| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (16)

Posted: Jun 20th 2008 1:47AM Yuccadude said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why should devs care about if people know about their game early. If they are the kind of gamer that cares about your game, you should be letting them know that you are hard at work on making them a game and they can start to get excited about it. If they don't care about your game, you aren't losing any money by them knowing about it sooner than you want them to.
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2008 1:53AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Exactly, I would think it would be better for them to have that info out there earlier.
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2008 1:52AM SeanR said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Lets see how well this works... But as I quickly found out this year. If people want to find something out, they will.
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2008 2:25AM 007craft said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is dumb. I mean those developers are idiots to begin with for not announcing their games. an ESRB rating means the game is DONE. COMPLETE. FINISHED. READY FOR SALE. If your game is THAT far ahead into developement and it still hasnt even been announced, it must be a piece of crap to begin with.

I know theres exceptions like with secret XBLA ports coming for a surprise release, but for new games, yeah what I said above still stands.
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2008 3:57AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Fair play to publishers, would be a bigger impact if the announcement about a game going gold was done rather via them than having people find out by the ESRB website...would have a better impact on the market I reckon...
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2008 6:24AM Neofalcon43 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't really get why this is on 360 fanboy as opposed to joystiq. It seems like this is a change that would affect all platforms - not just the 360 in particular.
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2008 8:30AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
? They're competitors, yes I know, same owner, but they're still competitors.

Plus stories overlap, I don't read Joystiq at all and rely on the individual sites, 360 fanboy, wii fanboy, for my news.
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2008 8:48AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
well if you think about it some developers might get and esrb and then make some tweeks or some such which could push there intended release date back as far as a year or more (as seen with some of the more recent trends) and they don't want people getting too much info too early because if you give someone all the info right away and then make them wait a really long time for it they will have lost interest for the most part (not true in all cases there are exeptions to that rule like metal gear solid 4) and so they want to wait till they're ready to let us know so that they can still hold our attention and build they hype to sell more copy's (one example of to much hype too early is timeshift from what i can tell too many people, me included, got tired of waiting for it and didn't buy it right away when it finally came out)
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2008 9:16AM JCarpio said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
First of all let's make some clarifications.

It's the PUBLISHERS that have the problem with it, not the DEVELOPERS.

PUBLISHERS don't want it revealed early because they want the ability to announce and market the game. Haven't it leaked takes some of that announcement steam from them.

DEVELOPERS make the games and rely on the PUBLISHERS to market the games to be sold (as well as give them money to develop the games).
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2008 9:24AM anoffday said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Meh. Oh well. We won't know about games as soon, but I don't know if I'd go as far as to call it an "end to an era."
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2008 11:42AM hotpuck6 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is stupid.
If you want to keep your game all hush hush, don't submit it to the ESRB until you start the marketing for it. How hard is that?
Besides, most games that are announced long before this sort of leak don't need any sort of hype boost, while games that aren't, do need one. It was free press for developers, and apparently they are too concerned over total control of their product to see that.
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2008 11:46AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As was pointed out above, it's the publishers, my friend, the publishers.
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2008 11:49AM hotpuck6 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
alright, well my comment still works, just take out developers and plug in publishers.

"Besides, most games that are announced long before this sort of leak don't need any sort of hype boost, while games that aren't, do need one. It was free press for publishers, and apparently they are too concerned over total control of their product to see that."
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2008 11:50AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Quite true, good sir. Quite true :)
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2008 12:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
C
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2008 12:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
d
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW