| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (44)

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 2:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Well they certainly got the right platform on display there. Although, you gotta put the sensor bar above it.
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 2:28PM R Planteer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
With HDMI ports becoming more common I think this is a bit late. I just bought a 19 in widescreen monitor with HDMI and VGA ports, and I have my 360 hooked up via HDMI. Easy to swap back and forth from comp to console.
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 2:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
...doubt that.
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 2:30PM RobAccomando said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
what's the point? HD TV > Computer monitor. (unless you're still using a 19" SD). Plus, why would u want your console powered on AND your PC just to play a game? Waste of $, imo.
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 2:33PM NumberZero said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It is mainly for people in College who can't afford a decent TV. I think.
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 2:43PM Grey Acumen said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, I'm not interested in spending $500 for a TV that I'm only going to use for playing Wii games on, but being able to use my laptop's widescreen for that is something I've been hoping to do for a while now.
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 3:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Rob,

Reasoning, please?
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 3:12PM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
HDTVs have the ability to scale far better than PC monitors - case in point, a game at 640p (GTA IV on the PS3) looks far better on a 22" HDTV than a PC game at 800x640 on a 22" PC monitor.

This is not an anti-PC comment, I'm a massive PC gamer myself, but a mere statement of fact on the quality of screens.
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 3:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As for what Number_Zero said, it's probably for people who primarily use a PC monitor (like college students), but if that's the case, then shouldn't a VGA cable do the job? Most college students I see carry a mid-size or larger laptop, and those usually have some sort of display jack for input, and those with much smaller laptops probably don't care about playing console games anyway. Others usually have a regular PC and either use a splitter for the VGA or a separate input on their monitor.

Maybe this is a USB jack or something that allows video signals to travel from the console to the PC screen, and you use software on the PC to display the game.

Other than that, I really don't see the point either.
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 3:29PM Roto13 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Who actually turns their computer off these days? Mine has been on for, like, a month.
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 3:31PM ultimateq said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
HDTV == Monitor.

Fixed.
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 5:00PM RobAccomando said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Sorry, imo, it's still HD TV > PC Monitor.
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 9:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You can buy computer monitors these days that are full HD in resolution so in that case an HDTV is the same as a computer monitor and a lot of the time you can get the monitor cheaper than the TV, from some of the research I've done. I know my friends have HD monitors and use them as a TV also because its a lot more convenient. Plus having the monitor is real nice for LANs because when you're waiting for a tournament to get started or when youre not in a certain round you can just swap over to your Xbox 360 or whatever and not have to worry about missing a round or someone playing you're game as you can pause it when you need to switch back to the computer. So I'd have to say that the computer monitor makes things a bit nicer for us gamer types which use PCs and consoles. Putting a console through a computer can make things a lot easier if you cant get to the back of your TV but your computer is right there making things a lot easier and quicker to do. This isn't a bad idea imo
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2008 5:29AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, I'm living in a small apartment in Tokyo, and I don't have a TV. But I do have a laptop.. so being able to buy a Wii and play it on my laptop would be sweet.

I can probably do it already though, I'm sure I've seen several devices over here that claim to allow you to play console games on your PC monitor.
(I just haven't trusted my japanese translation abilities enough to buy one and try it yet...)

(PS/ most laptops don't have a video in, they have a spare vga-OUT incase you want to plug in an external monitor).
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 2:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
The sensor bar IS there, right above the keyboard, below the screen
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 4:05PM d134 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
how is the sensor bar hooked up? there's no sensor bar port in the macbook pro.

btw why does that macbook pro not have an isight in the top middle of the screen?

and if it's for pc only then this computer is running parallels or boot camp or something.

but in any case, something to look forward to.
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 5:27PM geeksunny said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@calvin: The sensor bar has a very long cable, and obviously its hooked into the Wii, where the computer is also hooked into.

The photo is not the Trioxide thing... its the EyeTV, which is a Mac only product. Read the whole story before making stupid comments
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 2:36PM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Uh..weird.
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 2:36PM MrHashbrown said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Way to get my hopes up Scott. DON'T TOY WITH ME!
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 2:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This could work good if you only have one TV in the house. It could certainly cut down on bickering for who gets to use the TV. I wonder if there is a slight delay like with the slingbox or how close the console needs to be for the controller to work properly if at all. I can run any of my consoles through the slingbox but it is not practical for gaming because of the 4-5 second delay in movement in the real world and on screen. The only practical use in that situation would be movie playback or viewing photos.
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 2:42PM foxhound said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
x_o Coincidentally, I bought those VC games depicted.
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 2:45PM thecshow said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Go ahead honey, you can watch your show.
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 3:00PM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I disagree with your guess that it'll just be a device to put console video output to your PC.. those have already been invented (called 'cables'). It's likely that it requires the controllers because it would be ridiculous of them to program PC control schemes for every console game in existence.

Besides, if the blurb states you need the controllers, why doesn't it state you need the consoles? And elsewhere in it, it mentioned two price points, one at $49 and one at $299. $299 just for a few cables and video display software?
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 3:49PM beano311 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I totally agree that it's definitely not a cable for hooking your consoles up to your computer screen... unless the $49.99 unit would be for one system, maybe a Component-HDMI/VGA or HDMI-VGA and the $299.99 unit would be some sort of HDMI/VGA/Component switch box complete with three sets of cables for each system. Look it up, HDMI switch boxes are expensive, add in the fact that the Wii only does component at best, you'd have to have some sort of HDMI and Component combo switch box that outputs to either HDMI, DVI, or VGA for PC input. The price would add up. Also, HDMI-VGA converters are also expensive as it has to convert from analog to digital, so it's not just an average cable.
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 4:02PM beano311 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But, what I really think it is (and what I hope it is) is an emulator along the lines of Bleem! If they could some how write an emulator for all three systems in assembly language, like Bleem! was written, then you'd have as damn close to a 1:1 ratio of performance on console to PC emulation. Granted, it would also be extremely difficult (read near impossible? especially converting the multi-core optimization of 360 and PS3 games) to write those emulators in assembly, but if it could be pulled off, it would be expected that most PCs that could run modern games smoothly could also run 360/PS3 games almost as easily.
Also, that whole "any games played using Trioxide utilize their original game controllers, rather than the PC's keyboard or mouse" does nothing to prove that it's simply a way to hook up video/audio to your PC. Wouldn't it say "utilize their original game controllers and consoles"? I have a wired 360 controller hooked up to my PC right now, I've connected my Wii remote to my PC over bluetooth, and I'm pretty sure you can do the same with a Sixaxis too (and a wireless 360 controller using an RF dongle). I'm sure they could easily write drivers that could make Wii/360/PS3 controllers a breeze to connect and use on your PC, especially if they have the talent to write an emulator for "now-gen" systems.
I'm thinking the $49.99 product will include just the software, where as the $299.99 might include a Bluray drive for PS3 games as well as other hardware, like maybe a controller or two (or maybe just the drive, who knows).
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 4:39PM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's what I think/am hoping.
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 4:41PM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Also the 360 controller already works on the PC and can be used for quite a few PC games already. I read somewhere about the Sixaxis working too.

The wii would probably require a few peripherals though.
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 4:41PM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Also the 360 controller already works on the PC and can be used for quite a few PC games already. I read somewhere about the Sixaxis working too.

The wii would probably require a few peripherals though.
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 7:53PM Catprog said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 3:01PM Cigol said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I find my PC is better at rendering videos than, for example my PS3. Sometimes I wish I had the power of my PC when playing my PS3. T'is a crying shame.
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 3:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Bleem with another name?
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 3:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think its for using the PC as a TV screen, which is cool, it means less shaky cam footage on YouTube.
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 3:29PM ultimateq said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"...merely allows users to send video and audio signals from their console of choice to the PC for displaying..."

Yeah I can do that already, it's called a $50 tv card.
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 3:31PM Roto13 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"This theory is reinforced by the blurb, which states that any games played using Trioxide utilize their original game controllers, rather than the PC's keyboard or mouse."

The Xbox 360 and Wii controllers can be used with any PC with bluetooth. Probably the PS3 controller, too.
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 3:40PM Supermanisdead said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
WTF, this post's title is misleading! I thought I could put my 360 game in my DVD drive and play it! It's just a way to wirelessly transmit sound and video which can be done already. Also, the actual wires are very cheap.
I can already connect my 360 controller to my PC (I play audio-surf with it all the time), Wiimotes can be connected to bluetooth devices (and DS3/Sixaxis as well, I believe).
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 3:46PM Cabal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This seems rather pointless since its already possible to hook the consoles up to a computer monitor much cheaper than whatever this will cost. Now if the PC is actually running the game, just you connect the original gaming controllers to the PC, thats an entirely different matter.
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 3:47PM Rankore said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I got an HDTV for my 360 and my wii, and then dual computer monitors 24" 1080p for my PS3 and it looks hella nice :) It costs a shit load of money but its worth it. I love my MSG4 and Bluray movies for sure!
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 3:59PM beano311 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But, what I really think it is (and what I hope it is) is an emulator along the lines of Bleem! If they could some how write an emulator for all three systems in assembly language, like Bleem! was written, then you'd have as damn close to a 1:1 ratio of performance on console to PC emulation. Granted, it would also be extremely difficult (read near impossible? especially converting the multi-core optimization of 360 and PS3 games) to write those emulators in assembly, but if it could be pulled off, it would be expected that most PCs that could run modern games smoothly could also run 360/PS3 games almost as easily.
Also, that whole "any games played using Trioxide utilize their original game controllers, rather than the PC's keyboard or mouse" does nothing to prove that it's simply a way to hook up video/audio to your PC. Wouldn't it say "utilize their original game controllers and consoles"? I have a wired 360 controller hooked up to my PC right now, I've connected my Wii remote to my PC over bluetooth, and I'm pretty sure you can do the same with a Sixaxis too (and a wireless 360 controller using an RF dongle). I'm sure they could easily write drivers that could make Wii/360/PS3 controllers a breeze to connect and use on your PC, especially if they have the talent to write an emulator for "now-gen" systems.
I'm thinking the $49.99 product will include just the software, where as the $299.99 might include a Bluray drive for PS3 games as well as other hardware, like maybe a controller or two (or maybe just the drive, who knows).
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 4:01PM beano311 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And that post was supposed to be a reply to my post of a reply to Haggards post a few posts above these two posts that I just posted in the wrong spot because this posting system is as bad as the US postal service is at making sure your postage gets to the postmarked address.
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 4:01PM geeksunny said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So, what, it's a VGA box?
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 4:46PM WiNGSPANTT from TopTierTacticsco said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have been playing Dreamcast games on a PC monitor with a TV tuner card for over 7 years.

It cost $40 and took about 15 minutes to get working.
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 4:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ha, this will probably turn out like the Phantom.
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 5:11PM mgrochowalski said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This already exists. It's called the Gamebridge, I got one for $15 from Woot but didn't really use it much. A component in version would be nice, but I'm betting this is the same composite/s-video only type thing.
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2008 9:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Meh. This won't last.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW