deciding, "Hey, there's this giant money making industry, and they're not giving us money like all the other industries do."

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 3:54PM chispito said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There's a lot of wheels to grease, if you catch my drift.

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 4:57PM duerra said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I despise the ESA. I wish we never even started it. It's going to turn into the next MPAA. Mark my words. An Evil, vile, coalition of corporations conspiring to dominate the industry and remain in power. Ultimately they will censor the industry (fuck, they've already started doing that - Manhunt 2, anyone?), prevent independent developers from making a name for themselves in the industry, and otherwise reigning in the power for their own nefarious purposes.

I can't believe that gamers have accepted the ESA as it stands today. If they were really interested in protecting the industry, we wouldn't have things such as an "AO" rating at all today. We should demand more. You know, complain on the internet. It accomplishes a lot.

*sigh*

Sorry, having a long day.

Posted: Jun 12th 2008 7:05PM Gripen40k said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't get it, why are companies able to bribe legislators to begin with? Doesn't this bother anyone?

Posted: Jun 15th 2008 5:49AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The ESA isn't really meant to represent gamers... though they are less EVIL than groups like the MPAA and the RIAA.

If gamers want to be represented then they really should set up their own group... i'm sure a site like Penny Arcade or CAD could easily organise some form of gamers organisation if they wanted. (pay annual dues via paypal, get discounts on PA/CAD merchandise and events and maybe some free downloads... use the money to campaign for GAMERS rather than game makers. )

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW