| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (115)

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 11:35AM falcomadol said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wait? Different Publisher?
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 11:39AM OMGOMG said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
HALOZZZ 4!!!!!!

NO WAI!!!


Sorry, couldn't resist.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 11:40AM Fosssil said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Please Infinity Ward... Just make another Modern Warfare one...
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 11:44AM OMGOMG said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Give them credit for trying something different. This medium needs change, however bad that may seem. That's why I'm pumped about Alone in the Dark. However just meh the game is, the developers and publishers took huge risks and really thought outside the box when designing the game, and in today's "sequel" era, it's nice to see developers not take the easy way out when creating a sequel.

/end rant.

Love you, Fossil.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 12:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
OMGOMG: Woah woah woah. Did you just call a Sci-Fi shooter an ORIGINAL premise? (Not saying WW II is original either) I guess you must have forgotten DOOM, Halo, Gears of War, Haze, Turok, Half Life and countless others. I'm not saying a few of those games aren't good, but it's not that original. You said you don't want to see a developer taking the easy way out, then Sci-Fi would be a step backward, only way it wouldn't would be if they made it in the "Near future" with completely original/prototype guns.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 12:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Considering the amount of backlash Treyarch gets for "trying something different" praising IW would be highly hypocritical.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 12:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Futuristic shooter = something different?

No.

A game set in Vietnam or Korea = different.

This equals = zzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 12:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Give them credit for trying something different."

I hope you'e not talking about the WW2 game. I think i speak for many a gamer when I say: NO MORE FUCKING WW2 GAMES!

Over-saturation is a Goddamn understatement; too many times have I had to kill nazis, the idea of a future-set shooter sounds awesome, though.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 12:16PM Obienator said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
So when I get a 10 kill streak I can get the Death Star to blow up the enemies.....sweet!

I say go for it IW!
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 12:20PM Obienator said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
After the impressive showing of COD4, I will give IW the benefit of the doubt. They could potentially make a game with the grittiness of "Aliens" and not the cheesiness of "Starship Troopers".

So I will keep my eyes peeled.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 12:29PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Futuristic shooter = something different?"

Do you realize how broad "sci-fi" is"? It could indeed be something different.

"A game set in Vietnam or Korea = different."

Not really. There were several games with similar settings last gen.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 1:19PM Fosssil said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
OMGOMG: I didn't mean to imply that IW would do a bad job with a sci-fi shooter, or even that the medium isn't in need of a little innovation and change.

I simply meant to say that I think the "Modern Warfare" category is under-utilized outside of Tom Clancy titles, and that I feel IW can produce an equally impressive sequel to CoD4 before completely abandoning the genre.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 3:10PM OMGOMG said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
By the way, if this rumor is true, IW is taking the same path that the BF series did, minus the Vietnam stage.

So, get ready for a game with a hilarious story coming soon!! (and get ready to be gouged up the wazoo with buying weapons)

Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 3:46PM GreyFox said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'd rather see them switch it up personally. A futuristic FPS from those guys might now be bad at all.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 7:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
ya in my opinion they left call of duty 4 a little wide open like soap and cpt. price if they live or not
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 11:43AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'd like to see the COD franchise stay in the realm of human against human combat. But I'd also like to see an expansion to COD4.

As long as they don't take the "near-future" route of Battlefield, we should be ok.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 12:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Being sci-fi doesn't necessarily mean aliens, what about the same realistic style of FPS story and gameplay just based in the future? Doesn't even need to be in space, just have it based on earth with warring countries/factions with sci-fi setting an weapon. Remember sci-fi can open a lot of doors because it doesn't have to be based of real subject matter.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 8:37PM ILL Thief said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
battlefield 2142 was one of the best games for a PC..if they were to follow that formula an throw in their perks an new weapons i'd definitely buy that! I know alot of other people would buy it too!
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 11:44AM kingofwale said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
and once again will put CoD games by the "other publisher" to shame.

Infinity Ward is slowly becoming one of the best dev teams out there
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 11:46AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
im in
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 11:45AM Neebs said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
God no.

