| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (21)

Posted: Jun 24th 2008 1:12AM horngreen said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I tried the demo and decided these types of games are not my bag. I saw the three bombers flying around in little circles and I couldn't take it. I've always had a need for things to be in scale with objects around them which I guess makes me a little insane. As soon as I saw things were not in scale I deleted it from my hard drive. Well off to the shrink for me!
Reply

Posted: Jun 24th 2008 1:26AM Korova Pamplona said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I like the reviews, especially the NZ one is spot on. Dont like the scores.

I sank landfills worth of time into all Civ iterations and I enjoyed the demo immensely. The game hits that thoughtful and engaging strategy spot that no other game can reach. SimCity is too much building, RTS is too much action. Civ is just right.

I will buy day one, rain or shine.
Reply

Posted: Jun 24th 2008 1:26AM Halwende said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As usual, NZGamer are on the mark - I tried the demo and while it's not a bad game I'll stick to Civ IV on my PC thanks... but kudos to Sid Meier for managing to get the game onto a console in the first place, A+ for effort!
Reply

Posted: Jun 24th 2008 1:48AM BigD145 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I too will stick to my PC versions and the endless mods. Revolution is dead to me.

Civ has been on consoles before. I guess Sid decided the PS3 needed Civ II again after backwards compatibility was dropped.
Reply

Posted: Jun 24th 2008 7:19AM Ghen said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
One of the greatest features of Civ is the ease of modding. There's no way I'd buy a Civ game without the community's support.
Reply

Posted: Jun 24th 2008 2:30AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I read two reviews they said nothing about customizing your game, is that possible? Can I pick land mass types, player amount, victory conditions, other options?
Reply

Posted: Jun 24th 2008 2:37AM Yuccadude said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh man, I have been playing the hell out of the demo and counting down the days to July 8. Me and a couple of friends will be playing this instead of TF2 for a couple of weeks at least.
Reply

Posted: Jun 24th 2008 10:12AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Not sure if I will be buying this, as I already pump enough time into Shivering Isles right now, but what I can say is that I have never played any demo on Xbox live as long as the Civ demo, so there must be something to this game :-)

I think I played it 4 hours straight and was so disappointed that the demo ended when I was about to crush my last opponent. Oh well, another time.
Reply

Posted: Jun 24th 2008 4:16AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I didn't like it at all. You can't customize the map (even the map size), can't choose opponents (you always battle against a set number of them), can't even save game on some game modes (none of the multiplayer ones and the single player 'map of the week'). The game got too simplistic and because of that any given two playthroughts are very similar. It has none of the original civ games variety. I'm very disappointed.
Reply

Posted: Jun 24th 2008 7:38AM Uraeus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I got the game on my PS3 and I am enjoying it. The game seems somewhat buggy though, not the kind of bugs that ruining gameplay, but the AI seems a bit underdeveloped at times and I have found at least one crasher bug in the trophy room.

I do recommend the game as it is a lot of fun, although a very different experience than 'normal' Civilization. Lets just hope Fireaxis releases a patch to make this game the true gem it has the potential of being.
Reply

Posted: Jun 24th 2008 9:37AM foxhound said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I loved the PS3 demo almost to the point of becoming a cackling megalomaniac; but I'm a bit wary about buying the game given what I've heard thus far... especially since I wisely held off on THE ORANGE BOX and got the PC version instead(it's now the brightest case on my desk due to the orange plastic x_X).
Reply

Posted: Jun 24th 2008 11:30AM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Good choice too, nobody plays TF2 on the consoles compared to the thousands on the PC servers (and you get free updates)
Reply

Posted: Jun 24th 2008 10:09AM KTXL said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I thought that the demo was great- a really nice change of pace.
Reply

Posted: Jun 24th 2008 10:20AM Vcize said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I haven't tried the demo yet but I've heard nothing but good things, so I was expecting to see more scores around the 90 range, not that it really matters.
Reply

Posted: Jun 24th 2008 10:24AM Player1 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Needs more raised eyebrows.
Reply

Posted: Jun 24th 2008 10:39AM Odog4ever said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So the only knock against the game is that it's not Civ 4? That's good then, since I never played Civ 4. I've played the demo at least 10 times and will be picking this up day one.
Reply

Posted: Jun 24th 2008 11:22AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I tried Civ 4 on PC and didn't really care for it.
I was more an Age of Empires 3 kinda guy.
After trying the Civ Rev Demo on XBOX Live I will definently be getting this on opening day!
This game rocks! It is so much fun to play while still being challanging. I love the crazy animations as well.
Reply

Posted: Jun 24th 2008 11:57AM juju187 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i like this civ because now older with kids and a yob i cant sink the time and thought into a full civ game. yes its civ lite but a revolution on the fact that its a fun, not overly complicated, sim on consoles.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2008 4:24AM eepyaich said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
My situation entirely - with a young family, I just don't have time to spend days playing Civ 4 on the PC. Civ Rev is a good way to get a simple Civ fix in limited time.

For diehard Civ fans, its clearly no replacement for Civ 4, and I'd be surprised if it is being marketed as one [I haven't seen any ads, so I may be wrong]. For more casual players, I think it has been put together very well - the controls are easy to get to grips with and it encompasses much of what is good about Civ, whilst doing away with lots of the micromanagement.

Yes, it's not perfect (mini-map, anyone? more customizable worlds?), but it's not bad!
Reply

Posted: Jun 24th 2008 12:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
People seem to be missing the point of this game. This isn't supposed to replace Civ 4, and is not supposed to BE Civ 4. Its a gateway to Civ for people that don't have the time to invest in a full fledged Civ game, or people who never experienced Civ 4 and would be overwhelmed by it at this point. Gamers have become more and more attention span limited to games with the rise of consoles, so this speaks to a different market than then normal, full Civ games.
Reply

Posted: Jun 24th 2008 1:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
NZGamer? I don't believe New Zealand is in Europe. =P
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW