When it was revealed that PC adventure Limbo of the Lost had basically lifted its art assets from a slew of other games and subsequently was pulled from shelves, we had little more than a passing interest. But now that we've seen the first ten minutes of the game, casual interest has turned to deep, profound mourning. Limbo of the Lost would have been, and we don't think we're going too far out on a limb here, the most entertaining game of all time.
But even that gameplay sliver pales in comparison to the ending, which we've placed just after the break. If you can believe it, it's a musical ending that would have knocked Portalon its minimalistic ass. And yes, this video would be a spoiler if you were ever going to play the game, but you're totally not.
I pirated (copyright infringement of a copyright infringement) the game and tried to play through it. I barely made it past whats shown in the video before I had to stop for sanity reasons. The game is TERRIBLE.
Question: How do you just casually turn and look at a hairless, green man hanging upside down from the ceiling, just inches from your face, without so much as flinching?
Yeah. Casual gamers love this kind of point and click adventure junk. They sell like candy at Wal-Mart. Hopefully, these guys go back at it, don't outsource art work and surprise everyone with something decent.
You're obviously a little confused. Point and click adventures were hugely popular before "casual" gaming even existed. There are some great point and click adventures like Sam and Max, Zack and Wiki, and of course who could forget Monkey Island?
The fact that Limbo of the Lost is a point and click adventure isn't why it sucks.
I was reared on Gold Rush! in the late 80's so I'm all about the allure of adventure titles. I mean the low-budget shovelware stuff that you see all over the place for $9.95. I recognize a place for these titles in the gaming ecology both good (Sam & Max) and bad (Limbo of the Lost).
WTF is going on here? Both you and Zootittles received a three heart and a one heart comment in the same post. In all of my stiqing, I've never seen that happen.
Check out the wikipedia article on this game. It's basically been in development for almost 2 decades. How do you spend nearly 20 years stealing crap for your game? Did they just have trouble deciding what crap they were going to steal?
Holy Hell on a midget. I just... Just can't... Even begin to comprehend what in the name of the inventor of the doughnut is supposed to be going on here. My brain is about to implode. Look! Our letters are on FIRE so you know it's X-TREEEEME. And why the frak can't they average more than 2 frames per second in their cinematics? Oh ya, cause they were rendered on a Windows '98 Dell, that's why. I mean, is this game actually sold in stores? Who the funk greenlit that? "Yes, this game is quite good. I should like very much to publish this and distribute it among the masses so that they may revel in its unadulterated glory."
I've actually become extremely interested in this game. Probably just because of how bad it is, so excuse me for thinking out loud.
But after watching the opening, and then the ending, I was thinking. If someone actually was following this game, and waiting for it wouldn't the ending just piss them off?
The opening makes it look like the most serious, scary, hell on earth game ever. I mean, mankind are the ones that create evil on earth? blah blah blah.
And then you enter a room expecting a horde of demons eating human flesh, and instead it's a room of monsters playing piano and singing dooby do waa.