*hits eject button*
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 11:49AM deepfriedmario said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Don't you guys mean different developers not... publishers?
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 11:58AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well as long a its going backwards maybe they should go waaay back, Dino hunting anyone? I mean I need something to replace the gaping hole in my heart where Turok used to be...
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 4:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
As much as that would be cool, if that happened, it wouldnt be Call of Duty anymore.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 11:59AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
(sigh)

Don't we have enough space marine shooters? I mean, c'mon.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 12:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Don't we have enough WWII and modern day shooters?
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 12:35PM aristokrat said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Technically, we have enough shooters, period. But that doesn't stop developers from making them or fans from enjoying them. It might be fun to see what IW can bring to the genre.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 6:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Vietnam, Korea...
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 8:15PM Kodros said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Well, Bush tried to give us new content...
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2008 8:07AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Jeez, enough with the Historical, Present Day and Sci-fi shooters already! Try something different!

Like, er... ;-)
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 12:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Call of Duty 6: Futureistic Warfare

could work, as long as it doesnt get to silly with spaceships, aliens, lightsabers etc, that would just ruin the cod franchise
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2008 11:30AM Jerk Face said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I just hope they spell 'Futuristic' right.
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2008 10:52PM Inect said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
lmao jerkface
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 12:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Games like Call of Duty (and Splinter Cell, and more) alternate developers (not publishers) in order to keep a yearly schedule. The next CoD, futuristic or not, is definitely Infinity Ward's.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 12:04PM GenGrievous said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Looking forward to it. Hopefully for once a MP game where the two teams aren't carbon copies of eachother.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 12:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If they made it starship troopers, i would cream my pants
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 12:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Especially if it includes some topless scenes!

In a tent!

On a battlefield!
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 12:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
NO WAI
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2008 10:59PM Inect said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The problem is there is only men in COD and BF.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 12:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually I'm probably guessing that it will be more like GRAW than Starship troopers if anything. That seems pretty likely to me
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 12:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Compared to other games Halo is shallow I mean whats so great about it story wise?"

Well, the novels introduce a lot of humanizing aspects to both the main characters and their opposition, give them backstories, explain the reasoning behind the various Halo conflicts in more detail, etc. It's got a great story going, but heres the thing - you wouldn't know it if your Halo experience is of the games alone.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 12:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Wrong reply chain, damnit
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 12:52PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agree. Everyone seems to be assuming the it's going to wind up like Halo when it could something as simple as Advanced Warfighter... no aliens and only a few years into the future. Really, "sci-fi" is broad there's really no way to know at this point what that could mean.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 12:12PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Yeah...CoD fanboys would still claim that their Space Marine Game is better and deeper than Halo.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 12:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well if it's anything like COD 4 then yes it will be much deeper
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 12:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Tmac, I don't think that you really want to compare a Modern War Gun & Run with a clichéd Tom Clancy-ish Story to an Universe with it's own LORE AND NOVELS.

God I hate when people call Halo "shallow".
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 12:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Compared to other games Halo is shallow I mean whats so great about it story wise?
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 12:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"God I hate when people call Halo "shallow"."

But as a game, it's not as deep as some of it's competitors. Sure, its got plenty of lore backing it, but where's the lore in the actual game? You shouldn't NEED separate novels and shit to make a game seem deeper - fuck, you get just as much lore casually scanning throughout the Metroid Prime series than if you play Halo and read the accompanying novels. I think Halo is a fun series and is worth the purchase, but don't try to pass it off as all that deep, 'cuz it's not. Neither is COD4, at least in the story aspect, but they manage to make that up with far deeper gameplay than what I've played in Halo.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 12:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
It is shallow. It's the very definition of shallow in video games. I shouldn't have to read books to get a VIDEO GAME'S story.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2008 12:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Compared to other games Halo is shallow I mean whats so great about it story wise?"

Well, the novels introduce a lot of humanizing aspects to both the main characters and their opposition, give them backstories, explain the reasoning behind the various Halo conflicts in more detail, etc. It's got a great story going, but heres the thing - you wouldn't know it if your Halo experience is of the games alone.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Portabliss: Sticky Bees (iOS)

Posted on Feb 6th 2012 9:00PM

Now Playing: February 6-12, 2012

Posted on Feb 6th 2012 5:45PM

Sanctum 2 defends PC, consoles in 2013

Posted on Feb 6th 2012 9:00AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW