Wondering what happened to the number "5" trailing Call of Duty and preceding World at War? Senior producer Noah Heller offered some insight into its absence, saying, "We're getting rid of the number in Call of Duty for a very specific reason: It's because we want you to know that when you're playing Call of Duty: World at War you're playing the best shooter, the best WW2 game ever. Likewise when you're playing Modern Warfare, likewise when you play any game that will be called Call of Duty."
Now, a handful of us have tried to parse that quote and, no matter which angle we take, it proves elusive. Is he saying that Modern Warfare didn't have a number in the title (because the game's box clearly says otherwise)? Is he saying that future Call of Duty installments, including whatever Infinity Ward is presumably working on, will also be sans number? Or perhaps, as rumored, Infinity Ward has renegotiated their relationship with the flagship title and any numbered sequels (all future sequels?) will be saved for them to develop?
We've sent our own inquiry into Activision for some clarification. We'll let you know what it throws back.
Reader Comments (48)
Posted: Jun 23rd 2008 4:22PM FernandoRocker said
I guess this will not be last Call of Duty 5 story today, right?
Reply
Posted: Jun 23rd 2008 4:25PM (Unverified) said
Must be a slow news day, they could have combined all of these into 2 or 3 articles.
Reply
Posted: Jun 23rd 2008 4:38PM (Unverified) said
Actually here is where you are wrong rv...
"there will be no more Call of Duty articles today, because Call of Duty 5 does not exist"
Just because COD5 doesn't exist doesn't mean there won't be anymore COD articles...I bet there will even be one for that COD World at War game...
Reply
"there will be no more Call of Duty articles today, because Call of Duty 5 does not exist"
Just because COD5 doesn't exist doesn't mean there won't be anymore COD articles...I bet there will even be one for that COD World at War game...
Posted: Jun 23rd 2008 4:23PM (Unverified) said
This is almost as crazy when Joystiq did like 12 GTA 4 articles very near each other. This is getting almost as close on the ridiculous meter though.
Reply
Posted: Jun 23rd 2008 4:24PM (Unverified) said
So basically its not CoD5 because it will suck horribly..
Gotcha Treyarch..
Reply
Gotcha Treyarch..
Posted: Jun 23rd 2008 4:28PM (Unverified) said
Maybe that's it, he will let IW put out COD5, and then start naming theirs the even ones. Then everyone that said they would only buy the even games will buy theirs!
Reply
Posted: Jun 23rd 2008 4:49PM (Unverified) said
Probably about 3 or 4 years. They will put out this one which will suck, then they will think that it's because it doesn't have a number so they will put out 6 after IW puts out 5, which will then suck. Then they will stop making games.
Reply
Posted: Jun 23rd 2008 4:28PM (Unverified) said
Why no Treyarch it's not Call of Duty 5; it's Call Of Duty 3 ver.2
Reply
Posted: Jun 23rd 2008 4:29PM (Unverified) said
@Megastryke...wherever you are.
Are you there? Comment Stalking? hate to say I told you so but...
I TOLD YOU SO! COD:WaW will not be COD5! That is reserved for IW baby!
Reply
Are you there? Comment Stalking? hate to say I told you so but...
I TOLD YOU SO! COD:WaW will not be COD5! That is reserved for IW baby!
Posted: Jun 23rd 2008 4:33PM (Unverified) said
*In a very fast,teeny slut accent*
Oh-mah-gawd....
Reply
Oh-mah-gawd....
Posted: Jun 23rd 2008 4:34PM (Unverified) said
He's probably busy crunching nintendo numbers for his next spin comment.
Reply
Posted: Jun 23rd 2008 4:39PM (Unverified) said
Just look here and you'll see what I'm talking about, lol!
http://www.joystiq.com/2008/06/17/first-call-of-duty-world-at-war-trailer-to-rolls-onto-xbl/
Reply
http://www.joystiq.com/2008/06/17/first-call-of-duty-world-at-war-trailer-to-rolls-onto-xbl/
Posted: Jun 23rd 2008 4:46PM (Unverified) said
You just couldn't let it go. :-)
I love it when every once in a while,a mature people starts acting like an eight-year-old.
Reply
I love it when every once in a while,a mature people starts acting like an eight-year-old.
Posted: Jun 23rd 2008 4:48PM (Unverified) said
Told ya so, told ya so, told ya, told ya, told ya so!!
:P
Reply
:P
Posted: Jun 23rd 2008 5:04PM (Unverified) said
Since everyone knows that I'm still floating about, I'll respond by saying that from here on out if you want to have an actual game discussion, you'd do best to email me at megaStryke@gmail.com.
But to get this out of the way, Super Contra is the second Contra game. It has no "two" attached to it, but the following game in the series was called Contra III. Just saying.
Reply
But to get this out of the way, Super Contra is the second Contra game. It has no "two" attached to it, but the following game in the series was called Contra III. Just saying.
Posted: Jun 23rd 2008 5:06PM (Unverified) said
Oh, and if you wish to refer to me in the future, it is "megaStryke", lowercase 'm', capital 'S'. I am extremely anal about that and can't keep letting people butcher it.
Reply
Posted: Jun 23rd 2008 4:37PM (Unverified) said
The quote made perfect sense to me..
Heller was saying that he wants each individual Call of Duty game to be the head of its genre instead of simply "The next call of duty." World at War should be the best WWII shooter, period. Call of Duty 4 should be the best modern shooter, period. If rumors are true then Call of Duty 6 would be the best Sci-Fi shooter. It makes sense until you start running out of genres.
Reply
Heller was saying that he wants each individual Call of Duty game to be the head of its genre instead of simply "The next call of duty." World at War should be the best WWII shooter, period. Call of Duty 4 should be the best modern shooter, period. If rumors are true then Call of Duty 6 would be the best Sci-Fi shooter. It makes sense until you start running out of genres.
Posted: Jun 23rd 2008 4:38PM (Unverified) said
An after thought: They might be trying to split Call of Duty up into a broader franchise under which they could sell multiple titles?
Reply
Posted: Jun 23rd 2008 5:00PM (Unverified) said
Could be. Maybe they will get another developer and start having one put out WWII games, one do Modern Warfare games, and one do Scifi. Then another will do the old west.
Reply
Posted: Jun 23rd 2008 8:51PM (Unverified) said
Call of Duty 32.5: Getting all your pee in the toilet bowl
Expansion pack: ...while drunk.
Reply
Expansion pack: ...while drunk.
Posted: Jun 23rd 2008 4:45PM (Unverified) said
THE FOLLOWING TEXT IS POINTLESS AND MAKES A BIG DEAL ABOUT NOTHING AT ALL.THE AUTOR KNOWS THAT WITH THAT IN MIND ENJOY (Caps are awesome)
It is a different game from the rest, so it is a spin off then? Normally you have the official time line (Weird for a game that is based on historical events) and then spin off to complement the main story or a different timeline and you reserve the number for the essentials. So basically this is either a spin off or they decided to drop the numbers.
I wonder why companies do this, I mean after a few sequels they drop the numbers just because they can and start with the sub-titles. Like Resident Evil you got 1,2 and 3 then Code veronica which hell if I know why it didn’t count as 4th installment since it counts in the official time line. Then a lot of Spin offs as far as the eye can see, after that RE:4, UC and now RE:5.Is not confusing but it makes you wonder about the continuity of the series but I guess it doesn’t matter in this case.
A confusing case is DMC: First DMC3 after that 1 then 4 and finally 2? WTF? But the most confusing one is The Legend of Zelda but I don’t want to get it details.
Well if world at war is after COD3 then this is COD4 making COD4 COD5.If COD games are based on historical events and COD4 events are fictional then COD4 should be the spin off and not COD: World at war.
Finally what about the PSP and Ds games, should those count as well?
Reply
It is a different game from the rest, so it is a spin off then? Normally you have the official time line (Weird for a game that is based on historical events) and then spin off to complement the main story or a different timeline and you reserve the number for the essentials. So basically this is either a spin off or they decided to drop the numbers.
I wonder why companies do this, I mean after a few sequels they drop the numbers just because they can and start with the sub-titles. Like Resident Evil you got 1,2 and 3 then Code veronica which hell if I know why it didn’t count as 4th installment since it counts in the official time line. Then a lot of Spin offs as far as the eye can see, after that RE:4, UC and now RE:5.Is not confusing but it makes you wonder about the continuity of the series but I guess it doesn’t matter in this case.
A confusing case is DMC: First DMC3 after that 1 then 4 and finally 2? WTF? But the most confusing one is The Legend of Zelda but I don’t want to get it details.
Well if world at war is after COD3 then this is COD4 making COD4 COD5.If COD games are based on historical events and COD4 events are fictional then COD4 should be the spin off and not COD: World at war.
Finally what about the PSP and Ds games, should those count as well?
Posted: Jun 23rd 2008 4:49PM (Unverified) said
I think it's more in the lines of "IW making the official series and Treyarch making games under CoD4 brand."
Reply
Posted: Jun 24th 2008 1:54AM KungFuChaosNinja said
I guess IW doesn't want Treyarch messing up the sequel to their beloved game.
Reply
Posted: Jun 23rd 2008 5:10PM MacGyver10 said
i think its more along the lines of after awhile people start seeing these numbers get higher and higher and realize the developers are milking a franchise. i guess they're just trying to keep COD from becoming the next Land Before Time and the millions of degenerating sequels it has represented.
Reply
Posted: Jun 23rd 2008 5:11PM (Unverified) said
So they're going the Rockstar way, by not using numbers in some of their games?
That can only mean that this game is a prequel of COD3, not that is a bad thing right?
Reply
That can only mean that this game is a prequel of COD3, not that is a bad thing right?
Posted: Jun 23rd 2008 5:14PM (Unverified) said
I think they're recognizing the industry. We keep getting sequel after sequel. I think they're trying to say they're going to make a series of Call of Duties and each one is going to be special. Modern Warfare is obviously whats happening right now. Then with World at War for WWII. Then we have rumors for Future Warfare. Then beyond Call of Duty, maybe they'll keep bringing something completely new until the next gen console remakes.
Reply
Posted: Jun 23rd 2008 6:33PM Korova Pamplona said
What it boils down to is that CODWAW is a standalone expansion to COD4. They are just too embarrassed to use the 4, although they are using the COD4 engine.
The WaW expansion ads a new campaign and several new gameplay elements (fire and Russians!). Woo-hoo!
You dont need the original COD4 gamedisk to play, but you do need U$59.99 + tax.
The Beavis in me want to play as a loco Russian! So, yes, I am interested.
Reply
The WaW expansion ads a new campaign and several new gameplay elements (fire and Russians!). Woo-hoo!
You dont need the original COD4 gamedisk to play, but you do need U$59.99 + tax.
The Beavis in me want to play as a loco Russian! So, yes, I am interested.
Posted: Jun 23rd 2008 6:42PM Vcize said
I think part of the issue here is that they're releasing new CoD games so fast now they have to get away from the numbers to keep from reminding people of that.
Pretty much once you get past 4, it starts getting too far in the numbered sequel line. CoD8 just sounds stupid, as does CoD6 or CoD14.
It worked for Final Fantasy because those are totally different games from each other, and even there it's a rare exception to the rule.
Reply
Pretty much once you get past 4, it starts getting too far in the numbered sequel line. CoD8 just sounds stupid, as does CoD6 or CoD14.
It worked for Final Fantasy because those are totally different games from each other, and even there it's a rare exception to the rule.
Posted: Jun 23rd 2008 7:12PM (Unverified) said
I really hope IW calls their next Call of Duty # 6 just to spite Treyarch
Reply
Posted: Jun 23rd 2008 8:46PM (Unverified) said
If Infinity Ward's Call of Duty game isn't titled Call of Duty 6, I will riot.
Reply
Posted: Jun 24th 2008 12:54AM snarfoogle said
It means that CoD:WaW is the NUMBER 1 FPS, and it shouldn't be associated with second place numbers like "5".
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 220 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 153 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 107 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
- Battleship movie adapted into FPS by Double Helix 93 comments










